Right, that's very possible. Those who have a high financial level and who are behind ranks and positions in government are very likely to buy one bitcoin or even more bitcoin if they want. Those who have an investment spirit will look for bitcoin, because this commodity is very profitable. Do they save it and invest long term, it is all their free will.

Telegram and Facebook are in my opinion both social media who want to dive into the world of crypto. But between the two, only telegrams might be realized. Because before Facebook told the community that they were hampered by existing regulations. But I think between the two there are differences, where Facebook will issue its own currency, namely Libra, and TON telegram.

Right, I agree with both. Bitcoin can be used as an asset to store a certain amount of money within the desired time period. Outside the context of bitcoin trading can also be used as a means of payment.
Now more and more outlets are accepting payments with bitcoin, as will be held in France. This is amazing about the adoption of bitcoin for the real world.

I think the price of bitcoin still has the potential to go down again before halving occurs. But many predictions of the price of bitcoin at the end of each year will increase, although it is uncertain, but almost every year long-term investment is always profitable.
In my opinion, bitcoin is worth saving or investing in the long run, because every year bitcoin will increase its price. 2021 may be the next peak of ascension, let's look forward to it.

I think USDT is a stable currency now. USDT is guaranteed with Fiat at a ratio of 1: 1 and therefore USDT may be very suitable for storage and investment. USDT volatility in the market in my opinion is not high, and this is different from altcoin and even bitcoin.

I feel that meeting and eating dinner with him is the most impossible thing for me. The reason is that so far no one knows where he is and who Satoshi really is. But someone might recognize him out there and maybe he gets paid for not publicizing it.

Yes, anyone can predict the price of bitcoin. But good predictors are those who can display several reasons why their predictions will occur. If for no reason, I think it's just a hoax. Maybe bitcoin can reach prices as the OP said, but at least there are factors that cause prices to rise. For no reason, it feels absurd.

I agree with you, there aren't many new projects out there that are truly legitimate and have good potential for investors and prize hunters. But in my opinion, now investors have begun to be smart in choosing their investments. Many ICO sales ended in failure and the project decided to stop. In my opinion this is the impact of the lack of investor interest in putting money into new ICO projects, so that now IEO has become the main goal of investors. Even then, if IEO looks good and convincing.

Bitcoin is still a good investment asset now and profitable. But the volatility is very high so this investment must be carefully considered by investors. Maybe for experienced investors already know where the weaknesses in this investment, but those who are new should start looking for weaknesses in bitcoin investments.
Bitcoin and altcoin are profitable investment assets, the decision depends on each of them to choose the right and profitable investment assets.

Libra will not be released before the US parliament approves it. It seems like Facebook will continue to obey the rules, they don't seem to move and reject the rules. Therefore some companies may leave Libra because they know that if Libra obeys the regulations then Libra will not be released. If Libra is released later, then this company will also return as a Libra partner, I'm sure of that.

This is the bad side of the ICO project, developers are not always good at improving the quality of their projects so that products that have been successfully marketed in the market do not have much demand. Automatically, when the demand for a product is very low then the price tends to be cheaper. I think this is what now makes investors no longer interested in ICOs, and maybe they will prefer IEO as their new investment destination.
10% of the ICO price is a very difficult price for investors to accept, if they sell tokens + bonuses received then I don't think it will return the capital issued.

I think the obsession to get rich quickly is the wrong thing to invest. Some ICOs have the opportunity to benefit, but ICO risks are now greater and vulnerable to manipulation. The IEO has given investors a little relief because tokens or coins are not obtained directly from the team but involve exchanges that investors can sell back to the stock after IEO is finished.
However, every investor should not be too easy to believe in the IEO project, without research they can still get a scam. Do not rush to invest in IEO, after you get enough information then you can decide to join or not.

You are right, I do not see now there is an ICO that benefits investors. Only IEO may be in some of the top exchanges that have good potential and provide opportunities for investors to profit, the rest may be the same as illegal ICO.
ICO is no longer attractive to most investors, because it is difficult to find legitimate and potentially successful.

Sounds very good to you, but how can I get a decent mining tool while the money needed is very much.  Actually ICO or IEO investment is not to blame, it's just that the people behind the project that issued the ICO and IEO were not good enough. Now IEO has a great opportunity to get ROI, but there are only a few.
Investors, in my opinion, will only take advantage of the opportunities available to make a profit, and that is why most of them continue to use IEO even though it is difficult to get maximum results.

Right, compared to forkdelta then I think idex has better features and good design. But if I have to choose, forkdelta seems the right choice even though liquidity is low but I like it more.
But still, dex exchange has a weakness where the price of tokens/coins traded there tend to be cheaper than other exchanges.

IEO is a new way in which project teams sell their tokens on the exchange. The better the level of popularity of an exchange, the project team will be very easy to get sales targets.
But the thing that must always be considered is, do not just rely on the big name of the exchange, but investors must also examine the project and its details. Because there is still bad potential even though a project is working with a famous exchange.

Yes, some people don't always check project updates either from the community or from managers. Though all participants are required to always get information related to ongoing projects.
If indeed the project has shown signs of scam, then participants must leave the project faster before they are truly disappointed because no results will be obtained during work. Consider always getting information related to the project and it would be better if we seek information through what they offer.

I do not think Chinese is the owner, but where the company was founded. If binance is located and operating in China, then it is true and it can be said that binance is a Chinese exchange. But if binance is in Malta, then it is Malta exchange even though the owner is Chinese.
What's important to me is, binance can be used by everyone and globally. This is a good exchange. We don't need to argue about the country of its owner.

Looks like the OP has got an answer about that question.  But if the OP wants to know more, why not look for it directly on the internet, it seems easy enough. Now enough people have given their opinions on this question and I think that's enough.

I agree with you, high volatility is very scary for every trader.  But is there a way to fix it in the future?
It seems very difficult, because a sharp increase and a sharp decline is the desire of traders. But I believe, this high volatility is caused by a group of people who are behind the platform and this is what is commonly called the crypto whale.