Seems it’s official. However I am puzzled as to why he bought it in the first place.

For one he overpaid for it because looking at tech stocks like Facebook, it’s value would be probably less than $20 a share compared to the $54.20 he paid for it. So he really must have a big interest in it.

Anyone know why? Is it because they banned Trumps account? Is it because it’s censored too much and he wants it to be more decentralized ?

A horrible and unreasonable idea of the IP blocking initiative.

If you are keeping funds that security of itself specifically needs IP address allowance, you truly should reflect on whether you should keep such an amount on a casino or not. 2FA for security measures is enough, for casino scale. IP address limitation requires users have a static IP address, which only a few people may have it. Plus, this is a casino, not an exchange or store/keeping funds-oriented platform.

If Argentina only relies on one player, it is likely to lose, but if Argentina relies on team strength, I am sure that I will win this FIFA, but that is just my opinion. I don't think it's only Germany and Brazil but there are still France, Spain and Holland to go through to become champions, it's very difficult to predict this match because many countries are very strong to become FIFA champions.

As I predicted earlier, the Gunners will win this london derby. they appeared dominant, a number of opportunities were created by Arsenal in the defense of Chelsea. however, in the end only one goal was created. I think Arteta's troops have gradually formed a strong mentality in every crucial match they have gone through. As a result, the Premier League leaders were taken back by the Gunners.

Manchester United, it seems that the absence of Bruno Fernandes, in this match really had a big influence on the attack that was built by Manchester United. I am optimistic, Man United will initially win this match. too bad, out of my 3 bets for the Premier League. only Man United didn't live up to my expectations.

Well, in general, this is also said "- people who want to live better. + -- looking for ways and solutions to achieve the goal"
Although I still agree!
It is foolish to deny that starting a "project to improve your life" with absolutely empty pockets, zero knowledge, without understanding how and what to do is more difficult than, for example, having at least knowledge! Of course, for such people, the path to a better life will be more difficult, more thorny. But this gives an advantage later - they value knowledge, diligence, perseverance, purposefulness much more highly, they have a higher level of "survival among their own kind." And what is important - they deserve a lot. At least they did not end their lives "at the bottom of the glass" or in a drug haze, hiding from difficulties

I completely agree with the op. I hate this whole 'rich mindset, poor mindset' thing because it's extremely ignorant of the privileges that some people are just born into and very unfortunate circumstances that others have to deal with. To add a bit of nuanced view to the overall good points the op raised:
- of course, if you're born poor, it doesn't mean that you have a great active mindset, are eager to learn and the only thing stopping you is your unfortunate circumstances;
- if you're rich, it doesn't mean everything will be handed to you and the only thing stopping you is your mindset.
Nobody says that everyone is the same within a broad category of people or that everything is easy for someone. It's just that it's very important to take a moment to recognize that tons of things depend on the country, family, wealth you're being born into. It starts extremely early on and continues throughout your life (the preconditions plus sometimes some random fortunate or unfortunate events). And yes, there are inspiring stories of people that get out of terrible circumstances, beat the odds and become wealthy. But it's absolutely unfair to point at such cases and say that everyone has got a shot and that privileges aren't real. Life is very different for many people, and it's important to understand that equal amount of effort can lead to extremely different results because of the circumstances.
A very simple example from my life: I've seen kids in a village who are average and overall don't mind learning new things at school, but they are forced by their parents to look after their younger siblings as well as do things like grow vegetables and sell some stuff on the markets on the weekends when they are teenagers. It's really hard to follow through with learning when you are forced to do many other things which are time-consuming. Similarly, I taught at a fancy private school where kids were taught very well and where teachers always helped the kids to understand things, tried making it interesting to them, and where you could easily request a private lesson for a teacher to help you with your homework. So the same average kids (who are not very eager to learn but are generally okay with leaning new things and doing homework) of course didn't have to take care of their siblings (because there are expensive nannies for that) nor sell produce or grow veggies (because they live in a big city and their parents are very wealthy), and they also have very nice teachers sharing knowledge with them. Equal intellectual capabilities, eagerness to learn and effort would lead to one kid barely knowing anything and another learning quite a lot and then, most likely, go to a good uni because of both knowledge and ability of parents to pay for their education.

That money and privilege though can positively affect many things if it's used correctly. With money comes better education, better nutrition, better social life, connection, etc. I'm not saying the poor can't compete with the rich, but they are already in a disadvantageous position compared to the rich. Maybe these situations affect mindset, but mindset alone won't mean a damn thing in the real world. Success is a combination of many factors, including luck.

The more beneficial mindset for the poor is the realization of their disadvantageous position. Therefore, they must try to push their limit to be competitive: work more, study more, and win just like in the anime. But, I've seen enough poor people stop trying and only demand "equality" dragging rich people down, and destroying the economy.

This is where I have issues with gambling websites, why won't they refund lost funds? If hacking is a popular issue that gambling platforms have they should have come up with a plan to have damaged funds aside, this does nothing but improve their reputation, this is why I won't ever stop using Binance.

Not counting the lightning network obviously, because anyone I guess could create a lightning network for any coin.

I already know the answer but please humor me because I'm talking to some other guys who are convinced the opposite of what I'm saying is true.

Even fiat casinos have a minimum withdrawal amount.

I don't see why gambling sites should allow less than or around $1 as a minimum withdrawal.

Even stablecoin transfer has network fees, how that $1 or lower can be accommodated? Gamblers should already know and understand that there's always a minimum withdrawal amount but as long as it's not that high, that should be fine.

jeez, money laundering is a non factor when gambling with BTC. Sending BTC to a casino actually makes bitcoin more "dirty".

There's no good reason for a casino to hold funds when requesting KYC, yet they all resort to these shady practices. I have been requested enhanced KYC by most of banks and my funds are never frozen or held if I refuse to complete the KYC.

this thread took a weird turn, not sure if it's full of spam trying to get post counts of non gamblers up or people actually believe bitcoin is washed in casino's ( 

This campaign is now closed, I will send everyones payments later tonight when I get home. Thanks for the 3 weeks and now you can remove your sigs.


**EDIT**

Payments sent

Online casinos and sports betting platforms are big businesses like we all know, and currently considering the economic situation of things around the world many businesses are affected and have been taking measures to cut costs in terms of reducing staff, taking loans etc to still be able to sustain operations. How do you think online casinos and sports betting platforms are adjusting to manage the situation?

I bought some crypto. And I have saved some if the prices go lower. However, there is no surety where the market will go. So, analyse it and your financial goals and take risks accordingly.

Day trading didn't work for me, and I always point out that it's hard to make a profit if you are a newcomer in trading, but people should be free to try it. Of course, with the money they can afford to lose! Jumping into something unknown with big money is not a good thing to do! Whatever stories you read or hear from others! Experience needs to be built somehow, but what we don't need is to spend a fortune before we learn something (or we do?!)! Each of our stories is different, it wouldn't be interesting otherwise... I guess.

I've never visited a casino while traveling. All I do when I travel is relax and watch the beauty of nature. And in a casino I can't relax and enjoy myself. If you go somewhere, take a break from gambling or do something you've wanted to do for a long time.

Well. lotteries do not make a lot of money. In my experience, lotteries make you lose a lot of money as it's too hard to win in the lottery.

Honestly, as long as the court and the jurisdiction isn't rigged the plaintiff will have a very high chance of winning and possibly earning more than the prize he's supposed to get, given the fact that multiple grievances are put on the name of this website. Goes to show how important it is to know your rights and what you even as an individual is capable of. I could tell you so much about the people in this country losing potential millions of dollars against large corporations and/or businesses just because they are afraid of the power that these companies have, not being aware or insecure about their very own abilities.

The question that I often the case with such scenarios is that, if it were a lose, would they have given the customer any refund, the answer is no.

This is a sad story as we said but I bet that you don't see a case like this in US,Germany or Italy to name a few countries where people win the lottery

Arsenal don't have experience at top of table recent years and it is a big test for them. It is not easy to repeat the 2003 - 2004 season and it is hard to stay at the first position until the season ending. Arsenal of course should try to get as best result as possible from the derby. However, if they lose it, they will still have a lot of things to work.

If they are strong, they will work hard to reclaim the first position in future. The final ending is important because it decides the champions of Premier League in this season. Arsenal can lose a match, even it is a big one, but they can also win a battle in a long season too.