Bitcoin is a product if technology, and technology can advance at any time to any point that you may never believe will be possible, in my country, we have digital payments system set up inplace already, especially that of traditional banks which makes them always encourage cashless system, and they have also developed to the extent that you don’t have to go online to make payment, you can just load your money from your account into a little chip that works offline.

Also, I think this can also work in crypto too, where you can transfer some of your bitcoin into the magnetic chip and then take it to any merchant to just use a machine that will be design for it to read it, but before we can get to this stage, government must have fully regulated the cryptocurrency.

Yeah I agree, I mean they are a casino after all and I can totally understand the dice in the name and that is why there is a requirement for some relevancy here that is for sure but adding lets say blackjack to this or slots wouldn't change a thing to be honest with you.

Maybe sportsbook could be too much, I don't even know about that, I mean argument could be made about something like sportsbook or even poker because that would change the level of play here but aside from that regular casino games shouldn't matter that much. People come here to play a dice game and I can understand that but NOBODY will leave because they have +1 game on top of dice, hence there is really no issue and no discussion of not adding anything because of the name. As long as its gambling, its fine.

The sad part about crash having that type of "106720" game, which I am 100% sure it is very rare, you do not get out on the last second. I mean how could you know how high it will get and considering it is almost never that high and you would lose one bitcoin before it happens again, I am not entirely sure if it is actually a good idea to wait that much.

You can just set it on auto betting and put 10 satoshi each bet and just make it like "cash at out 100k and repeat until you win" but I am pretty sure you will run out of 1 btc before you win again. It is still a great thing to see it there, I am sure some people made 50x-100x because there are ones that wait that long for sure. We are about to start seeing big wins on crash like we always see on dice and blackjack.

Bitcoin will never go zero and I will give you just one reason. I will not argue it with you that we still have whales who are manipulating the cryptocurrency market now, and especially that of bitcoin with large funds and this is why we have been seeing the high fluctuation most time, but as we grow in bitcoin, their activity will gradually start becoming less because bitcoin has infinite supply, and they will not always get bitcoin to buy once bitcoin supply becomes fished.

By that time too, they would have pulled out virtually all their investment, in which the value of bitcoin would have also becoming too high for them to manipulate. Bitcoin is still very cheap now, and reason why they can buy as much as they want, so someone with 500 million dollars now could invest and buy up to 40,000 btc, but what of when bitcoin becomes 1 million dollars, how many of bitcoin do you think they will be able to buy, and how would they manipulate the market with such quantity.

What does it matter if the video is wrong or not, the message that is needed to be passed has been passed, bitcoin is always higher in a particular given year than the previous year, even if bitcoin was at $300 in 2014, but 2015 was far higher than that and so as other years until bear market creeped in, and now that the bear market is over, same thing will still happen as we can already see that this year is already greater than last year and even if the market will have a deep correction, there is no way that it can be as low as the previous year.

The growth of bitcoin has always been wonderful and I am sure that by next year ending, we will be having another beautiful record of bitcoin value that will be higher than this year because I do not foresee any bear market for now.

What is the point having both together, ICO is for those that has zero capital to start with, so they can as well go for ICO and then wait for as long as they wish till they establish some sort of success in their campaign, while IEO is basically for projects that already has start up capital, because only projects that has startup capital can pay such amount of money they pay for listing on an IEO platform, but the payment is actually worth it because they tend to meet up with their hardcap within the shortest period of time.

The only issue I have with IEO is that I just feel these exchanges are exploiting more than even in ICO, because I really don’t see what they do to have been taking such amount of money to just list a project, it is the biggest scam I have ever seen in its cryptocurrency market that people are not looking into.

To actually be sincere, it takes extra effort to be able to get credit now, unlike before, and like you said, people just read post and no matter how constructive the post may be, they will never give you credit, I dint know if they want a whole full book to be written before they give merit.

The funny thing is that, hoarding merit does not really help anyone, I cannot count the number of merits that I have given out and yet it has not reduced my ranking, so why would I hoard something that is not affecting me negatively in anyways, anyway like you said, he should just keep trying and maybe someone would pick interest in one of his constructive post, which is why he needs to work hard, because no matter how much I wish to even give him merit, I have not seen any of his constructive post.

For long term investment, the best coin to actually consider are all these top altcoins because they are the ones that really have use case and will never fail in future but at least they will always serve the user well in terms of utility and in terms of investment, but the challenge we may find with these tokens is the we should not expect them to multiply small investment in to a big one except you are ready to invest with very huge capital.

This type of low cap coin are the ones that can yield any investors 1000x, just that they are not that reliable for long term, but when it comes to bull run, extra expect the highest profit from them. So it would not be a bad idea to also have some of them as investment while at the same time, we invest in some of these top coins.

No one really knows tomorrow off any projects really, and I would not dispute the fact that there may be chances of them becoming a very big exchange too, but for now, I think they are quite far from becoming the best exchange, most of the exchanges that you have seen better than Kucoin or exchanges that we say are the best have not lost interest in expanding in their own scope too.

The more they expand through series of great products being introduced, the more they become the best, so for Kucoin to meet some of these big exchanges that are known to be best, they must really work so hard and keep coming up with strategies that will be better than exchanges like Binance, Huobi, and few other recognized exchanges that are large.

Provided you are sure that the altcoins you made investment in are not dead already, keep waiting, the waiting will be worth it, this is just like 2 years that all coins went into the bear market, only bitcoin has recovered, while altcoins are yet to and they are still on the verge of making their own uptrend too.

Remember that there was once a time too that some investors of bitcoin got so fed up with bitcoin when it was released, and years keep counting without any improvement, some even threw their paper wallet away, while some lost their password out of nonchalant attitude, it was just a day that the whole thing turned around and bitcoin started increasing, you can imagine how those who waited benefited, I am sure that one of these days, stories of altcoins will change too.

They got delisted from that particular exchange does not mean the coin is gone or it is no longer alive, when Binance being the best exchange delisted BSV, did BSV died, no, they simply moved to other better exchanges, I actually don’t know the agreement between the project and some of these exchanges, but I know when it comes to delisting, it is either there is issue of payment challenge with such exchange or probably the project itself is no longer active.

Since you said they still have volume, then that should not be an issue, you will find them in other exchange, I don’t even know about the exchange you mentioned here, looks quite unpopular to me. If these coins are in coinmarketcap, check to see other exchanges they are still listed on.

Libra is not yet a coin but it will soon be and I am sure that you will also be tempted to buy some of it when it becomes released to the public in 2020. Everyone might just be saying whatever they are saying about Libra because of some certain believes that they thought from their mind, but Libra coin will have its own usefulness too, and you might never know, Libra may have solution to that one problem you have been looking for solution to it decades, so let us not be too quick to conclude that you will buy the coin or not.

It is better we let the coin be released first and see if they have any real use case or not, but based on their wit paper that I have seen, Libra coin really intends to bring so much into the cryptocurrency market, and I am sure many people will use it.

I personally do not mind, I mean it doesn't change much for me since I don't usually even look at the animation at all. Who cares what the end up number is going to be as long as I know what I am going to win something. If its 20 satoshi then that is fine, as long as I get it then the number could be anything and it wouldn't change anything for me.

Animation is there for design and "looks good" purposes and nothing else to me, they could honestly remove the animation and even numbers and just make one click that we can click and get money depending on the result without any animation at all. That would be even better in the sense that it would be quicker, I already change the page to something else without checking the animation anyway, all I care is how much I got.

I don’t understand man, how can they build vault for what is not physical, cryptocurrency is digital and they don’t need to build vault to have it saved or have difficulty in moving it outside the country no matter how large the amount is, I think they have been doing this easily which china itself has not been able to successfully control its technology as a result of its anonymous nature.

I believe that this is the reason why they thought of bringing the attack from the angle of miners, since they know that majority of the miners of bitcoin and other cryptocurrency are from china, so if they can limit their mining power, then they can limit the supply of cryptocurrency flowing round which will make it difficult for people to acquire crypto and them becomes difficult for them to move money out of china.

Buybacks are not the same as burns though. I mean they can buyback from the shareholders for a fair price and as long as its not forced there is no problem. For example if they get listed in some exchange and then buy it on the market price there then its totally fine and they can do whatever they want with it.

But, wherever this burn topic came out they are missing the point that team would have 30%+ of the website so why would they burn it. Burning tokens is only feasible on tokens that have too much supply and care about the price. Bet token is not something we care about the price, it is the amount of dividends we can get each week that we care about. Hence, burning would achieve absolutely nothing for us nor the team. As long as we can buy it and then get dividends the team could buyback as much as they want and keep it.

I think it is well beyond that "starting phase" right now, its becoming a dice website that is known, maybe not know nas the best yet, that is still a challenge and there is still a long way to go but at least cyberdice is beyond the stage of getting known, early stages of a casino is always getting people to know about you, when you first start nobody knows you exist and your first order of business is to get people to know your name and at least visit your website once.

Now, cyberdice is at a stage where enough people know about it that its getting organically known by others as well. Next stage is to get itself in the top 5 best dice website (whose to say its not already) and than of course go for that inevitable best one, that is the hardest because there is a lot of competition.

Well for now, tether is still very strong and can be trusted for the moment, but it is impossible to tell the future of some of these stable coin, and I believed more in tether after the bitfiniex issue with government and transparency challenge they had about the services of tether which even landed them in court, but none of these issue affected tether.

I think tether has come to stay strong for the time being, but before I can quickly conclude on this is when their new rival arrives the market, then I can know if they will be strong enough to withstand the storm or not. Libra coin is also a stable coin, and Libra coin will really gain more popularity and usage than these other stable coins, and until it’s release, we will, then know if they can stand Libra or not.

When you see projects like such, I think is best you just dust your slippers and fly away from them because they will end up failing. You look at it from your own end, how many trades and volumes do we have right now that really requires everyone opening exchanges, if most projects are opening exchanges, then who would trade on it. Will the users of Binance, bittrex and all these top exchanges you mentioned ever move their coin from a trusted one to an exchange they do not trust.

They say that the devil you know is better than the angel you don’t know, these people use the tactics of promising to give a better feature to lure people into their exchange, and then when you get there, what you find is rubbish or repetition of what the older exchanges has already incorporated into their platform.

Of course, nobody will leave stake for ripple but thats just one step towards something thats dangerous, with enough steps there are now other options out there and stake doesn't seem to be alone in this world. I can agree that for a looong stretch primedice/stake looked like the only feasible and honest option of gambling where all others had troubles but now with dapps coming up big time and other stuff it looks like stake has to be careful as well.

Ripple might have been picked, we still don't know if it was bots or if it was actual voters so lets leave that aside for a while but should it have been even an option? We are in crypto because we do not want centralized fiat whereas you offer an option of centralized crypto instead. Not a good move, people may not leave just because of this (maybe only a handful few might) but more bad moves like this and you may end up losing some customers eventually.

I think their honesty and trust comes from the fact that they have absolutely no reason to be involved in the winning or losing of a bet, they are not in the bet at all, they are just providing you with the option but you are betting against each other.

Now think about a sportsbook that you play against and when you bet against the house there is a house edge plus they are losing money when you win which means they have every right to wish you to lose and of course they could do everything in their power to make you lose and that requires trust from us, trust that they will not scam us.

Onehash is not like that, you are betting against another gambler in a pvp sort of way and that means you actually don't even have to trust onehash because the only thing they do is give you the option to bet against each other. It is the perfect system they have built.