It probably could, but usually it doesn't. If the website isn't completely down (which is the case here), and depending on the type of attack, some requests may be going through while others aren't. Therefore, checking whether BTCT is up for everyone is not going to be reliable.

Not really, no.

DDoS doesn't usually do anything on its own other than make resources unavailable by exhausting them.  Therefore, I doubt that any *serious* damage was caused unless other attacks were executed as well.

Read this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2244896.msg22675677#msg22675677, and lock this one.

All you had to do was read the 2nd sentence:

He claims to have worn the signature for the whole last period, and I have not marked him as a signature campaign participant. Therefore, he should have gotten 92 total.

I do; however, I do not have to if I do not want to. I don't have to review anyone if I do not want to, and could permanently blacklist everyone right away. By giving spammers 2 chances for reviews I am being lenient towards them.

1 review denied -> 2nd review denied -> permanently blacklisted.

Do you realize how many people PM me per day? Let me rephrase, do you realize how many people waste my time with bullshit per day? (more specifically, a lot of the requests are bullshit, complaining, et. al.) If I were to analyze everyone's shitposting and give suggestions in my free time, a backlog (for all on-forum *obligations*) would be created that would take weeks if not months to go through. Therefore, I rarely do such a thing (e.g. maybe I have extra time, or a good day).

I do paid consulting, but that's not relevant to SMAS. If you are complaining that someone doesn't want to do something for free for you, you being a stranger to them, then you're a self-entitled brat.

Everyone is being treated equally, more or less, thus it is naturally fair. Whether I am too strict or not, has nothing to do with fairness.

Question for those not very familiar with Titan (which includes myself): Who owns the lower numbers and when were they released (e.g. ANN thread)?

Your incompetence is your problem.

2nd review gets denied -> you are permanently blacklisted.

A high rank does not mean anything these days.

I do not care who you are nor what you do, thus you understood nothing and neither did your husband and friends (?).

Which will get you denied, again and permanently blacklisted. Something so simple as SMAS, and people still don't understand it. Sigh.

For someone to be a reseller, they literally have to: a) Own Gunbot. b) Know how Gunbot works (more or less). c) Use it. Resellers help build up the community in languages that Gunthar does not speak, as well as reduce the obviously high workload of his. You may be confused by the word; what they are selling is new licences.

All @ 0.11 BTC

This is what happens when you keep enrolling, dropping out and enrolling back in as well as not checking your own data. I've made the changes. If you want the difference in BSD, you will have to contact Chris yourself.

Unfortunately, I do not think that will happen. Given that OP refused to use escrow, we can pretty much state with certainty that we've prevented *some* damage (i.e. people from getting scammed). I'm sure that he/she will be back under a new alias though.

---

This forum is way too lenient towards bullshit, which is one of the reasons why butthurt scammers and criminals of all kids (see Quickseller & co.) as well as shills from shitcoins (see DeepOinion and a few ICOs cryptodevil has busted recently) can damage the forum by spewing bullshit out of spite.

That is only proof of the existence of a payment, not proof that the payment was made for the twitter account.

I would argue that buying existing twitter accounts could or should be treated equally as buying Bitcointalk accounts. When you buy someone else's existing account, you get everything that comes with it. So if you did buy this account, don't you think that you're responsible for/deserve the mess created by your own actions?

That's because you were very annoying, and still continue to be. When I said I might remove it in a few months, that did not mean I want you to PM me every month and annoy me with this nonsense. I receive an absurdly high amount of various requests and try to answer most of them. Wasting time is often a luxury that I can't afford in critical moments.

This.

The user is a butthurt shill from some project that cryptodevil stumbled upon then exposed. Any such, hypocritical and biased outbursts seeking revenge can't be taken seriously. Regarding my escrowing services, they were almost non-existent before that sting operation with the first major ones happening months after. It absolutely does not have any impact on that, nor does anyone who has/is/is planning to work with me care about that, largely falsified, thread.

Global moderators and admins, as well as patrollers (only for newbies though) can moderate that board.

None of that matters, nor does the shill care about anyone actually engaging in any scammy/shady actions or similar. That's what happens when you end up on the wrong end of negative ratings.

I think that it is fair to say that a number of people trust me on a much higher level than ever before.

Quickseller is a prime example of someone who deceived the public and who showed his true colors after his crimes were exposed.

Rejected.

Enrolled.

Nope.

For this to be true, you'd need to have: a) An argument. b) Something worth rebutting. c) (My) Intent to to do so. Neither one is the case, especially not a and b.

To distract from the fact that you're a butthurt troll that needs to be banned? Now why would I want to do that?