Casamentero fue mi pensamiento inicial ... tal vez emparejamiento? No tienes muchas opciones  En algunos casos me podría servir "casar" como "matchmaking", como casar órdenes,... En este caso no pero gracias por la sugerencia. |
|
|
|
|
We are very used in the forum to all short of FUD, and particularly if it comes from institutions that were too lazy to develop a system like the one that was generated with Bitcoin and alts.
|
|
|
|
|
Spotcoin is one of the best options, and the best about it is that you can become a partner by participating on the ICO. It is really cool!
|
|
|
|
|
Spotcoin is launching an ICO with its own dividend token that will grow on an existing over the counter trading system and has enough support to become a huge exchange in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Con asura coin cualquier cominudad local podrá crear un torneo de videojuegos entre cientos de participantes sin tener que preocuparse de la infraestructura o la organización.
|
|
|
|
|
Kazakhstan es uno de los mejores paises para minar Bitcoin porque tiene electricidad barata y buena tradición.
|
|
|
|
|
Xmoneta puede alcanzar billones de usuarios porque ofrece muchas funciones integradas en un mensajero. Los casos de uso sólo están limitados por tu imaginación
|
|
|
|
|
Asura Coin es una de las iniciativas más prometedoras en cuanto a crecimiento. Millones de usuarios están esperando esta plataforma.
|
|
|
|
|
Alcanzar el Softcap es muy importante, es garantía de que el proyecto tiene fondos para hacerse realidad.
|
|
|
|
|
Todo comenzará pronto y los que estamos en esta ICO daremos la campanada.
|
|
|
|
|
CERRADO YA - GRACIAS
Hola, a ver si alguien me da una traducción decente de "matchmaking" en español. Se ofrece un posible puntito de mérito para una traducción simple y buena. Que no sea "emparejar" que es lo mejor que tengo por ahora y no me gusta.
Contexto: hacer parejas de jugadores en una lista para disputar un juego.
|
|
|
|
Trouble is, many (most?) of those ICOs are outright scams, many others are just utterly lame and will never produce anything worthwhile. I don't think that's the right way to grow the "cryptoeconomy" and in any case it would be naive to expect that this whole mess could last. Governments are already stepping in - e.g. the SEC wants to regulate the ICOs.
Most ICOs do not accept participation from the US residents anyway, I don´t think is going to have that much of an effect. The market may change, but I hope it will still be there for a few years. The SEC is just an example. The point is - this whole ICO mess is so horrible that even the slow-moving US government bureaucracy seems compelled to do something. Other countries will catch on too. If there is no serious effort to self-regulate and clean up the ICO "industry" then it will end up permanently marginalized, and for a good reason. Re US residents - that would imply KYC, which most ICOs still don't do. I haven´t seen many ICOs without KYC in the last month. In fact, that would lead me to think they may be a scam. I think that the scams are dealing damage to the system, you have a point on that definitely. But think of it as something that can actually bring a good change, that is, rather than becoming marginal, legal stability and regulation may actually bring in institutional investors that cannot risk their client´s money on an unregulated market, but may happily do so given at a legal framework where they can play with know rules. For an ICO to comply with the regulations they would have to jump through pretty much the same hoops as any other business seeking funding (via bank loans, venture capital, crowdfunding, etc), which then raises the question - what's the point of an ICO? Right now many are simply saying "no US residents" because that's easier, even though there is a fairly well-defined crowdfunding regulation in the US. I took a look at a few ICOs on icowatchlist.com and they don't seem to ask for any personal info during registration although some may ask to check a box saying "not a US person". Not quite KYC. I didn't go through with any registrations, maybe they ask for more details later. But they do look like scams, that's true. That whole site looks fishy. I think that the advantages of ICOs are not related to jumping over regulations, but mainly a) Immediate liquidity for the investment, as the tokens jump into secondary markets within days or weeks. Shares rarely do, you may be stuck with your investment for years. b) No loss of voting or property for the team, as tokens do not represent shares nor voting rights. These two would remain even if rules make it harder to setup. |
|
|
|
|
Anything can be a target for patent trolls and particularly any new technology. I think that Google has already started to patent some inventions that are far too generic.
|
|
|
|
In order to identify the price of the currency, it is important to teach not just the factors of the external and internal environment and some factors of the economy such as: price, turnover, volume, the law of supply and demand.
Si y también es importante fijarse si uno está en la sección Española del foro. |
|
|
|
Totalmente pasmado XD
Añado que si en la web de la ICO sale el extracto de LinkeIn de cada miembro del equipo sin enlace ni nada, sólo la captura chunga borrosa es éxito asegurado.
Eso lo aderezamos con un montón de logos sin enlace de forbes, universidades, la NASA y JPmorgan y la ICO valdrá 100$ en 10 días.
Ahí le has dao con esa DAO. |
|
|
|
Algo de razon tienen tus palabras, pero la estigmatizacion social da un golpe super fuerte * Si no eres gringo -> ojos azules, cabellera dorada, suco.. !! Ni el libro blanco, ni la hoja de ruta, ni la tecnología, lo más importante es el equipo. En concreto necesitamos dos tipos de perfiles: a) 2 o 3 chicas y chicos superguapissssimos para el marketing. Da igual que no sepan nada, ya aprenderán, pero tienen que ser super-osea-sabes. b) Mogollón de gente de tecnología y finanzas cuanto más fe@s mejor. Y no vale solo con ser feo o fea de cara, es que además tienes que vestir fatal y hasta la camiseta del proyecto te tiene que sentar mal. No estoy hablando de "poco agraciad@s" o "bueno quizá bien peinad@", se trata de que sean realmente horrorosos, preferiblemente también asociales, y sepan perfectamente que su única oportunidad de echar un polvo es tener pasta a raudales. Ese es el tipo de equipo en el que yo confío.  Y siguiendo con la coña y pasando ya al racismo directamente, si puede ser feo y koreano mejor aun. (y yo nunca he dicho esto) |
|
|
|
La verdad es que es muy difícil de acertar, hay tantas que no es fácil y la mayoría de ellas desapareceran en poco tiempo. Quizás sea mejor repartir el dinero entre muchas y que triunfen un 10-15% y ya es mucho porcentaje.
Sería ya bastante más de las que triunfan en Silicon Valley. |
|
|
|
Me dejas "paxmao" Entiendo lo que dices, y puede que hasta tengas parte de razón, bueno, puede no, seguro que si lo dices y leo en tono irónico, es porque no te falta razón, y algunas vivencias habrás tenido, pero oye, déjanos algo a los guapos también eh. El marketing y las ventas. Los guapos somos fundamentales, sobre todo para captar a todos es@s inversores que son tan feos que saben que su única oportunidad de acostarse con alguien tan guapo como los de márketing es que la inversión les haga ricos. Si además trabajan en la misma oficina puede no obstante ser una distracción para los cerebritos, asique mejor teletrabajo. El post es mera frivolidad por supuesto. puede haber un poquillo de verdad porque ya sabeis que vivimos en la era del "nerd". |
|
|
|
|
Private pre-sales, teams and advisors should have a vesting period that goes in line with the project, normally minimum of 6 months to 2 years (5 in some cases) and the release of those tokens should be staggered adequately month by month. Above all, all vesting periods must be publicly know and, ideally, the positions of the managers should be public.
|
|
|
|
Trouble is, many (most?) of those ICOs are outright scams, many others are just utterly lame and will never produce anything worthwhile. I don't think that's the right way to grow the "cryptoeconomy" and in any case it would be naive to expect that this whole mess could last. Governments are already stepping in - e.g. the SEC wants to regulate the ICOs.
Most ICOs do not accept participation from the US residents anyway, I don´t think is going to have that much of an effect. The market may change, but I hope it will still be there for a few years. The SEC is just an example. The point is - this whole ICO mess is so horrible that even the slow-moving US government bureaucracy seems compelled to do something. Other countries will catch on too. If there is no serious effort to self-regulate and clean up the ICO "industry" then it will end up permanently marginalized, and for a good reason. Re US residents - that would imply KYC, which most ICOs still don't do. I haven´t seen many ICOs without KYC in the last month. In fact, that would lead me to think they may be a scam. I think that the scams are dealing damage to the system, you have a point on that definitely. But think of it as something that can actually bring a good change, that is, rather than becoming marginal, legal stability and regulation may actually bring in institutional investors that cannot risk their client´s money on an unregulated market, but may happily do so given a legal framework where they can play with known rules. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
