Another crypto currencies don't have bitcoin's potential because they are biased. There is always a developer individual or team behind altcoins which have personal interests that could lead to blatant manipulation. With bitcoin it's different because the original crypto currency gives the impression it was created for a more idealistic loyal purpose by its creator Satoshi Nakamoto, who wasn't solely focused in financial gains, but mainly in financial freedom.

Argentinians are maybe smug towards another latin countries and sometimes lack sportsmanship, however not among themselves and not that much nowadays. I remember decades ago the rivality was too much stronger, which created a lot of conflicts between the players from Argentina against their rivals and between the different crowds. But the team itself plays well together and cooperatively around Messi's figure.
As I see Messi is a must for the team, without him Argentina doesn't go too far, but it doesn't mean he is selfish, since he helped a lot his teammates to score and build strategies during the last match against Equador. That is a good indicator at their favour.

I think we can say crypto currency and especially bitcoin have the same potential internet had during its early years. The point is how crypto currency and bitcoin are going to be changed or improved along the years, as internet has been. I believe the main aspect of crypto we know right now, that is decentralization, won't last for too long because centralized institutions have already plans to introduce their governance over digital currencies and those which they can't control are going to be more heavily regulated each new day.

We can say internet aged well through so many years and implementations, but could we say the same about crypto currency in a near future?

The risks are the same than the risks you take by investing in any crypto currency: market volatility, hype, sudden decrease of demand for the game, what would lead to a crash in prices. Everyone must understand these risks when investing not only in Axies, but in any blockchain game. If the prices are skyrocketing it's because there are a lot of people demanding for it, but demand doesn't stay on top forever and once demand is over, players will see their in game daily income decreasing considerably. Thus it's necessary to calculate how much money you are going to invest, in how long you will recover it also considering SLP price might go down.

For some people it will worth anyway, because they enjoy playing the game, so it can take even several years to hit RoI that they won't bother. Or like others like to say: I would play the game even if I didn't earn anything from it.

I agree with those who say it's hard to happen. El Salvador isn't an independent country. It fully relies in foreigner income to maintain themselves. As we can see they use dollar and don't have a national income, more than 20% of the country's income come from other countries and more recently they made a partnership with China, receiving investements from the asian country.
A country so dependent on others can't become bitcoin's home, because bitcoin demands independency and autonomy (and a plentiful source of energy as well, what I think El Salvador doesn't have).

Actually, after seeing the partnership between El Salvador and China something started smelling really bad. I don't know how bitcoin would fit on that situation. A bitcoin friendly country involved with a country which banned bitcoin.

Crypto currency proportionates more accessibility to sports through sports betting and help to promote them in countries where crypto is popular, but some sports aren't. For an example, let's say you are deeply inside crypto universe and sports betting and you see some sports that aren't popular in your country on a crypto gambling platform. But since it's popular in crypto universe, you become used to it after a while and even start betting on the sport. So we can conclude crypto currency helped to promote that respective sport to a new group of people.

I guess the final is going to be Brazil versus Argentina (or would it be Neymar versus Messi?). Brazil should take Peru down relatively easy and Argentina will most probably win against Colombia if Messi keeps carrying the team on his back. Although Colombia isn't an easy adversary like Peru.

Well, so far this cup hasn't presented any surprises. The favorites are the ones going to dispute the trophy at the finals.
In times like this it's really hard to be focused on sports, so it might be the reason why so many players besides the main idols haven't shown an impressing performance during the games.

I don't think the team would put any extra effort on the game, because they didn't even want to play the cup at first moment when it was said Brazil would held the event. There were a lot of talks behind the curtains, involving the coach and some players, threating to not participate the cup because the pandemic. However, they were demoralized since all other championships were running smoothly despite coronavirus.
So they gave up this rebellion and accepted playing at the event. Actually these guys play only for money and sponsorship, not for the country or any patriotic value.

The attempt to not participate the cup at first moment had a political agenda interest.

Yes, it's already hard enough to hit a nice prize in gambling and finally when someone win the jackpot the government is ready to take a big piece of the cake. Interesting that when we lose, the government doesn't share the loss with us, but when we win we must share our winnings with the government.
This kind of situation gives some notion about how things really work and how the government is not worried about anyone else besides themselves collecting maximum money as possible from people. Then someone might say these taxes will be returned to people in public services. And I would say this money is only going to public employees pockets, because the country has a lot of them to maintain.

I agree it has been used for a long time already, but in past decades, like the sixties, it was only used by few groups and like madnessteat said, people smoked it concealed from the society. However, since the beginning of 2000's and even more after 2010 I see things reversed and people who don't make use of drugs or don't support it are the minority while being seen by the society like drugs users were seen decades ago, in a negative way.
I remember when I was a kid there were advertisements on the television against drugs. Probably such propagandas couldn't even be made nowadays because there would be a lot of criticisms and retaliation. Anyway I still believe majority of elders from any societies are against cannabis.

I really hope only few casinos adopt these called cannabis lounges, because not everyone support this idea, especially the bad smell it causes around. Also, many elders like to gamble at land based casinos, because they don't know how to use computers or smartphones and I believe they won't tolerate such habits as well, since they come from an older generation from a time when it was unacceptable.
Casinos must think about the pros and cons carefully before adding any new features to their businesses.

In case of seized assets the government can hold or sell through an auction. Bulgaria for an example, was discovered to be a bitcoin whale holding more than 213,519 bitcoins. If other countries are smart they are also going to hold seized bitcoins just like Bulgaria did. This way they can invest in bitcoin without having to pass any law in the legislative house, what would take a lot of time and in many countries bribery for congressmen vote favourably. About McAfee, however, I don't know if they are going to find anything... Let's see soon.

Bulgarian government actually owns $3 billion USD in Bitcoin (Mar 24, 2021)

He claimed to have nothing else in his hands regards crypto. It's not possible to know, however, if he was telling the truth or just trying to keep his treasure safe from third party undesired attention. Anyway that is not an impossible mistery to be solved, because transactions can be tracked and if authorities investigate it carefully they will find a connection betweeen McAfee, his coins and its currently whereabouts.
Or maybe he was just saying the truth and there were no coins left, what I think might be the real history, since he was in financial difficulties, as it is well known due to living a life without rules or limits.

An exit scam probably won't happen, but prices can crash once the hype is over and those who invested a lot in the game may end not recovering their investments, although they would still have a team to play the game normally. That is the risk of blockchain games and everyone investing on Axies must be aware about this possibility, especially the ones you mentioned who are selling everything they have to enter the game.
By now the market is working nicely because there are a lot of people joining the game and breeding tons of axies, what boost a lot SLPs transactions' volume. However, high demand doesn't last forever. I'm not being skeptical, just realistic.

Don't you lose the spins if you don't open the emails? Sometimes I also miss one or another spin due to expired tickets, but that happens to me when there are two not viewed emails from Freebitco.in, so most probably the oldest one won't work. I think we have 48 hours to use the ticket since the time it arrives in our inbox, but just to guarantee I check it every day, so the emails don't get accumulated and I don't lose any chance.

Yes, I see bet365 everywhere on the internet and I have already answered surveys about them (probably surveys ordered by bet365 itself). They must invest a lot of money in marketing to reach most potential gamblers as possible. That may have helped them to win this award considerably. But frankly, I would like to see more crypto platforms in these competitions.
It would help a lot bitcoin adoption to increase among gamblers who still stick only with fiat currencies.

Everyone should take risks with money, otherwise no one is going to take this risk for them and consequently there won't be any access to investment opportunities. The person just needs to be careful with the risks and potential consequences they can lead. As an example I would say to borrow money with high interest should be avoided and in this case the person's life can really become a hell. Another example is gambling when seen as money making method. On the other hand, not all risks will have bad consequences mentioned by OP. For me that is pretty clear since we have many examples of wealthy people who grew their funds (sometimes from zero) through risking money (investing) along their lives and reached to very interesting results.

You still need reputation to make money. Who is going to hire your services, spend at your business or even work for you if you don't have any reputation or a negative one?
I believe what happens nowadays is that many people get their reputations through dirty ways and since money is the most important thing in modern world, they actually buy their status instead of building it step by step from the bottom. Maybe that is what you mean.

That is true almost nobody reads terms and conditions. In this case it's important to at least verify on google reviews about the casino you are going into. There are several sites which offer customers' reviews about every online gambling platforms nowadays. They aren't too extense like terms and conditions and still present a lot of useful informations which will be enough for you to decide if that is a good idea to play at that particular casino or not.
There are also comments' sections on these sites with more opinions from users and there are forums like bitcointalk which are very useful in this sense as well.

* Just avoid youtuber streamers opinions

They say the probability you will not fall off the bridge is 99%, but in fact it's much less. So I prefer to not cross the bridge until a stone or steel one is built instead. The river crossing can wait.
The same way a solid bridge takes a longer time to be built, an efficient vaccine also takes several years to be achieved. So I will just wait patiently and keep considering covid the same threat it was when everything started between the end of 2019 and beginning of 2020. Maybe in 2 or 3 years a real vaccine appears, although it may take even longer.