As I have already pointed out, this is just a word of one man whom I personally have no reason to trust - especially when he says that one crypto exchange is worth more than the total value of all European banks. It is true that the situation in the EU is not perfect, but all of them together have far more money than what this crypto exchange has - it is something that is incomparable to me. The only thing I can agree with is that this company has a lot more money than is publicly known.


There is something in money, but it is not the deciding factor that can keep someone competitive in today's world. They live off the old fame and the fact that they have long resisted KYC, but now that this is no longer the case and they can remain competitive only if they otherwise attract customers. Since they obviously have a lot of money, why not reduce the withdrawal fee by at least 30%?

For those who know how to assess the situation a little better, key decisions are made long before prices skyrocket, not after we find ourselves in the midst of inflation and war. People will say that it is impossible to estimate when such things will happen, but the consequences of the pandemic simply had to surface and there is no more hiding than the fact that ordinary people will have to pay for everything politicians did during that time.

I doubted that the four-year cycle would continue and I decided to take a share of the profits on the last ATH which now turned out to be completely correct. I now use that money for all those things that I would not otherwise be able to buy from my regular income. Although I know the potential of Bitcoin, I can hardly decide on such an investment at the moment - I just don't have the cash I don't need at the moment.

For all those who will not understand the difference between CBDC and Bitcoin until then, it will not be too important anyway, because the only difference between paper and digital fiat is that the government will be able to control us much better than now. Those who value privacy will certainly gravitate even more towards Bitcoin, but I do not mean only those good people, but also criminals who prefer banknotes above all.


It's always a possibility, but the authorities still have very powerful instruments today to do great damage to Bitcoin, only if they want to - all they need to do is follow China's example. In addition, the CBDC will be introduced gradually, so we know from the example of the EU that it has been proposed that each adult resident will be able to have a maximum of 300 digital EUR one day when it becomes available.

We are definitely in a different environment than 4-5 years ago, because large amounts of BTC ended up in the possession of institutional investors, and they mostly bet in the long run and have credit for some claiming that there is less liquidity on crypto exchanges. Yet this is far from any serious shortage that would arise if some big investor wanted to buy some larger amount of BTC and the market could not meet his demand. If we know that there is an OTC market as well, then we probably have several million BTCs on sale at any given time.


It would be more accurate to say that many people have heard of Bitcoin, but are not too interested in such investments. One of the reasons is that negative stories about Bitcoin being harmful to the environment are constantly circulating in the media, not to mention how Bitcoin, without any concrete evidence, is often put on a par with crime and terrorism. The average person still trusts the mainstream media and politicians more than some random guy who writes or talks about Bitcoin online.

When it comes to inflation, people are faced with a lack of money for basic necessities, so the question is whether they have any money at all for any investment.

He didn't show anything because he has nothing to show - such statements without any cover only serve to attract some new investors and make free PR for the company.


Given their shady business throughout their existence, one might be very interested in how much money they really have, or in other words how much tax they have evaded so far. If this statement is even approximately true, then this company could find itself under investigation. Of course there is another option, and we all know that enough money in the right pockets provides a certain dose of immunity.

This problem has nothing to do with Bitcoin, but with the fact that every kid today wants to have their own token or coin - which is easier to do than many other things in life. This whole altcoins industry is very problematic and no matter what anyone thinks when it comes to cryptocurrencies, much stricter criteria should be set when approving such projects in the sense that the process of listing such tokens on crypto exchanges should be much stricter than is the case now.

Of course, scam always requires the participation of the other side - and the world is full of millions of naive people who obviously have the money to invest in every crazy promise. The question is, should we protect these people from themselves in such a way that we do not allow such scams to be presented to them at all - or should we pretend that nothing is happening?

Before you answer that question, remember that the biggest collateral victim of all this general mess is Bitcoin - because the average investor doesn't make a difference between shitcoinx and Bitcoin, when he loses money, it's all the same to him.

Thanks for the additional clarification, because it was illogical for me that PP was not present before in Ukraine - and once upon a time it was the same in my country, you could pay for goods and services, but you could not withdraw funds to your bank account .


A logical move by a US-based company whose president has called the Russian president a war criminal - and most companies that hold on to their reputation will do the same. I watched yesterday and I can't believe my eyes, 100 000 Russians at the stadium are celebrating the occupation of Crimea and the invasion of Ukraine. As someone has already noticed, we seem to have got another North Korea, only much bigger and more dangerous.

Yes, you got it right - paying with Bitcoin and some altcoins is completely legal, although the question is how many people use such payment methods. I can only say that the payment processor and the company behind it are generating more and more revenue year after year, although I believe most of the revenue comes from their crypto exchange business.

I didn’t want to put links in a previous post, but this is one of the very popular web stores in my country, and everything you see can be paid for with cryptocurrencies. Another example of how easy it is to accept cryptocurrencies in everyday business.


This is more than evident, but very little can be done about it. Most people are far from understanding Bitcoin to the level where they could use it as a currency, because the problem with on-chain transactions is that they are not instant and people do not understand how fees work, not to mention the input/output factor and transaction size. Some say the solution is in LN, but the whole thing would have to be considerably simplified to be widely accepted.

In this regard, we currently have a problem due to the influence of people who promote Bitcoin as digital gold, and ordinary people are just following their example. It is ideal to find some balance between using Bitcoin as a currency and at the same time as a long-term investment.

Everyone was killed, whether soldiers, children or women, there was no mercy for anyone - all with the support of the British Army, which could have saved most of these people but returned them to Tito's butchers. About 444,000 people were captured, and according to official documents discovered later, only 10% survived. If you don't believe me, here's what the British soldiers say...

https://archive.org/details/BleiburgBritishMassacreConfessions

If there is a physical or online store where you would like to pay with Bitcoin, then you should ask them if they can add that payment option. If more people were interested, the store would certainly consider this option. Sometimes it’s better to act than to wait for something to happen on its own. I see that we agree on that, and I think that is the best way towards that kind of adaptation.


Your view of the situation is based solely on where you live, but I live in a relatively small EU country where Bitcoin is not regulated as a currency, but at the same time it can be used on various online sites but also in physical stores. The fact is that the state cares exclusively about collecting taxes, and all those who operate legally are liable to pay taxes. In addition, sellers use a local payment processor that allows them to get a fiat directly to their bank account, in the end, it is a win-win situation for everyone.

However, one thing we must not forget is that most people do not see Bitcoin as a currency, but as a speculative asset - which leads us to the fact that the volume of such payments would probably not increase significantly even if Bitcoin becomes a legal tender in most countries.

@Husires, I believe that this information is outdated, because the Bitcoin Store has a branch office in another city (Rijeka), and cryptocurrency trading is also possible in 55 offices of the Croatian Post, in various money exchange offices, and places where gold is sold/bought. It should be emphasized that except in the Croatian Post, it is not necessary to show documents in any other place if it is traded up to the amount of 7500 HRK (around 1000 EUR), or 15 000 HRK, which is the limit in the Bitcoin Store.

Strange people wept for one of Europe's greatest criminals and dictator, who killed over 400 000 Croats after World War II alone. Even stranger are people who still have some sympathy for Stalin, Tito or Máo Zédōng and even Hitler today. More than 1000 mass graves throughout the former Yugoslavia testify to how good Tito was, and a CIA report says the total number killed during his rule was more than 1 million.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Pit_massacre

The Kingdom of Yugoslavia has not existed since 1941, and the other Yugoslavia since 1991 - that prince is royalty as Faketoshi (CW) is Satoshi Nakamoto.

---

Yes, it seems to be quite crowded above the EU.

@PawGo, this problem has existed for more than a year, and in addition to the problems you describe, in some cases, the signatures have also been blocked. As others have already noticed, I can also confirm that I notice the same thing 2-3 times a month - but it lasts for a very short time (maybe 1-3 minutes) after which everything returns to normal.

If I understood correctly, do you want someone to help you find out the true identity of the person or person behind someone who introduced himself as Satoshi Nakamoto? Do you even understand why Satoshi decided to leave his project to others and can you understand what it would mean for someone to really reveal his identity?

This would not only jeopardize his security (if he is alive), but would very likely have very negative consequences for Bitcoin. The strength that Bitcoin has is that we are all Satoshi, and one man is completely irrelevant in the whole story. In other words, some mysteries should never be revealed - and even if someone discovers them out of curiosity, it would be better not to share them with the public.

You think logically, but the world has long since ceased to be a place of logic, and has become a place where power and interests rule. The US behaves like a world policeman who reacts to irregularities, but only those that will not harm their personal interests. At one time, they went to war against Iraq and Afghanistan because of what later turned out to be false reports of weapons of mass destruction or that Afghanistan was a world terrorist base.

What is the result of that policy? Both countries have been left in chaos, people are living worse than before, the number of people they have killed is in the hundreds of thousands. As for India, it is no secret that they are great allies of the US, and that their attitudes towards China are almost identical to those of the US - so this warning should be understood as a warning more of a cosmetic meaning than a real threat.

In Europe, we have a case where a country that is in accession negotiations with the EU (Serbia) refuses to impose any sanctions on Russia - and helps them by maintaining an air corridor with Moscow through which Russians travel carefree throughout the EU. I have not read anywhere that the US is protesting against this, although the EU does not have a firm stance on such things either.

Unfortunately, the world is full of hypocrites who say one thing and do something completely different - as well as news that should deceive the public, while on the other hand, everyone does what they want.

This article does not provide any evidence, but like hundreds (if not thousands) of others, it tries to use the mystery of the identity of the inventor of Bitcoin to promote a token or app. No one serious will put in their article as one of the candidates the well-known Faketoshi, or some random people who are only Japanese, or of Japanese descent.

Satoshi was (and probably still is) a man of above-average intelligence who planned everything down to the smallest detail and all these clues that various researchers take as some important references are nothing more than false clues.

I hope you have learned something from what has happened to you, and that is that you need to be extremely careful with whom you communicate with when it comes to any things related to cryptocurrencies. All these airdrops are a potential danger, not only in the sense that someone will ask you to send them your seed or private key, but also because of the possibility that someone will try to infect your computer with a virus (fake wallet/s) or clipboard malware. Before you know what's going on, you can have RAT (remote access trojan) on your computer, and then the hacker will have access to everything.

The OP says it earns $10 a day, which means about $300 a month, which means it will set aside $30 each month to invest in Bitcoin or some other altcoin. Although it may seem like a small amount, I think it is quite enough to start with, especially if that amount is not something that significantly affects everyday life.

As other members have already mentioned, with such small amounts one should always be careful when it comes to fees for sending money to crypto exchange and in case of withdrawal of cryptocurrency in a non-custodial wallet. Therefore, the only logical choice for the OP is to deposit $30 each month on the crypto exchange, buy the cryptocurrency and then withdraw to his wallet after a few months. Of course, the OP can always choose the option to store coins on the exchange, the risk is always there, but it will certainly save on fees.

Such physical branches also exist in other EU countries, whether they are specialized branches exclusively for the sale/purchase of cryptocurrencies or are located within post offices. Although some think that Bitcoin must be a legal tender or have some special approval to be present in this way, in fact, it is very simple - everything that brings tax revenue to the state and is supervised by the relevant services can be made available to the public.

For some, this is really a much better option than online trading, because in addition to staff advice, you often have the opportunity to buy a hardware wallet. The only downside is that you can be the victim of a physical assault after making a transaction, in the sense that bad guys monitor such places and then follow you to find out your location.

https://www.bitcoin-store.net/en/stores/