نعم اخي من افضل الطرق لعرقلة البتكوين او الاقتراب من كسرها نهائيا سيكون عبر التحكم في اكبر قدر من الهاش ريت لمدة طويلة , اقل مايمكن فعله هوا تعطيل المعاملات وعدم قبول اي معاملة جديدة, ان استمر وضع مثل هدا لفترة يوم او يومين سيكون كفيل بأن يتبت ان البتكوين لا تستطيع او تؤدي ما صممت من اجله.

في الواقع يوجد شي من هدا القبيل قامت به شركة Bitmain منذ عدة سنوات ولكن للموضوع عدة جوانب , وانا ملم بهدا الموضوع جيدا , شرحه سيحتاج لموضوع منفصل , سأحاول ان اضع الموضوع في اقرب وقت , لن يأخد مني الكثير لان معظم المعلومات لا تزال عالقة في ذهني.

تعديل : تم صياغة الموضوع : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190597.new#new

What's more interesting about this is that the removed the L5 from their cloud mining Bitdeer ,I remember people reporting 1.4gh for 1200w or so , quite  impressive giving the fact the two L3++ do only 1.1gh but consume about 2000w.

but almost everyone in the mining industry knew about the existence of Antminer L5, I don't think that Bitmian will embarrass themselves and launch a gear that has been out there for almost a year, maybe they will launch L5+   ?

S9 , S9k , S9i , Sk , S9E each of these have different "looking" hash boards, I am not sure about the structure design and current flow but these are different from one another when you simply look at them with your bare eye, in fact even the S9 itself has 2 different hash boards.

But as far as Chips are cornered, here is how they are grouped.

S9 and S9i > same chip
S9j  > own chip
S9k > own chip
S9E > own chip

as for the last two , someone mentioned that both have the same chips, but I am not sure, the boards look completely different, heat sinks on the S9E look fairly large , which makes me think the chips are different , unfortunately the last two models are pretty new to the market and I doubt anyone has gone to the extent of changing a chip on them.


Talk about design, I got something for you.



The above diagram explains how the signal follow within the hash board, it should give you a better and simpler understanding , if you have problem determining what the colors stand for, feel free to ask and I would explain.

من وجهة نظري اهم شي في تجارة الفوركس هوا ادارة رائس المال وكيفية ادارة صفقاتك , علميا يجب عليك ان تسعمل Stop loss و Take profit واي صفقة تدخل فيها لابد ان يكون هناك نسبة وتناسب بين وقف الخسارة واخد الربح بما لا يقل عن 1:2

شرح اكثر , دعنا نقول انك قمت بدخول صفقة على البتكوين وكانت شراء بسعر 1000$ , انا كان هدفك للاعلى هوا 1500 فوقف الخسارة يجب ان لا ينفص عن 750$ , مما يعني انك تخاطر بخسارة 250$ لتكسب 500$ وهدا على اقل تقدير , حسابيا باتباع ادارة مال ناجحة يمكنك فعلا الكسب على المدى الطويل حتى ان كنت تدخل في صفقات عشوائية الى حد ما.

طبعا الافضل هوا تجنب العشوائية ويجب ان يكون لديك استراتجية معينة تستعملها , ولا تكتر من المؤشرات والكلام الفارغ فقط ركز على الدعم والمقاومة والاشكال الاكلاسكية مثل المثلثات الصاعدة و الهابطة وغيرها , بالاضافة الى شكل الشموع, في حال استعمالك لهده الاساسيات سوف تجد فرص دخول جيدة تمنحك مستوى ربح : خسارة جيد.

نعم يمكنك شراء بتكوين باستخدام paypal من موقع باكسفول , بالنسبة لرسوم الموقع نفسها (رسوم الوساطة) بسيطة جدا على حد علمي , انا لم استعمله في شراء بتكوين ب paypal ولكن استخدمه من قبل في اشياء اخرى وعمولته بسيطة جدا , طبعا عمولة paypal نفسها لا يوجد لدي اي خلفية عنها , عند تحويل المال من حسابك لحساب شخص اخر على الاغلب انه يوجد عمولة لابأس بها , واعتقد ان البائع سيشرط عليك ان تحول المبلغ على friends and family لانه يظمن حق البائع الى حد ما.

I don't really give a shit about Nutilda or anyone else for that matter, you claim that I don't understand the subject when it's clearly you who have a problem  with understanding how the forum operates, you are discussing a trust/scam/reputation stuff in Meta which is pretty useless, your topic should be in reputation directed exactly to those who tag account sellers but chose not to tag the member in question, which you had before and I think you have gotten different answers for why he wasn't tagged, everyone had their own justification regardless of whether it made sense or not.

You know what almost everyone is going to tell you ? Theymos made the edit button for a reason, and as long as they are not editing someone else's posts, members are free to do whatever they want their old posts, period

The problem is that you think the forum is 100% fair and that everyone is treated equally, history has proven to you that this is not the case, it's not a perfect world, you must understand that there is no place on earth where everyone is treated or judged the same, this is how human beings are created for God's sake.

I am not sure why are you so aggressive, I am trying to help you, you really have some serious problem and online account sales should be the least of your concern.  I really wish you a speedy recovery and good luck.

It should also mention that there is no point in meriting shitposts such as


I have no problem with how members like to spend their merit, but if we start to think that all of this is an "okay" way of dealing with merit, we get to the point where we all think the whole merit system is completely useless.

If you check the OP's posts and compare it to MichaelX's it actually makes more sense that OP "should" have earned more merit , I know the merit system isn't exactly perfect and things don't work that way, I have probably gotten more merit that I thought I would get in 5 years , so it's kind of irrelevant to me at this point, and I am sure it's the same to many others, but to Newbies it makes a lot of difference, someone who posts some quality posts and don't get half the merit MichaelX "or anybody else for that matter" get ,might be discouraged and leave the forum for good.

it's not about the 18 merit Dabs sent, it's the whole future of the forum overall content quality, we either take the merit system a little more seriously, or watch it slowly fall.
 

Please make up your mind , is this topic meta or reputation related ?

Anyhow, I can't answer on behalf of everyone, but if I posted something in the past and later on I realized it was stupid, I see no reason why I shouldn't edit it, we all do things we regret and we wish we can "edit them" only if everything else was as simple as editing a post on forum.

For those who don't know, it's pretty obvious you are talking about Nutildah, you have brought this up a couple of times, I am not sure why do you keep expecting the results to be different, let's evaluate the reasons why he got away with whatever you think he deserves to be tagged/banned for.

1- At that time it was okay to trade accounts.
2-He is a protected member of the "gang" / impunity.
3-Nobody gives a fuck.

Whatever the real reason is, why do you care so much?? and please don't get me wrong, I dislike Nutildah as much as I like you , but leave the man alone and move on with your life.

Binance, KuCoin,Bitfinex,BitForex,BiBox,Hotbit etc,,,

These exchanges and many others , either have daily limits for withdrawal without KYC , allow only crypto (no bank transfer) deposit and withdrawal, and some don't require KYC at all, and the list goes on and on, and most importantly non of them allowed people to deposit funds and then "forced" them to either submit their documents or suffer a loss,  you obviously have no clue what you are talking about.

If you actually did read the topic you would understand that the issue is not  KYC per se, it's the way they went about it, now if you are done spamming the thread, you can go back to alts.  Thanks

كما هوا مذكور في الموضوع , لكي تتمكن من فك شفرة برافيت كي في 10 دقائق او اقل تحتاج الى 2330 كويبت , بكل تأكيد يوجد محافظ كبيرة تحتوي على عشرات الملاين , والهجوم عليها قد يكون نافع من ناحية اقتصادية , ولكن ولانه لااحد يتملك القدرة اللازمة لامتلاك مثل هده القوة اولا , وتانيا لان محظم المحافظ التي يوجد فيها رقم يستحق المحاولة تقوم بتغير عنواينها باستمرار مما يعني ان public key غير معروفة وبذلك الهجوم لن يجدي نفعا , طبعا اتناء نقلها للبتكوين من عنوان لاخر يمكن محاولة اختراقها قبل ان يتأكد التحويل فالخطر علميا موجود ولكن تقنيا لايزال بعيد جدا.

بناء على المصادر التي اطلعت عليها فان تشفير ECDSA امن ضد كوانتوم لفترة 20-30 سنة قادمة , طبعا هده الحسابات مبنية على سرعة تطور اجهزة كوانتوم يمكن ان ياخد الوقت اكتر بكثير او اقل بكثير, ولكن الحقيقة الاقرب للواقع ان التشفير يستم تغيره قريبا لنبقي البتكوين متقدمة على كوانتوم بعشرات السنين.

I am not sure how do you use the three candle set-up, but to me I only take it seriously when it shows reversal of trend direction, the three white soldiers you show in your chart were present in a natural trend direction (up) so they are kind of irrelevant, the real three white soldiers were the candles of Feb,March and April , and they worked out very well, the market went up more than 150% after April candle closed, these three black crows I am pointing out has every characteristic that determines a trend reversal

1-They came up after about a movement of 315% to the upside
2-The wicks show strong rejection to the down side
3-RSI was very close to critical a resistance on the monthly (67)

and by the way, the best way to use the three set-up candle is along side with RSI , at least based on my personal experience.


Do you remmeber my topic (ichimoku cloud says 3100$ is the cheapest bitcoin will ever be) ?

I have been taking the cloud very seriously, and guess where we at now?



According to history, we must test the top of the cloud before making any higher highs, and guess where at is ?6500$ , does that match your Fib 0.705?

The cloud also tells another story , it says , bear/sideways market till 11/11/2019 , this is based on the fact that until we pass the ichimoku resistance, there should no movement to the upside, check 2016 you will get a better clue.

Again out of all these analysis, I still stand by the 20SMA on the weekly , and I still take this as a bear market until it's broken to the upside.

بغض النظر عن جميع النقاط التي ثم سردها , انا لا ارى اي نقطة سلبية حقيقية لنقاط الجدارة , ببساطة نقاط الجدارة تميز الاعضاء الجيدين من الاعضاء السئيين الى حد ما , يوجد عامل حظ وعامل سلوكي مهم جدا يحدد مدى امكانية حصولك على نقاط الجدارة ولكن في النهاية جودة منشوراتك هي التي تجعلك تتحصلى على نقاط جدارة بالمجل حتى ان لم تكن محبوب من معظم الاعضاء.

في الواقع بقليل من الاصرار قد تحصل على مئات النقاط في فترة وجيزة جدا, ولكن هدفك الاول يجب ان يكون الافادة ومن ثم تاتي النقاط وحدها , لقد كتبت عن قصتي وكيف تحصل على 500 نقطة في 4 اشهر https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5120371.0  وانا لا اعتبر نفسي فوق المتوسط ابدا , ولكني احاول دائما خلق محتوى مفيد للجميع واتجنب النقاشات الشخصية والمواضيع الغير مفيدة لحد كبير ( طبعا احيانا مشاعري تتحكم بي وادخل في نقاشات لا فائدة لها ) ولكن بالمجل كل ماكتب شي, احاول ان يكون مفيد للاعضاء الاخرين حتى ان كان مفيد لشخص واحد فلا باس في ذلك.

To me, those two words in bold are good enough to create a flag against them, I will not be convinced by any law backed facts that justify whatever those scammers did, and to make the discussion of this topic a little bit more convenient for everyone let's just assume that crypto-bridge have not broken a single law on planet earth, yet , that does not change the fact that they deserve to be flagged and I personally wouldn't touch them with a barge pole.



I am glad you took the time to think it over and to actually see how the process of their KYC goes, at first , you kind of opposed me in this and I was thinking that maybe I should remove the tag since you being their client should know better than I do, at this point I have no doubt that both the negative tag and the flag are well deserved.

The flag still appears as inactive, please request support in LoyceV's topic

Was KYC mandatory before october 1st? If yes then how were they able to operate if they are obligated to follow EU law? If no then when was it ? Unless AML laws were enforced on October first then I see no justification to what they did and how they did it.
 
I have asked this question twice now without an answer, let me rephrase "excuse my English"

If the exchange is located in EU zone, how were they able to operate for 2 years without compliance to EU AML laws and had no issue, i am sure EU law enforcement don't need 2 years to spot an exchange like this one, AML/KYC have been there long before 2017, unless the law in EU is optional and you can follow it whenever you feel like it

if they are not obligated to follow EU laws then where did all this KYC shit come from??


Irrelevant to who? The jude? My grandfather?  True, but to the reputation of the exchange in question it is relevant indeed.

You see, one does not have to break the law of a certain country to be considered a scammer, if that is the case then we probably should hire an international lawyer for this section of the forum before calling anyone a scammer.

If you allow me to deposit funds without KYC then i should be able to withdrawal without KYC as well, unless law enforcement "forced" you do such a thing, if that is not the case then you are a scammer regardless of the law.

You are right, but I am not wrong ,you kind of misquoted my reply to LeGaulois's sentence where he stated


What I was trying to say is that, this part does not mean they can "precisely" change the contract as they wish without notifying their clients, unless the modification serves a purpose of complying with a new law / law amendment then that's a different story, meaning that for example, they can't change the withdrawal fees without notifying the users , I am 99% certain about this, however, assuming AMLD5 took place on 1st Oct 2019, then crypto-bridge are not obligated to notify their clients , as you mentioned nobody is responsible on notifying anyone about the law.

Now I hope that part is cleared.

However, the problem with this case is that AMLD5



according to https://www2.deloitte.com/lu/en/pages/risk/articles/amld5-has-entered-into-force.html#targetText=On%2019%20June%202018%2C%20the,application%20from%2010%20January%202020.

non of the two dates mentioned above is 1st Oct 2019.

 I will admit that I was mistaken in the part where I thought what they did was illegal , when I gave it a second thought , the contract's modification enforced a law, thus , it gains legality  , I doubt any judge will send them to jail for doing so  

But wait , it's very likely that they "where were able" to inform their clients but they chose not to,  I also have another way of looking at it , it's sorta of conspiracy theory based, but please hear me out

Crypto-bridge does not answer to any authority, they don't give a fuck about any EU law  "well they run for years without complying to it anyway" and they faked this whole thing in an attempt to steal clients funds who refuse to submit their personal documents (probably plenty of them), so this could be more or less like a scam under the protection of the law.

My conclusion : Crypto-bridge did not break any law by enforcing KYC , but they directly or indirectly scammed clients by "suddenly pretending" to comply to a law they operated without for 2 years.

There is no disagreement about this, every law including AML made by the European parliament must be followed down to a t , however my concern is this


This is how crypto-bridge justify the need for KYC, howver ,AMLD5 has been effective since 9 July 2018 , "assuming" they are based within EU authorities jurisdiction, how were they able to operate without applying AMLD5 for over a year? and why the sudden change?

This takes me back to the same question I asked in the OP


They were able to operate since 2017 without any KYC requirement, what are the chances that they really had noway to notify their clients? I would love to hear more from crypto-bridge, but apparently they don't even care !

كل عضو هوا عبارة عن (مرسل ومستلم) لنقاط الجدارة , يعني لا يوجد طرفين في هدا الموضوع , ولكن الموضوع هنا لا علاقة له بنقاط الجدارة في حذ ذاتها , انا لا اكسب شي من عدم اعطاء اي عضو نقاط جدارة, ولكن نظرا لاني لا امتلك الاف نقاطر الجدارة لاعطيها , احاول ان "انتقي" الاعضاء الذين قد اعطيهم تلك النقاط , طبعا بعد الاخد بالحسبان مدى جودة المناشير , يوجد الكتير من الاعضاء الذين اعرفهم جيدا وعلاقتي بهم ممتازة ولكنهم لم يتحصلو على نقاط جدارة مني , والعكس صحيح , هناك اشخاص لا يعجبونني واعطيهم نقاط الجدارة , وتفهما مني لامكانيات بعض الاعضاء العرب هنا , احاول دائما تقليل الستاندرد التي اتبعه لاعطاء نقاط الجدارة.


صحيح ولكن اعتقد انه لا مانع من تسئل احد الاعضاء عن سبب عدم اعطائك نقاط جدارة خصوصا ان كنت تتحصل عليها من اعضاء اخرين , يجب ان يكون هناك سبب مقنع.

لقد اخبرتك بان لا تاخد الموضوع من منطلق شخصي، ولكن يبدو انك فعلت ذلك وهده مشكلة... لا تجعل عواطفك تسيطر عليك، لقد كنت صادقا معك وكنت اتمنى ان لا يزعجك كلامي فالامر طبيعي جدا،  وكما قلت لك هدا لن يؤتر على تصرفاتي تجاهك فانا لست مسؤول هنا.

لا ادري ماعلاقة kyc في موضوعنا هدا.. انا لم اطلب منك ان تتبت لي اي شي لانه لا يحق لي ذلك، على العموم لا داعي لهءا الكلام الان، قد اوضحت لك اني لن اعاملك على اي اساس باستتناء جودة مناسيرك..اما شعوري تجاهك فهدا شي  لا يجب ان يقلقك.

من هم الطرفين؟  هل انا احد الاطراف؟

الموضوع بسيط جدا , لنفرض انه ثم فعلا صنع حاسوب كوانتوم قادر على فك تشفير ECDSA في دقائق , طبعا وبطبيعة الحال سوف يكون هناك الغورتميات جديدة مضادة لكوانتوم , في حال شعر مالكين البتكوين ( النودز و المعدنين) ان الخطر يقترب, كل ماعليهم هوا مهاجرة البلوك تشين القديم الذي ينص على استعمال ECDSA كا Public-key - Private key بروتوكل واستبداله بتشفير جديد اقوا منه , الموضوع تقنيا لن ياخد اكتر من بعض دقائق , ولأن كل شخص يتملك القدرة على التصويت من مصلحته واولياته ان يبقي امواله امنة لن يعترض احد على الفورك وسوف تتم الفورك بسهولة مطلقة  ولن يشعر المستخدمين العادين بشي , بينما ان حاولت شركة فيزا او البنك المركزي ان تغير طريقة تشفير بياناتها الموضوع سيكون معقد جدا جدا لان نظام الاموال التقليدي معقد اكتر من البلوك تشين عندما يكون الموضوع متعلق بالانتقال من شي لاخر.

That is not true, you can't possibly change the terms without the other party agreeing to the "new" amendments/changes , the term "“We Can Change These Terms at Anytime" only declares that they are not obligated to stick to the agreement "forever", it means exactly that, nothing more nothing less.



source and more interesting facts here > https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/publications/blt/2016/05/07_moringiello/


in most country if not all, notifying your clients about any changes to the agreement is a must, unless the "court" orders you to do otherwise , in fact even if you notify your clients in a manner that the court does not find reasonable it's as good as not having informed them in the first place.

This means an exchange like crypto-bridge can't make a tweet in Chinese and then expect the court to find it a reasonable way of notifying clients , in fact in most cases companies lose cases due to clients proving that they were not informed, " My email address was hacked and I had no way to see the notification from crypto-bridge." is in MOST cases good enough for a client to win the case , let alone not attempting to notify users in the first place.

Therefore, unless a court order has taken place, stating that crypto-bridge MUST seize it's clients' funds until and unless they submit KYC then , crypto-bridge is in deep shit.


Makes a lot of sense if you ask me, however there will never be a "Fully decentralized exchange" unless it's ran and managed by aliens and hosted out side of the milky way, as long as the exchange is located in any place that is reachable by any authority it will always be under some sort of rules and regulations, don't get me wrong , I am all about decentralization, but honestly speaking nothing in this world is fully decentralized, not even bitcoin itself.