Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here!

[LoyceV]

Theymos introduced Trust flags, which can be created by anyone (conditions apply!), but need support from at least 1 or 3 DT-members.

It looks like this:

How
Before creating a flag, please create a topic in Scam Accusations to use as Reference link. It can't be self-moderated, and it can't be locked.
I've seen many Flags that point to a generic topic, which makes it much more work to check the evidence. Stick to the facts, and keep it as short as possible without leaving things out.

If your Flag doesn't have enough support, feel free to post it here.
To anyone: please check the reference topic before deciding to Support or Oppose the flag. When in doubt, don't do anything.

Identify Flag types

           type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
            WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37

            type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
            WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9

            type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
            WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35

Trust Flag viewer
See LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] for details, or go to http://loyce.club/trust/flags/?MD directly for the data. There's a very convenient "BBCode for Bitcointalk" link on top of the page, use the most recent one to post the Flag here.
You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer.

No spam
Self moderated to stop spam.
Don't go off-topic.
Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation.

If this topic proves useful, I'll make a nicer OP. If not, I'll lock it.

[1579691621]

1579691621

[1579691621]

1579691621

[1579691621]

1579691621

[1579691621]

1579691621

[LoyceV]

I'll be the first:

I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags

Flags
Flag on BetKing.io
Flag on BetKing Support
Flag on PocketRocketsCasino
Flag on dean nolan

[Lafu]

I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags

Done for all 4 Accounts and supported.

[NeuroticFish]

I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...

Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct?

Correct.

[Lauda]

I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...

It's just dumb. Anyone who was scammed, e.g. by an exchange has no direct contract and the third option can never be used. Also if no victim speaks out / creates a flag = no scam occurred. Astounding logic. Look at this request: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153493.msg51440061#msg51440061. Nobody who got scammed by YoBit as a exchange user can rightfully make this flag.
Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.

[LoyceV]

I don't want to be the party stopper

That's the part under "conditions apply". It has some strong limitations, but I assume theymos created those to restrict the use of Flags. It makes red trust a bit less strong, and the stronger Flag shouldn't be used for everything.

Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.

In between all his red trust, he Repaid another 0.2 BTC no collateral loan. Therefore, I can't Support this Flag (but I won't Oppose it either).

[NeuroticFish]

I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...

It's just dumb.

It's not me who you have to argue with. I wrote from start that "I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules)". What I meant was exactly that under certain limits/rules some others should be able to also add flags.
I added the "rule" into discussion for 2 reasons:
1. Avoid (for now!) doing work that could be invalidated.
2. Discuss (with Theymos?) for better rules.

[Lauda]

Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=49
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=50
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=51

[Quickseller]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1046791.0

All of the people linked in the above thread.

[TheNewAnon135246]

TradeFortress flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58

I have created a flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58

I planned on creating a new scam accusation but I found an open topic that had my quote in the OP, which I have used as a reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=326879.0

Here is a post from my previously hacked account (couldn't quote it since it was posted in a locked thread):



That address leads to the inputs.io wallet, proving that I actually had funds stored there/lost money: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Inputs.io?from_address=1LH3aGsw5BzhPwbSANgfCnUXoS7XkK8fQM

I cannot recall the exact amount I had stored there. I contacted TF about a refund but I have never received a reply.

[logfiles]

How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case?
Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen


Sorry i have been away for some hours and I am just still learning about the new development.

[LoyceV]

How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case?

Assuming you haven't been scammed, you can use the Newbie warning Flag for those:

Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.)

[TryNinja]

How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case?
Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen

If I understood correctly, you can only give him the first type of flag "Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money" - which is only shown to guests/newbies.

The other 2 cases are only valid if you are a victim of OP (scammed, deceived, etc). If he "violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages" or "violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages".

[otrkid1970]

I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...

It's just dumb. Anyone who was scammed, e.g. by an exchange has no direct contract and the third option can never be used. Also if no victim speaks out / creates a flag = no scam occurred. Astounding logic. Look at this request: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153493.msg51440061#msg51440061. Nobody who got scammed by YoBit as a exchange user can rightfully make this flag.
Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.

You failed. The list of opposers  will grow

[Lauda]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=64
It's reasonable to say that users dealing with him would be at risk, at the very least. If this one isn't within the guidelines, nothing is.

[actmyname]

When you have time. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153703.0

ToC will be updated as flags increase.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Flag for user nitrat. He seems not just a bounty manager but directly involved with the project team.

Tagged and flagged. If you agree then please support : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=74

Thank you.

[suchmoon]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=80
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=81

PSA: don't forget to flag known alts of any shitbird you're flagging... remember, previously red-trusted accounts look very different now. It used to be enough to label a scammer (and alts) with one or two red trust ratings, but now such accounts my look like this:

+6 / =0 / -1

[Last of the V8s]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=77 r0ach

I wouldn't advise anyone to trade with him, let alone a newbie.

Thank you.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Please support my flag for Kriptonian1661

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=105



His post in thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5154206.0

Hi lads, Coming back again to promote my services. As i mentioned 1 Month ago i am the one who put Bitcoins name on Youtube Streams :Bloomberg Global News, Fox news and to continue. Basicaly every popular stream was marked with the name Bitcoin and as you searched Bitcoin the first thing that poped up was Bloomberg Global news, i am not going to provide any proof as it might endanger my career. The actions it self are my proof and you will have to trust me that i have a new technique to do it again and put BTC over the 20k Mark, but as i did it for free in the past i sure as hell am not doing it for free again !! So i am asking 50 BTC for my endevour and 1 year of time to make it all work properly so it all sinks in to the minds of consumers. This is not a scam, i simply want to be paid for my Idea, i will not do it for free ! So dont start saying oohh dude do your self a favor and pump BTC, what do i have from that? Sure i could sell BTC at a higher price but so would everyone else.. ppfftt not for free lads not for free. So here is my awful grammar but i do not care as English is not my Native language so you will have to deal with that.

Anyway, my idea and endevour is worth 50 BTC, that is the price take it or leave it. Just remember you have to risk it to get the biscuit ! I will not reveal my identity or anything regarding to my plan, again you will have to deal with that.


1GZR3SFzXrc3gd2M74ga4P18CxvfEboeNG

Once i see 50 BTC in my Wallet i will start my Project Troy.


Kind regards Cryptonians.