I appreciate any advice that someone may offer other that go mine to a pool lol!
If you want solo/lotto mining I will suggest a solo pool. You can read more here: http://www.kano.is/index.php?k=soloinfoBut yeah, still a pool hence I may be off topic. If so, please PM me and I'll delete this.
|
|
|
I have argued on this before, I reckon cryptocoin anonymity will be the next leading issue after the bull market. Everyone will be searching for a solution on how to hide their profit from their governments hehehe. However, there will be solutions available. Monero is a proven altcoin for privacy, grin is being developed and Charlie Lee has declared that Mimblewimble technology will be adoped for litecoin.
While you are correct, people will most probably keep holding and using bitcoin, since it's more popular and brings higher returns. Also most don't know that bitcoin is not anonymous. Also way too many of those who know that bitcoin is not anonymous still think that "they have nothing to hide", not gasping the huge importance of anonymity. I hope that people will open their eyes before it's too late. Litecoin doesn't have Mimblewimble yet; Grin is not known good enough; Monero is not accepted by some of the exchanges...neither of the options would go main stream too quick; still one has also the option of mixing his bitcoin an option you forgot to mention.
|
|
|
Dot com domains are to be used by private companies. Satoshi and the early team were educated enough to know that and use the more correct .org domains. They were educated enough to use the dot org top-level domain, but not smart enough to register those few (.com, .net) which would definitely manipulate the users if the project ever succeeded? Struggling to accept this. I don't think that any of them have even dreamed how big a success will bitcoin become. It's the only explanation that would make sens in my head. (It would also explain why so many early coins are most probably lost forever.)
|
|
|
.com
Dot com domains are to be used by private companies. Satoshi and the early team were educated enough to know that and use the more correct .org domains. Of course that now, various... "people"... made the corresponding .com domains, to profit from the popularity of the original or to simply scam. I wish he (and the early ones) wouldn't have underestimated the human wickedness and would have bought the .com domains too, at least to redirect to the correct ones. But no, those .com domains (bitcoin, bitcointalk) are not related to Satoshi. You can always try to look at the web archive, for example https://web.archive.org/web/20091219013549/http://bitcointalk.org/It won't work perfectly, it won't have all the pages you'd like, but it's.. something...
|
|
|
Satoshi Nakamoto
Nonsense, just nonsense. Your writing style looks nothing like his. Your ability to think analytically and logically is nothing like his. If you're Satoshi Nakamoto (the creator of Bitcoin), then I am God Actually... we're all Satoshi Nakamoto. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Except you-know-who ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) But yeah, OP is.. just another Satoshi wannabe. Excuse me, did you try to say something, ask something, or just advertise yourself as Satoshi? I'm asking because you didn't say anything new, you just re-composed (quite badly) the conclusions of some other discussions.
|
|
|
I believe that people in this country can use Bitcoin as well as people in other countries. Is not it?
I know that foreign currencies are now banned in Afghanistan, but I don't think that Bitcoin is considered part of them since it's not issued by a central bank. On the other hand, it may be just "bad wording" there since the goal is that Afghan people use only their local currency. TradeOgre
Now, with the ban, there might very well be that one may not be able to send or receive fiat from any known/international exchange... And it looks like TradeOgre works with USDT and xUSD, hence stable coins, not fiat. Getting that fiat in Afghanistan is the real challenge...
|
|
|
Unfortunately, I can't read the article because it requires registration or subscription, so I might ask a question that has already been answered. How much of an impact can this move affect Visa and Amazon when it comes to both companies ’revenue in terms of the GB market? I'm trying to conclude whether Visa users in GB will start putting pressure on Amazon to reconsider their decision, or will Visa at some point decide to cut fees anyway and thus admit that Amazon was right after all?
The impact is not that big, since only the UK VISA credit cards are affected. Still unpleasant and some customers may just buy from elsewhere. I've found an alternate link here: https://fortune.com/2021/11/17/amazon-blocks-uk-visa-credit-card-payments-fee-dispute/Some interesting numbers: Visa and Mastercard this year both raised their interchange fees from 0.3% to 1.5% for credit-card transactions between the U.K. and the EU The British Retail Consortium said Wednesday that the hikes were costing British retailers $135,000 more each day, while also adding costs for Italian, German, and Dutch retailers selling into the U.K. It's interesting that Amazon didn't do the same with MasterCard, although I see they have the same "problem". Or maybe they just try to force them to lower the fees - one by one.
|
|
|
Just this morning a friend came to me asking me how he can invest in crypto. I was surprised because he always has been skeptical of Bitcoin.
Be very careful on how you present the information to your friend. Make it 100% clear that it's his choice whether he invests or not. Make it 100% clear that Bitcoin price can rise and fall. Also, if he indeed wants to invest, present him information about how to keep his coins safe (the wallet, which can be even hardware wallet, and the backup too).
|
|
|
Well, that's the point, innit? Until someone gets these jokers into a court of law or even into arbitration, there is no way to find out what they're actually doing. We're all just guessing without knowledge. My point is that the mechanism to gain knowledge IS to go to court; you can't magically find that evidence before you go to court unless there's a whistleblower.
The problem is that even with a court order you may not find out much. I mean that since these problems occur pretty rarely, it's clearly not something the business does it, hence in the "best case" it's a developer that will do this for short time, remove his traces and move on. The "worse case" for you, the case that will be blamed officially is the user being sloppy, not taking care of his seed/keys (like storing in mail or cloud), clicking into phishing, or having malware on his computer. ...I honestly can't see any way you would have the tiniest chance to win this... (and I'm clearly not their supporter either). ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
Although I see many rising their hopes vs bitcoin acceptance, unfortunately I don't think that's the case.
As somebody already said, it's pure business here. Both sides are flexing their muscles in order to get "a bit more". Of course, I expect that at some point soon they'll both agree to a middle point, since with the current state both sides will probably lose some money.
But that's all: business. No relation with bitcoin. They don't care about crypo. If they would care, they would have been simply buying it.
|
|
|
I think its a good decision by government.. What you guys think about it?
Do you realize that if you hold such a currency the authorities can automatically withdraw or seize your coins in your wallet? Do you realize that the authorities can make mistakes or abuses and this can become even a tool against their opponents? Now think again: is it a good decision or not?
|
|
|
Honestly, I don't really see any worth in a feature like this... but that's just me and my particular use case. I'm sure someone would appreciate a virtual "Bitcoin Nanny" that stops them from spending all their coins on shoes or boats Exactly. @DaveF: everyone here is somewhat right. The problem is not if we need such a feature, we don't. The problem is that here - especially in Dev & Tech - you have the wrong audience for such a question. I would only add that imho the market needs badly a wallet for newbies, packed with a lot of (optional) features like this (whether we find them useless or useful), with a lot of explanations and fences so the user cannot "hurt himself" while he is learning his way into using bitcoin. If such a SPV wallet is not implemented soon enough the "ultimate" newbie friendly wallet will most probably be a custodial one.
|
|
|
There are hundreds of billions of dollars being invested by naive people. I really hate this idea that they are all appropriate victims for dishonest companies. In the absence of appropriate means for punishing them directly (where are you, Anonymous?!?!), we have to use the current legal tools available to us. Otherwise, the rip-offs will just grow and spread.
I don't see how can you prove those "dishonest companies" guilty. And if you can't you won't really have a case. Those naive people most probable clicked into phishing sites and gave their credentials to malicious third party. I don't say that the businesses are not necessarily guilty, but why would they risk stealing if they do earn money anyway? Again, you only have a case only if you can prove them guilty.
|
|
|
I'm disappointed no one has taken the time to write a little bit more about our forum, but indeed left an article that only describes really summarily its history and scams...
The signs for this were there in another topic, less than one month ago. The original was removed because the topic creator was banned. Here's the topic, but it's not a pleasure to read. Nobody from here seem to have been acting since then on that matter. Unfortunately more people read wiki than Bitcoin wiki... As far as I know anyone can update information in Wikipedia. And I have also told that information in Wikipedia are not something you really should relay on. So who cares?
Actually most take Wiki as granted. Hence that page has quite a potential to hurt.
|
|
|
All Virtual Currency held in your Trading Account will be custodial assets held on trust by Blockchain.com for your benefit on a custodial basis on trust for your benefit.
Then for the trading account - and only for that - you may have a case. But I know of complains about the funds missing from the wallet, not from the trading account.
|
|
|
Whoever have edited that article doesn’t know exactly. That's why they used the wrong info. You can create account and edit the article, see if they approve your edition.
Whoever edited that had the clear intention to discredit bitcointalk. The most prominent reference is the overly inflated scandal for epochtalk costing too much and not being in use yet at bitcointalk. Also news[dot]bitcoin[dot]com is one of the references. Nothing about satoshi, nothing about the current reality. Maybe somebody takes some time to make it right, although I don't know how Wiki decides what version is well intended and which is not.
|
|
|
And let me just emphasize again: T&Cs cannot make illegal behavior into something legal. If they're stealing coins or negligently failing to protect coins or negligently failing to protect their domain, that is all actionable. The only thing the T&Cs could do is force the customer to file suit in a specific court or to use arbitration; they can't change the fact that Blockchain has a duty to its customers.
I can't think of any other field where people think, "Eh, I gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to someone and they claim it's now gone, but I should have been more careful."[/i]
You seem to fail to understand how blockchain.com works and how bitcoin works. Blockchain.com is a tool, helping you handle your coins. The coins are not in their custody. It's not like Coinbase or Xapo wallet. The coins are not in the wallet. They never are. They're "on the blockchain". So it doesn't matter you have a wallet on blockchain.com if you or somebody else use your private key or seed, recover the wallet in - let's say Electrum and spend the funds from there. Obviously blockchain.com will also display them as gone. So you didn't give your coin to them. And you may very well spend the coins yourself without telling them.
|
|
|
I was wondering what will happen in an event of large scale network split were a large portion of the nodes can’t communicate with the rest of the network for days.
The chances for this are pretty small. One node connected to both sides it's enough to have no actual split. The more realistic chance for such thing to be happening is for a relatively small region, probably one country, which will be done on purpose, hence probably the mining won't go well there either. Now, let's go by your initial logic. If such a thing happens, keep in mind that the difficulty will remain very high, while a good amount of miners (let's also say half of them) may be seen as offline (by every side). This means that the blocks will come much slower. That could trigger a response from developers in order to do a fix related to difficulty and also, why not, a fork in order to conserve the current chain (i.e. the other side will never be able to rejoin). But I went on science-fiction realm with you ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) , realistically it's not a big issue since the region will be small and will probably have no chance to mine anything because of the difficulty.
|
|
|
I need a reliable marketplace or a dealer to buy a large amount of Bitcoins. Do you guys know any private or public platform?
If KYC is not a problem, just pick one (or more) of the exchanged from https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/markets/ with higher volumes and you should be good. You didn't state your country and it may matter, but if you're not allowed, you won't get past KYC so yeah.. Binance, FTX, Coinbase, Bitstamp are just some of the good exchanges. You may want to also check the fees of various exchanges: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5309545
|
|
|
|