No. Only admins can do that.
Thanks! It's also possible (though rare) for a report to be marked as neither good nor bad -- such reports don't count toward your accuracy percentage.
The only way it would be 'neutral' is if every mod 'ignored' it.
I am in confusion now. Can anybody explain please? Thanks! -MZ |
|
|
|
This most probably a ponzi scheme. Be careful investors.  -MZ |
|
|
|
Thanks all! I think I understood but not complete. And whether a mod marks a report that is moved to a different section than reported as bad or not is up to them but I think reports are sometimes automatically 'handled' ie marked as good when they're moved to a different sub.
Can reports marked as good by a staff be changed to bad in a very short time realising it was a bad report? -MZ |
|
|
|
Uh.. we're the ones who actually care about bitcoin; you're the ones trying to make a new one with your gavincoin hard fork nonsense. What do you think a hard fork is? It's a new chain! An altcoin! And it's already been proven that there's no such thing as cryptocurrencies. I am not for 20 mb fork [1] even theymos has told in a neutral way. But... what you told about Satoshi made me to say that but no offence. [1] It needs more investigation and some improvements. -MZ |
|
|
|
|
AFAIK anything CC funded is reversible.
-MZ
|
|
|
|
Sure they are ponzie...coz nobody will give u double of ur investment with just a tym pass game....why dont they do it for themself if they can double it
They won't be profitable. Once they get enough investors, they just run. For my question, some people replied they have invested more than 0.05 BTC. I think people are too greedy... -MZ |
|
|
|
Uh.. so let me get this straight. 0.9.3 is the best version because its authors said so? Did you "verify" the code? I happen to know that real people have taken a look, and it's not pretty. Satoshi wasn't a very good programmer, and the stooges that you call "lead developers" are even worse -- not because they lack expertise, but because they are good enough to actually do serious damage. Take your "obviously"s and shove them up your USG hole. Now you are telling Satoshi wasn't a good programmer!  I am liking you more. I suggest you to quit BITCOIN because it wasn't made by a good programmer and it isn't good. Or I suggest you to tell your REAL PEOPLE to create new Bitcoin. -MZ |
|
|
|
I would strongly advise against using that codebase; it is of questionable quality and security. The Bitcoin Foundation recommends starting at version 0.5.3 and from there, applying some patches to remove some of the more obvious malicious bits of code. That site isn't really Bitcoin Foundation's. Need solid news and proof. -MZ |
|
|
|
They won't decrease your accuracy unless they are marked as bad. The reports are neutral until they've been handled in one way or another.
So there isn't neutral reports? If a person reports a post for moving a thread to Project Development but the staff moved it to Digital Goods. So is that post good or bad? The mistake he did was the way he saw it: You did report it, but it was still pending/unhandled, though one had been moved. Both of those do belong in digital goods. There's always going to be some overlap with project development and service announcements, same with trading discussion and service discussion, so there's no fine line. Some threads would fit fine in either, downside of board based forums. I agree with what Shorena said though.
-MZ |
|
|
|
I dont think thats bots can solve the capthcas. its impossible
There is bots which can solve simple captchas such as recaptcha's captcha. Solvemedia, Minteye and areyouahuman captchas are even better. But there are bots which takes specific captchas from websites and will give to paid captcha solvers(humams). P.S. If you want to look for yourself, go to browser extension/plugin store, search for captcha solver and install it and open a faucet which has recaptcha. Solvemedia may not work. -MZ |
|
|
|
If I'm understanding BadBear's response correctly he can't. I can see all of a user's reports, but I can't generate reports like that on the fly. This post confuses me. Seems like a antithesis to me. BadBear could do it, but would have to do so by hand, which would take days? Theymos can directly access the database and create the stats on the fly. At least thats my interpretation of this. That was my interpretation too but after I read Welsh's post, I got confused. I don't know if anyone has suggested already(sorry if yes). It would be helpful if we can see a detailed stats of our reports(one by one) or atleast a summary-like: Number of reported post : 123
Number of good reports : 111
Number of bad reports : 12
Accuracy of reports : 96%
There should be 2 other lines Number of reports marked neither good nor bad: __
Number of reports not attended to: ____ Thanks for the suggestion! I think reports marked neither good nor bad are generally considered as bad reports as they also decrease the accuracy.(?) Summing up: Number of reported post :
Number of good reports :
Number of bad reports :
Number of reports not responded to :
Accuracy of reports :
|
|
|
|
Deleting an account is very simple, simply publish your password here in plain text.  The account will be stolen rather than getting deleted. -MZ |
|
|
|
I get it now i guess , thanks for the links , both of you (Muhammed & reds0ow) You're welcome! I have seen redsn0w telling people about the 0 in his username instead of o what people usually post. Try to correct it typo! Waiting for spams now!  -MZ |
|
|
|
If I'm understanding BadBear's response correctly he can't. I can see all of a user's reports, but I can't generate reports like that on the fly. This post confuses me. Seems like a antithesis to me. What , who is Stefan Thomas
As far as I know there is only couple of developpers on the forums which are making the new forum software and this name isn't one of them
He's been part of the moderation team for a very long time, big part in Bitcoin too. You might know him with his alias "justmoon". He was the operator of and BitcoinJS.org & We Use Coins. He's fairly active, logs in from time to time, but doesn't post a lot lately. P.S. I don't current Admins must be a developer of new forum software. I know. -MZ |
|
|
|
Humm this dosen't look a piece of cake to be honest , not even sure what Bitcoind is .
Sorry for lack of details!  Bitcoind = Bitcoin daemon. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoind . Bitcoind is a program that implements the Bitcoin protocol for command line and remote procedure call (RPC) use. It is also the first Bitcoin client in the network's history. It is available under the MIT license in 32-bit and 64-bit versions for Windows, GNU/Linux-based OSes, and Mac OS X.
For integrating with faucet, you may want to read: 1) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=412425.0 - PHP help. 2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73593.0 - server costs [1][1] You can also connect your faucet to the bitcoind in your computer or the computer you want to. Freebitco.in and btc-flow for example ? are they using what you just mentioned ? because you can withraw directly
They are most probably using one of these : Blockchain.info API, BlockTrail.com API and Bitcoind. If you want to continue this discussion, need help, PM me or start a new thread to get maximum help. -MZ |
|
|
|
GreenAddress is safe and easy! Sorry for the laste answer and thank u for replying
Wondering what's that BIP38 tho , is it some kinda of encryption ? I guess i've seen it on Paper wallets also
A method is proposed for encrypting and encoding a passphrase-protected Bitcoin private key record in the form of a 58-character Base58Check-encoded printable string. Encrypted private key records are intended for use on paper wallets and physical Bitcoins. Each record string contains all the information needed to reconstitute the private key except for a passphrase, and the methodology uses salting and scrypt to resist brute-force attacks.
See : https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0038.mediawiki(recommended) and https://bitcoinpaperwallet.com/bip38-password-encrypted-wallets/ . -MZ |
|
|
|
Yes, it is. Eal F. Skillz said here before. I'm not sure, however if an updated list is around. I think theymos or staff need to download it from server. Only Theymos can get that information. I should imagine he's too busy at the moment to do it too. He's had a few requests by numerous people, probably the people who have high reports and want to boast their ego. I think BadBear and maybe Stefan Thomas can also get that information. I think he is busy building new forum. -MZ |
|
|
|
I am using this script becausr it has a referral system. I also have a custom theme integrated with this theme.I think it will be a lot of work to migrate to new script.
Can you fix this script?
Have you tried using Nginx? See http://seravo.fi/2013/optimizing-web-server-performance-with-nginx-and-php . Sucksyd is a thief and a liar, don't pay attention to him
Sockpuppet of michealadair maybe. -MZ |
|
|
|
I can't login to BlockTrail. When I click Forgot pass? and entered my email address which I used to login, it says 'You never provided an email address with us' [1] but when I tried to signup, it says 'The email address is already registered' [1].  [1] This may not be the correct line. -MZ |
|
|
|
No they're not cloud mining. I've read that they're selling off the 5 PHS of Bitmain S4 miners they bought for this. The company line is that the maintenance fees they collected did not cover the cost for cloud mining. Others say that there's SEC concern about them mining now that they're running PayBase, Paycoin and an Exchange. GAW is trying to be the first company doing things by the book so that they can release the PayBase features when they get the legal green light. Once they set the example of meeting legal requirements in what they are doing behind the scenes now, others will be examined by the governments and have to meet the same requirements too. It will be interesting to see how Crypto 2.0 unfolds in 2015.
I also got the email. But... I think THs-they-were-selling isn't equal to THs-they-have. -MZ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
