Call it whatever you want as long as you know what you will be using it for. 

Yes. 

Yes, that's how I explained it in the previous post.

Yes, you generate an address in the new account that will be used for your long-term storage.

Yes, you can just generate a new receiving address in your "long-term storage" account or even create a 3rd account that will be your "second long-term storage LTC account" if you want to be absolutely certain that you won't connect addresses A and B in the "first long-term storage" account. If you bought 5000 LTC one time and 5000 LTC a second time, those two parties don't have to know that you own both inputs.

Yes, just generate a new receiving address in the account you created for those small LTC deposits.

If you have only funded that account with one $50 LTC deposit, it's obvious that's all you have. You can't select a second input if it's not there. If you want to send something, the funds for the new transaction have to come from that previous $50 deposit. Coin control helps you when you have multiple inputs of $5, $10, $15, $25, $50 worth of LTC, for example. With coin control, you decide which of those inputs you want to spend.

The thing is, it's dangerous to give automated "helpers" like bots and APIs the permissions to access and work with your money. Can you trust it to not have any bugs or intentional vulnerabilities that would allow its creators to edit the receiving addresses and amounts being bought/sent? Probably not.

I have never used the app, so I don't know. My assumption is that the coins will be deposited in an address that's part of your app. But maybe you can enter a custom address, which in your case would be one that's part of your Ledger. Someone who knows more about Cash.app could give you a better answer.

Don't forget the often-occurring wallet maintenance issues. You mentioned a good example with Dogecoin. Wallets can be in "maintenance mode" for weeks and months before you can access your coins again. Interestingly, it occurs when there are huge pumps or significant drops in value. Once the issue is fixed, it's too late to take advantage of the situation in case you wanted to buy something cheaper or sell it at a high.

Not necessarily the experienced ones, but certainly those concerned about their privacy. Often, it goes hand in hand, and those who have been around for a while are also concerned about remaining anonymous. That's something you can't do on CEXs where you are often asked to verify your identity and answer questions about your business activities or origins of your money. Saying, that's none of your business doesn't work. Hence, we have completely decentralized P2P exchanges where no questions are asked.   

Maybe. But don't forget that signature space is limited. Chances are that most of that character space is already lost because of the sig you are wearing, so you won't be able to do much with what remains. One way around it is if a Hero/Legendary would wear a sig for a Member/Full Member, which leaves him with enough room to include other things in his signature space.

Good campaign managers surely check if there are additional lines and entries in the signature that shouldn't be there. It's against the rules to have that.
Here is just one example:

 

I informed you about the existence of this scam accusation against your casino on 7 February. You were on the forum that day because I saw you online.


A week later, I posted in your ANN thread again mentioning the scam accusation and asking if you can share your side of the story:

He doesn't have to. He most probably just registered to inform the community and make the scam accusation thread. He isn't the first one to do something like that and he won't be the last one.

If that's true, you have to prove it. Just saying it doesn't make it true. Post some proof to convince the community he is a faucet abuser. I think that's the only way to remove your negative trust rating.

A support staff banning your from the casino's chat is not a scam. Your feelings and opinions that Max might be an Indian who is a scammer waiting for you to deposit money so he can confiscate them is also not a scam. The only thing that happened here is that you got banned from accessing the chat by someone who has the power to do so. Maybe he didn't have to do it, but you also didn't have to go off-topic and talk about Luna or Terra.

5Dimes did not scam you, case closed.

I have used Etherscan yesterday and the day before yesterday because I was checking some transactions, but I didn't notice any requests to connect or log in to MetaMask. I am using Ad Guard and uBlock Origin though and they might be blocking the malicious ads. I highly recommend to have at least uBlock Origin installed in your browsers as it does the job it's supposed to do.

There is a second thing that players should pay attention to and that's the restrictions that individual game providers have. Those restrictions can be completely different from the lists of banned territories by the casinos.

Let me explain what I am talking about.
Imagine that you live in Switzerland. You want to play on a casino, so you check their TOS and find out that they have no problems with Switzerland-based players. Therefore, you are allowed to register and start playing. However, if you select a game developed by game provider X, that game provider might have introduced bans for Swiss-based nationals. So even if the casino doesn't have an issue with you being from Switzerland, the game developer might.

Some casinos mention these additional restrictions set forth by game providers in their TOS, but probably not all of them.   

I like my proposal better.

Damn. It would have been much funnier if it was dicklover, but at least we know now how you came up with the username. We also know that I should have my eyes checked for everyone's sake.

I guess it's about how you do it and how much time has passed between those transactions. Let's assume you wanted to transfer $500 worth of Bitcoin from a casino to a CEX and you want to hide the origin of the coins by sending them to one of your wallets first, there are different ways to do it.

Withdraw more than you intend to deposit to your own private wallet days/weeks before sending to the CEX. If the two transactions (from the casino to your wallet and from your wallet to the CEX) confirm in a short period of time one after the other (one block between them for example) it might be obvious that it's the same person initiating them. So it's better to wait. It also doesn't look good if the CEX can see that $500 left a casino, landed in some 3rd-party wallet, and then the same amount minus the fees was immediately transferred to the CEX.   

I think in that particular case, you would have to prove to the support that you are not the one who gambled with those coins, you just purchased them from an alleged gambler. You might be required to show proof where and how you purchased them for them to unfreeze your account or allow you to withdraw the "problematic" funds.

I remember that someone found an alt account of a forum member a few weeks ago that had a username like dicklover, dicklov3r, or something like that. I tried to find it but BPIP wasn't being helpful on this one. Then I remembered the name "naim", looked it up, checked the trust ratings, and voila - Dic3L0v3r.

Look at it in this way:
You need money to finance a signature campaigns. Who is more likely to be willing to pay hundreds and thousands of dollars weekly? A business like a casino that generates a lot of profit every hour of the day, or a developer who has just created a new free service that doesn't earn him any income and he has to spend his own money to pay promoters? We all know the answer.

Even ChipMixer and BestChange earn money. CM through donations and the users who use their services and BestChange through fees.   

Using this to spread phishing or malware links isn't really the best way to do it. Think about it. If you wanted to share something malicious, your goal is to have as many people click on that link as possible. You can't click on something you don't even know is there and if you don't even see it unless you come across it by mistake like when quoting a post the way you did.

But the possibility to take advantage of it is definitely there and if theymos can quickly fix that, I hope he does.

+1
Only for external links though. There is no need for that if the link redirects you to a different forum post.

Inter was the better team in the Coppa Italia finals but what a shameful penalty they were awarded in the 80th minute. I wonder if they would have scored the equalizer had it not been for that ridiculousness of Lautaro and the awful refereeing team.   

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=556360412514575
Martinez stuck his leg in between Bonucci's, fell to the ground, and got the penalty. That's what took the game to extra time.

What a ridiculous way to gamble and entertain yourself. I have never heard of such nonsense as regulated and legal cockfighting in Europe. I am sure there are some countries that are involved in such crap. If you support these kinds of "sports" and like them, just step into the ring yourself and fight to the death with another man who made that same decision. That makes more sense because you both agreed to it and are doing it of your own free will. When you put two pitbulls or roosters in a small ring, you decided their faith, not them.

It should be banned and the scum organizing and making money on it should be imprisoned.

We already covered this. Can you please pay attention to what is being written? Create a new Litecoin account on your Nano S. Call it "Monthly $5 payments to Mister X" or whatever you want to call it. Generate a new receiving address in that account and top it up with the LTC you intend to send to that mystery person you keep mentioning. That's it. Don't use that account and all of the other addresses in it for any other purposes! It only serves to send that monthly $5 payment and nothing else.

If you decide to purchase 5000 LTC in the future, and you don't want there to be a connection between those coins and the ones in your "Monthly $5 payments to Mister X" account, create a brand-new (second) Litecoin account on your Nano S. Call it "My long-term LTC bag". Deposit your 5000 LTC in one of its addresses and you are done.

Whatever you do in the future with either of the two accounts, they won't be connected unless you deposit or request a deposit to be made in the wrong one.

None of the support personnel were willing to give away hints in my case. Support agents are used to responding to the same questions over and over again. They don't really know what is going on in the background or how to handle complicated matters. Ask them about some specifics about their Privacy Policy or TOS, and they wont know how to handle it. There are other departments within the company that handle the real stuff, but they reveal their methods only to government agencies and law enforcement, not to regular folks who come knocking.   

Cash app has a feature called Auto Invest that does something similar as what you are asking. You can schedule when the app will purchase Bitcoin for you and in which amount. This can be done daily, weekly, bi-weekly, or just a one-time purchase. There is a $10 minimum judging by their FAQ. 

That's a good point. One might ask what would happen if the Seedkeeper tool or Satoship as a company isn't around in a few years? How do I get access to my seeds Tibu?

You can use up to 16 characters, so it's not that short. And there is really no protection of the words if your seed phrase is written down on paper or engraved in steel or wood either. You can use a passphrase though with your standard paper wallet or the seed you store in your Seedkeeper.   

Good choice of words. I am glad you used that construction because that's exactly the way it is. Someone else might have said that if you use open-source software with verifiable builds, there is no risk or you are absolutely safe due to the publicly available code.

The more popular the wallet is, the more user it has, and the more security experts verify every single piece of code, the lower is the possibility that the developers would get away with trying to introduce a backdoor or other type of vulnerability. Or if they just overlooked something by mistake which could have negative consequences. On the other hand, if the wallet is unpopular, it might take weeks or even months before someone discovered that something is off with the most recent update.     

We obviously didn't understand each other. I know that you are aware of the dangers of using custodians for your crypto, so I was just stating a fact and wanted to mention a new recommendation by the SEC, which I think is good. Since there are still many of those who believe using exchanges as private wallets is a good idea, articles like the one above show why they aren't.