Klondike 16 is live With 1 chip and half power 128Mh without heatsink. Changed few resistors pull up for chips. Avalon shcem was brong in this resistors.  That's great news, nekonos. Are you going to try with the 16 Avalon chips? Do you have a fire extinguisher near the board?  |
|
|
|
I suggest we collect lots of bitcoins together and buy a island before creating a p2p government system. We allow edward snowdon safety and other whistle blowers ( wiki leaks). We all live happily ever after while nuclear war enrages the earth!
Open a BitcoinStarter Project: https://bitcoinstarter.com |
|
|
|
BFL is shipping units now but they are are still backed up and have yet to ship out many orders.
Avalon has sold all their 3 batches of units. #2 is partially shipped and #3 has yet to be fulfilled. They are now selling chips to assemblers and endusers.
ASICMINER has their blades and USB's for sale with quick turnaround but they are known to be overpriced.
All other manufacturers have yet to ship out a production unit. They are still in development and most are taking or have taken preorders. Hope this helps.
The USB Block Eruptor (336 MH/s) went down in price to 0.99 BTC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241414.msg2559519#msg2559519 |
|
|
|
New Sales Policy
Customers in EU, Switzerland and North Europe non-EU countries Please contact forum member yxt, whose RRP is agreed by us.
Customers in the rest of the world
Minimum Order Volume of 50 USB sticks. Price of 0.99 each. 2% sent as redundancy (not in warranty). Shipping is free.
If you reach the total volume of 1,000 USB sticks, price is dropped to 0.89 each and we will pay back the price difference of all your historic transaction of USB sticks.
If we get an excluding deal with resellers in some certain countries we will stop directly supply USBs towards there, as in the case of China zone,
yxt, are you going to organize a new groupbuy or will you only handle bulk order with 50 sticks ? Please, please, please, yxt, as I need to buy another USB Gizmo and the price now would be lower...  |
|
|
|
will mine peon automatically pick up the USB erupters ? The miner underneath is cgminer so it should, it does have problems with some hubs though. I can only get the FPGA going The Eruptors use a FPGA driver, is that what you mean? Neil  Got it working neil. Strange... my version of MinePeon, from today, includs cgminer 3.2.2 and not version 3.2.1... MinePeon-0.2.0.img.zip
Released on 2013-06-23  |
|
|
|
Greetings, Neil..... working (Thanks, My Lord Neil!) and I s..eat work, Neil and I wil.. Please don't bold my names and attribute me titles I don't deserve. It's kind of creepy  . (Look up Fincham though (My last name) there is actually a Village called that and there used to be a Lord Fincham) Glad you liked the stats though. Neil Dear Lord Neil Fincham:  Of course Your Grace deserves all the titles and bolds. Your Grace is working for all us. I hope to keep using MinePeon, when in a (not so) near future, I shall receive a BFL Jalapeño and a Klondike16. I do like the new stats and also the old status. Please don´t forget to include again the Status link to miner.php @ the upper menu, Your Grace. Yours sincerely, Rui Costa |
|
|
|
Greetings, Neil. I already downloaded MinePeon 0.2.0 from SourceForge.net and this time, it could be unzipped without errors. It started with no problems, configured well (the 15m/24h stays ) and it started mining. htop confirmed the calm work, with a RPI almost sleeping...  The miner.php page is now working ( Thanks, My Lord Neil!) and I still can't get that option @ the upper menu, but otherwise, the Graphics new feature is working fine...  Keep the great work, Neil and I will keep mining some time daily for you. I hope that all other users of this great Program will keep doing the same. |
|
|
|
Hi all, Update of Klondike16 project. Picture of testing board without chips  Power testing OK Comunication seems OK In feew days with all 16 chips Regards Great! No smoke or fire. Good luck for the tests and thanks for your kind support. |
|
|
|
Hi all For buyers that wish to send the chips to other assemblers other than nekonos, could you please put your order as follows so that I could advice the involved assemblers how many chips will be heading their way? <forum nick>; <Total Chips N>; < Total BTC >; < Total Miner to be assembled>; <Name of Assembler to send the Chips>; <sending address>A complete list of assemblers where you could send your chips can be found in SebastianJu's thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=192860 ) Cheers. I will stay with my neighbor nekonos! Batch 1, ID 23.
ID No. Chips Total BTC BTC Address Miners Note
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23 16 1.296 1LHcdewdDzSW5hNaLqfiEoe7R7SDwWz255 1 Thread- Verified User - @0.081BTC
|
|
|
|
Many thanks for the explanation, deepceleron. I now understand the logic of a digital currency transaction, but I always imagined that the change would come back to the same address. In this case, the change went to the (probably) primary address of the Bitcoin-QT that started the transaction, regardless of the money being sent from an imported address and not from the primary one, generated upon installation of the Bitcoin-QT program. Next time, I'll send the money from the wallet that generated the address I use as primary one (the Android Bitcoin Wallet in my cellphone). ㋔ Geek Facts
Transactions are comprised of a list of inputs, individual payments that were previously received by a wallet, and outputs, a list of amounts and addresses to which the bitcoins will be transferred.
Only the full amount of an input can be spent. If the exact amount of the transaction can’t be constructed from available inputs, an additional output, called change, is added, which sends the remainder back to a new address in the user’s wallet. Change addresses are not shown to the user. |
|
|
|
Congratulations... I hope to receive my Jalapeño still in this decade...  Regarding hash rate, You bought 7 GH/s, not 8 GH/s... but interestingly, the one that gives you 8 GH/s is the one with lower temperature... |
|
|
|
please provide screenshots.
Too late, as I already transferred the 0.09908462 BTC to my primary address (not Bitcoin-QT primary address, as this address is from my Android Bitcoin wallet) using blockchain.info site... Bitcoin-QT now displays that last transaction as a self transfer. Status: 50 confirmations
Date: 21/06/2013 22:18
Debit: -0.09908462 BTC
Credit: 0.09908462 BTC
Net amount: 0.00 BTC
Transaction ID: 84b72902f79c14c9cf412ed3f0f69f040c9d77164de1f9b4c8dc22c2dbf617f7  |
|
|
|
Order date was the first day they started taking orders in late June last year.
...
Many thanks for the photos and good mining. |
|
|
|
Congratulations. Do take some photos... |
|
|
|
I'm here and alive! |
|
|
|
New update: After all that address is mine. - I tried to list the addresses with the command listaccounts and I couldn't see the BTC "lost" or that address.
- But trying with the command "getbalance 1DrjveHXqQzT6CqS34whJScEtDoXRyB9JL" i got the answer "0.00000000".
- Next, I tried the command "dumpprivkey 1DrjveHXqQzT6CqS34whJScEtDoXRyB9JL" and I got a private key.
- With that private key, I imported it to blockchain.info without errors.
- In the option "Receive" I could now see "1DrjveHXqQzT6CqS34whJScEtDoXRyB9JL 0.09908462 BTC"... my "lost" BTC.
Now, what I can't understand it's why my bitcoin-QT insists in telling me that the address has 0 BTC and the address from whom I sent the 0.025 still has this 0.09908462 BTC, even after a bitcoin-QT start with "-rescan".
|
|
|
|
I sent today .025 BTC to the address BitcoinStarter gave me when I signed in, using Bitcoin-QT 0.8.2 for Windows. I forgot to previously select a transaction fee, that stayed at 0.00000 BTCThe status of the transaction: Status: 88 confirmations
Date: 21/06/2013 07:27
To: BitcoinStarter 1Ns4sPesjfpcCXX8SnwKsWpoABANmAq7ZM
Debit: -0.025 BTC
Net amount: -0.025 BTC
Transaction ID: 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3 But when seeing the transaction @ Blockchain ( https://blockchain.info/tx/6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3), I see that the total of 0.12408462 BTC was sent by the program: 1LHcdewdDzSW5hNaLqfiEoe7R7SDwWz255 (0.12408462 BTC - Output)
[b]1DrjveHXqQzT6CqS34whJScEtDoXRyB9JL - (Unspent) 0.09908462 BTC[/b]
1Ns4sPesjfpcCXX8SnwKsWpoABANmAq7ZM - (Unspent) 0.025 BTC
Inputs and Outputs
Total Input 0.12408462 BTC
Total Output 0.12408462 BTC
Fees 0 BTC
Estimated BTC Transacted 0.025 BTC
I don't know who is the owner of the 1DrjveHXqQzT6CqS34whJScEtDoXRyB9JL address, the Bitcoin-QT still gives me a balance of the value I had minus the 0.025 BTC, but using the Bitcoin-Wallet for Android or the Blockchain site (I also have my private key on those 2 locations), the balance is the old value minus 0.12408462. Log of the transaction (debug window): keypool reserve 2
CommitTransaction:
CTransaction(hash=6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=2, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(b97e9c1293ad322ca4da0400add035dcbab2308cefbb00d7b6cc7e056e36bed2, 21), scriptSig=30440220181e8196310b6385)
CTxOut(nValue=0.09908462, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 8d09b931c2e1)
CTxOut(nValue=0.02500000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 efd2ab47b3a3)
keypool keep 2
AddToWallet 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3 new
WalletUpdateSpent found spent coin 0.12408462bc b97e9c1293ad322ca4da0400add035dcbab2308cefbb00d7b6cc7e056e36bed2
NotifyTransactionChanged b97e9c1293ad322ca4da0400add035dcbab2308cefbb00d7b6cc7e056e36bed2 status=1
NotifyTransactionChanged 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3 status=0
NotifyTransactionChanged b97e9c1293ad322ca4da0400add035dcbab2308cefbb00d7b6cc7e056e36bed2 status=1
AddToWallet 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3
NotifyTransactionChanged 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3 status=1
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3 (poolsz 2065)
Relaying wtx 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3
NotifyAddressBookChanged 1Ns4sPesjfpcCXX8SnwKsWpoABANmAq7ZM BitcoinStarter isMine=0 status=0
updateWallet b97e9c1293ad322ca4da0400add035dcbab2308cefbb00d7b6cc7e056e36bed2 1
inWallet=1 inModel=1 Index=21-22 showTransaction=1 derivedStatus=1
updateWallet 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3 0
inWallet=1 inModel=0 Index=15-15 showTransaction=1 derivedStatus=0
Flushed 14528 addresses to peers.dat 67ms
updateWallet b97e9c1293ad322ca4da0400add035dcbab2308cefbb00d7b6cc7e056e36bed2 1
inWallet=1 inModel=1 Index=22-23 showTransaction=1 derivedStatus=1
updateWallet 6e7b0460cf23fa456a1a6d1dbbdea56ef6c286ea230638cd30ee829ac8e551d3 1
inWallet=1 inModel=1 Index=15-16 showTransaction=1 derivedStatus=1 UPDATE: After forcing a "bitcoin-qt -rescan", the balance stays the same, as if only 0.025 BTC went out... |
|
|
|
Ok, I confess... I was one of the selfish guys that put the donation box to 0, as the Stats option doesn't work yet and I do need it working (I don't like te screen -r console). I selected again 15 minutes. Here is a screen shot just for you;- ... It is off my unstable machine (I am not saying it is unstable, I develop on 3 separate machines, one called 'unstable', one called 'testing' and the last called 'production bob'). Actually, I take that back, its unstable as hell right now , the new CSS freaks most windows browses out and the updating of those stats is a bit temperamental. But yeah, I am working on it. Neil I'm always confident in your work, Neil! And I love that " new" function! If you need a 4th RPI test machine, send me the MinePeon image and I'll test it in mine, with the 2 USB Gizmos attached. Do you have any form of confirming the " offer" of mining for you n minutes/24h? If not, think about that... ...
Seriously though, as I mentioned at the time there was a rather irritating bug with how php handles raw sockets and sessions in Arch ARM (crazy I know). Kano (who wrote miner.php) uses sessions raw sockets to communicate with the cgminer api. I don't use sessions and use fopen and that mysteriously was not affected and it was 2 versions on before anyone pointed out to me that miner.php was not working (I don't use miner.php and had not really counted that as part of MinePeon so it was not part of my test plans (it is now)).
...
I love the miner.php page and I still use it with one of my RPI's, CPU mining a monstrous 150 KH/s. I can't upgrade it, as the old cgminer 2.11.4 still uses CPU for mining (versions 3.n.n don't use CPU's any more). ... I hope you guys appreciate the blood I sweat for you . ... I'm a vampire...  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
