Im sure this app could be modified to run on 100 CRY quite easily by someone with the skills, if only I knew the "very little known language with proprietary IDE and plugins" etc.   |
|
|
|
it's simple just a period...
If so, Maybe a tampon would help to stop the altcoins from going down.  |
|
|
|
DeViL303: If Crypt had only "a little FUD" I would agree with you
You are right, it did get a fairly big attack by former group members. I can see why though, Even if I was a member and this group had made me some BTC profit, I would still be sceptical of their actions and I would not want to be associated with them, its not sustainable to pull scams like this, too many big mouths etc as we have seen with all the leaks. |
|
|
|
... - One of our team members will be testing the wallet internally before release to public very soon
- Our method is truly new to anything out there, as it uses no intermediate nodes, a totally new innovation
- We thank our investors who are still believing in us, and we have more coming
Thanks for the update ccryptcoin. Anon with no intermediate nodes means that the coin is bomb-proof from DDOS attacks, now the only threat to this coin is believing the FUD. hold strong fellas! <3 Yeah, the random people with no reputation posting on the internet is really the only threat to this coin, but what does that say about the investors? if all it takes is a little FUD from strangers to drop this coin to 1.5k ? Im not sure why MoosaNYC didn't just lock this thread and go self moderated about 250 pages ago. It would make much more sense. |
|
|
|
I have come to a conclusion. I keep it for myself.
Whether your conclusion is in favor of KeyCoin or not, +1 for the professionalism, sir! The crypto community could stand more professionalism. +1 I was gonna say "good answer man" |
|
|
|
There you have it. Honesty! Which shows Integrity.
I always assumed Keycoin was a shared account for the Dev team. Probably only a couple people use it to represent the entire team. This is obviously common sense. Whats the big deal? Except to be more careful next time.
Yeah, but I dont get why 90% of these people need access to the keycoin account? one person who made the original coin
one person who made the website
one person who added on the anon system
one person who works on the videos and 3d models
one person who is working on the encrypted messaging
one person who is working on the keyos distro
one person who is working on ordering and burning keyos onto custom usb drives
one person who handles PR releases and writing (This is the only person who needs access to the keycoin account)
one person who is programming trading tools for keyos
one person who manages the twitter
one person who creates graphics
And couldn't the PR/writing person also handle twitter? or maybe you just wanted the list to sound longer? a person dedicated to twitter is taking the piss? try harder guys. |
|
|
|
Problem is: If there is no plausible explanation for the Dev-Post in the Cryptcoin-Thread, no serious new Investor will buy Keycoin. Its simply a to high risk, because anytime they could push the Sell-Button. And again: I don`t say that as a Fudder. I say that as an Investor. I sold today at a loss, because I know how serious Investors think. They don`t want to play russian-roulette. They want to see longterm-plans and a honest Dev-Team. I thought to see that. Maybe there will be an plausible explanation, but if not... this Coin has no Chance.
Keycoin team consists of: one person who made the original coin one person who made the website one person who added on the anon system one person who works on the videos and 3d models one person who is working on the encrypted messaging one person who is working on the keyos distro one person who is working on ordering and burning keyos onto custom usb drives one person who handles PR releases and writing one person who is programming trading tools for keyos one person who manages the twitter one person who creates graphics We share the credentials to the account when needed. The post was made in error by one of the team members. Sharing the login credentials to things seems to be a problem for you guys, for security and seeing as what has happened with you guys in the past and the ccryptcoin account being hacked multiple times etc, wouldn't it be better if only one or two people had access to the main keycoin account? LOL, a whole person dedicated to "manages the twitter" , sounds like an easy job..  How about a straight up answer , how many of those persons are the exact same persons that were part of the cryptcoin team? |
|
|
|
I am debating on locking this thread and creating a moderated one to eliminate posters related to attious and galt. Show of +1 for -for against?
+1 |
|
|
|
yawn
As you have no arguments to any of my points ill assume you agree and are just tired. It must be that pipe kicking in. I am debating on locking this thread and creating a moderated one to eliminate posters related to attious and galt. Show of +1 for -for against?
+1. Let's do it. Laughing at all these Fudders/liars trying to get their last shot in before it's too late. Might as well go out with a bang, right? Like I said days ago, DO IT already and stop talking about it! |
|
|
|
|
So let me get this straight, the keycoin account "got reprimanded for sharing" cryptcoin info from mindfox on IRC, so WHO reprimanded him I wonder?
|
|
|
|
Will you ever shut up about coinsource, Remember you invited me over to coinsource IRC?
Remember I asked TK & co. if his verification actually meant anything?
Remember I posted all of his replies in this thread?
Remember that not one thing he said gave his verification any trust ?
Remember that there is no way for coinsource to know if the person they are verifying is even able to code?
They cant tell if this person is a developer, so how can they verify shit?Put that in YOUR pipe and smoke it!  Hows that pipe going? I smoked your one, and I didn't get anything off it yet! |
|
|
|
Keep crying while you can fudder. We are receiving lots of support and one -1 your fud game is over. +1
All coins should do this for the good of crypto in general.
Yeah, every thread on every forum should be moderated by the initial poster. For the good of the internetz in general. Who even invented the unmoderated thread anyway? makes no sense. Ive been saying you guys should just click ignore on fudders and go to a self moderated thread for days. go for it! Im sure it will be much better for the value of your coins, and thats crazy really, comments by random people like me and you in a forum thread should not really effect the price of something in the real world, but it actually does. It really is not right, but its interesting all the same.. EDIT: That comment by the keycoin account in the cryptcoin thread was a bit of a fk up though wasn't it? That's the problem with running many accounts, easy make mistakes...Good that it got deleted minutes later anyway. It effects the market a lot. It's actually illegal in regulated markets. Thanks to those holding on, we'll have a moderated thread and enable the private forums soon. Free speech is illegal in regulated markets? or what are you saying is illegal? comments by me in this thread or what? Are the positive comments illegal too? or is it just negative comments that would be illegal in a regulated market? |
|
|
|
Keep crying while you can fudder. We are receiving lots of support and one -1 your fud game is over. +1
All coins should do this for the good of crypto in general.
Yeah, every thread on every forum should be moderated by the initial poster. For the good of the internetz in general. Who even invented the unmoderated thread anyway? makes no sense. Ive been saying you guys should just click ignore on fudders and go to a self moderated thread for days. go for it! Im sure it will be much better for the value of your coins, and thats crazy really, comments by random people like me and you in a forum thread should not really effect the price of something in the real world, but it actually does. It really is not right, but its interesting all the same.. EDIT: That comment by the keycoin account in the cryptcoin thread was a bit of a fk up though wasn't it? That's the problem with running many accounts, easy make mistakes...Good that it got deleted minutes later anyway. |
|
|
|
KeyCoin has now been awarded 7/7 Trust Verification score. This means, we've confirmed the lead developer/creator behind the coin 100%. We've also spoken with various KeyCoin team members into a greater insight behind the team. If you have any further questions regarding the Trust Index, i suggest reading the F.A.Q. http://www.coinssource.com/trustindex-faq/View KeyCoin's verification here: http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/Do you know what the funniest thing about coinsource verification is? If a software Developer has no social media accounts, (is not on facebook or twitter etc), they can never get a 100% trust rating with coinsource! And a dev cant make a new facebook or twitter either just to get verified, I already asked coinsource about that. So this verification is only for publicity hungry devs. |
|
|
|
+1
All coins should do this for the good of crypto in general.
Yeah, every thread on every forum should be moderated by the initial poster. For the good of the internetz in general. Who even invented the unmoderated thread anyway? makes no sense. |
|
|
|
KeyCoin has now been awarded 7/7 Trust Verification score. This means, we've confirmed the lead developer/creator behind the coin 100%. We've also spoken with various KeyCoin team members into a greater insight behind the team. If you have any further questions regarding the Trust Index, i suggest reading the F.A.Q. http://www.coinssource.com/trustindex-faq/View KeyCoin's verification here: http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/I wouldn't be surprise if these Scammers have paid you to post this.. posting it at the right now when price is dropping to show confidence to people. I'm starting to think Coinssource is run by the same group of 30 scammers Our identities are prevalent on the site http://www.coinssource.com/about-coins-source/. We require a verification in the mail with the developer sends the code. We sent this code to the KeyCoin development team as soon as they became verified about a week ago or more? I will have to recheck. They simply send us that code and they get verified. The last step is not that difficult to achieve to be awarded 7/7 if you already have verified your other information. Each developer has to already pay a $30 fee or roughly .05btc to under go the verification process. That alone covers the time and effort we spending during the verifications. F.A.Q: http://www.coinssource.com/trustindex-faq/About Trust Index: http://www.coinssource.com/trust/Press Release: http://www.coinssource.com/introducing-the-coins-source-trust-index/If you or anyone has any suggestions on how to make the trust index even better, don't hesitate to reach us out! We value everyones thoughts/opinions. We already have an update towards verifications that we will be implementing soon. IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=coinssource "Each developer has to already pay a $30 fee or roughly .05btc to under go the verification process." Developer? I see nothing in your verification system that verifies this person can even code, how do you verify they have any skills?  |
|
|
|
I am debating on locking this thread and creating a moderated one to eliminate posters related to attious and galt. Show of +1 for -for against?
+1 |
|
|
|
Will you ever shut up about coinsource, Remember you invited me over to coinsource IRC?
Remember I asked TK & co. if his verification actually meant anything?
Remember I posted all of his replies in this thread?
Remember that not one thing he said gave his verification any trust ?
Remember that there is no way for coinsource to know if the person they are verifying is even able to code?
They cant tell if this person is a developer, so how can they verify shit?Put that in YOUR pipe and smoke it!
|
|
|
|
Yeah Mindfox, you need to get on here and explain your ass and it's lack of impressive performance. Or pay me my 0.8 BTC for my time, effort, energy, and stress in mining and buying this coin. And you better do it soon, because everyone who has been disappointed here will slam your ass on any future coin you work on. We will find it and tell everyone of your unimpressive performance, which is way overdue.
Cmon, that's BS, Mindfox obviously owes you nothing, Hes a developer doing a job (maybe), I wouldn't be surprised if his promise of payment on completetion has been pulled by the group, So he is not gonna work for no pay is he? MoosaNYC is the creator of this coin and the man in charge allegedly , He is the one who should be giving you updates..but his latest comments are about keycoin...so go figure. For all we know he told mindfox to not bother finishing the work on CRY and maybe he has already moved onto the next project.. If you decided to buy/mine this coin its really your own fault, you should have read the entire thread and made an informed decision, you cant claim for damages due to stress either. Its also possible that mindfox will still release something for this coin.. |
|
|
|
[6/8/14, 2:26:32 PM] Moosa: i could make concept wallet in photoshop maybe [6/8/14, 4:16:54 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): I believe that by caring what exchanges needs, you create a good partner for your coin [6/8/14, 4:17:16 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): I witnessed it in my interaction with exchange admin members [6/8/14, 4:17:58 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): most of them kept telling me that they wish others would be so helpful (devs I mean) for their coins and how good it was that I was taking under consideration their needs [6/8/14, 4:18:35 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): key role (imho) is exchanges at first [6/8/14, 4:18:48 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): and merchants or payment gateways, after [6/8/14, 4:19:04 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): if one wants to create a coin with a future, that is [6/8/14, 4:19:13 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): if not, then only exchanges
[6/8/14, 4:19:25 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): and then, fancy stuff
[6/8/14, 4:19:36 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): so, it all depends on where we're heading with CRY
[6/8/14, 4:21:13 PM] Costas (aka mindfox): and since both projects are based on my ideas, I believe we got the emotional aspect covered as well [6/8/14, 4:21:29 PM] Ahmad (sinarline): Hehe yea Hadnt noticed this little convo before.. So, from this I think mindfox is kind of saying, if one doesn't want "to create a coin with a future", then "Exchanges" and "fancy stuff", and then interestingly he says: " so, it all depends on where we're heading with CRY" ... or am I wrong? So are we going to see some " Fancy Stuff" from CRY soon or what? Oh hold on, that commander demo was kind of fancy wasn't it..  I wonder is there any related coins just using exchanges and fancy stuff to create the illusion of value.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
