|
Yo no tengo problemas en pagar impuestos, incluso el 50% si es necesario al estilo de Noruega pero....
- Si yo pago y tu robas, tú vas al trullo, y no un par de años, sino tanto como alguien que intenta quebrar la democracia. Y no te libras si te apellidas Borbón, Pujol, Aznar, González, Botín, ni su P*ta madre.
- Si yo pago, quiero responsabilidades políticas individualizadas, no cobardes que se esconden en la masa del partido. Quiero elegir a UNA persona concreta (como en Francia o en Inglaterra) y esa es la que va a responder directamente cuando yo pida cuentas.
- Si yo pago, yo decido en que se gasta tan directamente como sea posible.
- Si yo pago, no hay sueldos de por vida ni privilegios.
- Si yo pago, no hay trabajos "chollo" con todos los derechos y otros "basura" donde la legislación laboral es papel mojado.
Por todo esto, entiendo perfectamente al que decide usar todas las triquiñuelas para no pagar, porque si el sistema es claramente injusto y no hay ganas de modificarlo... pues que lo pague quien lo quiera. Lo contrario es un vulgar feudalismo o directamente tirania en la cual se emplea la fuerza del estado para hacer tragar al ciudadano con las imposiciones de unos pocos, con el disfraz que se quiera poner.
Tampoco quiero un liberalismo economico que lo unico que ha demostrado es su capacidad para destruir el bienestar y el equilibrio de las sociedades.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that the future means that a few revolutions are going to happen. The best way I could spend my money is not by sharing it as such, but creating a framework in which everyone can benefit from progress, working less in things they don´t like and more in the things that are purely human, such as arts, creativity, innovation, etc...
The greatest wealth is your own time.
|
|
|
|
Have 1 merit for that one. It is not that I necessarily agree, it is that the title of your post is super-fun  April 7, 2018
Twitter CEO endorses leftist blueprint to drive conservatives from public life
By Monica Showalter
The chief executive officer of Twitter, one of the big social media titans, has declared on his own Twitter account that a long, grotesque screed about driving Republicans from public life and turning the whole political configuration of the U.S. into California is a "great read." One of his board members thought so, too, tweeting it first and calling it "interesting."
This from the guy who claims that his social media site is non-partisan and wouldn't dream of censoring others.
...
At some point, one side or the other must win – and win big. The side resisting change, usually the one most rooted in the past systems and incumbent interests, must be thoroughly defeated – not just for a political cycle or two, but for a generation or two. That gives the winning party or movement the time and space needed to really build up the next system without always fighting rear-guard actions and getting drawn backwards. The losing party or movement will need that same time to go through a fundamental rethink, a long-term renewal that eventually will enable them to play a new game.
...
Trump is just making clear to all what was boiling under the surface for decades, and that's exactly what we need him to do. Why? Because America finally needs to take the Republican Party down for a generation or two. Not just the presidency. Not just clear out the U.S. House. Not just tip back the Senate. But fundamentally beat the Republicans on all levels at once, including clearing out governorships and statehouses across the land. ... I am struggling not to give you even more merit for this super-fun article. Do you think that politicians would dare to blame the (free) press for their own problems? (perhaps a bit) However, if it is the digital media it is considered as valid. So, if I use Facebook to manipulate is bad, if I use controlled TV channels and paid reporters is fine. |
|
|
|
|
El bitcoin volverá a subir y tu puedes tener ahora la ocasión de comprarlo barato con esta ICO tan espectacular. No lo dejes que pasar que no queda nada!!
|
|
|
|
|
Moneta es perfecto para invertir con el ether barato y luego lanzarse a recibir los resultados en un mes, cuando el mercado recupere. Aun hay bonos.
|
|
|
|
|
Y ademas tienes Electroneum que es una cadena basada en el nucleo de Monero.
|
|
|
|
Un dato mas para que tengan idea de que tipo de personas estamos hablando en este caso de Soros osea imaginen que puede llegar a hacer con el BTC..
Es conocido por ser «el hombre que provocó la quiebra del Banco de Inglaterra» el 16 de septiembre de 1992, episodio llamado miércoles negro, donde Soros obtuvo unas ganancias de unos 1000 millones de dólares y produjo pérdidas al Estado inglés por valor de unas 3400 millones de libras. Soros es una de las personas más ricas del mundo, con una fortuna de 24 200 millones de dólares en 2015 según Forbes.
No, Gran Bretaña se produjo perdidas a si misma por ese valor por llevar una política monetaria irresponsable, al igual que en su momento España. Los tiburones solo atacan si huelen sangre, o para más claridad, si tu moneda esta inflada no es culpa de los tiburones. |
|
|
|
I am not sure if I understand your first question, but the second one is a genuine and known concern. I assume selling merit will result in negative trust feedback, but it will probably not result in users losing their rank.
If you are asking on how did the merit system affect higher rank users, well, it depends.
Legendary members are obviously not affected by this in a negative way at all, since they can't rank up anyway.
As for Hero and Senior members, they got some merit in the begging, but it made it very very hard for them to rank up further.
Closer you were to ranking up, more negatively did the merit system impact you.
If you were a week or two away from ranking up, like I was, then a sudden requirement of needing 150 merits slowed down your ranking up a lot.
I was lucky to get the merits I did, but I still haven't ranked up since the merit system was introduced.
Merit selling can only result in a very limited harm. I have discussed this before: a) You can possibly sell you initial merit. This is just a little amount and once it is gone you can only get it from a merit source. Thus, the damage is limited. b) The remaining option is to buy from a merit source. This could only be done in limited manner, as the merit given by sources is public and, eventually, forum members would discover it (post of low quality merited, too much merit to the same users, etc.) So, the system is not perfect, but is not that bad. |
|
|
|
In my country you will get in trouble with the police if you kill or injure a burglar. It is crazy. You can't legally defend yourself. And if you do, maybe it is best NOT to call a police  I recently read about a case, where a burglar had come to a house, and slipped on the slippery pathway and injured himself. In that case the owner of the house had to pay the burglar for his injuries. (There is a law, that requires house owners to keep roads non-slippery) LOL where do you live? In the UK, where this happened, you have the right to defend yourself from an aggression, but furthermore, you DO have the right to strike preventively if you have a well founded suspicion of someone going to harm you. You cannot however go after someone who hits or harms you if the individual is running away or not going to harm you further. In most European countries you get the right to self-defense with proportional means (don't use a gun if the other guy has only a stick). However, once things go to trial, it is very difficult to prove anything. |
|
|
|
Have 1 merit for that one. It is not that I necessarily agree, it is that the title of your post is super-fun |
|
|
|
|
I think that you don't fully understand the concept of risk in business terms. Your post is very emotional and I am sure that those that get emotional about crypto will enjoy it.
|
|
|
|
|
Creo que el mercado de criptodivisas es muy pequeño para ese tipo de inversores. Si entran pondrán un poco y seguramente no será su prioridad en cuanto a la gestión de activos.
|
|
|
|
|
It is one of the best to make profit, but it is also very demanding beacuse it takes plenty of time to choose a good one and to make profit from it once it has become a success.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I guess everyone in this forum is sad they did not buy 100000 bitcoins when they were worth nothing, but alas, now we have to create our new chances of richness by ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|
I do believe in cryptocurrency as long as I have positive proof that cryptos are creating value where there was nothing and meanwhile creating value for myself and my investments.
|
|
|
|
|
Una caverna, una ICO, una pasta que puedes ganar si te apuntas. Ahora que el ether es barato es la occasion de tener vision de futuro.
|
|
|
|
|
These are all excellent initiatives, but it may be difficult to put them into practice as the coin or token economics need an incentive for the developers of the system and that is more difficult in these cases.
|
|
|
|
|
Airdrops are rarey worth the effort and lately the term is being used to describe bounty hunts like in the case of the ONION coin and others that say is airdrop when they mean bounty hunt.
|
|
|
|
|
Incluso en situaciones dificiles, podemos conseguir grandes resultado con la ICO adecuada: Ice Rock Mining.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
