Izgleda da ce u BestChange kampanji biti slobodna dva nova mesta od sutra.
Jesi siguran da nije neki bug? Po bpipu oboje nisu banani, a koliko vidim i lovesmay je bila i aktivna nedavno, ostavila je post poslije ove tvoje objave. Vidim neki vec poceli ostavljati prijave u BestChange threadu haha Edit: Oboje su nedavno ostavili postove tako da se ta skripta ili šta već koristis očito zbrejkala. |
|
|
|
I am sure his image is also FAKE!
Yeah, I recognize few stock photos used on their website, I don't even have to do reverse image search as some of those are often used. I must say that this is one of the worst DeFi scams I've seen lately, and I've seen quite of those. The only reason for me to share this is that I am sure, he is going to do same thing with many freelancers. He will first get the work done and then ask Fiverr to cancel it.
It is good that you reported these scammers, as you said they probably try to contact others and in case someone googles YFPO they will get this result. I know it's late now, but next time when you get hired for something like this, do simple reverse image search via Google images or Yandex. Chances are, if they have fake team members, they will try to scam you as well. |
|
|
|
As others have said though it doesn't really matter as he's not on default trust. I think in cases like these it would be helpful if a user could leave a follow up comment/give their side of the story.
According to bpip he is on DT2, so his feedback is visible, I can see it too. Personally, I see the Negative trust as overdone. The person seems to have posted a report after the Campaign was concluded. That does not warrant negative feedback, as Trust it is not meant to be used as a tool to tarnish/punish based on campaign management specifics. The trust feedback has nothing to do with:
Even though he warned everyone that he will leave negative feedback for submitting bounty report after its over it does feel like an overkill. Bounty campaign manager should have closed the thread after bounty ended, but he went afk and I guess some bounty hunters thought it's not too late to submit their reports. |
|
|
|
inace ja brijem da kinezi namjerno uspore btc chain...
Ma cisto sumnjam da namjerno usporavaju. Nego, zavrsila je sezona kisa u Kini, ide susno razdoblje pa se majneri prebacuju sa hidroelektrana na ove klasicne pa je u tom periodu pao hashrate, a jos se povecala i potraznja zbog rasta cijene, i eto onda velikih feejeva. Kao sto si spomenuo, difficulty ce se prilagoditi i to je to. |
|
|
|
I'd suggest trying to check the ones mist active. A tiny thread with only a few posts, if moved, would probably just be deleted and the op will relaunch back in the same place. A thread with a good level of interaction and number of replies is less likely to be deleted...
Yeah of course, that's what i did, I don't wanna waste mods and my own time by reporting abandoned/dead threads so I focused on brand new or active ones. So far all reported were moved, but I won't overdo it. If someone mistakenly posts a topic in the wrong section, the moderators will move it to the right place.
True, but for that to happen someone has to report it and somehow I doubt that mods are going through that board checking which one should be moved, seeing how many are in section. And that's fine, mods probably have too much on their plate anyway. Recently I have come across many topics with the same content: Is it a DEFI? What do you think DEFI scam? Why is it dangerous to invest in defi? ..
May wait a bit until the market settles everything in its place.
No surprise considering the amount of hype around these glorified ponzi schemes. Market will settle when enough people loose enough money, like in ICO bubble. History tends to repeat itself. |
|
|
|
A kad se nikome vise neda pisati u gamblingu. Pogotovo ako ne pratis sport, ona sekcija sa casinoima je totalna bljuzga.
Ekipa samo shitposta, il postavi neko pitanje bez da ikad provjeri odgovore, nego iduci tjedan opet pita isto pitanje, i tako u krug.
Da vjerojatno taj requirement od 7 postova tjedno u gamblingu odbija neke, ali shitposter vulgaris domesticus bi pisao i na temi o kvantnoj fizici i teoriji struna ako treba, nece ga to obeshrabriti. Bas gledam druge zahjeve, prilicno su strogi. I jos na to treba dodati da se broji samo 5 domacih postova. Ali opet, 0.006 BTC za Hero je cca 80 USD, sto je fina lova. Posts in Games & Rounds, Investor-based Games, Off-topic, Lending, Auctions, Serious Discussion, Micro Earnings, Politics & Society, Archival, Announcements (Altcoins), Bounties (Altcoins), Scam Accusations, Signature Campaigns threads, or Spam Mega Threads will not count. hvala za informaciju, nisam primetio na vreme i zakasnio sam da se prijavim, ali bice valjda neka druga prilika  E jebiga, steta, izgleda da se gazdi zurilo jer je mjesto popunjeno za 2 sata. Meni je puno veći problem to što netko dođe pa napiše da je Ronaldo super igrao za vikend a lik ne igra 2 tjedna jer je pozitivan na COVID.
Ma takvi nisu vidjeli loptu u zivotu a kamoli Ronalda. Pogledaju malo sta se pise na temi, izguglaju koji rezultat utakmice i onda ostave shitpost. Rinse and repeat. Najbolje rjesenje je ovo sto @Trofo radi, platis i onda pises na temama sa ekipom koja i zna neki kurac. |
|
|
|
Ima više dobrih kampanja nego ikada (od kada sam ja na forumu) i to se itekako vidi. Kako si i sam napisao konkurencija radi čuda i više nije dovoljno ponuditi par satoshija da bi se dobilo čak i prosječnog korisnika. Kampanje nemaju izbora osim platiti dobro ili prihvaćati totalne shitpostere a to im po meni više šteti nego donosi koristi.
Pa da, najavljivao sam to ovdje prije nekog vremena, da ce jednostavno kampanje morati nuditi vise jer mjesecima raste broj aktivnih kampanja i konstantno dolaze nove, a broj kvalitetnih clanova je ogranicen. Evo recimo da ja sad imam neki biznis koji hocu promotati na forumu, i to dugorocno sto znaci da mi trebaju kvalitetni clanovi, nemam bas puno opcija sto se tice placanja. Ako ponudim 50 USD tjedno za Hero/Lege, dobit cu ostatke ostataka koji se nisu uhljebili negdje. Ako dam 75 tjedno, ni to mi ne garantira da cu dobiti kvalitetne postere jer em sto ih je hrpa vec u boljim ili slicno placenim kampanjama, ili nece samo tako prijeci u novu ako im trenutna ide vec neko vrijeme. Na kraju ti ostaje nuditi 100 USD tjedno, pa se na taj nacin moze privuci ekipa iz Roobeta i slicnih kampanja . Eventualno mozes pokupiti dobre postere za malo love ako imas srece pa taman pokrenes kampanju kad neka prestane. Seller's market FTW  To je sada već puno zdravija tržišna ekonomija i mislim da bilo tko ko je loše plaćenoj kampanji može riskirati prelazak u novu nedokazanu kampanju koja dobro plaća jer i u slučaju da ona prestane s radom bez većih problema se može naći nova.
Da, malo je zajebanije kad si nizi rank ali kad dodjes do Hero/Lege ranka, onda nema uopce dileme da li se isplati malo riskirati. |
|
|
|
It looks like he managed to rake in almost $60k in ETH in less than 2 months, not bad for something that was pretty clearly a scam from the beginning. I guess people weren't doing their research on this project before investing -- this thread probably comes up as a 1st page Google search result.
Not bad ROI at all, considering low quality scam he pulled and amount of time invested. And sums an average DeFi nicely, in which only creators earn something, while rest loose money. For them it is indeed high-yield, and reason why we see so many. I guess people weren't doing their research on this project before investing -- this thread probably comes up as a 1st page Google search result. This still baffles me, that people have no respect for their money, therefore hard work needed in obtaining that money so they are ready to give it away so easily without spending 5 minutes googling. if you ask him. As he does to invest in the currency?, he shits with fear and does not answer, or answers with evasions and ends up kicking you out of the group
I guess you are one of those that invested in Yearnify? If yes, I hope you didn't invest much. |
|
|
|
Roobet ima jedno Full member mjesto otvoreno. @casperBGD posto si ti i dalje u Bitvestu, eto dobre prlike za upasti u jednu od boljih kampanja
We have 1x Full Member position open, apply now!
Tower bet isto ima par slobodnih mjesta: 2 Legendary
1 Hero
1 Full member still open
A Wolfbet nikako da popuni ta Hero member mjesta The following positions are still open:
6x Hero Member
Ocit je nedostatak kvalitetnih visokorangiranih membera pa se vec krenulo u lagano pojacavanje isplata, i snizavanje trazenih rankova. Samo neka tako nastavi, konkurencija cini cuda, tko god sada bude htio pokrenuti dugorocnu kvalitetnu kampanju morati ce dobro platit, za 50 tjedno sada dobijes Hero/Lege shitposter, sve sto valja vec je negdje a i nece prelaziti za istu ili slicnu lovu. |
|
|
|
Ok, so the first batch of reports is "good" and mprep merited jackg's post so I'm assuming I'm the right track  Yeah, looks like it's working. For testing purposes I reported 9 ANN threads that should be in Tokens section, and so far 8/9 are moved to appropriate section, while one is still unhandled, waiting to be moved. I just need to figure out a better way of figuring out which of those threads are tokens. Reviewing 1000s of ANNs is not fun.
I don't see any other way other than manually checking each ANN. And yes, it won't be fun to check all of them as there are shit load of them, but job could be done if focused on active threads and ignore abandoned ones for now, or save for the end. I think it is wrong when Ethereum (2nd most famous cryptocurrency) is discussed in the same section as the new shitcoin, which takes 1xxx place on the coinmarketcap.
Perhaps need to add new sections, for example "new projects" which are less than 1 year old. This time is quite enough, because scam projects die earlier.
While it is 2nd most popular one with 2nd biggest mcap etc, but it is still an altcoin, therefore in the right section with all the other altcoins. All these new shitcoins will die soon anway, so imho no need for another section just for them, and then move them to other section if they survive etc. Thanks to bump changes Ethereum thread is mostly on the top anyway, so it's not like you have to go through bunch of pages to find it. |
|
|
|
|
Kratko i jasno, ne. Neki dan je jedan član podijelio baš taj Coinbase referral i ako se ne varam bilo je obrisano u roku od sat vremena. Forum ima problema sa referral spamom pa onda brišu i ono što je zapravo korisno i ne šteti nikome. Valjda im je tako lakše.
|
|
|
|
Don't these projects have Tokens that run on eth? Is so, then they do belong to altcoin forum.
They do, that's why they should be in Token (Altcoin) section that is reserved for token based projects and not in the Announcements (Altcoins) where only altcoin should be. But it's free for all situation there, it's a complete mess and I'm sure many that post there don't even know a difference between coin and token. They just posting it , and i guess they will be doing again even we have or get a DEFI section.
I sure hope this crap won't get special section as all this hype will die off sooner or later. |
|
|
|
I don't understand why people keep replying to such posts, and its not about new members either, high ranked members do the same.
Answer is simple and obvious: to fill up the signature quota. This is the only forum where you have actual incentive to shitpots and answer to shitposts, so of course even high ranking member will do that (and those are usually in the signature campaigns, therefore having even more incentive than a Newbie/Jr Member). It's the same reason why trolls are so successful here, as people have incentive to engage in pointless discussions. I also noticed that Offtopic board gets more and more spammed with zero value posts and topics. Let's see two examples:
Those two examples sums up Offtopic nicely. It is a cesspool and even if you make an interesting topic (Movie topic for example), it will attract low quality posters who just wants to dump their post to increase activity or eventually those that are in signature campaigns that counts posts written there. I have a feeling that mods simply gave up on that (despite having "No low quality posts and topics" rule, similar to altcoin/bounty section. I was somewhat active there when I joined forum, but I gave up eventually. People will start changing posting behavior when their posts start disappearing massively as a consequence of deleted topics but for that to happen mods should start deleting all non coherent and non well written topics. |
|
|
|
"Stolen names and photos". We proved it. Even having one stolen identity is enough to call a project a scam. "The team does not have enough experience" We have already proved this. We have shared Instagram, Twitter, Linkedin, and Facebook team members. Check it out. Do you think these profiles show a professional and reliable team?
Hm that's weird. Few days ago when I was checking your website I couldn't see any content whatsoever there, only scores. No links, no photos, no proof etc. I don't know what was the problem, whether your website or my browser but it works fine now. I agree about that part with stolen identity, it is a scammy behaviour indeed. One thing i would suggest you to add link to the real identity of"Dimi Lakis", so people can immediately check it. We appreciate your suggestions. We will try to improve our work in the next reports.
Another thing, please share ANN link when you are reporting, and as suggested try to use report format. You don't have to share all the evidence on the forum, but at least some would be good, and not just link to your website. It will only take you few minutes and your report will look much more substantial. Gonna tag EpoxyDao for having a fake team member photos but it looks like they don't care much about the issues as I see they are ignoring your post in the announcement thread. Let' see if we get their attention then. |
|
|
|
|
I would also add that when you are copying directly from the article to put that text inside quotation marks, as that's the proper way to deal with verbatim copying. While copying big pieces of article and just sharing link in the end is enough to cover your ass from being reported for plagiarism, it's still not right and in my opinion is dishonest.
I've seen quiet a few of those ( and not not just noobs ) not doing that part properly, whether due ignorance, laziness or simply wanting to appear that they wrote the whole thing by themselves.
|
|
|
|
Probably he meant to say you walk down the street and you see a machine with a sign that says "Yes, this is an ATM", another one that says "Withdraw 100$ and we give you 50$" and while you go around it you see it's 1 cm thin so it has no way to actually store money to give to you... Then what do you do? Since we are asking rhetorical question, here is another one: would you do bounty campaign of just another DeFi shitcoin for a couple of months without knowing exactly how much you gonna get, when will those tokens be distributed, with solid chances of not getting tokens at all, and being previously screwed numerous times in the similar manner?  Leaving that alone, I guess the problem mentioned in the OP post is this: Also, payments will not be made directly to the hunters ' wallet, but through the team's platform. gas fee fully fall on the hunters. And if you take into account the cost of the gas fee, many hunters will not get anything. True, that sucks. Since they allegedly migrated from Ethereum to Binance Smart Chain, they could at least give them those tokens as I heard transactions are much cheaper on BSC than they are on the Ethereum. It would be interesting to see a little math on it but...at this point it's a bit useless, there was never anything bounty hunters could do to force the team to do otherwise, you either chose a project in which the money for your work is escrowed or you gamble...
That bold part is what these altcoin bounty campaigns are, nothing else, so bounty hunters join as many bounty campaigns as possible, not choosing much, and hoping that few of out few dozens will be success. If bounty manager insists on escrow, projects will simply find another bounty manager who won't ask for that, and if by some miracle bounty hunters decide to go on "strike" and not join non-escrow campaigns, there are plenty of those that will see that as an opportunity to join and get even more tokens as majority of them are stake based, or even worse, make alt accounts and join with them. Only possible solution would be if bounty managers/campaigns have to be approved by the forum, but imho there are bigger chances for bounty campaigns to get banned altogether than that to happen. That quote about insanity generally attributed to Einstein fits well in all this altcoin bounty campaign mess. |
|
|
|
Bas gledam na https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper i vidim da i dalje nema naseg prijevoda na stranici. @Trofo vidim da si ti ranije spominjao da imas tamo neke veze, jesi ih mozda kontaktirao da se to ispravi? Ono cisto da se ne sramotimo, cak i Zlovenci imaju svoj whitepaper uploadan i stranicu prevedenu. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
