So TwitchySeal can go around harassing forum members, and you have no problem paying him to advertise your signature or leaving him positive trust, but if I advertise something you don't like, you have a problem with it and I'm untrusted? Even when I'm taking steps to resolve the situation as quickly as possible?
I just have a question, though - have you read this post? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322261.0If you haven't, I'd highly suggest doing so - with an unbiased mind. Also, from which account did Betcoin ask you to advertise for them? (If you wish to answer) |
|
|
|
Wait, you mean because I wanted to lend my signature space to him I should be punished? Oh dear god... I'm sorry, but just because we're responding to you negatively doesn't mean we're alts. After all, if that were the case, then I'm obviously an alt of TwitchySeal, Lutpin, game-protect, mexxer-2  Actually, thanks for bringing attention to me about the giveaways! That's actually pretty awesome that DarkStar_ and I are so in-sync. No wonder I wanted to advertise for him temporarily. Just remember, folks. When it gets rough, just accuse them of having alts! That always works, right? |
|
|
|
That thread is in the wrong section. This thread is about saving this forum the OP of the other thread has a different agenda.
What is the different agenda? Also, I would think that Reputation is more suitable as you would be posting of the users (which reputation is mostly used for) instead of things relating to the forum itself. I understand that spam is a forum-wide problem, but it just felt like a better place to put it. (Oh, and you can usually pick out a spammer easily by randomly going to any huge thread and choosing someone that recently posted. Most of the time, their replies are "redundant, generic and is a one liner") |
|
|
|
|
Nickname: actmyname
I like Crypto-Games.net because: The blackjack game kept me going for a while - of course, I was losing, but it was an enjoyable experience, playing my favorite table game. The dice house edge is also lower than typical, which is nice, and the faucet leveling uses multiple factors which is also appreciated for those who don't wish to gamble that much.
|
|
|
|
Seems to me like you'd want to go first... because at most, you get 3 attempts... and by going first there is always a chance you don't die on each one of your attempts, whereas by starting 2nd, you end up at 100% chance of death on your 3rd try... plus your odds are technically better for each one of your attempts if you are 1st... 1st attempt: Player A 1/6 die, Player B 2/6 die 2nd attempt: Player A 3/6 die, Player B 4/6 die 3rd attempt: Player A 5/6 die, Player B 6/6 die Although, I'm not exactly sure that is a mathematically sound explanation... perhaps it is more of a "gut instinct" answer??  However, the reality is that for player B to shoot, it requires player A not to die. That would change the probability. For example, for the first attempt: There are Player A dies: 1/6 chance Player A lives, Player B lives: 5/9 chance Player A lives, Player B dies: 5/18 chance Following this, what I'd previously posted begins to flip the odds in B's favor (provided my math is correct) quickly. Right now it seems as if Player A is the better option: and it would be, if it was only one round. |
|
|
|
|
Txids:
19e38b6c1a09b75b477a139d2b1c593d297d63d98f9be4a736d76d2d97574880 - 2
98e77bd0015f0b5a9e13e23a23ad913bda86715c163ddac3e30f18c3eea7d02f - 1
a1bf4399157290a038e7648391a1c91a1624976ffe3151a932796aa5e501fdee - 1
4 in total
|
|
|
|
Having a vendetta against Betcoin.ag and dragging in other members to remove their advertising and twisting shit up makes me give you the red you deserve.
Now why do people think that quoting a long post to in turn write a tiny one is a good idea? Just reply naturally, seriously. First off: I'm not sure about what was twisted. Secondly, have you seen this post about all of Betcoin's problems? Please read it, and avoid using ad hominem to say that the evidence is invalid - because it's not. If that doesn't change your opinion then not much more would. Better I answer here.....instead of making a 3rd edit....of adding feedback to the Scammer gameprotect which no doubt is either Twitchy himself (which I believe is that jason jackpot guy) (from Og thread) Please stop. Making these ridiculous connections with accounts only makes you look more ignorant. Also, if you know about the problem with the Betsoft jackpot, then why would you still trust Betcoin? It doesn't make much sense - a player wins a jackpot, the casino refuses to pay out and ignores him for several days, then offers him a settlement to shut up and promote Betcoin (in a few posts anyway). How is that trustworthy exactly? |
|
|
|
I've never visited it yet, but always remember don't try invest any investment site
I would shorten your message to this... There is no opportunies out there, there is no magic investment site that will give u huge profits. There is no mining investment that will give you profit. Best investment? Hold your bitcoins man. hashnest was worth investing in, IIRC. They branch off of BITMAIN and are unlikely to scam. Although I wouldn't advise investing in cloud mining in general, due to the fact that there are some other opportunities that may be better. Like working. |
|
|
|
Can you upload that screenshot to an image-hosting site, like imgur.com so that we can actually see it? All you did was [img]http://C:\Users\home\Desktop[/img] which doesn't do anything. I'm not on either side of this argument - I just want to see your evidence, if you have it. Earlier today all I saw was that you came on for a few minutes, gambled, then left. I also noticed that you kept the same amount of bitcoins (so perhaps you lost some in the time that I was gone) Ray also might be idled during the IRC - not everyone is there 24/7, you know. |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0Everything you need to know about addresses. It's usually good to search the username of the person - and exclude all but Meta to see if they've posted in "Stake your address". Otherwise, you would use but remember that it lists all addresses that the user posts - not just their own.
|
|
|
|
I mean, the answers are probably already said in the first pages and of course, a single user cannot read back to know if his answer is already said because of too many pages.
A single user cannot read back to know if his answer is already said - it most likely has been said. If you have a thread spanning longer than 20 pages, and you're about to post something general or vague, then that's worthless because it's already been stated countless times before. Especially if the topic title is vague and general. Especially if you only looked at the topic title and worded your reply off that. Anyone who continues to post in that manner of responding only to the title should be considered a spammer. There are some rare cases where someone asks a genuine question (not one that's absent-minded and seemingly has substance, but is just spam) to which you may answer. That, I would consider, to be one of the only acceptable times to reply in those spam megathreads. However, in reality, you should just avoid them entirely.
Let us not forget about those who quote other people's insubstantial posts and pretend to have a discussion, just feeding off each other. And those who quote and "agree" with other people's posts. "yes i agree, x will definitely y" |
|
|
|
It kind of proves that they are scammers honestly, why would they close the topics If it's not because they got exposed? I can't say that they didn't make it look legit (even If it's just a little bit) with the Spreadsheet on Google documents + the beautiful design of the signature. The spreadsheet is not being edited anymore as well: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zE__87DOv3PLcM8MaOzqbByj6k31cbHE19qDyCYiRYI/edit#gid=0 , I know there was someone called "Bitcoin evil" editing that file but not sure about the email or If someone could get the email just by the name. The signature is actually incredibly simplistic in nature - using a few ASCII symbols for the arrows and hearts, and the rounded font choice of Century Gothic with their colors. However, the spelling errors in the member and full member signatures add some hint of sketchiness - "powerfu" and "powerfull" respectively. You can't get the email via just the name - you would have to be a part of the document (have it shared with you) to see the contributors' emails and information. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=387329laiyskylone has liqui exchange in his signature, the original ann-post for the hybridmixer sigcampaign promised to pay out to the liqui-exchange deposit address of the sigcampaign members (IIRC). This text was edited out pretty soon, but i was one of the first people who read the OP of their sig-announce thread, and i seem to remember it. Also, IIRC, liqui-exchange also ran a promo giving away 1 LTC Coincidence??? Liqui has also been having some issues with their campaign members, IIRC. i have not yet received any payment in my liqui account.
and just for the record i am leaving this campaign and i would be happy to join again if your pay-rate is competitive and also you have fixed the problems.
its not work on my account, my btc balance still 0 please recheck again sir  |
|
|
|
I have said it to many who have helped me, but let me extend my thanks to the community. I truly do owe a debt of gratitude to many people who helped me publicize my case. Without their help I would have gotten nothing. I'm not asking for anyone's help currently. I am trying to help others avoid the issues that I went through. The fact that you think you and the community are somehow the ones who got fu**ed here is laughable. I'm pretty sure I'm the one who was fu**ed.
Let me just leave this here (says much about your integrity) I want to thank Betcoin.ag staff for helping me come to a resolution with BetSoft on the matter of my spin on "The Glam Life". I have said in my forum posts on bitcointalk.org and other places that my issue was with BetSoft and not Betcoin. Andrew and the staff at Betcoin.ag have always been good to me, and have continued to support me in this matter with BetSoft. They were unfortunately caught in the middle of this situation as the BetSoft slots are played directly on BetSoft servers, and they not Betcoin.ag decide the payouts for the slots. Andrew has helped to connect me with BetSoft, and today we have come to a mutually agreed upon settlement. This settlement is confidential, so please don't ask the details. I will continue to play with Betcoin.ag, and hold no ill feelings towards them, quite the contrary. I look forward to continuing my relationship with Betcoin.ag and feel very good about their actions in helping me to resolve this matter.
Jason you are as two faced as it gets. But please do continue crying . Let me just highlight this: Andrew has helped to connect me with BetSoft, and today we have come to a mutually agreed upon settlement. This settlement is confidential, so please don't ask the details.
Do you know what that means? It means he was paid to shut up and back up Betcoin (until now). He took the settlement because realistically, that was all he would have been able to get from them. And now that he is able to publicize the reality of it, he does. Correct on all counts CL-Ed. I have pretty much given up any hope of seeing another dime from my lost jackpot. Just wanting to warn others of the bad behavior of betcoin.ag and BetSoft.
Well, truth be told, ignorance is bliss. So is youth. |
|
|
|
How is it that as soon as a situation unfolds, people are always accused of having a mass of alternate accounts? It's simply illogical and takes from your argument (or lack thereof, in most cases). And what preceded that ? A bunch of Twitchy and Lutpin attempts in forcing their opinion on the rest.
I'm not sure that telling people not to advertise a scummy site with a huge history of problems which were exposed with evidence is "forcing their opinion". I sure as hell wouldn't want someone respected to be advertising a ponzi, for lack of a better comparison. Don't try to make this about me. I just wanted to show how majority of Lutpin +rep is begged out of.
And this untrusted feedback allows him to... (Also, are you going to quote that original post, or not?) And Luptin Look at your trust ratings, you're just engaged with shit tons of drama. I feel bad for you.
What drama? He just hate people's who don't like him.I think Luptin have shit tons of alt account to support him.Og-nasty should just ignore his alt's !
Edit : I feel like Mexxer-2(Alt of luptin) going to pop up soon.
1. List his alts. You should be able to prove at least one link, if Lutpin (which you spell incorrectly) has that many alternate accounts. 2. This is ridiculous and unwarranted. |
|
|
|
|
Btctalk Username: actmyname
Bitsler name: actmyname
Post count: 1161 (including this one)
Rank: Sr. Member
Bitsler Deposit address: 3B4sFf523aYKNTrftyVQUB646vWsfudhZY
|
|
|
|
Please don't contact me with offers over $0.3. I still need this...
Why don't you check for free virtual phone services online? All it takes is a simple google search of "receive sms" or something like that. That's much cheaper than 30 cents, don't you think? |
|
|
|
U're totally right. This "traffic" is useful to no one.
Not true. When theymos runs auctions for ad spaces on the website, he also includes data as to how many impressions previous ads have seen. Removing signature campaigns would decrease the impressions that ads see, and in turn, the amount of money brought in from ads for the forum. U're totally right. This "traffic" is useful to no one.
Both account sales (multi accounting included),and campaigns should be straight out forbidden. Quality over quantity. Until then, it's wild west.
I agree with you on the possibility of banning account sales. I think that would do good around here to cut down on the number of signature spammers there are going around posting absolute trash and cluttering up topics. The problem with banning account sales is that you're banning the sale of Bitcointalk accounts on this forum. There's nothing stopping these dealings from going on elsewhere, and accounts still changing hands. I don't agree with you on banning signature campaigns. Although there are lots of users simply spamming for satoshis, there are plenty of users who actively contribute valuable content to the website and who wear paid signatures too. It makes sense to me - if you're already going to be posting on this website, why not get paid a little bit for doing what you're already doing? After skimming through the data, it seemed that the only times that the past was competing with current impressions is back when the price skyrocketed during 2013, and unique ips were triple what we have right now (300k!) However, I would like to state that logged-in users make up about 12.5% of the total impressions, and perhaps ~40% of those are in signature campaigns? (Hard to tell.) That would not cut off too much traffic relatively, though it would be noticeable. |
|
|
|
Having ten accounts doesn't help you with anything. Campaigns (good paying ones) need max 90 posts a week in average as I can see. 90*4*10... 3600 posts a month to get your ten accounts paid with the max amount. You don't have time to write so many posts.. over 100 posts PER DAY. Even having a secondary account is hard. What is the point? I mean, 10 posts with the main or 10 with 5 accounts.. same thing  And that is why there is spam. They put in less effort for the same amount of payment. Why wouldn't they do that? It's less work, but the reward remains the same. |
|
|
|
Art: http://imgur.com/a/uK7cxPrimedice username: actmyname Only played around with some images, oh dear. (Can it be called minimalism?) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
