[quote author=xolxol link=topic=5161689.msg51715521#msg51715521 date=1562318695]
thats the old flag,these 3 flags are new and its clearly an abuse of the new system.
[/quote]

Moving right along...

http://loyce.club/trust/flags/39.html

40 Insufficient support. Lauda flagged Bitcoin SV (type 3, see why). Supported by Foxpup, Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, [size=1]mosprognoz, Iamtutut, GeoRW, korner[/size]. Opposed by theymos, malevolent, chimk, [size=1]jbreher, Quickseller, peloso, MirkoIta, hv_, HardFireMiner, sirsplashalot, williamuk, actisstupidname, Bitcoin SV, breign[/size]. - In a thread started by nutildah although the it's obvious that the thread concerns the coin called Bitcoin SV, the actual user Bitcoin SV isn't mentioned. (might be splitting hairs I know, but the thread can be locked at any time thus null and voiding the Flag).  The majority oppose the Flag including theymos.

47 Insufficient support. Lauda flagged bill gator (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TheUltraElite, [size=1]Timelord2067[/size]. Opposed by OgNasty, malevolent, redsn0w, The Pharmacist, eddie13, Steamtyme, [size=1]TECSHARE, Quickseller, Rmcdermott927, bill gator, teeGUMES, Thule, otrkid1970, actisstupidname, BharatDEX[/size].  - Lauda has voided his own flag by locking the thread but not withdrawing his support.




[glow=orange,2,300]49 Active.[/glow][/b] [glow=#FFFFE0,2,300]Lauda flagged deeperx (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, Avirunes, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, micgoossens, [size=1]mosprognoz, N0sferatu[/size]. Opposed by dragonvslinux[/size]. [/glow] - @Lutpin (not @Lauda) gives merit to the thread this Flag and the following flag cite.  The thread goes for 117 pages, so there is clearly substance to it with crypto-rainbow (following Flag) being cited in the OP, however, in one of those TL;DR moments, I can't find the accused @deeperx mentioned in the first page of the thread.

[glow=orange,2,300]50 Active.[/glow][/b] [glow=#FFFFE0,2,300]Lauda flagged crypto-rainbow (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, Avirunes, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, micgoossens, DireWolfM14, [size=1]mosprognoz, N0sferatu[/size]. Opposed by dragonvslinux[/size]. [/glow] - the accused is the subject of the thread which has run for 117 pages.  Lauda didn't start the thread, so there is always the risk the flag will be voided if the thread were locked.

[glow=orange,2,300]51 Active.[/glow][/b] [glow=#FFFFE0,2,300]Lauda flagged PHI1618 (type 1, see why). Supported by [size=1]Lauda, mindrust, Vispilio, micgoossens[/size]. Opposed by mhanbostanci, [size=1]TECSHARE, Quickseller, 2run, Matthias9515, PHI1618, Dogan86, zfrey, huseyin15, gospodin, vipganyan[/size]. [/glow] - In this flag Lauda accuses two users, PHI1618 and BCT Staff member EFS, but only creates a flag on the soft target PHI1618.


Although Lauda creates the flag, he does not respond to any of the multiple questions put to him (including the accused PHI1618 responding to justify what he had done) concerning the accusation in the thread that was started on the 12th of June 2019.

[glow=red,2,300]52 Active.[/glow][/b] [glow=#FF9696,2,300]Lauda flagged MemoryDealers (type 3, see why). Supported by Foxpup, Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, infofront, yogg, mindrust, Hhampuz, HairyMaclairy, micgoossens, [size=1]Hueristic, mosprognoz, GeoRW[/size]. Opposed by theymos, Stunna, malevolent, [size=1]jbreher, Quickseller, MirkoIta, iwantapony, actisstupidname[/size]. [/glow] - Lauda seems to falsely claim that he engaged in a contract with the accused (and is not the starter of the thread) - @theymos amongst others oppose the red flag.  The OP @TheNewAnon135246 has not created *any* flag against the accused who had not been online for nearly three months prior to the thread being started.

This seems to be the only one so far that has substance:

[glow=orange,2,300]64 Active.[/glow][/b] [glow=#FFFFE0,2,300]Lauda flagged The-One-Above-All (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, owlcatz, babo, LFC_Bitcoin, yogg, o_solo_miner, TMAN, Lafu, micgoossens, bitmover, ChiBitCTy, DireWolfM14, 1miau, [size=1]Timelord2067, IconFirm, mosprognoz, blurryeyed, cabalism13[/size]. Opposed by Quickseller, xolxol, The-One-Above-All, actisstupidname[/size]. [/glow] - even @theymos supports the Flag.

---

Our running totals for the 13 Flags that Lauda has created:

Two Red flags which offer no proof - one of which he withdrew support.

Seven no reason/revenge , three users not mentioned in the fake flags out of thirteen studied flags.  Two actual accusations and one Lauda does not respond to questions with the majority of the flag's voters voting against.

---

Eleven out of thirteen Flags ~ 85% of Lauda's Flags are inaccurate when you look right into it.

...then one of the of the LoyceBots ^TM Mk V comes along and resets your chip.

LoyceV helped me quite a while ago with some data for the known alts thread which I appreciate him doing.

He was also creating simple vanity wallets for others (without charge).  I think he's too swamped under with other work to do any these days.

Not sure if it's been pointed out so far, but Hhampuz has withdrawn his support for the Flag he created against Quickseller:

56 Active. (Withdrawn!) Hhampuz flagged Quickseller (type 1, see why). Supported by Vod, Foxpup, Lauda, minifrij, babo, yahoo62278, chronicsky, LFC_Bitcoin, redsn0w, The Pharmacist, yogg, Lesbian Cow, mindrust, nutildah, marlboroza, TheUltraElite, bob123, Timelord2067, IconFirm. Opposed by TECSHARE, BayAreaCoins, Quickseller, iwantapony, lighpulsar07_alt[/size].

---

After the grief I received from @marlboroza when I said I wasn't going to give that person distrust, I think I'll respect Hhampuz's request for distrust.

If/when they lock this thread and rescind the request, then I'll gladly remove the distrust.

In the meantime...

Thanks for your support - just a reminder that although this isn't a moderated thread I ask that now most of you have had your laugh that you please keep the posts civil.

---

Example eight, we go back to Flag 103:

103 Active. Lauda flagged sgbett (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, Hhampuz, micgoossens, sgbett, GeoRW. Opposed by jbreher, MirkoIta[/size].

sgbett starts a thread Craig Wright recognised by US Govt as Satoshi, author of white paper and has been slapped with a Flag by Lauda for his troubles.

This is the OP:

---

Just for clarity, there are no flag creations by Lauda between Flag 103 and 284, so the running tally is (six no reason/revenge and two user not mentioned) fake flags out of eight studied flags.

Continuing to count backwards

286 Active. Lauda flagged Thorecoin (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. - Other than Lauda's one line (shit post?) Red Trust and flag of The OP Thorecoin (who has absolutely no other Trust Wall, good, bad, or indifferent). Lauda does not provide a reason why he believes Thorecoin requires a flag.


285 Active. Lauda flagged Pete550 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. -  Pete550 has a 79 page thread - Lauda's post #1,570 quotes a source then makes this threat:


284 Active. Lauda flagged Dogedarkdev (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. - While the thread Lauda cites discusses a potential scam, Dogedarkdev (the subject of the flag) is not mentioned even once in the thread, or the Reddit thread that is cited in the OP.

---

So far out of six Flags created by Lauda, four gives no reasons or are revenge flags while the remaining two flags the subject of the flag isn't even mentioned.

---

I've only just spotted this:

35 Insufficient support. <U>(Withdrawn!)</U> Lauda flagged Quickseller (type 3, see why). Supported by mosprognoz. Opposed by theymos, malevolent, qwk, redsn0w, Pamoldar, crwth, chimk, DdmrDdmr, TECSHARE, Quickseller, peloso, actisstupidname, BharatDEX, rakasss.


Which as with the previous identified Flags created by Lauda is a thread that wasn't even started by him.

Quickseller vs cleaning up the forum - one of those tedious threads, but clearly @Lauda did not enter a contract with @Quickseller - so I have opposed the flag.  (That makes seven Fake Flags from seven Flags looked at)

---

Likewise, I am sure.  (did it months ago)

Your Tiara is slipping Lauda.

Have now found the last three Flags created by Lauda don't seem to meet the criteria that the thread is about the person being flagged.  Am going to have to have a look at the other flags Lauda's created.

Reserved #2

Reserved #1

Comment:

Flag 712: @bobitza , @ChuckBuck , @Enre , @JollyGood , @RBF , @rhomelmabini , @robelneo , @sabotag3x , @ScamViruS are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg53951875#msg53951875

Flag 1260: @AlexSimion , @joksim299 , @nullius , @TheUltraElite , @TMAN , are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg53951875#msg53951875

So far I've come across three flags Lauda has created whereby the thread is not the subject of the flag or the UID isn't even mentioned in the thread.

http://loyce.club/trust/flags/35.html

304 Active. Lauda flagged xolxol (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. - Lauda appears to have engaged in Trust (Flag) abuse after xolxol posted this in their thread.

294 Active. Lauda flagged proudhon (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. - proudhon makes one post which is replied to by another poste of the thread in a civil manor. (If the thread is so bad, how come the OP wasn't flagged??)

288 Active. Lauda flagged Khaos77 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by Khaos77[/size]. - Khaos77 doesn't even post in the thread and is not mentioned.

---

I don't have time tonight to review more of Lauda's Flags, but to me it seems he is using the Flag system to punish others.  What's @theymos' position on the creation of Flags?

This thread is being used by Lauda to promote their flag against xolxol https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=304 (the thread) was neither started by Lauda, nor is the subject of the thread concerning xolxol.

I believe that Lauda is engaging in Flag Abuse.  What's @theymos' policy concerning Flag abuse?  Is there a thread to report such things occurring?

No one seems to be monitoring the creation of flags.

4 Accounts Connected:

lobcmt2, thd26bct, btcsmlcmnr, btcsmlcmnr159, <--- this last one, not the highlighted last one in the image)

[color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color]



yahoo62278 has flagged the above (except the last one) without giving an explanation.  The last UID was created at the same time as  so it's more than likely that they are alts, hence it is included here.

---

2 Accounts Connected:

doublebitcoin24hours, Bitcoindoublerin24hours

[color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color]

Registered 146 seconds apart and are consecutive UID's.

---

2 Accounts Connected:

Timelord2067, Timelord2o67

[color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color]


 :-* 8)

s/he did the same thing to me. As with DireWolfM14, my Trust Settings distrust of nutildah was little more than a tit-for-tat when I saw they'd given me distrust.

I've never met either, but if they want to be like that, then so be it - water off a duck's back.

Hard to say. Given what's transpired with Cryptopia, it should have sent a shiver down the spines of exchange operators and served as a wake-up call.

---

From this site: https://www.grantthornton.co.nz/update-for-cryptopia-account-holders-3-july-2019/ Key points we should be taking away is as follows:

Thanks for the update - Chat with Hex and Saddam on Twitter:

• https://twitter.com/Triple_HeXXX
• https://twitter.com/sa_ddam213

In that link you shared is the following:

Website: https://www.grantthornton.co.nz/update-for-cryptopia-account-holders-3-july-2019/
Title: COMPANIES IN RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION Update for Cryptopia account holders 3 July 2019
Byline and Date: 03 Jul 2019
Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190703131629/https://www.grantthornton.co.nz/update-for-cryptopia-account-holders-3-july-2019/

---

In case I haven't mentioned it before, there is also an FAQ page here:

Website: https://www.grantthornton.co.nz/faqs-cryptopia-liquidation/
Title:  COMPANIES IN RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION FAQs: Cryptopia liquidation
Byline and Date: 17 May 2019 (updated 3rd of July, 2019)
Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190703215057/https://www.grantthornton.co.nz/faqs-cryptopia-liquidation/

Looks like Hex has lost control of his website:

2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140510005052/http://triplehexxx.net:80/ (notice Hex says his site was hacked - in 2014???)
2019: https://web.archive.org/web/20190703051831/http://triplehexxx.net/

Website triplehexxx.net URL taken from this Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/TripleHeXXX-Industries-806210706060256/

Chat with Hex and Saddam on Twitter:

• https://twitter.com/Triple_HeXXX
• https://twitter.com/sa_ddam213

When you work out the answer be sure to let me know. 

Yeh I'm seeing there's a few coins that need to be locked away just to be able to transact on the Lightning Network.


I'm looking at trying out testnet coins for a little while and will then try out the main-net version again.


Soon my precious...  

Hi Nigel from ?SA?, the reason you are still a Newbie a year or more after merits were introduced is partly because you haven't posted in almost the last six months and what little you did post no one found merit worthy.

The second button on the middle row should help you out.

Anyone wanting to do this trade should take some one with them and meet in a public place such as a library,