Funny how that website leaves out the metrics that are actually important in determining the true popularity of a coin, like active addresses, average transaction size and total hash power of the network. Wonder why that is.

BSV is a joke led by a fraudulent cult leader. Its going nowhere as an honest investment until Craig is removed from its equation entirely. Based on its actual utility and minus the Faketoshi Factor, I put the fair price of SV to be somewhere between $30 and $40 a coin. Everything above that at the moment is based on Craig's everlasting charade.

I have, many times. Most recently I can remember the case of irfan_pak who you incorrectly linked to a wallet not belonging to him, your 8 flags against the Turkish community (only 1 other member supported 1 of your flags, the rest are all opposed by over a dozen other members), and of course when I brought up this gem in which you refuse to remove a negative feedback after explaining to you they were joking about having hacked cryptopia.

Here's some other examples of your erroneous negative feedback:

Thule   2020-01-10   Reference   Narcissist.

Do you really think its appropriate to leave a negative feedback for being a narcissist, especially when the account has already been tagged to shreds?

humanrightsfoundation   2019-08-27   Reference   Who creates a self-moderated thread in the *Reputation* section?

This guy was in all likelihood a scammer for other reasons but making a self-moderated thread in Reputation is hardly grounds for a negative.

Lauda   2019-07-09   Reference   ~85% of all Flags Lauda has created are without basis or proof. I do not trust this behavior.

Again, not a good reason for leaving a negative feedback. Instead of leaving a negative, simply oppose the flags and perhaps voice the reasoning behind your opposition in their reference threads.

Sandwiched between these dates are dozens of other ratings which I disagree with but I don't have time to go over all of them individually. But I feel referencing 13 instances of misuse of the trust system should suffice for the time being.

Here's a tally of guesses for the Super Bowl scores so far:

nutildah: SF 24 - KC 22
Hueristic: SF 37 - KC 34
tyKiwanuka: SF 25 - KC 51
wheelz1200: SF 31 - KC 35
DireWolfM14: SF 49 - KC 3
willy2streams: SF 34 - KC 28
kingcolex: SF 28 - KC 24
South Park: SF 34 - KC 27

6 for SF vs 2 for KC, exactly mirrors the poll.

Don't think I missed anybody, so if you haven't put your guess in yet, now's the chance!

My first interaction with TS that I can recall having was asking him why he was so upset with the trust system given his great rating, and this was back during the time of the old scoring system, when he had zero DT negatives. I was just trying to ask him an honest question and he proceeded to be extremely condescending in his answer, going so far as to compare himself to Morpheus. Long story short: you can't stop some people from going nuts.


Not true. I've pointed out several times to you how you were wrong, more than I can remember. This isn't exactly the thread to get into it though.

He's just a troll. Half his posts either mention me directly or are attempts by him to troll me. He wouldn't even be in this thread if I hadn't posted in it. Ever since I helped oust his scam exchange (Trade Satoshi) from the forum he's been following me around from thread to thread. I'm putting him on ignore and I recommend others follow suit.

I LOL'd at about 4-5 of them, have to admit most of these are pretty good. In #6 I like how they gave Putin an Addidas jacket.

I saw this one quite a while ago, its probably my favorite of the bunch.

Don't feel bad. When I first saw it I thought it was a bra.

I've never actually seen one before, but I imagine they look something like that.

But really, I thought it was a bra for about 2 minutes.

Well, my faux argument wasn't whether the wallet contained malware or not, it was whether that fact rendered the poster of the link a scammer. Do we have to wait until the account was proven to have profited from introducing malware onto the computers of others before we can justly tag them as a scammer? Because I'll tell you right now: theymos bans them right away.

Regardless, I do appreciate your appreciation.


JollyGood is also pursuing that interest.


By stating a rational argument I suppose, similar to your own.

That's hardly a point when all we have are our opinions. Who's to say that an account posting links to a malware-laced wallet client for their shitcoin is a scammer? Isn't that just an opinion as well? In a non-scientific based nor rigorously tested environment like this one, what differentiates a fact from an opinion other than opinions?

We all work together to find some sort of common sense resolution to issues and establish a protocol for handling them. The opinions of those who aren't willing to make concessions of any sort are eventually cast aside. As far as I know there have not been any exceptions to this rule.

Frankly I don't understand what your beef is. Your negative was removed, and the YoBit signature campaign has come to an end. Why are you still arguing with people in this thread?

What does it matter when its transactions are tiny?

BSV avg transaction value: $717
BTC avg transaction value: $47,226

BSV sent from addresses: 19,468
BTC sent from addresses: 259,122

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/sentbyaddress-btc-bsv.html


You've been saying that for a year now, yet the BSV hash rate remains a tiny sliver of that of BTC's.

https://coin.dance/blocks/proofofwork

Perhaps you should save your low IQ trolling for the moderated thread. I won't bother to correct your misinformation over there.

Update

korner is currently using these accounts to once again troll the forum and sling mud:



That's a trick question. Obviously I can't give away the formula because the patent on it is still pending, and it would ruin my chances for winning the Nobel prize if I did.

What's especially nefarious about this project is that their website insists that you sign in to a social media account using a sketchy app called GiveLab. By "signing in" you grant them a ton of permissions to basically control your account:



Its absolutely not worth it, in case there was any doubts.

FreeBitco.in has been around for quite a while and has a long-standing presence on the forum, but since I've never actually made a deposit or withdrawal from there I won't vouch for their abilities. If you are up for some risk, there certainly lies some decent arbitrage opportunities therein. You could stand to profit from either outcome by placing a bet on the Chiefs there and on the 9ers anywhere else.

Its not like freebitco.in knows something about the Super Bowl that we don't -- their bettors are probably just biased and oblivious to what's going on in the sportsbooks.

I just read through my first 5 pages of posts, and for the life of me, I can't remember how I heard about Bitcointalk! Perhaps it was mentioned on one of the bitcoin podcasts I used to listen to, probably "Let's Talk Bitcoin" or something. Most likely I found it via Google search and signed up after doing some lurking.

My first post on the forum is no clue at all -- just asking about where to find nodes for an obscure and now defunct altcoin. I remember I was so enamored with the idea that I printed a fancy, decorative paper wallet for it and kept it in my actual wallet, ready for the impending day that BonesCoin would finally be accepted at Starbucks!

Well, things haven't exactly progressed the way I once envisioned. I stopped keeping a mobile Dogecoin wallet about 2 years ago, and now do all my BTC transacting from my PC. Cryptocurrency just isn't really for brick n mortar retail spending it turns out, which is fine, as its proven to have other uses.

JG -- I think your negative is a bit harsh for these accounts as the YoBit campaign is now over in its entirety.

There's no doubt that YoBit is sleazy and X10 is obviously a Ponzi but I don't think your 24-hour window was long enough.

Would you perhaps consider adjusting these ratings to neutrals?

As of now, with a week to go, the 49ers have 5 votes and the Chiefs have 2 votes. Looking back at their odds of winning the Super Bowl at the beginning of the season:


If the Niners win, that would be a 33.5x payout had you bet on them at the beginning of the year -- not bad! Chiefs are far less exciting at 8.3x.


I was just thinking the same thing. The Pro Bowl just doesn't seem like real football because the stakes are so low. As crazy as it sounds, maybe they should have the 2 teams play a game of basketball or softball.

RIP Kobe. What a random story.

Thanks guys! The learnmeabitcoin.com tool is exactly what I was looking for.

For some reason I can't load walletexplorer.com at the moment but I'll try again later.

OK, so I did just that.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deceitful


The behavior described above fits this definition perfectly.

I would say accusing a signature campaign manager of theft with one account while sneaking into one of his campaigns with another is pretty deceitful.

What do you call it?

I mean really, who in their right mind does that kind of thing? People who care about money more than anything else in the world, I suppose.