|
Is this real, or war from another magnitude ?
Don't get me mad man !!
|
|
|
|
Head and Shoulder pattern, I feel you are right, Klee. |
|
|
|
There will be time when Chinese exchanges will be irrelevant!  Care to elaborate more please  |
|
|
|
Wake up! Coffee time!!!  I saw what you did there |
|
|
|
Send me a list with prices of office , please buddy Sent it for you |
|
|
|
Is it using the blockchain though. No matter how hard that article tries to make it sound like they're using the bitcoin blockchain no where does it say that. They are using BLOCKCHAIN technology. Nothing to do with Bitcoin or the price of it. Even if its on the Bitcoin blockchain they could do whatever they are doing with fractions of a coin. No effect on price as they're not about to go out and by 100k coins to carry out whatever it is they are doing.
I didn't say it would do anything to price but it is running on top of the BTC blockchain. http://www.coindesk.com/chain-nasdaq-partnership-pr-stunt/'The shares, he said, will move on the Open Assets protocol, a colored coins implementation that allows users to augment small amounts of bitcoin to represent shares. These shares can then be transfered and tracked across the bitcoin blockchain.' https://github.com/OpenAssets/open-assets-protocolFrom a fundamentally motivated, speculative perspective, this is maybe the crucial question that'll be answered over the coming years, maybe decades. Quote from the article: Still, while Nasdaq has decided to build on top of the bitcoin blockchain, Ludwin suggested that Chain, and by extension, Nasdaq, are taking an agnostic approach to the technology.
"We believe that there will be an Internet of chains, there will be many, many interoperable blockchains," he continued. "As that innovation moves forward, one of the things that Nasdaq and First Data have selected us to do is make that transition very simple, starting with Open Assets but over time [maybe] moving that to a sidechain without interrupting the service." I agree with that, as I don't follow the binary way of looking at Bitcoin's success that is held widely. My premise #1: The Bitcoin blockchain is relevant (in a niche field, so far), and it will almost certainly stay relevant (to some degree). No comparably minor complications (mining centralization! max blocksize! waste of energy!) is likely to change that. However: My premise #2: Other blockchains (and by that I don't mean sidechains) will become relevant as well. Most likely, they will mainly differ from the BTC blockchain in the degree to which they are built on making "trust tradeoffs" (to reduce costs, to allow final "oversight" by some authority, etc.). The price per bitcoin will then largely depend on which side the scale of the options above will be leaning - major assets and financial products being tied to the original blockchain (or its sidechains): moon time; most financial products being connected to proprietary chains: the Bitcoin chain will most likely remain marginal, and price will reflect that - although a market cap in the range of some billion USD is still compatible with that scenario, just not the OOM increase everyone is quietly (or not so quietly) hoping for. Could you tell me please how is Bitcoin price affected in your two premises ? And in general, using blockchain in general, it has no effect on Bitcoin right ? For example Bank X will use bitcoin blockchain for their usual works. |
|
|
|
Can you pm me the list, for single and bulk orders? Thanks
I've sent the list for you my friend. On a side note, Windows 10 is out now |
|
|
|
Average Joe.
Yup. Pretty much everyone despite it being easy enough to learn a few facts in a minute or two. I don't know if Bitcoin is the end product, but I don't see how anyone could look at what it does and not think there's a future in there. Not everyone one is like us, mand. We are believers and hauling for the long-term and have a way far vision. One of the main issues, even I face it, is buying BTC. Still BTC is difficult to buy in most countries. It is a hurdle to teach what BTC is and it holds a value. It really needs help to be more widespread. I would love for someone to do a experiment. Put a paper wallet of BTC worth 10 dollars and a 5 dollar USD bill on a table and let person take one. I think were so early in BTC a lot would take the 5 dollar fiat money. I would love to see some numbers on that if I am right. I just think a lot of people still don't understand BTC. In 5-10 years its hard to say what it will be like, but I hope in that time all will pick the BTC worth more and know about BTC. Guess time will tell. I've been told something about Bitcoin from a reputable member and I've read on some online bitcoin magazine where they were interviewing some bitcoin related power-person "BTC will be used like Linux is used for the internet". What I want to say is, it's not a must that people understand BTC, to use it. All the Average Joe want is, cheap, nearly instant and easy payment system. Don't forget it can work as an asset as most of us do now by hodling it. I like the idea of the experiment, +1. It could be done with some popular youtube people and I see it easy to be done where some good bitcoin exchanges like coinbase for example, sponsor the experiment. In 5-10 years, bitcoin will be either a big thing or worth nothing, take a look at my signature, but I go with first. |
|
|
|
Average Joe.
Yup. Pretty much everyone despite it being easy enough to learn a few facts in a minute or two. I don't know if Bitcoin is the end product, but I don't see how anyone could look at what it does and not think there's a future in there. Not everyone one is like us, mand. We are believers and hauling for the long-term and have a way far vision. One of the main issues, even I face it, is buying BTC. Still BTC is difficult to buy in most countries. |
|
|
|
There is a long, boring quiet time (base-building) prior to the second large rally. We are nearing (or at) the end of a similar phase, so it does indeed look "strongly bullish". You don't have to wait until $550 (for example) to call it the (probable) start of a major bull market. Anyone who isn't buying when it passes 400 is mad. Also, you should read my last post before this one. Why $400 on purpose ? I expect the pattern at this point is going to trigger recognition in a lot of people at the same time, especially if the price has been climbing rapidly for many consecutive weeks. Got it, you mean until $400, it's a must-buy cheap coins. |
|
|
|
Average Joe.
Could be. It will be a while before I sell BTC though paypal. Just a lot of risk it seems as seller. Sadly paypal is always been buyer protection. Sellers don't have near the protection. The day I can sell BTC from paypal and not worry about chargebacks would be big. I think we are far from it though sadly. I wouldn't never sell BTC for PayPal under any circumstances. And every payment processor is kind of a scam for me tbh, PP, Skrill, Payza, all this shit. When people got to know Bitcoin well, they will laugh on themselves for how they were using these shitty payment processors. |
|
|
|
There is a long, boring quiet time (base-building) prior to the second large rally. We are nearing (or at) the end of a similar phase, so it does indeed look "strongly bullish". You don't have to wait until $550 (for example) to call it the (probable) start of a major bull market. Anyone who isn't buying when it passes 400 is mad. Also, you should read my last post before this one. Why $400 on purpose ? Kind reminder, Beliathon |
|
|
|
Seems so |
|
|
|
There is a long, boring quiet time (base-building) prior to the second large rally. We are nearing (or at) the end of a similar phase, so it does indeed look "strongly bullish". You don't have to wait until $550 (for example) to call it the (probable) start of a major bull market. Anyone who isn't buying when it passes 400 is mad. Also, you should read my last post before this one. Why $400 on purpose ? |
|
|
|
Something should happen in 2-3 hours...
I told you soo...  If you don't mind, could you elaborate for your novice-in-charts friend about the 1d MACD green candles please. It was green from 10.6. to 16.7. And today is green again. It is a relatively slow indicator to it takes time to switch. Thanks for elaboration, so you mean that the green 1d MACD will be the trigger for the coming up leg ? |
|
|
|
Something should happen in 2-3 hours...
I told you soo... If you don't mind, could you elaborate for your novice-in-charts friend about the 1d MACD green candles please. |
|
|
|
Something should happen in 2-3 hours...
I told you soo... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
