Doesn't matter.
He can't even mention about his countries problem.
And he isn't the president of bitcoin.
Countries? How many countries does he own? just one country which has all over countries) I think the way it's really working is that whenever someone says "And we are intensely pursuing the BLOCKCHAIN technology in (medicine, financial, blah blah blah)... there is a message being sent at the same time, the unspoken but heard message... "....And dudes ----BITCOIN ROCKS!!!!" If true then President Trump is a powerful voice, not a weak echo... |
|
|
|
.....
Its kinda obvious at this point Trump is/was a money laundering front for Russian oligarchs; you buy expensive real estate, sell cheap back to Trump, and your money is legal. This is to subvert the Magnitsky Act; small wonder why Don Jr was discussing the very same act with known Russian operatives. You have to be blind not to see this at this point; there are even anomalous real estates deals (buys property for 10 mil, holds for a year or two, sells back to Trump for 5 mil) on the public record; this isnt debatable at this point as well. Since this is known, and Mueller is clearly pursuing this angle, it will be up to Trumps lawyers to paint this in a better light. Kusher will be complicit as well; all the real estate dudes that hang with Trump will be complicit.
If they convict Trump, they will say "treason". If they find out that he is being blackmailed or coerced, which also seems obvious to me, they will say "high treason". He has so much general dislike that at this point, he may see jail. Deep State! (that was also plain sarcasm, but he will most likely be seeing jail. the deep state isnt real dammit, as least as Breitart/Infowars tells it)
Just let this train wreck, and get off while you can. folks, no one helps the guys that could have helped himself.
But im just a talking head on a forum.....
Have you considered writing fantasy fiction for a possible very low paid, but rewarding, career? |
|
|
|
Has Trump mentioned BTC at all?
My guess: Trump is Pro America. Trump is thus pro Dollar and wants companies like Apple to bring all their billions off shore back in the tax system. Trump is anti deep state and anti status quo. Bitcoin is and shall remain away from any gov and states in the world. I love Trump but It would be strange if he would embrace Bitcoin. On the other hand Trump would and should love the Blockchain and applied the protocol to the US bureaucracy. The deep state HATES keeping braid crumbs behind. Hard drives get destroyed or disappear. FOIA requests are delayed, or trapped in the even horizon of a paperwork black hole. Applying Blockchain tech to a gov would be a paradigm shift of a biblical level. The citizens would find strange and unethical for a government not to have a blockchain protol in place afterward. Either way: Trump does not like bitcoin. People who hate Trump would put more trust in BTC and the value goes up. Trump loves Bitcoin and the system would be ready to accept it as an official currency, making the value of bitcoin goes up. Just the guess of a newbie on bitcointalk. Hmmm..... But has Trump mentioned investing in gold? Has he mentioned Apple Pay? Etc. Of course the answer is no. It wouldn't surprise me at all if we start hearing him or his admin mention blockchain, though. |
|
|
|
Yep, that sounds about right. |
|
|
|
The interesting part to me is the absolute desperation in your replies trying to convince someone that you are far beyond everyone's understanding. I started pointing out things changing in major ways, but you'll find some little bit of evidence countering some scientist's claims at some point.
Where exactly is the absolute desperation? I only see that in the attitude of Warmers, desperate to keep their stupidity in front of everyone. |
|
|
|
I agree that today her Christians are very much eager to fight and are fighting even in foreign countries. But nonetheless Muslims do very bad things, and in these acts of terrorism there are a lot of peaceful people.
Islamic terrorism is something unique to that religion. No other religion has equivalents. If you study the holy books belonging to all the major world religions, you will understand why there are so many terrorists who are Muslims. Islam is an ideology which encourages violent acts and genocide against the infidels (or the non-believers). That's why there are so many continual sock puppets on this thread sternly lecturing to us about being good pacifist turn the other cheek respect all religions be a stupid cow or sheep. |
|
|
|
The most corrupted organization man created people dont need religion to live peacefully. Bitcoin and some wine can survive my cravings.
You don't have much crave. There's bacon... There's women... And grapes... |
|
|
|
It is not the islam that hatesvthe people..
But it is the people who were bent by their wrong beliefs ...
Commitment to evil doings is a choice of those whove done it and not by their religion...
Fascinating how many try to "correct" the thinking of people on this thread that simply point to aspects of Islam as the problem causing Islamic terror, when instead they should correct the thinking of Islamic terrorists. But no. They are silent there, and only seek to correct Westerners. What fools, to ignore what is right in front of them and that is obvious. |
|
|
|
...They hate other religion like Christian because Christian making fun for their religions. And admit it same people think if they sow a Muslim they think it is a tattooist. And Muslim just have different belief from Christian they don`t eat pork .Muslim think if you eat pork you are a sinner. So they think we are a sinner. ....
They hate... They think they are better than other people... Well, we already knew that. |
|
|
|
See how carefuly the media has avoided using the term "Muslim".
They have gone in to great details in pointing out the nationality of the rapists. Check this:"Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Indian, Iraqi, Iranian, and Turkish heritage". Instead of typing all this, they could just write that all of the rapists were Muslim. But they will never do that.
And now it is the turn of NewCastle after Rotherham. The United Kingdom has become a heaven for Muslim pedophiles.
One thing I don't understand is the widespread reporting of these as "Asian rape gangs." It's an insult to Asians, and the countries mentioned are not, by any standard I know of, "Asian." Can anyone shed some light on this? |
|
|
|
Of course I did, as i said, I live in Paris suburb lol
I saw them many times, lived few km away from the riots started in 2005 ..
But there are many weird stuff with colonial past too, you probably heard that, and next to this, all rest seem isolated story..
And not sure what Islam has to do with car burning, you saw this on faux news too ? .. between two news as why usa need to do a drones war in the middle east, make sense now.
There were car burning in france at least since 90's, before usa needed to steal oil from middle east, nobody care de about it, and Islam was no even mentioned lol
I don't read or watch faux news, so your presumption there is as wrong as many of your ideas and prejudices. But it was reported that the yearly 1000+ car burning occurred in lower income neighborhoods largely populated by Muslim immigrants, and at least one report is that most arrested for these crimes were (Muslim or "immigrant"), I forget which offhand. You live there, your opinion? |
|
|
|
Japanese ideology is from shintoism.
This thing is always product of some form of brainwashing by military entities. Such as samouraï.
And they did horror in china before the Pearl harbor thing you heard in faux news.
Japanese attack on Pearl was pretty standard surprise military attack, BUT... Kamikaze attack subs and aircraft, suicide bombers, have striking resemblance to standard Islamic terror methods. Japanese WWII (and pre WWII, in China) use of torture and barbaric methods is also similar. |
|
|
|
Extremism and fanaticism in any religion can lead to terrorism.
Ah, the most parallel examples to Islamic fanatic behavior is not in other religions, but in two political entities. A) Japan. The behavior of it's soldiers and citizens leading into and through WWII. B) North Korea, today. But then, Islam is a political movement hell bent on a global Caliphate. You forgot the OAS in Algeria  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_arm%C3%A9e_secr%C3%A8teThe Organisation armée secrète or OAS (meaning Secret Army Organisation) was a short-lived right-wing[1] French dissident paramilitary organization during the Algerian War (1954–62). The OAS carried out terrorist attacks, including bombings and assassinations, in an attempt to prevent Algeria's independence from French colonial rule.[1][2] Its motto was L’Algérie est française et le restera ("Algeria is French and will remain so"). Secret Army Organisation Organisation armée secrète (in French) The OAS was formed out of existing networks, calling themselves "counter-terrorists", "self-defence groups", or "resistance", which had carried out attacks on the FLN (Algerian National Liberation Front) and their perceived supporters since early in the war. It was officially formed in Francoist Spain, in Madrid in January 1961, as a response by some French politicians and French military officers to the 8 January 1961 referendum on self-determination concerning Algeria, which had been organised by General de Gaulle. By acts of bombings and targeted assassinations in both metropolitan France and French Algerian territories, which are estimated to have resulted in 2,000 deaths between April 1961 and April 1962, the OAS attempted to prevent Algerian independence. No, I didn't forget it. I mean exactly what I said. Look at the similarity between Japanese Kamikaze and other suicide mission profiles and Islamic. |
|
|
|
Just to remind how sometime the one Shouting the loudest against a crime are not always the more innocent lol https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/02/front-national-activist-on-trial-for-politically-motivated-arsonA young party activist for France’s far-right Front National (FN) has gone on trial accused of setting fire to cars in secret late-night arson attacks in order to complain about rising crime and insecurity. Adrien Desport, 25, who stood for the FN in local elections in 2011 and once headed communications at a local party branch in Seine-et-Marne outside Paris, appeared in court in Meaux with five others on charges of arson and vandalism, conspiring to commit crime, drug charges and faking an attack on himself. Attempt to defeat an argument with isolated news stories? Actually every year you have a virtual rampage in France with thousands of cars burned, don't you? |
|
|
|
Extremism and fanaticism in any religion can lead to terrorism.
Ah, the most parallel examples to Islamic fanatic behavior is not in other religions, but in two political entities. A) Japan. The behavior of it's soldiers and citizens leading into and through WWII. B) North Korea, today. But then, Islam is a political movement hell bent on a global Caliphate. |
|
|
|
Compared to Trump I prefer Obama, I think Trump is only suitable for businessmen, not suitable for dealing with national affairs.
Good, given the state that national affairs have sunk to. Let's restore national affairs to the level of honest business and honest business transactions. |
|
|
|
nope,.i have no reason to hate Muslims... Besides, my religion taught me to love my neighbour as my self and they are also my neighbour
No, your religion does not teach that life is a suicide pact; neither does it teach that you must be passive when another religion teaches to kill you. |
|
|
|
You can't judge a person on the behalf of its religion.Because a person can be judged on the behalf of his behaviour and character . You can't have a same mindset for the whole community.
For example: If I hate ISIS that doesn't mean that I hate Muslims. I hate that single person that belongs to ISIS whether he is a Muslim or a Christian.
So if I encounter a tribe of cannibals, I can't judge one to be a cannibal? |
|
|
|
^^^^ The Rohingya situation is quite complex. They are actually Bengalis, who ended up on the wrong side of the border after the partition of India in 1947 (both Bangladesh and Myanmar were ruled by the same colonial power). Now both these nations don't want the Rohingyas. An ideal solution would be to grant them British citizenship.
Why should the Brits grant them citizenship? The Rohingyas are immigrants from Bangladesh, and they should be going back to that country rather than harassing the peaceful Buddhists in Myanmar. The peaceful budhist ... is that so really lol So manichean view .. Budhist = peaceful innocent Muslim = hater Lol You got that straight from cia new feed right. . No, that could be pretty much from the religious and philosophical and practical works of the two groups. Of course I suppose Arafat's 400 terrorist bombings....doesn't prove he's a hater, right? lol.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
