No, that's not how it works. You need to provide evidence to back up your claims. If the system worked the way you suggest it should, half of the world would be in prison or dead because of hunches, feelings, and opinions.

Show us examples of some of those tags. I checked his most recent feedback and it's mostly related to people scamming or using multiple accounts in bounty and signature campaigns.

The post seems to have been deleted already, probably not due to its content, but because it was unimportant, off-topic, low-value, and whatnot. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't suggesting he should be banned. He shouldn't be here because of his mental problems that need to be professionally treated. He is obviously triggered by everything and everyone and a community with lenient rules where everyone can say whatever they want to certainly doesn't help him recover.

Yes, Bitcoin Core should do the trick. I found a post from achow101 from a few years ago. He explains how you have to import the public key into your watch only wallet for P2PK outputs to become visible. You can't import the address they are supposedly in because P2PK scripts don't have addresses. The public key should create the correct watch-only wallet.

 

What happened with the computer that you originally installed the Multibit client on in 2015?
Is it the same computer that you use now?
Did you give it to someone, did you sell it?
What do you use your computers for where you keep you wallets and private keys? Any torrents, pirated games, porn?
How tech savvy are you? Do you believe you could have caught some type of malware due to your internet activities?

The keys were imported from Multibit and maybe a second computer. That means the same keys exist and were hot in two different software wallets and possibly two different computers.

It's worth questioning why a product can be considered open-source if they use a closed-source secure element and no one knows what it does except that the company promises it doesn't do anything bad. And Wallet Scrutiny posted an interesting snippet from Keystone's Github:
https://github.com/KeystoneHQ/Keystone-system

All their products are (still) marked as "no source".

So the individual board components are manufactured in China and then they get shipped to France where a domestic company puts them together and creates the final product. There really isn't any issue with that besides their unnecessary claims that it's made in France. There is no need to lie about outsourcing certain work to the Chinese because everyone does it and it's cheaper. Lying about it just makes it look like you have something to hide. Considering all the letdowns Ledger has caused in the past, it doesn't surprise me one bit that everything they do now is questioned.     

So the guy found a vulnerability in the DAO and reported his findings. But he wasn't taken seriously and the developers thought it couldn't be exploited. To prove them wrong, he hacks the protocol and creates havoc for Ethereum. It really could be that German/Austrian lad. Even so, the article doesn't explain how he did it in a way for a non-computer and tech savvy housewife to use similar methods to discover what her husband has been buying.   

I tried to find something, but except the crap that you come across from search engines when you search for discount and promo codes, there isn't anything useful. Those who owned Cobo Vaults in the past could take advantage of a 50% discount on the purchase of a Keystone hardware wallet. Not sure if that is still valid, but it doesn't hurt to ask. Send them an email at support@keyst.one and ask if they can give you a discount.

Check this out:
https://twitter.com/keystonewallet/status/1400448019259027458

Alternatively, you can check if anyone has any codes on their Telegram group or Discord.
Seems they aren't active on Reddit.

E to je već pitanje za milijun kuna. Svaka centralizovana burza bi mogla da izmisli svoja pravila i načine postupanja kad je "taint" u pitanju. Pa čak i onda koje prvobitno ne zahtjeva KYC bi to mogla uraditi ako joj postaneš sumnjiv što miksaš coine. Ko si ti uopšte i zašto nam otežavaš da te pratimo, kontrolišemo i deanonimiziramo?

Evo zanimljive teme za one koji žele da prate kako Wasabi namjerava da surađuje sa kompanijama koje vrše analizu blockchain transakcija, cenzuriše određene coine, i spriječi vlasnike istih da koriste njihove usluge. Što je najgore od svega, rade to dobrovoljno jer ne postoji zakon ili regulatorno tijelo koje ih na to prisiljava.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5286821.0;all

A new breech of customer data and this time it happened back in December. I wonder how many other hardware and crypto companies have been hacked but are keeping it a secret. It's getting to a point where you should consider that your personal data has been leaked unless proven otherwise.

So the ex-employee has client names, portfolio values, payment information, and social security numbers. Wonderful. At least we haven't seen the data being sold somewhere. I guess they got to him in time.

Storing your coins on a hardware wallet has many benefits compared to keeping them on centralized exchanges. But not all coins that are supported by the older Ledger devices work on Nano S+ currently. Monero, Polkadot, and Terra are some of the ones that are currently not working. Check out this post by dkbit98 or go to Ledger's reddit for more info.   

Me too, but it should be noted that Ledger is also closed-source and not reproducible from source.

That's not something that is exclusive to Ledger. All secure elements are closed-source and Trezor could be the first one to develop an almost open-source chip.

Wives and employers won't be able to follow the trail from the source to what was purchased. They also can't acquire this information by asking Wasabi or blockchain analysis firms. Analysis companies feed their data to government institutions and other 3rd parties. It remains private in a way that the wife and employer won't be told about it.   

Nemoj tako. On nama svima želi dobro. Kupio je Twitter da nam omoguči neograničena prava i slobodu govora. Već se spekuliše da bi se Trump mogao vratiti nakon promjene vlasničke strukture.

Nisam nikada koristio te mixere za alternativne coine. Bilo bi zanimljivo provjeriti koliki broj korisnika imaju u poređenju sa npr ChipMixerom. Što je taj broj veći, veća je i šansa da se sakrije porijeklo novca.

Ne sjećam se taćno, ali neke centralizovane mjenačnice to već rade. "Taint" je već postao problem jer burze kao što je Coinbase odbijaju transakcije gdje novac dolazi sa kripto kasina a vjerovatno i mixing platformi. Pizdarija i bezobrazluk ali može im se pa to i rade. Kad bi slične analize radili i provjeravali novčanice koje su nekad korištene za finansiranje prostitucije, kupovine droge, oružja, mito i korupciju, pola onogo što imamu u novčaniku bi bilo bezvrijedno i trebalo bi zapljeniti.

Očeivao sam i da će drugi slični meme coini kao što je Shiba značajno dobiti na vrijednosti ali bar za sad prate normalan rast Bitcoina.

Elon is a manipulator who couldn't care less about you, me, crypto, or Twitter. He is aware that he has a big following amongst the crypto community and uses that position to create hype for the coins he owns and previously acquired.

He has already been charged by the SEC for fraud, and although he didn't admit doing anything wrong, he paid a $20 million penalty fee and was forced to step down as the CEO of Tesla. He tweeted and lied to his followers about his intentions of taking Tesla shares private for a much higher price than what they were worth. He lied that everything is ready for the listing, only the Tesla shareholders would have to vote and approve the idea. That was obviously all an act that resulted in the value of the shares to increase.

You can read all about it here if you want:
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-226

It can be a total bluff, yes. It's a way to make the project look better and more important than what it really is. If their way of presenting the system to their community centers around listing on Binance, you should stay away from something like that. A useful project will try to explain their technology and how they are different from the rest. Posting Binance announcements, moon pictures, and things like that shows ulterior motives.   

Ride the hype wave, that's why. They abandon their original ideas or complement them with the newest crypto trends because they aren't getting the response and the cash flow they originally expected. To change that, they take the easy route. Let's introduce whatever the kids are playing with these days. Not that long ago it was DeFi, then NFTs, and now the term metaverse keeps popping up all over the place.

When was the last time you heard someone say ICO or IEO? It's old news and isn't trendy. People have gotten tired of it. Come back in 3-4 years and something else will take over the NFT and metaverse craziness we have today.

I have to say that you confused me with this thread of yours. I thought you were initially taking about somebody else because of the way you began.

The late Hal Finney is unfortunately no longer with us. He died back in 2014. Satoshi has left the project even earlier. I think in 2011. His identity and whereabouts have remained a mystery ever since. The merit system wasn't around in those days and it was a different type of forum. He is surely not coming back to merit anyone. For security reasons, theymos banned his account.

Anyways, good luck in your quest for higher ranks!

Ni Bitcoin ni Ethereum nisu zamišljeni kao privatni coini i blockchaini i moguće je deanonimizirati vlasnike adrese. Kompanije koje se bave analizom blockchain transakcija skupljaju podatke i rade na tome konstantno. Pretpostavljam da je to lakše učiniti što je jedan projakat centralizovaniji a Ethereum to svakako jeste.

Čuo sam da neki koriste Tornado Cash mixer kako bi sačuvali svoju anonimnost u radu sa Ethereumom. Nikad nisam probao tu uslugu ali vidim da podržava i mnoge druge mreže kao što su BSC, Polygon ili Avalanche. Slično funkcioniše kao i Bitcoin mixeri. Ali ako nema veliki broj korisnika i mnoštvo transakcija, teško može da održi visoku razinu privatnosti. Jel imao neko priliku da se igra sa Tornado Cash-om?

He might or might not have access to the account he is advertising. Only he knows that. The part where he doesn't want to disclose the name of the account before receiving the money can't be used as proof he doesn't have it. That's his way of protecting himself and his account from not getting tagged in case someone contacts him and asks him for information about the account and proof he owns it. In addition to that, even if he says he is selling account X, it doesn't mean he actually is. He could be trying to frame someone. Proving that he can post from the account is the only valid proof that he has got it.

Ja mislim da su oni odustali od ideje da proizvedu taj hardverski novčanik. Od novembra 2019 nema nikakvih informacija. Na Twitteru se pojavi jedan jedini tweet ako se upiše pojam "origokey".
Na YouTube-u imaju ovu najavu iz istog perioda i onda zatišje: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYzbfYfm6KA.
Facebook i Instagram također ništa. Na dnu stranice imaju i linkove za društvene mreže koje ne postoje. Piši propalo...