I don't know about that.
A lot of things could be read in a book and you can't actually read them online unless you bought them as an ebook. Internet and Books could be our resource of knowledge to trade.
Exactly. It's just plain wrong to say that it's not worth it to read trading related books. To be successful in anything, first you have to know fundamentals, and what's better way to learn those other than reading. Those who skip those basic steps and just rush into trading will learn soon enough that it ain't so easy to be successful, and that it takes a lot of time and effort, otherwise trading will be gambling and nothing more. An average crypto investor is impatient, greedy and ignorant so I'm not surprised that some even think that educating themselves via books is a waste of time. |
|
|
|
Jep, i ja nekako mislim da je ovo točno. Po svemu što sam računao Roobet je i dalje top kampanja, nisam znao da je ova BitCasino tako dobra. Po ovome ispada daleko najbliža CM-u.
Istina, Roobet sigurno spada u red najboljih i da sam tamo napustio bi je jedino u slucaju prelaska u CM, BestChange ili Yolo. Bitcasino i Sportsbit mozda ne treba ni brojati jer od kad sam ja na forumu ne sjecam se da su imali i jedno otvoreno mjesto. To je istina. U FortuneJacku je isplata bila 0.02 BTC tjedno a onda su je smanjili na 0.015 BTC. Mislim da je to bilo kad je Bitcoin preletio vrijednost od $9.000.
Kad BTC ode na 20k+, ocekujem da bude opet promjena u placanju, cisto sumnjam da ce itko osim CM zadrzati te cifre. Mislim da je opcenito situacija sve bolja po pitanju signature kampanja,, hrpa njih je otvoreno i nije im lako popuniti sva mjesta te ce jednostavno morati povecavati "placu" ako zele privuci ikoga tko valja. Baš gledam prijave za MyCryptoMixer kampanju i vidim da valjda pola ekipe stavi potpis odmah. Kao da će im to pomoći da budu odabrani, a zapravo samo rade besplatnu reklamu. Debili...
Vidi se da dugo nisi trazio kampanje, to ti je standard. Na sve moguce nacine pokusavaju da ih manageri primjete. |
|
|
|
Znam samo za BitVest i CM, imate još koju možda?
Ima ih jos par koje placaju u fixnim BTC iznosima: WolfbetLegendary 0.00020 BTC/post Hero Member 0.00015 BTC/post CoinbeneFull Members - 0.0013 BTC/Week. Senior (Sr.) Members - 0.0023 BTC/Week. Hero/Legendary Members - 0.0035 BTC/Week. AmepayFull Member : 0.0016 BTC/Week Sr Member : 0.0018 BTC/Week Hero Member : 0.0022 BTC/Week Legendary : 0.0025 BTC/Week Bitcasino.io Hero/Legendary Members =.018 BTC/week (.00072 BTC/post) Sportsbet.ioSr. Members (Tier 1)= .005 BTC/week (.0002 BTC/post) Sr. Members (Tier 2)= .0025 BTC/week (.0001 BTC/post) Hero/Legendary Members = .01 BTC/week (.0004 BTC/post) Tower.betMember .00135 per week Full member .00228 per week Sr member .0032 Hero .00411 Legendary .00502 YOLOdiceLegendary 0.00035 BTC Hero 0.00035 BTC Sr Member 0.00025 BTC Full Member 0.00015 BTC Od svih ovih kampanja, jedno Wolfbet i Coinbene primaju nove clanove. Samo problem je sto se ne bi zacudio da prilagode isplate ako BTC jako naraste. Mislim da je @Pmalek spominjao da su to radili i u FortuneJacku, koja je bila jaka kampanja, a nekako sumnjam da se ove slabije ne bi prilagodile. |
|
|
|
It’s true that campaigns used to pay much higher amounts a few years ago, and then those amounts got smaller and smaller - and as far as I can see the main role in that is played by campaign managers because they probably suggest to the advertiser what pay rates to set, and each advertiser will refer to those prices that have already been set, because why pay a Hero/Legendary member $100 per week, if all campaigns pay $40- $60 for the same thing.
I don't know exactly how campaign managers work, but I think setting up pay rates is combination of their recommendation and the client budget. It makes sense that if you plan to have signature campaign for a longer period of time to pay more than average in order to attract more quality members that will make signature campaign more successful and I hope that managers are suggesting exactly that. When I look at those long term campaigns (CM, Yolo, Bustadice, Sportsbet,Crypto.Games etc) that are going on for years, all of them (well with the exception of Bitvest and 777Coin) pay more than average so hopefully others that plan long term will choose that approach too. As a matter of fact, the one I'm currently part of, BestChange, did exactly that. They cut down number of participants significantly and increased pay rates, in order to attract/keep better posters. If a common position of all managers would be created that prices must go up, and that this must be accompanied by the quality of content, I believe that advertisers would agree to the new conditions. Regarding quality of content, what I would like to see is managers doing those "cleanups" more often, and removing not only those that don't meet post quota, but also those that don't meet the certain standards. People tend to get a bit lazy if they see that they are safe as long as they meet the weekly quota so maybe even unconsciously they lower post quality. I think nostalgia is getting the better of people.
Yeah I know that people tend to look at past through rose tinted glasses, that's why I was curious about that. It makes sense though that campaigns from 3-4 years ago were great in the amount of BTC payed out, since BTC was much lower back then, so maybe that makes people think of that, they remember all those big BTC payouts week after week. |
|
|
|
I can't recall the quote, but the admin is discouraging to leave feedback for spammers. That's the moderator's duty to prevent spam from the forum, shouldn't moderate spams by trust system. Just report to moderators if someone has been posting spams, suspicious links with malware.
Hm I had no idea that we are not supposed to tag serious spammers, like those paid shill accounts that work on announcement threads and that won't stop spamming until they get banned. In some cases tag works, as those that hire them don't want to see bunch of neg tagged accounts in their thread. Regarding leaving negative feedback to those that are spreading malware, I don't think that mods have anything against that, on the contrary. Even though mods are very fast when it comes to deletion of those posts, especially if they were reported in Report Malware and Suspicious Links here so Mods can take Action !, occasionally it takes longer to get malware infected posts deleted (for example during weekend) and in that case negative tag helps warning people not to download malware. At least that's what I and others active in that thread are doing. |
|
|
|
Is our voice weaker than all the other voices in the forum or we are not loud enough?
I just went through other local boards and if I'm not mistaken all of them have trust rating visible in the marketplace section so it is kinda weird that is not visible in our case. We really stand out like a sore thumb. After all, trade section is exactly the one where Trust rating being visible makes most sense and should be by default. In the end, why not making Trust visible across all boards and sections as I honestly don't see the downside of having that. Anyway, let's hope for the best. |
|
|
|
Moram priznati da sam bio u iskušenju posuditi novac ali nisam jer me mučio baš taj rang Member kao i činjenica da Maotezi nije baš redovan poster tu kod nas na hrvatskoj sekciji pa ni ne znam kakav je. Sad ispada da mi je drago da nisam.
Upravo tako. Maotezi nije bio aktivan na forumu od 2/2020, vratio se prije cca 2 tjedna i odmah nakon par dana trazi pozajmicu. Nadam se da ce vratit lovu, ali takvom clanu ja osobno ne bi posudio lovu pa makar bio i Legendary rank, a kamoli member, jer je dosao nazad na forum da trazi pozajmicu, a ne da bude aktivan ovdje. To se uostalom vidi i po tome da poslije pozajmice uopce nije aktivan. Ali dobro, lako sada pametvati. Ja sam kockar vec preko 15 godina i na godisnjoj razini nisam nikada izgubio lovu. Bilo je dobrih godina i losih godina kada sam jedva ostao u zelenom. Bilo je losih mjeseci kada bi izgubio vise mjesecnih placi i dobrih koji bi to odmah ispravili.
Takvi kao ti se nazalost mjere u promilima. Kockam dugo, (svojevremeno i relativno jako, sada samo rekreativno i za male iznose), radio sam i u kasinima i realnost je da ogromna vecina gubi pare (malo ce ih to priznati jer ne vode evidenciju). Velika vecina jednostavno nema kontrolu, i najgora moguca stvar koja se moze dogoditi takvima je da osvoje neku veliku lovu. U 99.99% slucajeva ce sve vratiti nazad, i jos ulupati hrpu svoje love. Dva bivsa cimera su bili hc kockari u vrijeme dok sam radio u toj bransi tako da ne samo sto sam gledao u takve na poslu 12 sati dnevno, imao sam prilku gledati sve sto ide uz to i izvan toga. U 2 ujutro cimer digne 100,000 kuna a u 6 ujutro moli mene da mu dam 10 kuna za burek. Da ne spominjem kamatare i sav pripadajuci cirkus. E sad, ko i uvijek, kod bilo kojeg ulaganja bitna je procjena rizika i ucinkovita kontrola banke. Necu ici u detalje jer bi mogao pisati danima ali recimo meni ni jedna oklada ne prelazi 2% banke niti mi ozbiljni listic ima vise od dva ili max 3 para.
To je pro mindset i kao sto rekoh nazalost je jako rijedak pa otud i generalizacija/stigma. Slazem se da se sa ozbiljnim pristupom da i tu biti u plusu, ali sto bi rekli, easier said than done. Ja osobno sam do sada upoznao samo jednog sto se tice sportskog kladjenja koji je uspjevao biti u plusu i upravo je imao isti sistem kao ti, max 2-3 para i apsolutna kontrola. Isto tako sto se tice kocke u kasinu znam za samo jednog koji je redovno uzimao, bez greske. Nije bio jak igrac, ali je imao svoj sistem kojeg se drzao kao pijan plota i redovno je na mjesecnoj bazi uzimao 3-4 tisuce kuna, a sto je najbolje, ostali su ga redovno sprdali jer je igrao na sigurno i nije odustajao od svoje taktike bez obzira na iznose koje je dobivao/gubio. Srecom nije bio jak igrac inace bi mu sigurno zabranili kockanje. Ostali su zavrsavali zna se kako.
Mozda ne bi bilo lose da se otvori neka tema o kocki jer lagano odlazimo u offtopic, a sigurno bi bilo interesa. |
|
|
|
A member who can make quality posts in English probably wouldn't be interested in a campaign paying that little, but $30-50 per week is a decent amount of money in a lot of countries where English is rarely spoken. It's the garbage shitposters who are heavily motivated by that kind of money.
There are quality posters in campaigns that are paying up to 50 USD/week, even Legendary members who due various reasons ended up in one of those lesser paid campaigns. Problem is that there are only few campaigns around that are paying more than that, and spots there open very rarely, and when they do, competition is tough and it ain't easy to get in, especially if you don't have shit load of merit earned in 120 days, as that is a big factor. In the end, 50 USD per week for some posting is not a bad pocket money, even in Europe and not only in 3rd world countries, so why not join if you gonna write on the forum anyway. Only problem is lack of good members to fill all those spots, so signature campaigns are slowly getting filled with subpar posters. I assume when you say March you're referring to March 2019, right? I can't remember what the price of bitcoin was back then, but the ICO craze had worn off and IIRC there was just a general lack of enthusiasm around that time period.
He referred to March 2020, and he is right. Just around that time I've started following signature campaigns more closely and I remember it being much harder than now to join any campaign. |
|
|
|
Ocekivano, BestChange ima jedno slobodno mjesto za Sr Member/Hero/Legendary rank. Sretno svima koji se prijave, biti ce zestoka konkurencija
We have 1 open slot.
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, the problem is not in the number of campaigns, but in the fact that there are almost no quality members to fill them, so the criteria have been lowered considerably.
I was just about to write the similar thing, as I noticed lately people that are probably not good enough for altcoin campaigns are easily getting into BTC campaigns. Quite the difference compared to beginning of the year when I saw quality members having issues getting into campaign and competition was much tougher for each spot. Somehow I thought that increased amount of signature campaigns will push up the prices accordingly but I don't see that happening. At least not yet. Sooner or later that will have to happen if number of campaigns keeps increasing because those that are paying for campaign won't get the results they expected if their campaign is filled with 2nd rate posters that write nonsense. And the only way to attract quality is to increase the payment. I keep hearing from veteran members that campaigns used to pay much more. What was the reason for that? Was it simply due different market situation, high demand for posters pushed the price or something else? |
|
|
|
I am not sure why adding new sections on local board is a problem. some very informative posts remain overwhelmed due to a large number of posts in one topic.
Yep, that baffles me too. I mean, I would understand that mods/admins or whoever is in charge of that are reluctant to add new sections to board that is barely active, but Croatian local board is consistently among more active ones, month after month. If we somehow don't meet criteria for a new mod at the moment, it would be nice to get at least that. It is not a temporary solution and we still need our own mod who understands our language, but better that than nothing. I don't even have to mention that among boards with similar activity we are the only one without the mod, and generally one of the rare few without one. |
|
|
|
Good catch, OP!
Just to highlight what @holydarkness said:
Yeah I checked their exchange, if you can call it that as there are almost no info beside few announcements: - No Terms of Service
- No fee structure
- No social media channels of any kind
- "Help", "Contact", "Condition" links not working
- Registration not possible as they ask for referral code that is not available anywhere
If they call that "meticulous development and testing lasting more than a year" then they did pretty shitty job. But beside all that, I think that this ridiculous exchange listing offering for 50 USD doesn't even have to do anything with this non functioning exchange, as it simply doesn't make sense. |
|
|
|
Mislim da ne treba stavljati neke sekcije koje ce biti malo koristene da se ne napravi opet preveliki kaos. No evo prijedlog prvi: Umjesto - Početnici i Pomoć, staviti Pomoc za pocetnike, sve u jednom  Slazem se sa prvim dijelom, da se treba fokusirati na one sekcije koje ce biti redovno koristene, a neke tipa mining na mislim ni ne trebaju, jer se ne sjecam kad je netko u zadnje vrijeme uopce ista pisao o tome, a cini mi se da ce u buducnosti biti jos i manje toga. Ja bih dodao dio za NFT iako je rano, ali mislim da ce dobro doci poseban dio za to.
S obzirom da se o NFT na engleskom dijelu prica u altcoin sekciji a mi to vec imamo, onda nema potrebe ni traziti poseban dio samo za to. Trebalo bi i još neke postove staviti da budu sticky.
Mislim da to moze i globalni mod, ili barem onaj tko je zaduzen za nas. Sjecam se kad sam preveo onaj Trust guide, @marloboroza je to zatrazio i prakticki isti dan je pinano. Samo ne treba ni tu pretjerivati, mozda jos 1-2 posta max staviti i to je to. Sto se tice ove liste prijedloga za dodatne sekcije, dobro izgleda, mozda jos dodati i zahtjev za sekcijom tipa "Trading i spekulacije", ili mozda "Ekonomija" pa u to strpati i trading, mjenjacnice i sve sto ide uz to. Mozda zatraziti i "Tutorial" sekciju, gdje bi se sherali svi guidovi. |
|
|
|
What happened: User bitqynetwork claims to be representative of BITQY xchange, and offers listing on that exchange, and to do that, you have to buy tokens via Uniswap and send all needed data using Google form. All this doesn't make any sense, why would exchange sell their tokens needed for listing using Uniswap and not their own exchange. As a matter of fact, there is no bitqy tokens at all on that exchange. ANN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283145.0Archive https://archive.fo/RWByTExchange website http://bitqy.co/After a period of meticulous development and testing lasting more than a year, we finally announce our general opening to the public with an incredible offer for developers who want to list their coins with us.Our newly created company under the protection of the rising sun now opens its doors to all of you, wishing you to enjoy our software and the highly technological security measures imported for the protection of your capital. http://bitqy.co/ Feel a new air of fresh breeze in your daily trading and feel comfortable with probably, within a few moons, the best exchange in the world. Enjoy our launch offer to list your project, you simply have to buy bitqy in uniswap and fill in the form. We will list 100 erc20 tokens on November 15, 2020. Promotional offer, the cost for the listing of your project based on pairs with etherum bitcoin is only 100,000 BITQY tokens.that you need to buy and send us to 0x1f76202F3b069AAb10bfd9102d2D1F902447f7A5 https://forms.gle/3rm8waQH81YWSW9p7 o- This is an obvious attempt to scam people by selling worthless tokens via Uniswap and pretending to be requirement for token listing To be even more funny, they advertise price of listing only 50 USD 50 american dollar coin list only erc20 tokens only 100 offer
There are several more red flags here: - Their discord group only has 2 members. Weird for an exchange that was 1 year in the developemnt, as they claim to be
- No mention of the exchange about any kind of tokens as requirement for token listing
|
|
|
|
Always do your own research before registering specially for a new exchange and start depositing any amount of funds there and I'd even say totally avoid them over all at least until they get enough reviews and have some reputation to trust them with.
Finexbox is not exactly a new exchange, they've been around for a few years, but they are in a group of dodgy ones that hosted bunch of shitty IEOs, are ready to list just about anything that is willing to pay a fee, and don't care much about legitimacy of altcoin projects,, like Vindax, P2PB2B and similar. Problem is when people get some shitty altcoins, and they have no place to sell them other than equally shitty and dodgy exchanges, and then you get problems like this. It can all be avoided if people simply stick to top altcoins, if BTC is not enough for them (I know it is for me). |
|
|
|
Ne koristim binance pa nisam baš upućen u tiereve (što je tier 1?) ,
Tier 1 je u biti taj pocetni level za koji ti ne treba nikakva verifikacija, registriras se na Binance i imas withdraw limit od 2 BTC dnevno, sto je za nekog prosjecnog korisnika i vise nego dovoljno. Ako hoces podignuti taj dnevni limit, moras odraditi KYC i onda mozes dnevno povuci do 100 BTC, ulagati u IEO, stejkati i koristiti te ostale Binance kerefeke. |
|
|
|
I wonder if theymos will ever come up with the same idea from the last year's " 10th anniversary art contest" ? Well, a decade is something to celebrate for, I just want to reminisce how we've seen such talented forum members during that event and it's been year now. I must admit that anniversary contest was fun (I also participated with two submissions) but having it organized that way every year would somehow diminish its value. Maybe best to stick to every 10 years or so. After all, we don't necessarily have to wait for theymos to start contest and give out BTC in order to celebrate each anniversary. If someone starts anniversary topic, I'm sure people will start sharing their work, we can vote on best ones etc. Same goes for other important dates like May 22nd and Bitcoin Pizza Day. |
|
|
|
That means there are no legendary members and only 5 are potential to become Legends in 2021 from that time frame. It isn't mathematically possible to have Legendary members among the accounts created during 2019. If you created account on January 1st 2019 and have reached merit requirement, you would still be a few months of activity short to reach Legendary activity requirement. And that's best case scenario in case RNG gods like you and you became Legendary with 775 activity. Another thing is worrisome here, and that's the number of Sr Member accounts. Even if you made account on December 31st 2019, by now you would have enough activity to be Sr Member now, if you are an active user and have met merit requirement of course. Based on that data, only 22 managed that, out of 1100+ accounts that got at least 1 merit. When you put that in the percentage, less than 2% of the accounts created during 2019 and received at least 1 merit are Sr Members now. To me that shows that even something like that is a problem for huge majority of new users, so there is no real need to increase that. If numbers were opposite, if we have inflation of new users reaching high ranks, then I would think of this request as valid. I'm not sure how Ddmr counted, but I think he counted those members by their actual rank. But some of them - let's say some of the Full Members - could have earned already the merits for being Hero but they're mentioned by Ddmr as Full Members because this is their actual rank. If this is the case, it means for sure that the real number of Hero will be bigger at some point in the future, when these Full Members with more than 500 merits will also meet the activity criterion for being Hero. And the same applies for other ranks. For example, there are 21 Sr. Members and 5 Heroes. From these, maybe a few earned already more than 1000 merits so for sure they'll be Legendary members when the activity will allow them. I'm not 100% sure if this is the case (Ddmr can correct me if I'm wrong).
You are correct, only those that met both merit and activity requirements count among those 5 Hero, 21 Sr Member, 26 Full Member etc. Out of all those accounts created during 2019, four members earned more than 1000 merit: Ratimov, zasad@, efialtis and me. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
