|
Theymos, what's going on? Seems to be affecting several people, if not everyone.
|
|
|
|
How exactly is it *extorting money* from these campaigns? If it is being used for extortion, it might have been hacked by Lauda.
Classical libel. You never grow up scammer, do you?  |
|
|
|
Has anything changed related to the forum's trust mechanism?
It has not. Some members got booted from DT since your last update, and some negative ratings were thrown around. It was much worse a while back. |
|
|
|
This is one funny response that I have read here but unfortunately a "newbie" could know the two of them so well to have established a pattern in their posts.
Not really, no. Unless you have deliberately refused to post and only stuck around to watch both Lutpin and myself, which would be nonsensical. You'd either have to be paid to do that (why?) or sick. For the fact that we see things the same way does not mean we are one and the same person and not until we come to a public forum to argue against each other before people know we are against each other in terms if ideas. This your submission is not only faulty, but equally unfounded.
Such claims are almost always unfounded or outright bullshit. |
|
|
|
Campaign is still ongoing. I'm bounty campaign manager. If you have questions please PM me.
How about you start actually doing your job for once and kicking spammers such as this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=836349?
Are you part of the Atlant team or just a normal bounty campaign manager? Who hired you? |
|
|
|
There are some Indian translators who just change few words here and there, their sentences make no sense and they use "avrodh" word for blockchain which means "barrier". Most of their text is directly copied from google with wrong grammar and meaningless sentences.
Create and thread with sufficient evidence and I'll tag them all. Being a bystander to something like that makes you guilty as well (not 'you' as in erikalui alone, but rather anyone who sees that but remains silent). Their work is still being accepted as managers don't even bother to check or verify their work.
Can't really verify work if you don't know the languages, which makes translation campaigns problematic. Checking various translation tools is not sufficient. Don't know if anyone is outsourcing their work but I've seen people doing that so that they work on all projects and submit poor translation jobs in the end. These people are having some kind of groups to work on translations. Is that even allowed?
Forum wise? Yes. Campaign wise? Depends on the specific rules. This is classic capitalism / free market. For example if the bounty awards $100 for translation and you find someone else who wants to do it $50 for you (and you submit it for and get $100 - $50 (given to the person who actually translated it)), you're just good at doing business (given that the other person does a proper translation obviously). |
|
|
|
Who's the manager of this campaign?
is this still ongoing? Either it is ongoing or the people above me should all be banned. I'm somewhat unclear about the status of this campaign and their manager. |
|
|
|
Dang, yahoo messed up bad. I tried to warn him.
Sigh. I wonder what happens when NOTARY finds out? Surely they will. Most likely he will get fired like Nexchange did to me.  Fired for possibly delaying the payment for a small amount of time (though I'm still not sure the exact timing as there are different claims)? What kind of bullshit is that? There are *horrible* managers out there and *horrible campaigns* managed by nobody, and you think we should focus on someone for delaying the payment for a bit? |
|
|
|
Sorry, I am new here... what is the SMAS blacklist?
A list of spammers such as yourself. I was just responding to the guy who seems to only care about himself.
You have no idea who Yahoo is, nor what he is like. You are in no position to judge him. Go away. Half my posts are in Bitcoin Discussion. The site is called "Bitcoin Talk". You're a classic shitposter.
OP, I recommend adding both to your SMAS list (as I've done with mine). |
|
|
|
|
Who's the manager of this campaign?
|
|
|
|
Trust summary for Darwin02
This user's email address was changed recently.
This user changed his/her password recently.
Fits the classic pattern. Tagged. |
|
|
|
|
OP, what are you doing? This campaign is full of shit applicants. If you are not enrolling anymore, lock this down.
|
|
|
|
Wth? That's messed up. I will never join a signature campaign managed by yahoo.
1) Random shit project: Check. 2) One liner spam: Check. 3) Genuine concern: Error 404.
Stay away from sections where the people responding all not all illiterate spammers, will ya now? Welcome to the SMAS blacklist. |
|
|
|
* Lauda takes a look at your post history. * Lauda realizes that it is being bullshitted by a one-line signature spammer. * Lauda looks for the campaign manager of Solar DAO. * Lauda adds Kaller to its own SMAS blacklist.
Until someone posts something worth responding to, Cat out. |
|
|
|
You obviously did not read my entire post. I said your tag is 100% warranted, as it is not known if yahoo has stolen campaign funds.
You've explicitly said no such thing. Which is not what he did. The user has been tagged for libel, at least from my perspective. Have I missed something here? Now you are proven wrong.
I was proven wrong? Certainly not by someone like yourself. It would be nice to see a mod like you stand up for what is right around here for once and gain some credibility. As far as I know you ran Bitmixer's campaign perfectly, or almost at least... why do you defend such irresponsible behavior and false feedback from yahoo?
1) The feedback is not false, the user did commit libel. 2) I am not defending the behavior: Getting 'trashed' every once in a while is fine, albeit I'd avoid doing that around the payment dates.
Maybe you should start reading entire posts. |
|
|
|
However, yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made.
Are you sure? I can't see the timestamp of the rating, and it was modified and re-applied thus I can't say which happened. Lauda, even you must admit delaying payments by 26 hours due to being drunk and hungover is asking to get negative feedback.
No? That would be incompetence and bad priorities. Now, if I were to start going after signature campaign managers for their incompetence then we'd see >90% of them taken down by my ratings. Are you sure we want to be going there? Although FJ might be wrong about the stolen funds, they certainly do not deserve negative feedback simply for reporting misbehavior. Again, that is the whole point of a feedback system to begin with.
He deserves feedback for libel. You can't go around smearing someone's name as you please, especially not without any actual evidence. |
|
|
|
Edit: This is now getting serious.
It is not. I always thought yahoo was a good manager, but who gets "trashed" on the night you are supposed to send ~$5,000 to 100 people?
Considering the stupidity of the majority of illiterate people around here, there are only two ways to remain sane after dealing with them for a while: 1) Booze. 2) Therapy.
Getting 'trashed' every once in a while is fine, albeit I'd avoid doing that around the payment dates. However, arrangements can be hard to delay sometimes. I don't see a single grain of evidence that Yahoo stole any money, and the occasionally delay is acceptable anyways. maybe he is always getting druņk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member? Taken from FJ's thread, this is pretty much libel. Indeed. Tagged. |
|
|
|
Added a neg on OP's account for trying to buy a new one. Dumbass. The only reason he'd be looking to buy a new account is either to pull off a scam of his own or to earn money by shitposting his horrible English BS all over this forum. This is why account sales are bad. And look, he got scammed by an account seller. What a surprise!
Tagged both users as well. That is just a token from that website and has nothing to do with the account name, which is not visible. |
|
|
|
|
Tagged. Take this as a lesson. The general thumb rule is to:
1) Avoid lowly ranked members where possible.
2) Check their trust ratings (untrusted ones as well although take those with a grain of salt depending on their description.
3) Use escrow.
|
|
|
|
I am learning to use Bitcoin Core cli, I'm kinda noob.
I have not generated a multi-signature address using Bitcoin Core so I've never exported one.
Then rethink what you're doing here. You're asking me whether you should open an issue because X is happening, even though you don't know what the right behavior is supposed to be. Don't rush into things. So what information is encoded in a P2SH address? A specific unspent Bitcoin can actually have a whole range of different spending conditions attached to it, the most common being a typical P2PKH which just requires the recipient to provide a signature matching the public key hash. The Bitcoin core developers realized that people were looking at the capabilities of Bitcoin's Script language and seeing a whole array of possibilities about what spending conditions you could attach to a Bitcoin output, to create much more elaborate transactions than just P2PKH transactions. The core developers decided that instead of letting senders put in long scripts into their scriptPubKey (where spending conditions usually go), they would let each sender put in a hash of their spending conditions instead. These spending conditions are known as the redeem script, and a P2SH funding transaction simply contains a hash of this redeem script in the scriptPubKey of the funding transaction.The redeem script itself is only revealed, checked against the redeem script hash, and evaluated during the spending transaction.
Source (the whole piece if very useful / I'd recommend reading): http://www.soroushjp.com/2014/12/20/bitcoin-multisig-the-hard-way-understanding-raw-multisignature-bitcoin-transactions/. Segwit in it's current form is encapsulated in P2SH.
Again disclaimer: I have not used any SW stuff with Bitcoin Core yet, thus I'm just basing this on my knowledge of P2SH and SW, which should be correct (or mostly correct). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
