I'm pretty sure it was listed on the 'not working' part already.

OP, I think it will be more compelling if you can add some screenshot (with all personal details blocked out of course) or any other details when you do the test transaction. Just a suggestion, there's no need to do this if you don't like the idea.

Well, this was to be expected. Though I think the updated metrics are not really good either. Maybe unique visitors would count but hey that's still easy to fake out. Setting up a botnet to visit the website multiple times in a day is one of the ways you can get around it.

But anyway, you should expect at least things like this to happen when one of the exchanges owned one of the largest exchanges information sites out there. The explanation is, of course, a lip service like any other marketing activity.

I guess that's just how market/network works in general. Too many possibilities and users that might change the condition in the next minute or there might be none of the new transactions at all. Not to mention most of them would want their transactions to get confirmed as soon as possible.

I still believe that fee estimation helps though, instead of blindly guessing maybe this fee is enough without any basis at all.

You might want to change your wallet so you can do RBF. Sacrifice some convenience for more control over your transactions. Electrum is a popular choice and I believe you can do some extensive research on this topic on your own.

Kayaknya kasusnya si OP ini dapet merit dari akun yang diduga dihack atau jual merit, jadinya bukan masalah apakah si OP jual merit dari akun tersebut atau tidak. Sehingga ane rasa sign message ga akan bisa membantu.

Ucapan ane tentang internet & blockchain itu cuma analogi gan, bukan berarti ane beranggapan demikian. Kalimat setelahnya juga menjelaskan hal itu, yang prinsipnya adalah jargon-jargon "integrasi X dengan blockchain" hanya term marketing saja.

Eniwei, dari beberapa post yang ada ane rasa semuanya punya keraguan yang sama dan beranggapan kalau yang mau dilakukan ini adalah pembuatan database terpusat untuk meningkatkan keamanan jaringan 5G saja. Tanpa blockchain pun, hanya dengan hardware yang lebih baik dan cache server lebih banyak, sepertinya tujuannya bisa tercapai dan "blockchain" di sini hanya dipakai untuk marketing saja.

^

Catatan tambahan: biasanya tiap exchange punya clause "kalau kami mendeteksi ada aktivitas yang aneh di akun pengguna, maka kami bisa meminta pengguna untuk melakukan KYC". "Aneh" di sini bisa sangat subjektif dan tidak menutup kemungkinan sering salah sasaran, jadi tetep hati-hati sekalipun exchangenya bilang ga ada KYC bila WD ga nyampe 2 BTC/hari.

Ada banyak kasus "KYC paksa" yang bisa dibaca di sub reputasi/scam accusations/exchanges kalau mau riset lebih dalam.

Thread diskusi dari artikel blog juga tidak perlu dibuat. Kalau memang ingin membuat thread diskusi cari topik yang benar-benar untuk diskusi, tanpa ada shill ke link website/blog/apps dst. Tambahin aja link" terkait ke bagian signature dan itu juga udah jadi bentuk marketing yang lebih baik.

Btw, ane udah install apsnya. Untuk KYCnya ga bisa upload foto/file yang udah diambil sebelumnya ya? Apa ini ada aturan dari bappeti atau badan terkait? Jujur hal kayak gitu bikin agak males buat lanjutin KYC.

^
Ini thread bukan tempat untuk bertanya hal seperti itu. Silakan tanyakan ulang di thread Q & A yang di-pin.

Kalau arahnya memang ke sana, mungkin yang ane ragukan adalah masalah skalabilitasnya. Kalau ingin cepat maka tentu tidak mungkin menggunakan konsensus PoW dan kemungkinan besar menggunakan cache server. PoS atau dPoS mungkin bisa aja kepake tapi jadinya malah wagu. Kalau tujuannya sekedar lebih aman, maka ane rasa enkripsi https dan sejenisnya harusnya sih lebih dari cukup. Tapi kalau mau dipaksakan jadi blockchain ya sah-sah aja sih, tinggal gimana mereka mengakali agar interaksinya tetap cepat. Dan kalau ujungnya menggunakan central server plus cache server, ya sama aja jadinya database biasa sih. CMIIW.

Sepertinya thread accusations yang dibuat udah dibaca banyak orang dan beberapa member mulai memberikan support. Dan seperti biasanya, selalu ada akun-akun baru yang tujuannya hanya untuk ngebela proyek yang sedang dilawan. Kemungkinan besar itu tim dari proyek itu sendiri.

Saran ane jangan diladeni kalau argumentasinya mulai melebar ke arah personal attack atau strawman, fokus aja ke masalah 'kontrak' yang agan punya dengan timnya di awal gimana dan jadinya bagaimana.

This case sounds like an API abuse. To be honest it's quite difficult to prove whether the leak happens through Tabtrader or some other way and like TryNinja said, if Tabtrader is faulty then there should be more cases like yours.

I used them in the past and I don't face this problem. I don't defend them but maybe you should check again whether your API got leaked or not, and then remove all existing APIs from your exchange. Check whether your phone is infected with malware or not, check your e-mail, etc.

An analogy for this case is someone lost his funds after importing their seed through Electrum, while in fact their seed was exposed in the process due to malware or leaked through another way.

Take a screenshot from your phone/computer (if you don't know it search on Google how to do it), upload it to some image hosting website like Imgur, copy the image link here and you're done.

You can't accuse people without any proof.

I'd suggest you move to another publisher that pays directly in bitcoin or other liquid coins/tokens, so you won't' face this kind of difficulty. Even if you were able to sell these coins, if their liquidity is so low then your earning might be smaller than you might think.

There are some discussions around here and most of them suggest Cointraffic or Coinzilla. You might want to check them out. Don't forget DYOR.

There's no need to worry as the difficulty will get adjusted roughly every 2 weeks. It is not as bad as 2018 where people are rushing every time to make txs.

It will depend on what people actually wanted. If they need crypto to pay for something fast (but not that secure), using alts might be an option. But if they want to use bitcoin then they won't move from it. Bitcoin is really secured compared to other networks where 1 confirmation is enough for most merchants to accept your transaction, while on other chains you might need several confirmations.

According to this, it was around January 2018[1]. I think that's understandable considering how hectic that month was, after the crazy run everyone starts making transactions and want a fast confirmation so they don't miss the opportunity to sell/buy some sats. Another stats history show more or less the same thing[2]

[1] https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html
[2] https://billfodl.com/pages/bitcoinfees

What you're offering is essentially being a middleman in a process that's already complex, prone to scam, and risky. I doubt anyone would give you money just because you're a unique guy if they don't have anything that can confirm they'll get their money back or at least you wouldn't run away.

If you want to be a pool (which is not the first one) start by registering your business and publish details about yourself. You might ask why you need to do this but I believe most 'investors' right now understand that handling money (it's not a donation if they want to get interest) to an anonymous person is as good as burning their money right away. Having an account on a forum doesn't really help you, as it's really easy for you to run away with their funds.

Note: you don't really need to post multiple times in a row. It broke forum rules too.

Ane masih belum kegambar sebenarnya bentuk integrasinya kayak gimana. Ini kayak integrasi 'internet dengan blockchain', padahal mungkin yang dimaksud layanan-layanan yang memanfaatkan internet. Susah juga kegambar gimana ceritanya blockchain bisa bikin 5G atau jaringannya jadi lebih cepet. Plus, apa benar ini blockchain atau sekedar database yang dihost oleh beberapa komputer aja.

Untuk sementara ane menganggap ini cuma jargon marketing aja.

Oh, berarti update-update di atas itu yang paling baru dan bisa membuat Electrumnya berjalan setelah diinstall ya? Oke-oke.

Mungkin bisa dicoba PCnya juga gan dengan update yang sama, sebagai eksperimen apa benar update" itu yang membuat Electrumnya bisa berjalan atau jangan-jangan ada hal lain yang agan lakukan yang malah membuatnya berhasil tapi tidak disadari.

Maaf nih mau memperjelas. Setelah install update tanggal 13 Mei itu berarti Electrum udah bisa jalan? Atau masih belum bisa? Karena dari cerita sebelumnya yang ane tangkep adalah agan nginstall Electrum, gagal dijalanin, terus update Windowsnya dan baru bisa. Kalau tanggal 13 Mei itu pertama kali agan nginstall Electrum, berarti ada update yang lebih baru yang membuat Electrum bisa berjalan dong seharusnya?