0°C = 273°K
Assuming by twice as cold you mean half as hot, it should be 136°K or -136°C
Which, of course, makes no sense... so what the fuck is this thread about? Simply spam to increase your post count?
hahaha i read this question a while back and got mindfucked and now I'm just asking to see if some smart guys can answer  Sure, no problem, this is a simple problem solved as follows. First you need a good measuring device for cold (MDFC), and that's hot girls in bikinis. (HGIB). To get statistical validity, you need at least a quantity of 20 HGIB subjected to each variation of cold. Simply apply the 0C cold to each group of 20 HGIB, then the next day, apply a variant temperature to each group. Ask is it less than, more than, or exactly twice as cold as the day prior. I think the group that hits the twice as cold goal should get a prize. |
|
|
|
its based on their religion. dont actually blame them
Sure, let's actually blame them. The people doing bad actions, let's say they have the freedom to choose to do good, or bad, and they choose bad. Let's blame them. |
|
|
|
No I don't hate all muslims but there are few bunch of assholes who are involved in terrorist activities and that makes us to have same feeling for each and every muslim we come across but still I don't have faith in them as you never know what's going through their minds.
You mean the millions of extremist Islamics? Supported by hundreds of millions of Muslims? You think it might be more than a few? |
|
|
|
Bottom line--these are human beings, and these decisions have real implications. Have the decency to at least call a press conference and sound sincere. Yet another tweet that should never have been made. Didn't even do the Army and the Joint chiefs the decency of warning them he'd be tweeting up a storm again.
Frankly, just because the liberal community and it's gay fascist subset decided to loudly proclaim rights of transgenders starting about two years ago, does not mean it's actually an important issue. It's not important, in terms of the numbers of people affected or the interests of society. Bottom line--no reason for a press conference. Just a tweet does fine. |
|
|
|
hmm.I think at the first thought it's creepy.People become alienated more and more with the past of the time.I think this is the peak.Make love it's not something impersonal.Doing sex it's a way to express all that you can't say with words.However I think that it will possibly have succes like the vr and generally the sexism...
It's creepy alright, but no way it's as creepy as some people.... |
|
|
|
,,,,,Change things to make it so a man and a women have to go to a clinic to have children and now that problem is solved.,,,,
Yet another fucking Perverse Authoritarian Liberal Social Control Freak scheme. |
|
|
|
Fuck religion. Imagine a world without it.. Fucking peace and quite. Its just another reason to divide people.
No need to hate religion in general. Being a Hindu, I don't have any issues with any religion other than Islam (occasionally I enter in to arguments with Christian pastors who want me to convert to Christianity, but I ignore them). There is something I like about "entering into an argument with a Christian but ignoring them" while not having any problem with any religion other than Islam." |
|
|
|
The problem is that some terrorist groups are in different countries. And because of them many people die. Why do Islamists do this? They could live peacefully in their country and enjoy life
They are always obsessed with exterminating the infidels. The problem is that when there are no infidels remaining in a particular country (examples such as Yemen and Afghanistan), the Muslims will label each other as infidels and restart killing. But it makes it a lot easier to exterminate the infidels if you have Muslim apologists running around babbling about how "you need to respect all religions" and "My Muslim friends are nice" and "all religions are peace." Just think, if there weren't enough real Muslims willing to stand up and help in the disinformation efforts you could create sock puppets, fake Internet posters, that all made one post and vanished. Wait, that's whats been going on here. How about that. |
|
|
|
To say having sex with boys is legal ! you are lair ( it is in fact huge forbidden thing to do in islam homosex ) . Check the links which I had posted previously. It clearly says that in Afghanistan, more than 50% of the males are having frequent sex with under-age boys. That makes Afghanistan the only country in the world, where homosexuals are a majority. Now are you denying the fact that Afghanistan is an Islamic nation? As far as I know, it is 100% Muslim. That is the problem I do not care even if Afghanistan is 100% gays . What I care about is did islam promote and agree to homosexual or not . And the answer is clearly not . Now come to your link it is BS link . what about real links with real numbers from reliable source ! what about real link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Afghanistanof curse they have gays but not like what you are saying and clearly the penalty if anyone caught doing so is death  ( I do not agree but just saying ) . Just learn hate something is a thing , But keep lie and say lies about it is totally different thing . I said I will not comment then I did can not handle my self from reply so prob I will not visit this thread again . I don't know if 50% of the adult males in Afganistan have sex with underage boys there, but there is certainly a percentage that have this custom. Maybe it is done in certain areas and not others? Yes it is a repulsive custom and appears to be against standard Islam. As I recall they have some way of justifying sex with boys by way of saying before they have body hair they are not really men and so it's not homosexual. Utter nonsense, of course. |
|
|
|
Being a soldier always has to be war. And it always end up having a case of discrimination when disallowing a community when the truth is the truth. Transgender has some place of their own - let's just put it that way. War isn't for them.
I don't think we need them in the troops, but here's where I'd draw the line. If a male soldier has the surgery on his own money, what then? No way he should get a dishonorable discharge. But you can't have him on the Delta team, either. |
|
|
|
1st QUESTION : Do you think the Military Health System is the right organisation to pay for such expenses, whether it is expensive or not?
2nd QUESTION: Do you think there should be other organisms to pay for these operations? I mean should these expenses be paid by the transgender individual or should they be funded by the collectivity?
1. No, of course. 2. The transgender person should pay for it. It's not a health issue, it's more like a plastic surgery. You want to change your body, do it with your own money! Now, the transgender movement is something really strange, because these people modify their bodies to look like members of an opposite sex. It's actually getting ridiculous, because transgender men are taking part in sports competition for women and beating them. Somebody should tell them that cutting your dick off and changing your name doesn't make you a woman! There's a new type of laser eye surgery where the cornea is replaced with a corrective lens, and this eliminates the need to wear glasses. It's about $8000 USD, and it isn't covered by insurance. I can list a lot of things that are not covered by insurance. The only reason this discussion exists about trans is because of heavy pressure by the Pink Fascists arm of the Democratic Party. |
|
|
|
Theres nothing wrong with religions, evil does not exist only human beings create them in their hearts.
If there is something wrong with any particular religion, then you must be courageous to admit it. There are more than a hundred verses in the Quran, which urges the believers to wage Jihad. Either the Muslims must disown these verses, or they should admit that they are intolerant. What, and keep their practices of stoning women, cutting off limbs, beating wives, and other holy-book-encouraged violence? |
|
|
|
Exist! “These faggots kill fascists,” a banner held by two soldiers of the group read, according to an image released by the brigade. The image, which was reportedly taken in Raqqa, was released with the caption “#Queers smashing the caliphate.” Gays killing those who murdered countless gays. Good. |
|
|
|
Never had any issues with them myself. The media just making things worse for everyone creating hatred  Actually, it's the Islamic suicide bombers that make things worse for everyone, not the media. 164 Islamic attacks last month and 34 suicide blasts in 30 countries. 1176 killed and 1382 injured, and you are going to say... media just making things worse for everyone creating hatred What a foolish thing to say. Whatever. Just by the tone of your reply I can see anything I say will not get through to you so won't waste my time replying explaining myself in detail to you sir. The tone of my reply is based on 164 Islamic extremist attacks in June alone, and the fact there is a similar number every month. I am unable to find any rationale by which the "media just making things worse for everyone creating hatred" given this level of atrocities and barbaric attacks against innocent people. Be my guest and explain your position if you like but please understand there is a lot of Takiyya style lying on this forum by Muslims who just don't like the idea of Islam being portrayed as having a violent side. |
|
|
|
I was so disappointed with President Trump's comment because the way he's doing something is just like descriminating someone specifically gays, transgender, lesbian and even queers. It is not good that President Trump will going eliminate those transgender in their military job which is very disrespectful because it is just like saying that these transgender will not doing good well in fact most of them is very intelligent and courageous to face any circumstances in life. Gender is not a problem anymore but what matter is your ability to do something great with their fellow individual and that's what LGBT community wants and most especially they should respected not only they are professionals but because they are humans.
(Re bolded above) Says WHO? Maybe they're not doing good jobs. Maybe they're NOT intelligent or courageous. Maybe those around them DO find them to be disruptive. Also if women are excluded from various combat jobs or missions, why should not trans also be? |
|
|
|
i think it is not proper to say that islam hates people... but it is the people who are bent with their wrong that are doing these heinous things...  Proper? You are lecturing about what is proper speech? Check out this recent event in a California mosque. “Oh Allah, liberate the Al Aqsa Mosque from the filth of the Jews...” Imam Ammar Shahin said in Arabic in his July 21 sermon at the Islamic Center of Davis. “Oh Allah, count them one by one and annihilate them down to the very last one,” he said in the videotaped service. The comments, which were translated and distributed to the media by the nonprofit Middle East Media Research Institute, or MEMRI, have been roundly criticized by local and national Jewish leaders. A few of them have written a complaint to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. “It’s deeply concerning to read hateful and violence-advocating words directed against any group, including ourselves as Jews,” said Steve Cohan, co-president of Congregation Bet Haverim in Davis, in a prepared statement. http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-davis-imam-20170726-story.html |
|
|
|
The Climate Consensus Has Failed Citing the “97 percent consensus” talking point to silence debate on global warming is an unsuccessful distraction from more urgent public policy debates on the issue, according to a group of UK social scientists. “Such efforts to force policy progress through communicating scientific consensus misunderstand the relationship between scientific knowledge, publics and policymakers,” sociologist Warren Pearce and others wrote in an academic commentary, published Monday. “More important is to focus on genuinely controversial issues within climate policy debates where expertise might play a facilitating role,” Pearce and his co-authors wrote. Pearce and his co-authors argue there needs to be a more “cosmopolitan approach” to the climate debate that doesn’t rely on quantifying a scientific consensus, but rather “more urgent matters of knowledge, values, policy framing and public engagement.” “Recent efforts to communicate such scientific consensus attained a high public profile but it is doubtful if they can be regarded successful,” Pearce and his co-authors wrote. “Rather than securing certainty that was absent before, this exercise has invited intense scrutiny to the judgments underpinning their claim, and generated further doubt,” they wrote. For years, Democrats and environmentalists have cited research claiming that 97 percent of scientists agree human activities are warming the planet. The figure stems from a 2010 study led by Australian researcher John Cook. Cook’s study examined thousands of scientific papers and interviewed their authors to claim about 97 percent of climate scientists “endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.” Former President Barack Obama used the 97 percent figure to undercut critics of his policies to fight global warming. NASA cites the Cook study as one of several purporting to show near-unanimous agreement on global warming. The Daily Caller News Foundation has already reported on why Cook’s consensus figures are more a statistical sleight of hand than actual agreement. University of Delaware geologist David Legates and some colleagues wrote a paper in 2015, debunking the Cook paper. Legates’ study found only 41 out of the 11,944 peer-reviewed climate studies examined in Cook’s study explicitly agreed that mankind is responsible for most of the warming since 1950.......The UK scientists are saying, in a very polite sort of a way, what we can express more succinctly.
Cook's study was a complete fraud, and it's been used to propagate lies.... And make some people rich like with that Chicago Climate Exchange scam, among other carbon tax scams... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g961YA35-owWhat, you mean now they are going to have to earn a living honestly? |
|
|
|
From what I've read Muslim is far from a religion of peace.
You better search on your own what is all about. I see a brainwashed comment. ....yours? |
|
|
|
Never had any issues with them myself. The media just making things worse for everyone creating hatred Actually, it's the Islamic suicide bombers that make things worse for everyone, not the media. 164 Islamic attacks last month and 34 suicide blasts in 30 countries. 1176 killed and 1382 injured, and you are going to say... media just making things worse for everyone creating hatred What a foolish thing to say. |
|
|
|
As long as there is no oppression and as long as there will be criminal less world we wont see that ending in the near future. I do feel it as a trillion dollar business,initially the US funded the so called ISIS as all the weapons used by them are provided by them and now they are fighting against them,it is like a video game ,so that the war keeps on rolling as well as the business.
Yeah i've read a lot of articles and theories about how some powerful countries who seem to oopose terrorists,are in fact behind all these activities, basically for the business of war. It's hard enough to end it as it is with people who have twisted beliefs, and it's even harder to end it with powers unseen manipulating in the back There are quite a lot of examples. During the 1970s, the CIA trained, funded and armed the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan, to take on the Soviets. Evidence also exists linking the creation of the ISIS to the CIA. Yes, but you are mixing two different things here. Faciliating enemy of your enemy is part of geopolitics. Political violence is however fundamental part of Islam and has been since its inception. Those people would still be killers and murderers. Just with lesser weapons. The term Political Islam is a recently developed term. It is used to label the wide-scale activities of individuals or organizations heading towards the transformation of the state and entire society according to ”Islamic” rules. It is based on Islam which is a complex of political persuasion and fundamental Islamic books – Koran, Sira (the biography of Mohammed), and Hadith (Mohammed’s traditions). The term is often used in connection with the movements which represent the current political powers in the name of Islam, emerging at the end of 20th century. It is also used as a term describing political activities stemming from basic Islamic books aiming predominantly at Non-Muslims. I know some Muslim people and they are very nice to me. I can't say anything bad to them especially my professor way back in college which is a Muslim. She is very kind and considerate and she explained to us that muslim people are not bad. Buddy, that's just fine with me if your heart melts. You see, there are a lot of families whose hearts are melting because Islamic extremists killed their people. Go ahead and melt like one big ice cream cone left out in the sun. Then check the latest Allah Akbar attacks. www.thereligionofpeace.com |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
