|
Ane baru denger ada game yang dijadikan alat untuk skema ponzi. Maap ane tahunya gim cuma mobile legends aja, kayaknya ane mainnya kurang jauh jadi gatau ada inpo yang beginian. Btw agan termasuk salah satu yang invest disana kah? kok kayaknya tahu banget, kaya pengalaman pribadi gitu. Oya btw menurut agan tanggal 26 oct akan ditinggal kabur ama dev-nya, berhubung sekarang uda tanggal 28 oct, adakah perkembangan tentang gim ini? apakah dev beneran kabur gan?
|
|
|
|
The solution for BenCodie: Don't join gambling signature campaigns, if you really hate gambling and think it's harmful. Otherwise, you would inevitably contribute to be "harmful" as well by wearing that paid signature.  Only join a campaign, where you agree with the advertised service. And that's exactly, what CryptopreneurBrainboss pointed out in his topic.  Maybe you have free time so you have time to write something like this. I think benCodie is entitled to whatever his stance and beliefs are. Apart from that, if the campaign manager considers this to be a problem then he will remove Ben from the campaign participants I have read BenCodie's comments several times, I think he is a person who has principles and beliefs. I don't think it's necessary to give him advice, let him be himself. I once PM @royse777 regarding campaign issues, because I was afraid that my comments would damage the good name of the Sinbad brand, but I didn't get a reply.  But this is just my personal opinion, I don't have much experience in campaignsBenCodie created false accusations about me by alleging that I took discussions out of context and he even accused me of censoring my threads. After all the drama he tried to create surrounding my locking of my threads and citing fake censorship, BenCodie ended up deleting your post from his own self-moderated thread because he did not like what you wrote.
He is a multi-level hypocrite because he says one thing about joining signature campaigns and another thing about ethics and another thing about censorship yet ends up doing the very things he claims (he and) others should not. Giving him any attention is a complete waste of time and energy therefore he is remaining on my ignore list.
Oh yeah..... There are also those who accuse me, even though that person has no evidence. Just speculation. But that's okay, lower level members don't get much attention. Indeed, sometimes we remember more when we are accused by someone than when we accuse someone  |
|
|
|
Full member rank
bech32 BTC Address: bc1q324t24x7d9j8rsgdlgzdlt6eyxggvauvdf0u5v
Merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 84
Applyong for Avatar spot
Hi, buddy Maybe it would be better to use the format provided by OP like other members. You can copy from other members and edit them |
|
|
|
And I've also seen some in the past offering green trust score accounts for sale. You can certainly guess what it's for. Either the seller is a scammer, or the buyer wants to scam. If anything, I'm surprised account sellers aren't more creative! For years, I've expected it but never seen it, so I might as well give them the idea now: -sell accounts (this is happening already) -sell DT1-inclusions -sell DT1-exclusions -sell inclusions with 250+ earned Merits -sell inclusions with 10+ earned Merits -sell a Merit source -sell good posts that will earn Merit on it's own -sell good posts including a certain number of Merit received within a certain number of days -sell positive feedback (after a fixed trade) -sell negative feedback (for whatever reason) -sell Mod-accounts -sell Admin-accounts (there must be someone out there dumb enough to fall for it) All of the above of course comes with the (high) risk of getting scammed  And even if you didn't get scammed, if you can't create good posts on your own, chances are you're going to be found out as an account buyer. Or you may just buy plagiarized content. So just create your own account and learn things on your own, that's much more valuable in the long run. Wow, it looks like you have a large collection of accounts. Can I bid on a merit source account, a mod account, and maybe theymos account? Come on, we can talk. LOL  |
|
|
|
Does it therefore lie in the hands of campaign managers to curtail the usage of AI in making posts in the forum?
If Plagiarism leads to ban, why is AI posting not leading to a ban?
Considering that any post(s), that is not well connected in meaning with a flowing conversation can be regarded as a spam. I therefore suggest that the forum make an overall rule against AI posting.
Else a board should be created for AI posting where signature does not display, incase we don't want to fight a fast evolving technology.
I answer based on my personal assumptions and opinions 1# Campaign managers have the right to make their own rules, and I don't think those rules are up for debate. 2# Plagiarism is clearly prohibited and is very detrimental to the forum because plagiarism can bring the forum into the realm of law, therefore the forum prohibits all types of plagiarism because it avoids copyright claims. As far as I know, plagiarism in text is about plagiarizing writing. It does not contain thoughts and ideas, so if you read an article and you rewrite it in your own style then it is not plagiarism even though the ideas you convey are the same as the content of the article. Articles you write in your own style will be included as Uniq articles 3# In the context of using AI, AI does not completely plagiarize writing and does not violate copyright claims (correct me if I'm wrong) so it is not considered plagiarism and it seems that there is no law that can claim copyright because the article is used by AI. If plagiarism regulations are used to avoid copyright claims then the use of AI does not violate copyright and does not need to be prohibited in forums However, because the bitcointalk forum is a discussion forum, it would be unethical to use AI, the essence of the discussion would be lost because discussion is a place to share ideas, debate, look for ideas, share opinions, and so on. between humans and humans. If AI is used then it will no longer be a discussion, because discussions are born from the contents of the mind |
|
|
|
The technical difference, from a moderation point of view, is that conventional plagiarism is easier to prove and reference against an external prior existing source, whilst AI generated content is much more difficult to pinpoint (if at all), and normally its use will become clear not by mere comparison to a given source, but by differences in the posting patterns of the poster.
In my opinion, using AI to create posts is the same as the spinning article model that was once popular in the blogging world. AI is more difficult to detect because of its ability to improvise and combine various articles into a new article that looks unique. I doubt whether in the future there will be tools capable of detecting AI-generated articles or not because AI will become more sophisticated as time goes by. |
|
|
|
I have seen many new members on the forum who are just made an account here. Since they're new, they might not know all the ways to use the forum, like searching for existing posts and more.
As a result, they usually navigate the "Beginners and Help" Board to ask for advice.
So I have a idea: Let's create one really helpful post that lists the best resources for beginners to learn about Bitcoin.
After that Mods can pin this post to the "Beginners and Help" Board so that new members can easily find all the information they need. This will make it very easy for newbies to get started with Bitcoin.
and other members will save time by not writing repeated answers,
I think there are already many threads created for beginner's guides. When I was new to this forum, I read a lot of forum rules in pinned threads. The problem isn't a lack of topics explaining how the forum works but rather that new members don't take the time to read. Too many pinned posts are also unsightly, new posts will be below them and not very visible. So what is there now is good, no need to add new posts to pin, just update it |
|
|
|
Ya memang gitu sekarang di kalangan masyarakat lebih banyak ngutang di Paylater dan Pinjol daripada bank, karena bank kalau tidak salah harus ada jaminan yang ane tahu sebenarnya sih ane belum pernah pinjam ke bank.
Jujur ane pengguna Paylater Shopp* bahkan limit nya hingga 12jtaan karena ane sering menunggunakan limit nya terus naik, ane tidak pernah telat bayar menggunakan paylater justru lebih enak ngambil sekarang bayar nanti, selalu tepat waktu ketika jatuh tempo maka dari itu paylater sangat membantu, tapi tidak pernah menggunakan paylater di berbagai platform karena satu pun ane rasa sudah cukup.
Ane juga menggukan paylater, dan limitnya juga lumanyan. Hanya ane gunakan di saat-saat genting saja dan itu pun ane samain dengan budget pengeluaran tiap bulan. Jadi ane cuma perlu topup satu kali dalam sebulan yaitu pas bayar paylater dan ane tidak pernah ada uang lebih di aplikasi online (selalu 0) ini juga bertujuan agar tidak boros. Maka dari itu ane tidak pernah bayar denda terkecuali bayar biaya layanan paylater saja. Sebernarnya paling anti sama paylater dan kartu kredit. Sadar diri saja. Karena ane orangnya boros. Jadi mencukupkan diri sesuai saldo. Kalau di rekening sudah tidak ada saldo ya tidak usah belanja apa apa. paylater sebenaranya bagus jika di gunakan dengan bijak. Liat orang lain yang terjebak pada paylater dan pinjol memang agak aneh. Mereka punya "impulse buying" pada saat menggunakan paylater dan pinjol. Sebetulnya paylater tidak ada masalahnya kalau sesuai sama budget, lagian kan memang bisa disesuaikan sama budget. Pada intinya pinjol maupun paylater dikatakan jebakan bisa iya, bisa juga tidak. Karena tergantung pada orangnya masing-masing. Jika dia pinter mengatur keuangan dengan baik kedua applikasi ini akan baik-baik saja sebaliknya jika mereka tidak bisa mengontrol keuangan dengan baik applikasi ini akan menajdi jebakan bahkan bisa menjadi petaka karena gali lobang tutup lobang. Mereka yang terjebak dengan paylater tentu mereka tidak memahami dengan baik cara mengatur pengeluaran mereka sehingga mereka terus menggunakan uang mereka untuk kebutuhan yang tidak perlu mereka keluarkan dan membuat uang yang mereka miliki tidak tersisa sehingga menuntut mereka untuk melakukan pinjol, jika dapat mengelola keuangan mereka dengan baik tentu akan mencatat setiap pengeluaran uang dan mengevaluasinya jika mendapatkan uang mereka tidak digunakan pada yang penting tentu akan dapat memperbaikinya dan dapat menghindarinya pada lain kesempatan. Kalo di daerah ane, kebayakan yang terjerat pinjol karena uang pinjol di gunakan bukan untuk kebutuhan tetapi digunakan untuk judol gan. Jadi mereka itu sebenernya ga butuh uang untuk kebutuan hidup, tapi untuk memenuhi hasrat berjuday. Pada ahirnya pada gagal bayar, awalnya mungkin masih bisa minjem di pinjol yang legal tapi lama-lama pasti yang illegal pun di babat demi juday. Ahirnya bisa ditebak, mereka stress dan tanah milik ortunya di jual noh buat nutup pinjeman di pinjol. |
|
|
|
----
Forum sempat terhenti beberapa saat saat melakukan pekerjaan pengembangan terakhir kali. Oleh karena itu terkadang forum harus ditutup dengan cara shutdown. Saya telah mengalami pekerjaan pemeliharaan seperti itu berkali-kali. Meskipun saat ini forum tersebut berada dalam kendali yang baik sehingga jika ada masalah maka forum tersebut akan ditutup kembali dan memulai pekerjaan pengembangan. Untuk kasus yang terjadi pada Bitcointalk tempo hari tidak bisa diakses, admin sendiri sudah mengklarifikasinya disini: Re: Huge site outage!. Terkait pemeliharaan sistem, bukankah pada server bisa diterapkan sistem RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks)?, dimana ketika harddrive utama sedang di maintenance atau bahkan rusak, maka ada server backup yang datanya serupa dengan server utama; Sehingga ketika ada gangguan server maka bisa segera dialihkan ke cadangan tersebut. Ini trit yang di buat untuk mempertanyaakan situs yang down beberapa hari lalu ya gan? Nah, itu om husna udah menjelaskan tentang apa yang terjadi karena hal itu, dan itu penjelasan yang di ambil dari mpunya site, mungkin trit ini sudah terjawab dan bisa di tutup gan OP? |
|
|
|
Kawan kawan seperjuangan, saya punya rencana untuk update post pertama di thread ini agar lebih berisi informasi terbaru.
Mohon maaf karena sudah lama tidak aktif, saya mohon masukannya dari kawan kawan dan bisa ditulis di thread ini atau melalui PM.
Terimakasih sebelumnya!
Welcome back om, Ane baru sadar kalo ternyata agan adalah OP di utas ini. Wow... sepertinya pemain lama mulai turun gunung. Ntap gan.. Tapi mohon maap gan, keknya ane bukan temen seperjuangan, soalnya ane baru lair kemaren sore.. Monggo gan di update, biar makin idup ini Q&A |
|
|
|
|
Prediction 1: $38,889.89
bech32 address: bc1q269p5yuekmv9fkdhhhtlg828dn9eeguu422nx8
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin berhasil menyentuh harga $35K hari ini, jika dilihat dari beberapa TF candle, mulai dari 1H, 1D dan 1W, bitcoin cukup kuat dalam 2 minggu terakhir. Ini bisa menjadi sinyal positif dalam beberapa hari kedepan. Faktor sentimen ETF benar-benar menggairahkan pasar BTC dalam 2 hari terakhir. Jika disetujui, maka saya yakin akan terjadi konfirmasi bullish, ya setidaknya sampai area $40-$45K. Tapi, jika kembali ditolak, ini yang perlu diwaspadai oleh yang baru beli di area $33K, karena ada potensi BTC akan mengalami bull trap. level $28K menjadi support terdalam yang mungkin bisa menahan bitcoin untuk tetap berada di area $30K.
Bagaimana menurut Anda, apakah SEC akan mengubah keputusan dari berusaha menolak, ke menyetujui ETF?
Yang ingin ane komentarin cuma WTF, setelah ane jual btc ane di harga $27k karena kebutuhan mendadak keluarga, dari hasil beli di harga $33k dan $28k. Jadi pengalaman pertama ane hold bitcoin adalah rugi. Sekian dan terimakasih |
|
|
|
But don't pay too much attention to my opinion, because I don't really understand the trust system and the long history of this system. Read more, post less, so you can stand by your opinion when you share one. Of course I've read quite a lot, but because I haven't experienced what happened here in the past, I'm not very confident. BTW, I've also read your thread about trust systems, I think it's almost close to what Thyemos meant, but unfortunately there are still DTs who don't care or implement it. In many ways, you are indeed a great person |
|
|
|
So here's a new suggestion: would it be possible to give DT1 the power to "downvote" certain (negative) feedbacks so they are no longer shown by default? That could potentially solve many of the current disputes that have been fought through negative feedback for many months.
I'm not sure if this "voting" should be anonymous or public, unlimited or very strictly reserved for very rare occations, and needs just one or a majority vote, but all that can be figured out later if Admin thinks my idea has any merit.
Wow... Surprised, proposals like this have been around since 2019. Does that mean the drama has been going on for a long time? Maybe I'm still a beginner and don't know the history of what has happened on this forum. but let me give a little of my opinion here. I don't agree if DT1 has the capabilities you mentioned because DT1 has quite a lot of members. Maybe some of DT1 who have a high level of trust have this ability, one of which is you. Don't have too many members who have that kind of ability, maybe 5 or 10 members are enough. And also provide punishment if it turns out that the member who has the ability has made a mistake and doesn't want to admit it. So justice can be created because there are special abilities but there are punishments too
But don't pay too much attention to my opinion, because I don't really understand the trust system and the long history of this system.
|
|
|
|
it's hard to convince myself, at least at the moment, that theft -- intellectual theft, in this case -- does not fall under the cases when negative feedback can be used. I'm more pragmatic: plagiarism is dealt with by forum rules, and if something is handled by forum rules, it shouldn't be handled by the Trust system. Strongly agree Sadly, it would be no point in reporting those posts, because they are older than 6 months and reports will get (almost) automatically marked as Bad. I've reported old posts, and as long as it's for the right reasons (so not " We generally do not moderate posts this old for on-topicness, substantiveness, multi-posting, and other "cleanliness" issues."), it gets handled. Why care about Bad reports anyway? I think Bad reports as "proof" I don't only report the obvious cases, but also report the edge cases where the Mod can decide. Maybe because he no longer believes in mods and feels better than him. Very selfish, huh? Luckily Thyemos is very wise, otherwise everything would be lost... LOL |
|
|
|
I have been following the sinbad avatar campaign for 3 weeks. Today I just understood that in some cases, hiding bitcoin transactions may be necessary to protect our privacy from the public or for certain purposes. I have never had experience using a mixer, and if I may ask. How much does it cost for one mix? Service fees and network fees. Maybe I want to try it
Sorry, maybe my question is very basic, but I have no experience with mixers and I don't have much bitcoin so I thought I'd find out the actual costs involved. I hope those who answer have experience using a Sinbad mixer
Actually, you can calculate the fee of mixing your BTC in sinbad on the website. You can choose the amount you want to pay for the mining fee from 0.5 % - 2.5 %. This will determine the priority of your transaction (meaning how fast your transaction will be processed) + sinbad charges a 0.0002 BTC service fee. You can see a sample calculation by clicking on the calculator on their website. Can you provide an overview of real transactions? For example, I want to mix 0.002 btc, what is the total cost I have to pay for network fees and simbad service fees? Do network costs also depend on network density? |
|
|
|
... Kalau bitvest entah kenapa ane kurang sreg gan.
Maybe karena bayarannya kecil gan Kampanye yang dikelola Hampuz itu cara Hampuz menyeleksi peserta apakah berdasarkan jumlah merit diterima ya? Ketika ane mengajukan di Rollbit yang keterima adalah member dengan merit earned yang tinggi, begitu juga kemarin ketika ada 1 spot full member itu yang diterima juga member yang memiliki jumlah earned merit yang tertinggi diantara semua yang mengajukan.
Salah satu tolak ukur kualitas post mungkin merit yang di dapatkan (meski bukan jaminan), selain itu menurut ane juga tentang kebiasaan post. Misal sig juday mungkin lebih mengutamakan member yang suka post di papan juday.. Tapi gatau juga si gan, ane hanya menebak aja. Mungkin member lain yang udah wara wiri berkampanye bisa memberikan opininya |
|
|
|
If that's the case, just give theymos a suggestion to remove the DT system. So there will be no more abuse of the trust system. If you have a wound at a leg which hurts you, do you cut off your leg, to not feel any leg pain anymore? Or do you take some painkillers? Good answer. Of course that's not necessary The problem will be resolved. In the end, you will most likely reconcile with ratimov and remove the negative tags you placed on each other's profiles. This will not happen. Not from my side. I can not reconcile with a thief. I will take your word for it. I like it when you have strong self-confidence. There is no reason for me to shake your confidence In the end, neither of you is right, you both are just abusing the trust system by sticking negative tags on each other's profiles. ...says the one which did not even bother to read the OP, in order to understand the purpose of this discussion. LOL ... ok, ok,... maybe next time I'll spend more time for reading your posts. However, at this time I am not interested in getting involved further... Continue your struggle mate |
|
|
|
Every idea or article has a meaning and purpose behind it, so OP definitely has a goal by creating this thread Yes, the goal is preserving DT at a fair and decent level + protecting users from Ratimov's constant abuses. If that's the case, just give theymos a suggestion to remove the DT system. So there will be no more abuse of the trust system. The problem will be resolved. In the end, you will most likely reconcile with ratimov and remove the negative tags you placed on each other's profiles. I'm disappointed that as a non-DT member, DT is increasingly losing credibility with their respective bullshit and reputation fights. If you are the custodian of a trust system, then please create a reputation that you have wisdom, I hate drama and bullshit. In the end, neither of you is right, you both are just abusing the trust system by sticking negative tags on each other's profiles. Nonsense |
|
|
|
Please delete my account, the button doesn't want to work.
As far as I know, there is no option to delete an already created account. If you no longer wish to have an account, simply log out and don't come back. I think that's enough and the forum won't lose if you suddenly disappear. So no need to worry about anything. Finished |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
