I hadn't seen that yet. This change happened the week before March 9, in which theymos stopped trusting and started distrusting Tomatocage. I presume you do not like this because he has the integrity that you and those you support lack.
I was wondering if you would jump in with your main account or with one of your sockpuppets. I wouldn't call waking up just in time for DT1 election "integrity" but he would be instantly excluded so who cares. How about you try to post something on topic, TYVM. ...and just like that, TomatoCage is in poll position once again...
|
|
|
@Tomatocage, if you're still around can you edit your thread OP Stake your Bitcoin address here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0 to include the following piece of code (or the whole quote) [quote author=shorena link=topic=990345.msg10775516#msg10775516 date=1426375818] If you write a post/PM it should look like on the picture below: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F%26%2350%3B%26%2348%3B%26%2350%3B%26%2351%3B%2F%26%2348%3B%26%2353%3B%2F%26%2349%3B%26%2355%3B%2Fblob%26%2357%3B%26%2348%3B%26%2352%3Badffe%26%2349%3Bd%26%2352%3Baca%26%2350%3B%26%2350%3B.png&t=663&c=44XCa_Zxsa8VsQ) and for everyone else reading, it looks like this: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- <insert message here> -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- <insert address here> <insert signature here> -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[/quote] which was originally posted in the How to sign a message?! - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0 thread please? It'll save on a lot of extra posts asking people to sign their messages etc.
|
|
|
You have to mail to liquidation@cryptopia.co.nz if you want to write to them ! Thats the offical email now to contact cryptopia and the liquidators ! Yes, thank you. I Sent them an email. Just a reminder that there is quite a bit of information in the OP. The OP was last edited on the 31st of May and has that email, but thank you Lafu for re-posting that email.
|
|
|
Not really seeing it myself, but thanks for the heads-up.
The evidences are laid in there and if you can see the same ETH address on their profiles and the one posted by unemployed surely they are alts. Furthermore they do abuse the merit system by meriting his alts, clearly a violation of the forum rules. As marlboroza said probably more accounts can be connected in it, if I can get more time I may dig on it. Sorry, I should have explained myself a bit better, I don't use ETH and some of the patterns I'm not sure what I'm looking at hence why I couldn't see it. I've mentioned once or twice previous that I don't track ETH usage so I leave it to the experts. I'll try to ensure I elaborate better next time. Thanks for the confirmation @ rhomelmabini
|
|
|
As I said in my post, it's not just the merits.
Sorry for not responding sooner. The merit log is parsed every minute. Activity is updated once per hour (can I decrease this?) Trust on parse and recognition on change. The ranks are recalculated every min as well, but only if needed. So with merit not updating, the ranks would only update when something else changed. There are only five badges right now, but I want to add a sixth for DT status. No, I do not use any sub ranking because I don't know what best to rank on. MSSQL cannot guarantee the order of non ranked columns, so your ranking may change as the ranking tables are updated. Thanks for the explanation of the updating - I'm still trying to figure out how to utilize this tool for the Known Alts thread (I see others are referencing the site) I was in a group of writers a while ago that had a ranking system for the various figures, how many contributions, how many pages posted etc. One person came up with a formula (will have to dig it out to reference it) but it was something like square (number of ranks) root of ( 1/rank1 X 1/rank2 X 1/rank3 etc ) It's been over a decade since I last had a look at that formula so I'll have to hunt it out and pass it on to you for consideration. It did seem to work with varied ranks.
*edit* May have been square (number of ranks) root of ( 1/( 1/rank1 X 1/rank2 X 1/rank3 etc ))*second edit* Did some calculations during my break at work today, am trying to recall a formula I saw more than 20 years ago and haven't referenced in over a decade/dozen years... square (number of ranks) root of ( rank1 X rank2 X rank3 etc ) This gets you an accurate number - but I hasten to point out that it isn't the same number as when you add the values together and then do an average, you get a different result. (not sure where the inverse came into it - again I'll have to hunt out paperwork from 20 years ago, can't do a search all, just the old fashioned read each page until I find what I'm looking for method)The same goes for in statistics where you divide (or square root) by a number less one where one number is wildly out compared with the rest. eg, I have four values above 1,000 as does Vod LoyceV has all five values above 1,000 and yet another xtraelv has just three values above 1,000 so taking one out still leaves one value above 1,000 which drags his score down considerably. For a sample group of a quarter of a million UID's, you would have to use all five values bearing in mind some people would apear to drop down but that is only because their score is deficient in some areas.
To save confusion perhaps a generic shield with >1K >5k or >10K be added - so that anyone down the totem poll doesn't start asking the repetitive question of why someone with three shields is lower (or higher) down/up the ranks than someone with four or five shields. (And I just recalled the "Donation" Shield was the extra Shield I was counting in my earlier question)
|
|
|
Archive and verify my address, please Thanks
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is MrFreeRoMan from bitcointalk.org and today is an amazing day 2019/06/10 -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0) Address: 1MrFreeSjoKQonYC24p3VRd8A23xKbu6eP
G2k1k2RWLgejhiVe08mEGF4Hj9v95nCtnwSToQ1c+Cg1Bld/k1LrMvDOiJst7dokSEtCY0ErTl0oP7YtM54zH/M= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Quoted and Archived for future reference.
|
|
|
Still stuck on 187, while my account was supposedly parsed multiple times in the past 2 days.
I am also updating the merit parsing, so for the next few days the merit numbers will not be updated.
He just said that merit number will not be updated in the next few days. Just be patient. As I said in my post, it's not just the merits.
|
|
|
What version of BitCoin is needed for this to work? And, sorry to ask, can you give a brief walk through commands to use?
|
|
|
it has correct information in that link but don't you think it will be good to just put a link to download the app under that section instead of a quote from the thread?
That's a good point - just to explain what I'm doing I'm gathering the information and putting it on the page and anything useful I'm pulling off of the relevant page and once I think I've scoured enough information (there's a few hundred pages of posts to go through) I'll be tidying up the OP and taking down the W.I.P. (work in progress) tag. I appreciate your feedback and don't see any reason why that can't be done. Kudos.
|
|
|
I thought @theymos was trying to put a stop to these petty trust wall outbursts? Thanks for the laugh. Yeh, It was worth a shot. I don't see trying to continue this discussion is going to get anywhere - I've extended the Olive Branch of friendship to xtraelv and he's slapped it back in my face so I've been thinking of putting him on ignore for a little while, but then again he'd more than likely then try to Martyr himself saying he'd tried to communicate and that it was me who was ignoring him. QED. It's like those sad threads I stumble over every once-in-a-while where some person who was once held in high regards started to disintegrate before our eyes and then they went from being on the DT to simply starting rambling threads to beat dead horses with hearsay and supposition. Eventually they result to alts. I can't recall the name - I don't really take much notice of those threads, but it's kind of creepy that xtraelv would have started a thread perpetuating issues that have come and gone in the past wanting to drag them over long dead coals again and again. Can't quite put my finger on it - it reminds me of something, or someone, but I can't quite recall what it is... Not to worry, I posted my request to correct the incorrect text used by the OP - it's on the record now. I see hours and even days later the OP is modifying his previous posts (ie rewriting history on the fly). Nothing more needs to be said.
|
|
|
[quote author=xtraelv link=topic=4736673.msg51392865#msg51392865 date=1559988262] I hold you responsible for what happened with sexcoin. I think that is reasonable since you are a Dev of sexcoin. [/quote] But Why? You're not associated with Cryptopia. You say that time and time again. Out of all the 100+ alt coins that were hacked on Cryptopia last year, why do you hold Lavajumper and myself in such dismal regard that you have attacked us so? You haven't given any other Devs or their supporters distrust on the DT trust settings, so cowering behind you hold us responsible means you have a vendetta against us.
I've just had a look at your own trust wall, you've called people you disagree with criminals ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F%26%2350%3B%26%2348%3B%26%2350%3B%26%2351%3B%2F%26%2348%3B%26%2353%3B%2F%26%2349%3B%26%2355%3B%2Fblobbe%26%2352%3B%26%2351%3Bf%26%2357%3B%26%2356%3Bfa%26%2348%3B%26%2351%3B%26%2355%3B%26%2357%3B%26%2354%3B%26%2348%3B%26%2348%3B.jpeg&t=663&c=_w2-fzC7UKXV8A) and you've just in the last couple of days given one user Red Trust simply because they deleted your post ( poor you) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F%26%2350%3B%26%2348%3B%26%2350%3B%26%2351%3B%2F%26%2348%3B%26%2353%3B%2F%26%2349%3B%26%2355%3B%2Fblobcc%26%2352%3B%26%2357%3B%26%2348%3Ba%26%2357%3B%26%2348%3B%26%2357%3B%26%2357%3Bc%26%2351%3B%26%2357%3B%26%2355%3B%26%2357%3B%26%2353%3B.jpeg&t=663&c=H0h0ldpC47NJ8A) You've even given someone negative trust wall simply because they were friends of someone else you don't like: I thought @theymos was trying to put a stop to these petty trust wall outbursts?
|
|
|
I clearly stated that there was no official representation from Cryptopia on bitcointalk. I made it extremely clear that I was not authorised to say anything on behalf of them and that I was just helping out people in my personal capacity - I am not and have never been an employee there. Yet at times you tried to imply that it was otherwise and that Ben - a Cryptopia employee - was my "lapdog".
You'll be disappointed to learn that Lafu PM'ed me and demanded I change what I had originally written to read what you quoted. Perhaps after you've had a wank you should confer with Lafu. Where is "Ben" btw? - We've noticed he's gone AWL since Cryptopia went officially into liquidation... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Speaking of PM'ing, send me a PM some time as this barb of yours is not on topic and we wouldn't want to have a misunderstanding about off-topic posts now would we? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
This will be interesting, two newbies created in the last 48 hours wanting to swap notes. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Cryptopia is closed/ liquidated. Some says it is an exit scam.
Hard to say - the New Zealand Police investigation is taking its course and they haven't posted any updates on their website for a while now.
|
|
|
Please Quote:
----BITCOIN ADRESS ----
1BaHQb1eYCDJPzRdU2JZHXpo7ia7z2ER4T
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bitcointalk account : Asche Date 23 february 2018
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
IM6dRTJhukWSdgC8l0g6CT5uGO2neIEd8zFQLH/eqVvIOi5BJQyGD2EK0ct/xbpljAgZPz8VZMNHXVZ3hzvhsSw=
Thank you!
----BITCOIN ADRESS ----
1BaHQb1eYCDJPzRdU2JZHXpo7ia7z2ER4T
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Changed my password following my standard opsec. Bitcointalk asche 8 june 2019
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
IIKM2PnK4yN9sBLddXIE1Kqh9ixcVA+JAcQCHYae50C5GEfnZPi1S6a0zYVRvwcItY2C5rXXU+4SMiljdDVmfBc= Quoted and Archived for future reference.
|
|
|
Hi Timelord,
Yes still interested in trading gemstones for cryptocurrency what are you interested in and what crypto would you be interested in swapping for?
Thanks
I've got 20,000 SXC and was wondering about a "sample bag".
|
|
|
1) You are on my trust list as untrusted - because I don't trust you. The reason I don't trust you is on your reputation thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105851.msg49797331#msg49797331 In addition to the reasons stated in your reputation thread - You have personally attacked me on a number of occasions and encouraged others to put me on their distrust list. You have been trying to bully me into removing you from my distrust list which simply will never happen now. You are dishonest about the reason why you are on my distrust list. Yes I've been made aware that you have cited that post multiple times as the reason that I and I alone could have prevented the 100+ alt coin attacks on Cryptopia last year and the multi million dollar hack of Cryptopia this year. I've also been made aware of the shall we say pressure to have me removed from the SexCoin community such as placing Lavajumper on your distrust list until such time as I am removed. I'm sure @theymos has brought out edits concerning that kind of behavior.You have personally attacked me on a number of occasions Interesting narrative, but not true. I merely asked you to take your discussion back to the main Cryptopia thread as the thread you had posted in was for online articles related to the hack on Cryptopia. You also posted seven times in a row, then I asked you to stop posting off-topic. 2) This post (Bitcointalk trolls) was written before that time when your name was relatively unknown to me. Your name was put forward by others. I know now why. If any of this had been based on people that I have disputes with there would be a few names much higher and significant on the list than yours. So you just posted what you were told to. Interesting deflection.
|
|
|
|