Sooooo...how is this different than Bitcoin?
Nothing except it's close to worthless. |
|
|
|
|
TX d77c7943aef24e3fab567e1efe7e7e17c4a5b7b80c90718bda5b13b9d6316825
1 BTE -> lessthan4
sha256(d77c7943aef24e3fab567e1efe7e7e17c4a5b7b80c90718bda5b13b9d6316825[SECRET_CURRENTLY_HIDDEN]) = 4e6ae9c33eaeca35d7576bed922bb37858d155b0fb16e1f8ea359645cedbc8b1
Lucky Number: 4
LOSE (lessthan4, the lucky number was 4)
TX be3debacdda8ef02a256771fc5a357aa90f90d47ab59a11d2d407fad8df25288
1 BTE -> lessthan4
sha256(be3debacdda8ef02a256771fc5a357aa90f90d47ab59a11d2d407fad8df25288[SECRET_CURRENTLY_HIDDEN]) = ece491c17b3e90d5ff5e18cdda1a321cc095af71749f9354c5f545f0bd9a60db
Lucky Number: 14
LOSE
Min bet is now 25 BTE.
A 50% and 93.75% odds game is coming soon.
|
|
|
|
|
TX b11b564a79fd0fe989783fb32825e3b92fc0eb05cc0300183832d1479fc85b6f
50 BTE -> lessthan4
sha256(b11b564a79fd0fe989783fb32825e3b92fc0eb05cc0300183832d1479fc85b6f[SECRET_CURRENTLY_HIDDEN]) = dd15371e33893b4b457fd7ebecf498ccbbd1a3b9fd4fa7a934bd7eee2ea45242
Lucky Number: 13
LOSE
|
|
|
|
|
First bet!
Result will be published after 20 confirmations. This is due to the increased risk of doublespending with a difficulty of 1.
|
|
|
|
Bytecoin Dice: (Because I'm too lazy to code a site for this). Largest win so far: 525 BTEAs soon as you send the coins, please also reply here with a payback address (because of an issue with newly mined coins), or if you are not registered email to admin@glados.ccLessthan 1 (6.25% odds, win 12.64x your bet) 8bmKwMYHK5Y7p4CogkSmcpngsaNSPdo9p1Lessthan 4 (25% odds, win 3.16x your bet) 8VWXQEbHaBjCUiQTJKnMH1M2VvTePdLLm3Lessthan 8 (50% odds, win 1.75x your bet) 8SqHS5PNyNdCbYby2H1YFuwjxm1Mi4tAbuLessthan 15 (93.75% odds, win 1.05x your bet) 8R24VQy7Gmdx85VVyLeN9GDHYR9p1LHvZ4Secret hash: 897a7ccc6a1f7a926da949b03e1ad6d11458436d82eab2b581eb2c40963205b8 Lucky number calculation: sha256(txid + my secret), first character (0-9 = number, a = 10, f = 15) Current bet limits: Min bet: 1 25 BTE Max bet: 100 200 BTE |
|
|
|
*Warning incoming flames*
Why is anyone using BTCJAM at all? With the fluctuations in price, this service is at best extremely irresponsible.
It's not about the platform, rather, the borrowers. BTCJAM tends to a lot of scammers through. Actually, it is about the platform. When the money you borrowed is largely converted into another currency, there is an additional layer of risk. Even if the person has good intentions for paying back the money, they could default simply because of a price swing. If BTCJAM was used ONLY for BTC related invests, that would be one thing, but its clearly not. It's existing implementation is simply irresponsible. It isn't because you can already tie loans to USD already. No different from someone going on the lending section and borrowing BTC when they actually want USD. |
|
|
|
Bytecoin Dice:
(Because I'm too lazy to code a site for this).
Lessthan 1 (6.25% odds, win 12.64x your bet)
8bmKwMYHK5Y7p4CogkSmcpngsaNSPdo9p1
Lessthan 4 (25% odds, win 3.16x your bet)
8VWXQEbHaBjCUiQTJKnMH1M2VvTePdLLm3
Secret hash: 897a7ccc6a1f7a926da949b03e1ad6d11458436d82eab2b581eb2c40963205b8
Lucky number calculation:
sha256(txid + my secret), first character (0-9 = number, a = 11, f = 16)
Current bet limits:
Min bet: 1 BTE
Max bet: 50 BTE
I see what you're doing - testing bytecoin's ability to deal with dust tx. Hmm? It's a clone of bitcoin, no need to test anything. Plus, I don't send any dust if you lose. |
|
|
|
Bytecoin Dice: (Because I'm too lazy to code a site for this). Lessthan 1 (6.25% odds, win 12.64x your bet) 8bmKwMYHK5Y7p4CogkSmcpngsaNSPdo9p1Lessthan 4 (25% odds, win 3.16x your bet) 8VWXQEbHaBjCUiQTJKnMH1M2VvTePdLLm3Secret hash: 897a7ccc6a1f7a926da949b03e1ad6d11458436d82eab2b581eb2c40963205b8 Lucky number calculation: sha256(txid + my secret), first character (0-9 = number, a = 11, f = 16) Current bet limits: See here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=164700.msg1720625#msg1720625 |
|
|
|
*Warning incoming flames*
Why is anyone using BTCJAM at all? With the fluctuations in price, this service is at best extremely irresponsible.
It's not about the platform, rather, the borrowers. BTCJAM tends to a lot of scammers through. |
|
|
|
"Here, folks, Augusto Croppo personal information... So now that you have this information.... Well, he did not made anything wrong... So I do not know what to do or what to advise with this information... Oh, well, Augusto Croppo address is... Well... Should we send him flowers?"
I was thinking something just as fragrant, but less pleasant. At least we know to not use your dispute resolution -.- |
|
|
|
|
Doesn't matter, useless coin.
|
|
|
|
He stole $80k.
I don't expect anything, but maybe Avalon could change the shipping address of the ASICs in his name.
There is no way that Avalon will get involved. They have a contract with Ian, if Avalon fails to deliver on their contract then they could be sued by Ian. Avalon got involved in a lending dispute, so.. |
|
|
|
Bitter Lemon suggestion: Make the "spin" slow down when it is about to stop, so it's more exciting  And I love non-casino style games! |
|
|
|
Mods should not be able to remove negative comments against them - especially those accusing them of behaving improperly in business dealings.
This. Sounds fair...  If true...  What is this supposed to imply? |
|
|
|
You are hilarious!!!  Of course I'll delete your messages, you come to my thread and start calling me a liar... Zero tolerance for people like you. I did not give you any kind of freedom to meddle in my business. For me, you are just just another crazy Internet guy... Obvious conflict of interest. Why don't you make it a self moderated topic sour you are going to suppress people who are against you? There's being far more [false/misleading/whatever] accusations on bitcointalk that aren't deleted. Seriously, moderation here needs a review. I must to note that ThiagoCMC is also not telling the truth. He also deleted a topic that I made myself. That means he used his power as moderator of the Portuguese sub-forum to suppress evidence against him. Remove topic: ThiagoCMC, moderador suspeito de fraude in topic #164291 by member #50315 Do not post my private information (or of anyone else). Simple as that. Thanks, so I should go ahead and report all the pots containing private information of Trendon Shavers, Thomas Van Riper, James/Nefario, Ian Bakewell, Josh Zerlan, MPOE-PR, [...]. It looks like that this "rule" hasn't being enforced.. well practically ever until some mod got doxxed and deletes posts about it himself? I did nothing wrong. Policy is "not ok to post personal information unless they do something wrong?" What about Josh Zerlan and PuretoLibre? MPOE-PR? Tons of other examples. And besides not making a full repayment can be considered doing something wrong. (Apologies if wrong, I haven't followed this issue). |
|
|
|
You are hilarious!!! Of course I'll delete your messages, you come to my thread and start calling me a liar... Zero tolerance for people like you. I did not give you any kind of freedom to meddle in my business. For me, you are just just another crazy Internet guy... Obvious conflict of interest. Why don't you make it a self moderated topic sour you are going to suppress people who are against you? There's being far more [false/misleading/whatever] accusations on bitcointalk that aren't deleted. Seriously, moderation here needs a review. Please, let me know where I made a mistake. I do not have any kind of business with Augusto. And he keeps posting my private information here. He is nuts. Please don't skip over the question here - why is it not OK to post YOUR private information, but it is OK to post other people's? If the latter is not true, then why aren't those posts deleted? If you're not sure where they are I am happy to report a few hundred posts |
|
|
|
You are hilarious!!! Of course I'll delete your messages, you come to my thread and start calling me a liar... Zero tolerance for people like you. I did not give you any kind of freedom to meddle in my business. For me, you are just just another crazy Internet guy... Obvious conflict of interest. Why don't you make it a self moderated topic sour you are going to suppress people who are against you? There's being far more [false/misleading/whatever] accusations on bitcointalk that aren't deleted. Seriously, moderation here needs a review. I must to note that ThiagoCMC is also not telling the truth. He also deleted a topic that I made myself. That means he used his power as moderator of the Portuguese sub-forum to suppress evidence against him. Remove topic: ThiagoCMC, moderador suspeito de fraude in topic #164291 by member #50315 Do not post my private information (or of anyone else). Simple as that. Thanks, so I should go ahead and report all the pots containing private information of Trendon Shavers, Thomas Van Riper, James/Nefario, Ian Bakewell, Josh Zerlan, MPOE-PR, [...]. It looks like that this "rule" hasn't being enforced.. well practically ever until some mod got doxxed and deletes posts about it himself? |
|
|
|
Not finding the explanation given in either of these threads satisfactory. Mods should not be able to remove negative comments against them - especially those accusing them of behaving improperly in business dealings. If they truly believe that a post about them should be removed, they should be required to report it to other mods/theymos.
Regardless of my opinion about the original issue, I believe there was a blatant abuse of moderator power in this instance and such abuses need to be prevented in the future.
Agreed. I don't even have an opinion about the original issue. ThiagoCMC, please advise me if I should report a few hundred posts containing private personal information of Trendon Shavers, Thomas Van Riper, Ian Bakewell, Josh Zerlan, and others. |
|
|
|
|
And why the fuck are mods doing moderation on their own issues.. It's like a detective tasked with investigating himself for murder . Herp derp.
|
|
|
|
I removed only the posts under my own thread...
So you didn't remove this? Theymos can easily verify that. Remove topic: ThiagoCMC, moderador suspeito de fraude in topic #164291 by member #50315 As I said, I removed the posts containing my private information or any link to it. And my own thread. If I did something wrong, please, let me know. What the? Why are you not nuking pretty much the whole scammer accusations thread because it's full of dox? The fact that you have mod powers shouldn't mean people can't post your private info but can post others. Theymos, what is the forum's official policy on personal information? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
