try{
// CODICE NUOVO
}
catch(Exception e){
// SCRIVI LOG ERROR
}
sicuro al 100% Grin
Ritirate tutto, fidatevi. Male non può fare. e dove si va? cosa consigliate? io dovrei depositarci fiat (se bitstamp non se la fuma) TheRockTrading , kraken oppure anche btc-e . Vediamo però come se la gioca bitStamp ..... |
|
|
|
|
The actionCrypto team has not still sent me more funds , I hope they will send the funds before the 23.59 GMT of today. If it was not so I will pay only 50 constructive posts made during the week.
|
|
|
|
I can confirm that I'm back in control of my account.
Thanks again to Quickseller for the heads-up. Theymos for the quick acting. doingdoing3000, fronti and qwk for calling/messaging me and all others. I'm really impressed on how fast and well this was resolved.
It's late here so I will "fix" stuff (Post that were not by me, trust ratings, etc) tomorrow.
Oh , perfect ! I've removed my negative feedback. |
|
|
|
ok....i am not going to fight and argue.
it was hacked --- believe it or not
lord help you all
Can you prove that your account was hacked? |
|
|
|
Need of: 0.01 BTC
time line: 1 or 2 days
pay back: 0.12 btc
collaterals: 2 of my LTC
0.12btc payback? I can help him , right now  ! |
|
|
|
Amount needed : 0.01 btc
Term : 24-48H
Collateral : 2 LTC
Reason : buy new car
Do you still want this loan ? Send the collateral to a reputable users ( also marcotheminer, why not ?) and I can help you. |
|
|
|
From my own experience, Vod reacts fast when I message some of the trusted members to mark some defaulter or potential scammer. There was one instance when there was a delay in marking SuperDay, and he scammed Blazedout419 and was attempting more before finally getting marked. That was a rare case when Vod was late, and it also demonstrated the need to have someone like Vod who is usually very fast in marking them.
I am not saying Vod is right in this as I assume it would feel terrible to be at the receiving end of a wrong mark. But if Vod is removed then I can see a big problem, unless a few of the others step up publicly and say they are going to act on reports without delay.
Removing may be to much, but we are more concerned about the way it's done. He has used the system to state someone has lied. hell he just called me a pathological liar. And a child. With out reference. And accused another of having a hacked account If we use the system as a joke it becomes a joke. Vod will be never removed from the defaultTrust list. Just my two cents. |
|
|
|
Io ho provato con soli 0.028 btc , e devo dire che mi sono arrivati raddoppiati nei tempi stabiliti. Ovvio che non ci metto più neanche un satoshi la sopra . C'è gente che ci va giù duro..
2015-01-08 18:05:06 Bitcoin 13U3fuejR2VZLT9PRAV3BZBnGxaqhy6WfF 23.90938143 BTC DEPOSIT TRANSACTION ID 99:41:55 47.81876286 BTC
Potrebbero essere gli stessi "gestori" del sito ad aver "investito" 23 btc , proprio per attirare più gente. |
|
|
|
Hi dear I was banned for 5 days due to bump spam. Will you please take me in again . now im back Thanks No , you were banned so I can't accept you anymore. Feel free to remove the personal message , thanks for the attention. redsn0w |
|
|
|
I think this might be an effective metric when used with a mutually agreed upon transaction process in order to make sure people can not leave feedback without the other user agreeing to trade first.
Which I would find unfortunate. As it is, the trust system is not used too much, it's used too little. People should be encouraged to leave trust whenever they feel like it, not only after they've completed a deal with someone. We all remember at least one occasion where any trust system based solely upon earlier trades would have utterly failed: pirateat40. That's what we should avoid by all means. If any user does not trust any other user, the trust system should give him the means to express this mistrust, no matter what. In an open system, this will also mean retaliation ratings. As we can clearly see from users like Tomatocage, retaliation does not necessarily pose a problem. 1. Most scams are performed by low-level users, or by "suspicious" high-level users. 2. Most scams are detected early on by high-level users. 3. Scam warnings are needed the most by low-level users. Any trust system should reflect this. So as you told , for example : Can I leave a negative feedback to another user "only" because I don't trust him ? I think if someone will try to do this , he will be surely "obligated" to remove/change the feedback or bad removed from the defaultTrust list. |
|
|
|
ok, thx. So I suppose "recently" in the trust feedback means 30 days?
Yes , as you see he (or the buyer/hacker ) has changed the password :  I've left him a negative feedback for a security reason , when all will be resolved I obviously remove it. |
|
|
|
rl=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37537]Spekulatius[/url] * This user's password was reset recently.
How do you now that this user reset its password? Is that a publicly available info? (I think this shouldn't be publicly available. There is a legit use for a pw reminder, and I don't want my account being marked as hacked just because I forgot my pw and did a reset..) You can see this when you click on trust feedback. Here is the list ( 30days ) : https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php |
|
|
|
a. User ID in www.cloudmining.website: 3710 b. Bitcointalk.org User Name: redsn0w c. Bitcointalk.org Total Post Count: 4874 d. Bitcoin Address: 1redsY74u97ECVVKx7Gz9QWJWECUuzsrj |
|
|
|
Hello,
this is blizzen! I created a new accout "blizzen1", because my real account "blizzen" is hacked. I´m in contact with theymos to clear the situation.
greets
blizzen(1)
I've left to your account a negative feedback ( only for security) When you will come back in possession the account, contact me and I will remove it . However gmx is very incompetent. |
|
|
|
....
Nice rates but anyone knows if BitCoinDream is trustworthy?
He has no green trust
Green trust doesn't mean you are trustwhorthy, remember it ! However it is a nice signature campaign for 25 posts he will pay you 0.05 btc /week ( It is a great payRate). |
|
|
|
data matches. is spekulatius confirmed to have been taken? spoderman offered to sell it to me very shortly after its password was reset via email (see PM dump on page two of this thread) even though it hadn't posted in months. Someone also logged in to it yesterday but made no posts. He refused to confirm that he was able to confirm ownership which leads me to believe that he cannot do so. His last post was done the 07th of october , what do you think ? Is it an hacked account (after sold it to another person)? Or just coincidences ? |
|
|
|
Decentralization is the future !
Ma come fate anche solo ad immaginare ad un exchanger di fiat decentralizzato?  C'è la fiat di mezzo, centralizzata per natura Con quella frase mi riferivo al loro hot wallet (e struttura del sito) perché tenere tutto su un solo btc address ? Anche perché senza le valute FIAT non puoi ottenere bitcoin ( se non tramite l'attività di mining) . Quindi alla fine come dici tu un exchange resterà sempre un po "centralizzato" (lato euro /dollaro). |
|
|
|
mi puoi fare un esempio di "strumenti di business continuity che rendono veramente improponibile una roba del genere"? thx  In modo estremamente approssimativo: dal punto di vista architetturale, distribuzione su piu' piattaforme fisiche,
geograficamente dislocate in luoghi diversi, in modo da avere danni sempre limitati
ad una fetta del sistema, mai a tutto il sistema completo.dal punto di vista software, ci sono una marea di strumenti business enterprise che permettono di gestire queste cose, ad esempio vmware vsphere per la gestione dell'infrastruttura distribuita del data center, strumenti di backup tipo veeam che permettono di avere copie costantemente aggiornate e di ripristinare in pochissimo tempo tera di roba, firewall checkpoint, insomma tutta roba che ti permette di mettere su una struttura che ti garantisca una business continuity a livello enterprise. tutti i servizi veri (che so, google, il nasdaq, facebook, twitter e compagnia cantando) sono delle complesse infrastrutture distribuite. Ovvio che e' roba che costa, ma non stiamo parlando del sito per vendere le caciotte nostrane, stiamo parlando di un sito che transa diversi milioni di dollari al giorno ! Attenzione, non sto dicendo che anche prendendo tutte queste misure, sia impossibile un down parizale o addirittura totale, ma possiamo parlare di minuti, al massimo un'ora ! ma non tre, dico TRE giorni, col tipo che scrive su facebook (o non so dove diavolo) una riga che dice: tranquilli, stiamo ricompilando tutto da zero, fra un po' siamo in linea ! Esatto , anche perché viaggerebbe con l'idea che c'è alla base del bitcoin. Perché tenere tutto in un unico posto , stessa cosa per il loro hot wallet (sarebbe meglio farne 3-4 che uno con 180k bitcoin per poi diversificare gli stessi btc nei vari address). Decentralization is the future ! |
|
|
|
Ma è stato sui ~300 $ per neanche 15 min per poi di nuovo scendere , ora siamo intorno ai ~/285 dollari. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
