I was thinking about replacing DefaultTrust in the following way: When users first try to view a topic in a Trust-enabled section, they will instead see this page and be forced to select some users to trust before being allowed to continue to the topic. In addition to the empty text box currently on the Trust settings page, up to 30 users will be suggested. Suggested members must meet the following criteria: - Full member or above - At least one post in the last 60 days - At least 10 people listed in their trust list - At least 20 points (see below) Each person gets N points whenever they are trusted by someone, and loses N points whenever they are distrusted by someone, where N = 0 if the rater is less than a full member and N = [rater's activity]/120 if the rater is at least a full member. The 60 people with the highest scores are selected, this list is randomly sorted with a higher weight given to people with higher scores, and the top 30 people in the resulting list are suggested. When the change is made, everyone who currently has only DefaultTrust in their trust list will be redirected to the Set Initial Trust page. What do you think of this? I found it not bad at all , pretty good idea . But if you ask me , I would totally change it and make everyone able to rate . Basically each user have the following on their profil and we should add "Request Trade" so we know that they really made a thread by giving a reference link or something . Marketplace : 0/0/0 (Positive/Neutral/Negative)Everyone who is "Sr.Member" or above can rate the other users (so less abusing on the system). I like this idea , every feedback ( positive , neutral and negative) will appear under your forum username. It will be a new transparent trust system , and why not "visible in all the forum board". |
|
|
|
They've increasing the payment rate to 0.002BTC per post, paying every week, also changing the minimum and maximum post.
Its funny what they're doing. They are increasing pay-rate but lowering max. post counts. Thus, the max. amount always will be 0.05 BTC.  I think they are trying to attract users through the 'title of the thread'.  ~~MZ~~ Yes I think the same , but I still don't understand - Will they pay directly in the personal btc address or in the btc deposit address of the site ? |
|
|
|
I already told this at local sub-forum
I hope this can help you
And no update for Personal Message ?
Thanks for the help , no update for the personal msg only the signature has changed. So I guess you have more scrowed funds now that we have to change the sig?
No I don't think , the reply late because we are in two different time zones. I'm sure they will top up the bitcoin address before the 10th of January, if you want you can leave the campaign (but if you remain you will be paid max. for 50 constructive posts /if they didn't top up the address before or the 10th Jan. ~ So I can pay all the enrolled users). As soon as the rest of the posts get rolled over to next payment ill be allright Yes , if they will send more funds it will not necessary (because I will pay all the 100 constructive posts). I will keep all the enrolled users informed here in the thread about the situation. |
|
|
|
I'm also pre-Registered. However guys , the bounties are still "valid" come on !  2.26M of all coins are reserved for FindCoin bounties. All these coins will be deposited to redsn0w escrow - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=768454.0 Current official bounties are: 500K for scam reports - we will pay 5k bounty for every well-investigated report on altcoins scam you know of. You can write about devs that ripped you off, or services that ran away with clients' money, blaming hackers and hardware malfunction - we'll accept all kind of altcoins scam reports as long as they are compliant with our FindCoin Scam Report Guide (we'll provide it on 29/12/14). 1000K - reserved for backing up community bounties. If any member of FindCoin community decides to put up FindCoin bounty, we will use this reserve to double up his or her bounty. 100K - for first FindCoin multipool. 50K - for first block explorer with richlist. 8K - for translation to 8 languages, 1k per language: Chinese, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Russian; another 2 languages - doesn't matter what particularly - will be rewarded until all 8k is spent. 2K - for FindCoin logo (won by Sarahiko, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=865270.msg9825338#msg9825338) 600K reserve for future bounties; we are developing community, we're sure we'll think something up. |
|
|
|
I think this little exercise has quite concretely proven: i) Vod is incapable of responding to questions about his use of the trust system, and the feedback that he has left. ii) Vod attempts to avoids scrutiny by making inappropriate ad hominems and other off-topic remarks. iii) Vod is unable to identify and prove any instance where TECSHARE supposedly "lied". It is safe to assume that TECSHARE has never lied about Vod, and hence Vod used the trust system inappropriately. iv) In multiple instances (takagari, TECSHARE, iCEBREAKER) vod has used the trust system as a punitive tool for stifling speech. v) Based on a precedent theymos has set, Vod should be removed from the trust system.IMO your ratings of gweedo are inappropriate. His thread title is inaccurate and overly harsh, but this doesn't imply that he's untrustworthy. I feel that allowing your ratings to exist in the default trust network would be counter to the forum's mission of free speech, so I've removed you from the default trust network. I'm sorry for this post , but I can tell my opinion. I don't think that Vod will be never removed from the defaullTrust list , it will be impossible. |
|
|
|
Nice catch quickSeller  , now is all resolved or not ? except that the gaping pw reset vulnerability at gmx obviously still exists Oh that's bad , now I think no one will use gmx anymore. They are very incompetent. |
|
|
|
I already told this at local sub-forum
I hope this can help you
And no update for Personal Message ?
Thanks for the help , no update for the personal msg only the signature has changed. So I guess you have more scrowed funds now that we have to change the sig?
No I don't think , the reply late because we are in two different time zones. I'm sure they will top up the bitcoin address before the 10th of January, if you want you can leave the campaign (but if you remain you will be paid max. for 50 constructive posts /if they didn't top up the address before or the 10th Jan. ~ So I can pay all the enrolled users). |
|
|
|
Vod's account is acting strange. Quick everyone neg him with "account hacked"!  Ahahaha done ! However can we stop ? I think all this discussion is not necessary , it ruins the forum image. |
|
|
|
Nice catch quickSeller , now is all resolved or not ? |
|
|
|
Hi, i want to join Personel Message Campaign
Username : Dr1980m
Forum Rank : Sn. Member
Post count : 397
btc address : 1JnUskxiaBERhTeHfBzS9CJq1D18MCpArK
Thanks..
can i join personal message only?
Read all the first post *the rules*, to not to incur in any problem. @mizna post your bitcoin address , post count , rank & username. |
|
|
|
|
At the moment they didn't send me more funds , So as I told in the first post *maybe* I cannot pay all the 100 constructive posts made during the week. I've sent them an email and a PM here in the forum , if you are not comfortable feel free to not "put" the signature or personal message.
Thanks for the attention ,
redsn0w
|
|
|
|
hey redsn0w, now I am Jr.member, please update the list...  Updated your situation, Please attention , this message is for all the enrolled users.
Change the signature ASAP, here you can pick the new : >>>> Signatures |
|
|
|
Sampey grazie della risposta, visto che sei più pratico di me ti chiedo, blockchain gli ha dato questo nome, ma lo darà anche ai futuri pagamenti effettuati da quell'account?
Cioè se loro hanno spostato diciamo 1000 bitcoin sul wallet numero 1234, blockchain lo scriverà anche su quello ? Grazie
No, non possono farlo, se da quell'indirizzo partono BTC (cosa già avvenuta) quelli di Blockchain non faranno niente. In compenso credo che molti della comunità seguiranno quei soldi, ma tanto verranno ficcati in un mixer e tanti saluti. Purtroppo si , per la domanda del nome all'indirizzo bitcoin - ecco come si fa a dare una tag , un nickame : https://blockchain.info/it/tagsQuesto dovrebbe funzionare per il TUO indirizzo, non per quello degli altri. Si ovvio, pensavo che @lottoitaliano non era a conoscenza di questa funzione ( da usare solo sui proprio indirizzi, perché senza private key non vai da nessuna parte). |
|
|
|
Sampey grazie della risposta, visto che sei più pratico di me ti chiedo, blockchain gli ha dato questo nome, ma lo darà anche ai futuri pagamenti effettuati da quell'account?
Cioè se loro hanno spostato diciamo 1000 bitcoin sul wallet numero 1234, blockchain lo scriverà anche su quello ? Grazie
No, non possono farlo, se da quell'indirizzo partono BTC (cosa già avvenuta) quelli di Blockchain non faranno niente. In compenso credo che molti della comunità seguiranno quei soldi, ma tanto verranno ficcati in un mixer e tanti saluti. Purtroppo si , per la domanda del nome all'indirizzo bitcoin - ecco come si fa a dare una tag , un nickame : https://blockchain.info/it/tags |
|
|
|
...
The payment has been received .Thanks
Enjoy your bitcoin , now I will close the thread ( If I will have any problem with the bb_code can I contact you ?). |
|
|
|
Somewhat related to both systems, is it worth investigating an additional level(s) of feedback in the system? Currently there's not really a difference between "This person is acting in a sketchy/slimy way, I don't trust them" and "This person stole 100BTC from me" in the numerical ratings. If people used it properly a separate rating for personality conflicts / general sleaziness as opposed to a full negative scammer rating might see the system used more. I can think of many people I wouldn't personally buy from / do business with / trust, but I don't want to leave negative feedback for given the gravity of it. I have my doubts such a thing would be used properly and personality issues still wouldn't just garner the same 9999BTC risked "This guy is a scammer!1!! He was mean to me in my for sale thread!!1!" feedback we see now. I think this is very idea. #bitcoin-otc has -10 to 10 as rating possibility and it helps a lot. You know someone in person, you two are friends and you would trust him/her with your life? +10. You did a small trade? +1. You don't trust this user because of personality? -1. See Rating guidelines for more. I often feel that a negative is too harsh, so I go back to neutral, even though that doesn't fully reflect my opinion about someone. The problem is that people will abuse it. Don't like someone? -10. Do a good trade? +10. Its the same reason that neutrals really get used on here already, and why youtube swapped to a binary voting system. Yes , let do an example : Now I have two negative feedback but I didn't scam anyone. Have these two feedback the same weight as other two negative feedback of another user that have scammed someone ? Depends, if BadBear had left a negative feedback with 1000BTC risked, it would have counted for more. In this case, I think the system is actually working pretty well. You don't show up as a scammer, but it does give someone pause that while you've successfully escrowed many transactions, there has been a problem. Ok , the defaultTrust works better. Let see if theymos will add this new improvement to the trus system, because the other users when see a negative/orange number under your name/avatar (I'm sure) they will think firstly that you are a scammer and I'm (again) sure they will not read why do you have these orange/red number. *At the end this is the problem of the defaultTrust* no one know at 100% how it should work. |
|
|
|
Somewhat related to both systems, is it worth investigating an additional level(s) of feedback in the system? Currently there's not really a difference between "This person is acting in a sketchy/slimy way, I don't trust them" and "This person stole 100BTC from me" in the numerical ratings. If people used it properly a separate rating for personality conflicts / general sleaziness as opposed to a full negative scammer rating might see the system used more. I can think of many people I wouldn't personally buy from / do business with / trust, but I don't want to leave negative feedback for given the gravity of it. I have my doubts such a thing would be used properly and personality issues still wouldn't just garner the same 9999BTC risked "This guy is a scammer!1!! He was mean to me in my for sale thread!!1!" feedback we see now. I think this is very idea. #bitcoin-otc has -10 to 10 as rating possibility and it helps a lot. You know someone in person, you two are friends and you would trust him/her with your life? +10. You did a small trade? +1. You don't trust this user because of personality? -1. See Rating guidelines for more. I often feel that a negative is too harsh, so I go back to neutral, even though that doesn't fully reflect my opinion about someone. The problem is that people will abuse it. Don't like someone? -10. Do a good trade? +10. Its the same reason that neutrals really get used on here already, and why youtube swapped to a binary voting system. Yes , let do an example : Now I have two negative feedback but I didn't scam anyone. Have these two feedback the same weight as other two negative feedback of another user that have scammed someone ? |
|
|
|
|
Congratulation bitcoininformation , and good luck !
|
|
|
|
Is justcoin.com reliable?
Otherwise where would any of you suggest me to purchase Stellars?
I suggest you to use poloniex.com it is easy and rapid buy steller on it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
