Thanks for the fix...

Seems a discussion with devs was here:

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chrome/XUc4eFH98Ck

All of those worked for me on first load.  This time.  lets see what happens again

Next load the last image didnt work.. but overall more seems to be working.

Yes.  I have loaded this page 20 times with no luck:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg5902307#msg5902307

And for what it's worth look at what I am currently typing into:



Hopefully you can see it.  It's a broken jpeg for me.   I am getting a 502 for the image links.  Perhaps you are doing something now Theymos.

I'd say there are a few around.  Some of them prefer to be counted among the chattel though.

Probably a mountain-goat building up a cash position to go along with the needed bitcoin position to (re)open gox.com

This is so super important.  Bitcoin's fundamentals are very compelling.  Until something comes along that solves nearly ALL of bitcoin's problems and overtakes it's growing network effect bitcoin continues to have a lot of built in fundamental propulsive power.  Considering that many solutions to bicoin's shortcomings will be layers on top of bitcoin, there is also a possibility, in my opinion, that within bitcoin itself and its community is the solution to it's own problems.

I assume OP wants to make the USGvmt complicit in a bitcoin transaction in some sort of preemptive strategy.

I can't think of any other reason to think up this scheme.

You summed your argument up well.  So.  Why don't we just allow multiple connections from the same player?  It's the wild wild west.  Prevention is moot.

One last try...

When we enable dishonest players to have a different set of rules than honest players dishonest players can find an edge. 

This is not a moot point.

I personally don't like late reg.  I also don't really care if seals implements it.  I don't play many big buyin tourneys.  I am only arguing if we are going to allow late reg we go in eyes open.  I see a hole there.  Others don't. 

I am good disagreeing, I feel I have made my point as clearly as I can.

First of all I can multitable and sign in as more than one user at SWC on the same computer.  I could even multitable as multiple players.  I didn't say I DO this.  I say I could.  Easily.

Secondly.  If people can buy back into a non rebuy tournament then you are right it increases the prizepool, but it also increases the field.  This may or may not be desirable. 

Say I wanted to play low buyin PLO tournaments.  Also say I am an above average player.. ie winning.  And say I have no ethical qualms with using any multi login tactic possible to increase my shot at the money.  Then, i would look for <20 player tournaments with a buyin of 50 chips and under.  I would log in as 3 or 4 players, and if I busted out I would reload another until the pseudo-rebuy to prizepool math was bad.

I could go to the trouble to do a little math to prove this tactic would give me an unfair edge, but I don't really feel like it.  Plus I know intuitively it would work.  Help yourself though.

There are lots of other ways cheaters could use this method.

Another...   Say you have 5 players with a MSN or Skype connection...  well... do I really have to spell this out?  In the end for a little bit more buyin (and a bigger prizepool to match) our colluders will dominate the bubble all the time.

I have never said seals would face complex cheating rings like this...  I am sating the more opportunity seals gives for cheaters the more chance they will take it.

I usually just lurk as not to muck up rptilas thread, but this is too low hanging not to pick on.

1.  Anonymint took no religious position when he made his argument.  He was using religion to appeal to his audience.  You missed this completely.

2.  The answer to your above question is because he has as much right to express himself the way he wishes as you do.

In other words:

Why don't you keep your a-religious moralism (sic) to yourself?

There is a lot wrong with this OP.

1.  blockchain.info is not the blockchain.
2.  blockchain.info is not an exchange.
3.  blockchain.info does not take deposits.
4.  blockchain.info does not have access to your private keys much less your coins.
5.  blockchain.info can go away completely and you can import your keys into multibit.

None of the logical paths leading from this news end in a happy place.  Lol.

It's "bitcom" I am fairly sure.

Let's do lunch!  On YOU!!!

1010011010  (boo)

Haha.  This is a good/funny point.  I don't really have any fear per se.  I just like to have all information available to me for all the decisions I make.  Including what games I play, and how I treat the players at the table.

IF the site adds things like late reg I am for talking about what that means.

Poker players in the house...

It is the crowning achievement for someone who wants to dance like he means it.  It's a place where he can keep away from all the riffraff that has invades this forum, as well as the burdensome bureaucratics, politics or shady conflicts of interest – just cool people, who genuinely care for what they’re into.  It's simple really.  A wise man once said: You can’t worship two gods at once. Loving one god, you’ll end up hating the other. Adoration of one feeds contempt for the other.

That's the real unseen point here...  but someday it will be seen.

You are truly a high IQ alpha male.

When will you release your new coin?

Late entry for rebuys is a no brainer.  That will work.  For what that's worth.

Without blocking IPs and disallowing tor (not even possible?) I don't see a solution for regular tourneys.  In that case if you want late entry you just have to deal with the reality it's a rebuy for shadow accounts.