Just wait for the consensus of pro-criminal safety traitors to again redefine "assault weapon" as the Liberator single shot pistol from Defense Distributed...
|
|
|
TBZ1 15otKCBRdhGhPCVud1WEvG8GTgnrEqjg39
|
|
|
The only guns that should exist are the ones that cannot be used to assault
What gun would that be? I can assault someone with a Dora the explorer squirt gun if I keep hitting them hard enough. Guns are inanimate objects and are incapable of assault. Only people commit assaults, and they should be charged for it. No, you cannot kill someone with a Dora the explorer squirt gun, no matter how hard you pull that trigger. There is a difference between an AK-47 or other assault rifle and a squirt gun. I think I could kill someone with a squirt gun, although it would be easier with my AK. My point is that the weapon is irrelevant. It takes a person with malicious intent to assault another. They might use a gun or a Bible or a railroad spike or a large dried fish. Whatever they use, they are the assailant and not the weapon. They should face justice without offering them the excuse of "an evil gun made me do it". Actually, anyone could definitely casually kill someone with a single pump from a Super Soaker. Just fill it up with potassium cyanide or something. A semi-auto shot from an AK (one of many desired and actual infringements in America) is not 100% guaranteed lethal unless you tie the person down and precisely aim it at their brain stem at point blank range. So once again, name just about anything hundreds of millions of people own, way more lethal than firearms, perfectly free to be used as a murder weapon.
|
|
|
Prejudice should not stop innovation.
|
|
|
Get it on a famous band's gear on stage when they play an arena.
|
|
|
So you are creating a forum software out of nowhere? Why would someone do it?
|
|
|
"tosses into the air for the drone to catch"?
|
|
|
And any lawyer who doesn't want to be disbarred will preface any advisement pulled from ass with "this is not to be construed as legal advice" or something to that effect. So really there is no knowledge sharing that will be sufficient. Free=your guess is as good as the next guy's.
|
|
|
As has been said the last ∞ times this has been asked, "it is a highly fact-based, factor-weighing inquiry" - in other words, pay a lawyer.
Interesting - the scenarios I gave above are quite basic. So we don't have an answer for even the simplest case 1?? I don't see why a lawyer is needed for this. Yes, we don't. What is "simple" to laymen is harder than calculating pi to the ten-thousandth decimal place by hand with a non-genius IQ, in the legal sense. Any answer would be pulled out of ass. FinCEN's "guidance" (non-judicial interpretation of federal statutes) may or may not be enforceable, and a lawyer will not defend you against possible or actual enforcement based on any legal interpretation... without being paid.
|
|
|
As has been said the last ∞ times this has been asked, "it is a highly fact-based, factor-weighing inquiry" - in other words, pay a lawyer.
|
|
|
Have you been paid by btcfile?
|
|
|
Have you been paid by btcfile?
|
|
|
Have you been paid by btcfile?
|
|
|
Full-length free sample (with audio watermark): http://db.tt/pt2VOGK7License fee BTC0.25 per entity. Unwatermarked .wav will be emailed once you pay to a unique address. I made it practically a chiptune, for style and hopefully future hardware wallet functionality. Topic locked due to threadcrapping on my artistic talent, which everyone can judge for themselves by listening to the free sample above.Please PM, IM (links under my QR code avatar), text 619-393-2253, or IRC me.
|
|
|
Wish someone would buy my violin so I could get a refurbed MacBook Air with this...
|
|
|
|