Bili tebi stablecoini dragi ili ne, nemaš izbora ako trejdaš. Jednostavno ih moraš koristiti. Jedina alternativa je korištenje burzi koje imaju fiat parove, ali vrlo malo je takvih burzi. Meni isto nisu dragi ali evo već neko vrijeme držim USDC dok čekam pad cijene Ethereuma. USDC koristim čisto iz razloga jer imaju mjesečne audite za razliku od Tethera. Iako je pitanje koliko se može vjerovati tim tvrtkama koje rade audit. Nisam baš puno istraživao pa ne znam.
|
|
|
postoje trejderi (agencije) ili jos bolje botovi ali tu se ne mozes igrati sa 10$ pa da vidis kakav ce biti ishod, tu su puno veci ulagacki pocetni limiti u igri --- sacekati cu iduci signal u telegram grupi, pokusati postaviti bas da visim dali ce to meni funkcionirati... Ja sam danas popratio signal ali na kraju sam postao nestrpljiv i zatvorio prije nego je dosegnut target #2. Igram se s nekoliko dolara pa nije neki dobitak, ali nije ni gubitak BTW, upravo su stavili novi signal pa eto prilike da probaš.
|
|
|
A pusti čovjeka... Neka pokuša. Zašto ne? Ja sam mislio napisati da je to tema prožvakana već jako puno puta, ali tko zna... Možda i njemu uspije.
|
|
|
Čovječe... Ja mislio da je antikvark dobio ban, a on je očito bio u karanteni svo ovo vrijeme...
|
|
|
The exchange does matter because it creates the volume of that coin. A good exchange means that the coin is serious with what they are working with. Unlike the other coins that lists their coin everywhere and mostly unpopular exchanges, they just want to get rid of it as much as they can because they don't want investors to be the first one to dump it off and that's the main agenda of the developers. But, if they are serious and looking long term for the coin, they'll create a good volume through listing to a good exchange.
I don't agree. I think that a good project doesn't have to be listed on a good exchange (I guess that by a good exchange you mean Binance). I think it's better for a team to focus on the development and not on the listing. It's better to pay more money for a good developer than for a listing on Binance. And if you create a good project, then it will be listed on Binance sooner or later, and without paying the listing fee. I think that too much focus in crypto is on listing on Binance and other "good" exchanges. More focus should be on having a good idea for a project and a good team that will support the project. Well, I agree with @batang_bitcoin, I think what he meant by a good exchange means that it should be listed in an exchange where it is most likely used by a large number of users. It has a positive effect wherein it has more potential to be invested by large investors. It's okay if he disagrees with what I've said and he's entitled to it. Put a good project into a bad exchange and see if the developers will thrive to work for the project. If they just keep on saying bad reviews because of how bad the exchange is, they wouldn't have the urgency to develop it further because they're also affected by the feedback that's being thrown to the exchange if somebody wants to buy their coin. They're also the cargo of the exchange that's why a good exchange matters. That's one thing that's wrong with crypto today. It shouldn't matter where a project is listed as long as the development is ongoing and the team behind the project is good. For me personally it doesn't matter if a project is listed on a less popular exchange. If I believe that a project is good and that the team behind it is good, it's even better if it's listed on a less popular exchange because it has potential to make big gains once it gets listed on a popular exchange like Binance. And when I say less popular exchange, I don't mean fishy exchange. I mean exchanges that requires less money for listing but is still legit. For example, KuCoin is an example of such exchange. It's not Binance but it is legit.
|
|
|
Well... That's a public secret that almost everyone is aware of but Tether is still the most popular stablecoin. It's probably because people don't like to change their habits I guess. I personally trade in Tether but when I plan to stay in stablecoin for a longer time, I convert it to USDC. I'm aware that USDC too have the freezing option but at least they have a company that's doing monthly audits of their fiat balance.
Are you serious? Holding USDC for long term investment is not profitable I guess. I will be prefer to choose an altcoin even I choose ripple comparing I choose Tether or USDC, because most of them aren't investment place. The stable coin mean there is a little chance to you to get profit. But it will be suitable if your intention to came to crypto industry wasn't for investing. The price of stablecoins will always stand still, so making a profit with stablecoins is impossible. Stablecoins only help us to be safe in the bear market and help us not lose money. If we want to make a profit in the long term, we have to invest in altcoins that have good hype Guys, guys, guys... Where exactly did you see that I wrote I'm investing in the stablecoins? English is not my native language but I think it's pretty clear what I wrote.
|
|
|
Well... That's a public secret that almost everyone is aware of but Tether is still the most popular stablecoin. It's probably because people don't like to change their habits I guess. I personally trade in Tether but when I plan to stay in stablecoin for a longer time, I convert it to USDC. I'm aware that USDC too have the freezing option but at least they have a company that's doing monthly audits of their fiat balance.
Are you serious? Holding USDC for long term investment is not profitable I guess. I will be prefer to choose an altcoin even I choose ripple comparing I choose Tether or USDC, because most of them aren't investment place. The stable coin mean there is a little chance to you to get profit. But it will be suitable if your intention to came to crypto industry wasn't for investing. Oh man, I think you didn't understand me at all... When I said that I trade in Tether, I meant that I use USDT pairs for trading (BTC/USDT, ETH/USDT...). I'm not using stablecoins to get profit (that would be really stupid). I'm using stablecoins to keep my portfolio stable when the market is crashing.
|
|
|
All of you who says that USDT is the best stablecoin and that no one can take it's number one place. Did you know that most of stablecoins can be frozen? And by frozen I don't mean stablecoins that you hold on an exchange. Even stablecoins that you hold in your own wallet can be frozen in order to remain compliant with regulations. According to post I have linked, only DAI coin can't be frozen. in addition, my USDT also received information that only 70% of USDT was actually backed up with dollars. however, I think that could cause problems someday. but, although many people already know that, the use of USDT continues to this day. Well... That's a public secret that almost everyone is aware of but Tether is still the most popular stablecoin. It's probably because people don't like to change their habits I guess. I personally trade in Tether but when I plan to stay in stablecoin for a longer time, I convert it to USDC. I'm aware that USDC too have the freezing option but at least they have a company that's doing monthly audits of their fiat balance.
|
|
|
when investors and the crypto community already believed, but the team said differently! - The team did not respond well to the crypto community. - The team is very shady and does not provide updates about their projects on the telegram & social media channels. - The team plans to take a vacation - The team blocked accounts one by one from each community who questioned about the development of the project. - and finally you are banned in this group it's so annoying, how you feel? It seems you haven't come across a near perfected scam project that has none of these flaws you made mention, team will have good plan and will be up to answer every single questions thrown at them but in the end they still exit scam I think that OP wanted to warn new users on how most scam teams behaves and I think he summed it up pretty good. There will always be better organized scam projects. In some projects only the top team members are aware that they plan to do an exit scam. Other part of the team may think that a project is legit and that's why they answer every question and they try very hard to bring more people to the project.
|
|
|
How can we safe ourselves from well organized scam projects? Some projects are so well crafted and in the end they scam people, to my own understand research doesn't help here at all, use case, whitepaper, team, every thing are so real and make sense, please give advice about this
The best way to detect a fishy or a scam project is if it's promising something that sounds to good to be true. If someone is offering you a guaranteed 5%, 10% or even more daily, weekly or monthly gain, then that is a scam. No one can guarantee that much gain on such a short period. 5% gain on a yearly basis is great and everything more than that should be considered at least suspicous.
|
|
|
All of you who says that USDT is the best stablecoin and that no one can take it's number one place. Did you know that most of stablecoins can be frozen? And by frozen I don't mean stablecoins that you hold on an exchange. Even stablecoins that you hold in your own wallet can be frozen in order to remain compliant with regulations. According to post I have linked, only DAI coin can't be frozen.
|
|
|
Kod nas, na žalost, nema discipline i osjećaja društvene odgovornosti kao npr. u Švedskoj ili npr. u Japanu i J. Koreji. U Švedskoj vlada dijeli samo preporuke, ne mora ništa naređivati ali ljudi imaju osjećaj društvene odgovornosti i slušaju. Izabrali su izbjegavanje potpune karantene i pouzdaju se u to da će ljudi biti odgovorni i slušati. Još je to izraženije u J. Koreji i Japanu. U J. Koreji su bili na rubu ''talijanskog'' scenarija ali su se ''čudesno'' izvukli kombinacijom tehnologije i odgovornosti ludi. Kod nas toga nema, i zato naša vlast i nema drugog načina nego da naređuje i kažnjava. Ipak, kada pogledamo što se događa u jednoj Italiji ili npr. Španjolskoj mi smo za sada super prošli a mislim da je glavni razlog za to što su se političari malo povukli u stranu i glavnu riječ su dali stručnjacima.
Upravo to što su se političari malo maknuli nas je spasilo. Ovo je valjda prvi put u povijesti Hrvatske da premijer ili predsjednik u vrijeme krize nisu u udarnim terminima vijesti. Ali naravno... Opet postoji ekipa koja je počela raspravu o tome što Milanović kao predsjednik radi sad za vrijeme epidemije, odnosno zašto ga nema u medijima. A što bi trebao? Svaki dan iznova ponavljati da ljudi ostanu doma? Ili, još gore, miješati se u struku i davati svoje mišljenje? Onda bi opet ti isti ljudi pričali kako se miješa tamo gdje ne treba. Još jedan primjer kako nama Hrvatima stvarno nikad ništa ne valja. Jedino znamo kontrirali svemu. Samo da se razumijemo... Nisam niti za niti protiv Milanovića kao predsjednika. Samo mi užasno smeta to hrvatsko kontriranje svemu i svačemu...
|
|
|
Ako ništa drugo, sigurno utječu na OVR ekipe i igrača jer perkovima poboljšavaš performanse (ne znam kako bi ih drugačije nazvao ) pojedinih igrača. E sad, koliko to stvarno ima ulogu u cijeloj igri je rasprava koja traje otkad je sama igra počela.
|
|
|
O kakvom uplaćivanju sredstava se radi? Naplaćuju se savjeti za trgovanje ili se grupno trguje?
Koliko sam shvatio, btcltcdigger je u pravu. To je grupa sa signalima temeljenim (valjda) na TA. Što se tiče uplata, koriste Bybit platformu za koju imaju referral link na grupi. Ako se registriraš preko njega i uplatiš USDT, dobiješ neki bonus. Ali ne znam koliko se treba uplatiti niti koliki je bonus.
|
|
|
Nikako mi nije jasna matematika oko koronavirusa. U Hrvatskoj inače prosječno umre 150 ljudi dnevno, a od korona virusa je umrlo do sad službeno 21 u oko mjesec dana, znači ni jedan dnevno. Ok shvaćam da je i taj jedan važan ali valjda je važno i ostalih 149. Shvaćam i da zdravstveni sustav to ne može podnijeti jer imamo valjda 800 respiratora, a 5% zaraženih trebat će respirator pa zato moramo svi u karantenu, da broj zaraženih ne bi prešao neku brojku (16.000 x 5% = 800). Kako ćemo proći taj vrhunac ako nas istovremeno može biti samo oko 16.000 zaraženih na oko mjesec dana, a ukupno nas je oko 4.000.000? Zašto je baš presudno važno da se sada ne "opuštamo" kao da ćemo se moći opustiti za mjesec, dva ili godinu ili očekujemo neko čudo pa će virus sam nestati? Sve brojke su možda jako neprecizne ali mislim da je svejedno jasno što je nelogično.
A zato sto je vani sada lijepo vrijeme, plus uskrs. Ja sam primjetio da je zadnjih par dana puno vise ljudi vani nego prije. Pokusam popodne sa klincem otic na neki parking vozit romobil, no parking pun ekipe, piju pivo, rostiljaju, druze se. Prije cca 10 dana taj isti parking je bio prazan ko drzavni proracun. Da, ja isto primjećujem puno više ekipe vani i auta na cesti nego kad su krenula ograničenja. Ali kao što sam napisao, s vremenom svaka vijest (pa tako i korona) prestane biti zanimljiva pa se ljudi opuste. Meni je drago da ne živim u gradu pa imam dvorište u koje mogu izaći s klincima. Jer stvarno ne znam kako bi preživjeli nekoliko tjedana zatvoreni u stanu. A što se tiče ovoga što je napisao Nenad65, za godinu-dvije ćemo (valjda) imati cjepivo ili će virus nestati (nije nikakvo čudo da virus nestane; SARS je isto samo nestao) pa ćemo se moći opustiti.
|
|
|
Bitcoin and Altcoins form an ecosystem. No matter what happens, you can't just call them scam to protect the ecosystem. Sometimes you need to invest in those Altcoins even though it's so risky. This involves Whales of Platform coins too. As an example, Ethereum and Waves. Ethereum and Waves whales have to/need to invest in tokens under these platforms to make sure those platforms keep running and have enough liquidity. Let's take Waves into account. Waves whales need to invest and support Waves tokens more than users and newcomers because The more those tokens succeed the better the ecosystem works.
I don't agree with you on this one. At least when we're talking about Ethereum. I think that Ethereum network has enough good and already established tokens and ETH whales doesn't need to invest into Ethereum tokens just to keep the Ethereum network running. It will run without it because Ethereum tokens have enough trading volume on their own.
|
|
|
Stablecoins aren't giving us anything new or better than cryptocurrencies. They are only used by people who want to go around fiat exchange laws in their countries and/or not go through full KYC, as exchanging into a stable coin is like doing a crypto-crypto transaction that gives you a feeling of escaping into fiat. In reality, you are not really getting fiat and you are not escaping volatility as you're exchanging a real useful coin like BTC into a coin that mimmics fiat stability, but at the cost of centralization and lack of privacy.
I'm not sure if I understood your post correctly, but not all stablecoins are centralized. Have you heard of DAI? It's decentralized stablecoin. True, it has it's own problems but centralization is not one of them. But I don't think that centralization is the biggest problem with stablecoins. I think the biggest problem is when companies behind a stablecoin starts to act like banks and issuing stablecoins out of thin air. Of course, this is hard to prove but a rumor is sometimes enough for people to stop trusting them. That's why I like USDC. It's centralized (Coinbase is the company behind USDC) but they have monthly audits that checks if every USDC is really backed by a real $.
|
|
|
Kako ne mogu smisliit Saleta, to je nešto nestvarno 6-1 u šutevima, doma, valjda 150 veći overall i opet 1-1. Pa jebemu sve, na ovakvim utakmicama se titule gube! I s Trofom 1-1, isto ga primio iz jedinog šuta prema golu. Patriot golman bi mogo dobit papire. Haha! Da, nekako protiv tebe moji uvijek najbolje igraju Iako, nije da mi je to nešto bitno jer stvarno provodim jako malo vremena igrajući Footbattle. Malo sam izgubio volju, a i nisam više na poslu pa nemam toliko vremena. Na poslu mi je inače uvijek otvoren tab pa stalno nešto gledam
|
|
|
Restrikcije su jako dobro kratkoročno rješenje ali mislim da će dugoročno donjeti puno više patnje većem broju ljudi pa i državi. Takav udarac na ekonomiju ne mogu izgurati ni puno "jače" ekonomije a pogotovo naša hrvatska di pola ljudi živi od turizma. Da, restrikcije su vjerojatno spasile dobar broj života trenutno ali nitko nikada neće izbrojati koliko će ljudi izgubiti život tokom sljedećih 10 ili 50 godina kao posljedicu ovih restrikcija.
A da ne pričam uopće o tome koliko će pasti kavaliteta života velikom dijelu populacije. A još imamo i problematiku osobnih sloboda i privatnosti koja je u najboljem slučaju nepovratno narušena na jedno duže razdoblje.
Ne kažem da nije tako... Moguće da će puno ljudi umrijeti kao posljedica krize (ne kao posljedica restrikcija nego kao posljedica krize) koja će uslijediti nakon korone. Ali naša ekonomija je toliko u banani da vjerujem da bi završili u krizi bez obzira koliko stroge ili blage restrikcije uveli. Prema tome, ajmo pokušati spasiti što više života tako što ćemo ostati doma. Zar je kava, piva, šetnja parkom stvarno toliko važnija od života nečijeg bake ili djeda? Istina, svi koji su do sad umrli imali su kronične bolesti. Ali vjerujem da bi njihovim obiteljima ipak bilo draže da su poživjeli još koji mjesec ili godinu. Recimo moj tata je tlakaš. Prema tome automatski je u rizičnoj skupini. On se s visokim tlakom nosi dobro jer uzima terapiju i siguran sam da će živjeti još puno godina. A tko zna što bi bilo da se zarazi... Ali poanta mog posta nije bila u propitivanju trebaju li nam restrikcije ili ne i u kojoj mjeri. Poanta je bila da mi (tu mislim na Hrvate kao narod, ne na kolegu Rikafipa) uvijek samo volimo kenjkati i nikad nam ništa nije dovoljno dobro. Sad smo pri dnu po broju zaraženih i umrlih ali imamo jako restriktivne mjere. A da imamo manje restriktivne mjere i da smo pri vrhu po broju zaraženih i umrlih, onda bi opet kenjali kako Vlada ništa nije napravila da zaštiti narod. Jer onda bi za primjer uzimali Vladu neke druge zemlje koja je pri dnu po broju zaraženih.
|
|
|
imamo najvece restrikcije od svih zemalja u odnosu na broj umrlih i nama je to dobra stvar
Čekaj, stvarno? Pa zar bi to trebala biti loša stvar? Zar bi bolje bilo da imamo blage restrikcije uz veći broj umrlih? A da je među tim umrlima (ne daj Bože) netko od tvoje obitelji? Onda bi isto tako mislio? Ova tvoja izjava je samo dokaz da nama nikad ništa nije dobro. Sad nije dobro što imamo najveće restrikcije uz najmanje umrlih. A da je obrnuto onda bi opet pisali kako Vlada (opet) ništa nije napravila da se situacija s koronom ne dovede pod kontrolu EDIT: Znam da ovim postom samo otvaram mogućnost rasprave do unedogled, ali nisam mogao šutjeti. Da je situacija takva u Italiji, a kod nas da je situacija iz Italije onda bi svi pisali kako je Vlada opet prekasno reagirala i kako su talijani super to izveli.
|
|
|
|