Global inflation (and therefore probably the global recession) will spare no one. It will hit everyone, eventually, from the street sellers to the multinational corporations. In a state of hyperinflation, severe social disturbances occur and the economy does not function at all. People will focus all their energy on meeting basic needs and will lose confidence in the power of any currency (fiat or digital). Money exchange is replaced by trump (commodity exchange).
In the event of such a major global catastrophe, society is more likely to sink into the pre-industrial era. Bitcoin may be independent of institutions and countries, but it depends on other segments of modern society, such as electricity, the internet and IT technology in general.

This is my first time testing your playroom. It seems like a great game with awesome and cool interface. Responding time is fast, too.
I understand that you allow users to play with no funds, but hey, maybe you should enable the faucet for newbies as well. Nothing special, maybe every 24 hours or so, just enough to give a little more incentive for the game. I think the game can get addictive very quickly, so it will induce deposits as well.

BTW, I really like LuckyDice interface, too! 

This is not a game concept at all but, as some have already stated, the classic penny auction principle. Another drawback I see in your concept is that there is no incentive for the first player to place his bid (bet).

Player 1 must risk his 0.001BTC (which he will surely lose) for a potential pot of ... 0.001BTC??? Why would anyone do that?

User: FatFork
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 92
Address: 1Mtr3ie28nS9VXdhQvDq7QtAMRWzkBpjRG

Signature and personal text updated. Thanks.

EDIT: As there are no free slots for Member positions, I'm now moving my application to the Bitvest campaign.

Of course there are risks anywhere, especially in the crypto world. The whole point of smart investing is managing your risks. While no one can't tell you how to manage your investment portfolio, investing in gambling sites is considered less risky because of the 'house always wins' principle. Of course, this does not apply to scam sites, so you should always do your own research before making any investment decision.
I don't see any similarities between gambling sites and exchanges unless you were thinking of the potential scam.

Username: FatFork

thanks!

According to their Listing Criteria "CoinMarketCap listings are always free." and "CoinMarketCap DOES NOT accept payment of any form to bypass listing requirements or to intentionally publish inaccurate information."
What is likely is that some of these listed exchanges are reporting false trading volume data through their APIs or doing a large number of 'in-house' transactions to fake their volumes. I'm not sure if there is a proper method to deal with this. But I agree that Coinmarketcap should pay more attention to this issue since they have a very high place and reputation in the crypto community.

Ne volim baš previše ekstenzija u browseru ali ovo bi moglo biti korisno. Pogotovo 'aktivan/banovan/arhiviran status'.

Hvala na infu @dkbit98 

All the information is available on the Bitcoin Forum - Statistics Center page.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats

EDIT: Sorry Pmalek. I didn't see your post before posting mine. 

HNS siguran teritorij SDP-a?! Pa, ne znam baš... Bernardić je uvijek izjavljivao da "koalicije sa strankom koja je izdala svoje birače - nema!"

Can you substantiate this with irrefutable evidence? Because...

And it was a bold move, LOL!


Good luck to you, too. 

@Rikafip Vezano za Arc Iris Hydrogen, otkrio sam da njihov WP ima preko 15% podudaranja sa WP-om projekta Bitnanotech (bitnanotech.com). Nisu samo neke fraze identične već su čitavi odlomci kao i cijeli 'Legal Disclaimer' kopirani od riječi do riječi. Ali ne znam koji od njih je 'original'.

Evo ti link pa ih možeš usporediti kroz copyleaks.com i pohvatati screenshotove ako ćeš praviti prijavu scam-a:
https://www.bitnanotech.com/docs/Bitnanotech%20whitepaper.pdf

Potpuno te razumijem. Samo što su ti glupi scam projekti, imho, jedan od najvećih problema ovog foruma ako ne i cijele kripto scene. Jer, kao što je i Rikafip rekao, svi ti 'projekti' privlaće na tisuće 'bounty huntera' iz zemalja trećeg svijeta i, budući da nemaju poštene bounty menadžere, podržavaju širenje smeća po cijelom forumu.

Kad vidim ova imena kao savjetnike u timu... meni dovoljno. Hamza Khan je poznati scammer. Osnivač i CEO 'Stellar Gold' scama i samozvani 'ICO expert' koji je promovirao mnogobrojne scam projekte. Sa bitcointalk foruma je banan doživotno kao plagijator i merit abuser.

Hamza Khan, Rubab Arshad i Frederik Lund su navedeni kao savjetnici i na AoSPooling projektu kojega sam ja prijavio zbog plagijata u whitepaper-u:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221916

Khan je vjerojato još uvijek tu negdje samo se skriva pod nekim od svojih mnogobrojnih alt računa.

Gee, their team looks like circus freaks! Another good catch @witcher_sense.

Hopefully, you saved many souls.

There isn't much we can expect from a project with Hamza Khan as one of the advisers (if that is true at all). Hamza Khan is founder and CEO of Stellar Gold and a well-known scammer! A self-proclaimed ICO expert who promotes a lot of SCAM projects but has a lifetime ban here on bitcointalk.

63. FatFork

Congrats!

Nah, it is not the way it works. What you have stated above has absolutely nothing to do with the matter discussed here.

Clearly, you have some reading to do
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement

There is nothing wrong with doing research to get direction on a particular topic. The problem arises with the usage of whole passages of text copied verbatim from the source and pasted into your work, with just a few words changed here and there. There is no citation, no reference to the original author, nor is it clear how extensive the 'borrowing' was. This is blatant plagiarism!

Another thing we can talk about is copyright infringement. I guess you know what that means? The content you used in your whitepaper is clearly part of the copyrighted work, and I sincerely doubt that you got permission from the author.

Of course he has multiple accounts here, who doesn't? After going through his posting history (and the gaps), I'm pretty sure his account was bought/transferred at some point, nevertheless, this is not against the forum rules, nor is it relevant in this case. I have no previous experience with donuts1234 and I probably wouldn't do any business with him given his history and negative trust but this is something you should have taken care of before accepting his application.