Is this real? Baltimore is +2 in their home stadium versus the Steelers hehehe. What do the sportsbooks know? Lamar will not play?
Baltimore has clenched all xyz letters so maybe they are resting Jackson. He's a class act, got his offensive linemen Rolexes for Christmas. Pittsburgh is still vying for a wildcard spot, which makes this game more important than the SF/Seattle game, which it is why its this week's poll of the week: New Poll12/29 1:00 PM [117] PITTSBURGH [118] BALTIMORE Last regular season poll! Line is currently -2 Pittsburgh; poll, as usual, is for moneyline. If Jackson doesn't play, RGIII will step in as backup, which will keep things interesting. Ingram may also sit out, don't know for sure. But both players benched could explain the line favoring Pittsburgh. |
|
|
|
Admiral Byrd knows
we're looking for Atlantis
mock the Bible...
NOT!
#haiku
#JJG-not
2 merits for a perfect haiku, well done. Here's my Christmas gift for this thread. May all of you enjoy the holidays wherever you are around the globe. Also take a moment to be thankful for gravity, the moon, the sun, the solar system, and anything that is spherical and spins on an axis.  |
|
|
|
|
Hey Loyce, are you aware that BPIP is currently redirecting to your home page? Kind of weird... I know its off-topic here but I thought you should know.
|
|
|
|
The Bargain Boyz have kicked off the celebration early with some pints of shandy, happy to have loaded up their F-150s with sub $7k corn.  I suspect we won't hear from them in a while, but who knows what will actually happen? To be continued... Didn't you hear that they are still waiting to buy, those dweebs. They struck twice in the last 30 days. You can see the hallmarks of their work here:  - extra large volume - bargain prices - 20 inch mud tire tracks at the scene - lingering smell of cheap cologne |
|
|
|
The Bargain Boyz have kicked off the celebration early with some pints of shandy, happy to have loaded up their F-150s with sub $7k corn. I suspect we won't hear from them in a while, but who knows what will actually happen? To be continued... |
|
|
|
Chiefs up 10 - zip so far. Game needs to stay at this pace so I can earn some easy BTC.
Chiefs pretty much just gifted me the season, Kelce is being Kelce. They scratched McCoy on my opponent and they are holding down Robinson.  Weird thing is even though I have been watching the points McCoy was still in there but all of a sudden it changed to D. Thompson. Not that it matters but wtf. They probably knew they didn't need him and are saving him for the playoffs. What a runaway game. The line was at 5, hard to believe. I upped it to 6. I could have upped it to 19, LOL. What do you guys think about the Saints line being at -13? Seems really high for a late season game. |
|
|
|
|
Chiefs up 10 - zip so far. Game needs to stay at this pace so I can earn some easy BTC.
|
|
|
|
One of the Russian moderators still takes it into consideration -- I'm not certain if this is the reason why the wex.nz account was banned, am trying to get some clarity in that thread about it: Forum rules 3. No trolling.Look at the list of his posts and you'll see why he was banned. I'm going to guess it was the repetitive posting of a bitcoin address that didn't belong to him? Is that considered multiposting? |
|
|
|
The subject of the trolling is pretty much irrelevant. Being anti-BTC and pro-altcoin (even if that altcoin is a steaming pile of trash), isn't a reason to be banned. Indeed, if we banned everyone with a dissenting opinion, then what's the point of even having a forum in the first place. The trolling alone should be enough to warrant a ban, but given we have had to put up with cryptohunter/TOAA trolling the entire forum and derailing threads left, right, and center with walls of gibberish for over a year now, it seems that the "No trolling" rule is being firmly ignored.
One of the Russian moderators still takes it into consideration -- I'm not certain if this is the reason why the wex.nz account was banned, am trying to get some clarity in that thread about it: Forum rules 3. No trolling.Regardless, now that he's outside of the Russian section, I'll make an appeal to have Bitcoin SV banned using the same logic that korner was banned (both updated their password on the same day). However, Bitcoin SV has not admitted he is korner, guess he doesn't want to make the same mistake twice. That's why its tricky. |
|
|
|
I think a lot some of DT1 feels like they might get a retaliatory exclusion, and if you don't have many () to waste ("political capital" as I like to call it), then you're not going to exclude people for less than exceptionally compelling reasons. That's always a trade-off indeed. There's still far too much retaliation in the Trust system. Speaking of people with a lot of political capital, Loyce why haven't you excluded them yet? I'm just curious. I don't like to jump to conclusions, that's why I wanted to get community opinions first. Translated: Of course, LoyceV has a strange logic, because my trust list has not changed much. It has already been discussed many times about the importance of creating my own trust, which I actually did (I added precisely those people with whom financial relations mostly connect me).
And all this was done before I entered DT1, and there can be no talk of any DT farming here. The trust sheet is used for its intended purpose, no more and no less) The part in red (if translated correctly) makes me think he confuse the Trust list with feedback. All this is true; I just think its poor form to have banned members in your trust list. Hello, community!)
It's funny you're discussing me without me)
If you remove the banned members from your trust list I will remove your exclusion next week after checking Loyce's update. Hope you didn't take it personally. |
|
|
|
|
This haiku is called, "We Don't Have Winter"
Sweatin me balls off
On a sunny winter day
The damn A/C's out
|
|
|
|
not a shitpost, but definitely entertaining. the context is this guy is trying to recover his "hacked" account. The situation is like this.. my account got stolen by brain-computer interface that works wirelessly.. it is not commercially available so only the state have access to technology like that. The state can real thoughts, see what you see, hear, taste, smell and feel.. They can get to those information in real time or stored in memory as your history.. they have access to computers with operating system backdoor and can get to my wallet and my password and can sign messages so this method is not a good proof of account ownership..
I was attacked once by this brain-computer technology in may of 2014. and they fucked me up with extreme pain, they can cause illusions, simulate mental illnesses and cause reactions on the body that represent real illness even if you do not have it.. they generate illnesses.. was sent to hospital (mental institution) at the end so I think something is wrong with my brain and hide what they have done..
I am in the state of Croatia BTW..
In 2017. I was attacked by them for the 2nd time and they sent me to hospital at the peak of the market so I cannot work in crypto anymore. They have hacked my blockfolio application on my iphone by messing with app files so my portfolio shows around 2.8 million earned in crypto instead of 4.5 million USD that I actually have so I cannot manage my crypto and invest correctly.. They have kept met captured with brain-computer interface technology so I cannot wrok or do anything.. they can cause shifts in emotions bug me thoughts so I cannot keep attention on my own and cannot do anything.. they can cause laziness so I have no willpower do things I need to do.. They developed fatty tissue on my skin, caused my teeths to rot and get destroyes, caused extreme stress so fatty tissue develop into cancer, cause excessive body hair growth and they can also remove body or head hair.. Changed how I look, made me fat, messes me up completely and started stealing from me.. They stole BTC and XMR from me... I lost 2 years of my life being unable to do anything and I lost 4.2 miillion dollars.. They attacked crypto projects that I invest in and people that work on them so they go bust...
My account was stolen by them reading my password from my brain and then changed password and changed email so I cannot recover it anymore..
|
|
|
|
|
klarki is now down to DT1(0).
Is (0) the threshold required to deactivate their DT2-appointing powers, or is it (-1)?
I think a lot some of DT1 feels like they might get a retaliatory exclusion, and if you don't have many () to waste ("political capital" as I like to call it), then you're not going to exclude people for less than exceptionally compelling reasons.
Speaking of people with a lot of political capital, Loyce why haven't you excluded them yet? I'm just curious.
|
|
|
|
Maybe Craig will just settle for all his patents, whatever nChain is worth when fully dissolved, and a lifetime of employment as butler for the Kleimans. That would be fair.
Fair as long as Craig does not have any abilities to carry out future scams/frauds. He could still carry out scams in his capacity as butler... Pocketing loose change and such. Assuredly his internet and media access privileges will be revoked as part of the deal. |
|
|
|
|
I don't actually believe korner was hired by nChain or whoever to run the Bitcoin SV account, though I can't rule out the possibility completely. He's certainly not very knowledgeable about BSV, at one point claiming that half of Satoshi was a bunch of "barefoot Indian coders" (while the other half was Craig Wright, obviously).
I think what's more likely is he has a lot of fun roleplaying as the voice/community manager of different coins, exchanges, and companies. His long-standing goal is to be as disruptive to the forum as possible -- posters of the Russian local board will attest to this.
As far as complaints on Meta about it are concerned, I don't foresee that actually being a problem, but more like entertainment. What rational argument does a banned user actually have for being allowed to engage in ban evasion?
In this thread I'd like to build a solid case that Bitcoin SV is korner before reporting Bitcoin SV for ban evasion. I was kind of hoping some members from Russian local could chime in with something I may have missed before proceeding.
|
|
|
|
The blockchain evidence corroborates that the passthrough was shorted in the end.. Does it not?
I think the allegation is that some of what he got back from pirate (even if it was not the full amount) he didn't "pass through" to the investors. That is a separate allegation.. I was responding to this allegation.. I accused Og of lying based on sworn testimony that is on public record and blockchain evidence that confirms/proves funds were returned to Og from pirate.
Pirate said he repaid Og in full. Og said he didn't.
Og is the only person who can answer if pirate's sworn testimony to the SEC is true or not.
What I want to know is why pirate would say he reimbursed Og in full while Og said he didn't.
blockchain evidence that confirms/proves funds were returned to Og from pirate.
If anything, the blockchain evidence shows that he was not fully paid out by pirate.. The only "evidence" the passthrough was paid in full, is pirate's testimony to the police, in the transcript.. ognasty was shorted around 1300 btc.
if you find the payments for that 1300,which i cant. you would have something.
As for the mysterious 144 BTC dead end.. Separate allegation... (144 BTC is all that's left unaccounted for after it was shown that the passthough was stiffed around 1300 BTC, not fully repaid by pirate) You're making things more complicated than they need to be. 1. The testimony was delivered under sworn oath to the SEC, not the police. 2. I can't prove that all funds were returned to Og by pirate by looking at the blockchain -- I never said that I could. But certainly some of them were, which contradicts Og's statement. I just want to know what would compel pirate to lie under oath about returning all of the funds to Og, if he indeed lied. |
|
|
|
The #FREE coin is committed to actively support real world crypto adoption. Therefore the FREE coin will be implemented as a payment coin in several vending and e-commerce solutions. Our first 2 implementations :1) FREE coin implemented in the Ivendpay.com vending machines : buy a coffee and pay with FREE coin ! How ? See : https://youtu.be/4EmdsND2Mkk2) FREE coin implemented in the #weshopwithcrypto marketplace. You can also become a vendor on this platform, sell your products and get paid in crypto ! See http://weshopwithcrypto.com/more of this actual usage and maybe, maybe people will start to believe that this coin has real usage in the market. but if you will manage only few merchants, then your goal of being in the global arena is just a dream. im not availing this coin atm because i have the impression that you will just be a holder of worthless tokens in the long run...everyone if free to fill their own bags anyway.. Why wouldn't people just use Ethereum for these purposes? What's the advantage of using a highly-volatile token which you have to pay a transaction fee in ETH to use anyway? |
|
|
|
Thanks for another demonstration of the inversion of the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused.
I accused Og of lying based on sworn testimony that is on public record and blockchain evidence that confirms/ proves funds were returned to Og from pirate. I added him to my distrust list -- whoopty f'n doo. He's not being tried or convicted of anything because, as I've already explained to you yet you still don't seem to grasp, this isn't a court room. He could perhaps present another side to the story that I hadn't considered, but he doesn't feel its worth doing so, and frankly I don't blame him. Am I missing anything? You feel the need to do some more barking still? |
|
|
|
Is that what this thread is? People just asking questions?
Stop lumping us all into one group. Its dishonest, and stupid. That's why I brought up Twitchy: he was the one who said he could "prove beyond a reasonable doubt" that Og stole from his investors. While I tend to agree with him, I'm not willing to invest the time trying to "prove it beyond a reasonable doubt." I never said that I could. What I did say about Og was this: I certainly don't wish him punitive harm from something that happened 6-7 years ago.
So just stop with your bullshit Stazi Gang narrative for one second. What I want to know is why pirate would say he reimbursed Og in full while Og said he didn't. And you can't answer that question, so why you keep responding is beyond me. |
|
|
|
I am seeing a repeating theme of the inversion of the burden of proof and people demanding OGNasty prove his innocence rather than people proving his guilt.
Nobody is demanding anything. We just want to know what happened. Pirate said he repaid Og in full. Og said he didn't. Og is the only person who can answer if pirate's sworn testimony to the SEC is true or not. Yeah you're right, people are just making a string of accusations attempting to impugn his character over and over again until he is forced to prove his innocence rather than accusers proving his guilt = no one demanding anything. You are continuing to twist this into things its not about. TwitchySeal hasn't posted in days. How is asking a question the same thing as "making a string of accusations"? This is why some people consider you to be untrustworthy and/or a troll. I know you don't care what they think, but I'm just letting you know: this behavior is why they think what they do. All the accusers have is speculation, and the ambiguous statement of a convicted felon. There was nothing ambiguous about pirate saying he had repaid Og in full. He even spelled out O-G-N-A-S-T-Y for the record. Again, you are just lying. For what reason, I have no idea. If you didn't keep churning out bullshit I wouldn't feel the need to keep correcting you, BTW. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
