Due to this circumstances it seems Ryan will keep on sacrificing his moneypot's share of profit back to the investor until everyone back to green again ( was the previous promotions from Ryan over) (?) Too bad but Ryan is the one that suffer the most because of this huge win though , plus that this luthic guy is betting for max win which means there isnt any share of profit for Moneypot

One or two variance is pretty much needed here as there hasnt been any huge winner yet in Moneypot and with investor's profit taking a huge dip down then this is a good time to "gamble" in investment as the variance might soon shift again to the investor's side ( or that luthic could come back to dip more of this  )


or he can win more . He got some pretty nice luck though

No problem 


I did and literally I dont mind them for not showing it as they have proven themselves so far (yet this doesnt mean anything for future reputation though ) . Plus that it is not like that they are giving thousands of BTC jackpots unlike the other site


Tempting but I will have to decline this


You can use that for yourself as well though. Exploiting things is not really my way though I would love to get compensation for providing some bug .


There is and you can get more than 10BTC if there is literally a bug like you have quoted . Simply provide the proof to Coinroyale and they will compensate you though  .


Depends, you cant expect to win most of them in a very short run even with the edge in your favour. Variance is there to ruin it though.


Am I reading this correctly? Of course you know when the dealer is going to hit. The house is using the rules of soft17 which means that unless dealer has 17 or higher then it will keep on hitting

If your friend actually has an "edge" than it means that your friend are bound to win in the long run. Having the edge in your favor doesnt mean that you will keep on winning or that you will not lose because of the dealer's "luck as few bad hands are unnavoidable situation though I have never seen anything about bug in BlackJack that gives player an edge


Message this guy directly for the bug, he is the admin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=151862


They have replied to your request already, they will not be showing proof of their cold storage

If you check on the post, it is a proof that it is another rounding issue which cause the house edge to be over and under 1 % edge at some circumstances. It should be fixed though and those who are affected should be compensated


Judging from this matter that only 1 player complained / realized about this issue, It seems no one else realized this thing . Mostly people will not be aware of few small rounding issue though (most though but someone like Nico/dooglus might be able to notice it instantly).
As for the bolded part, players are not getting any EV+ though the house edge is only lower than the quoted 1 % house edge which means that the house is still getting profit because the edge are still against the player

P.S : Im merely stating my opinion about the bolded part based on two examples from Nico's post as a thorough checking needs to be done to see if players are actually getting EV+ or not

Honestly ,as one of the "bus-strategy" haters I would want them to keep on losing but that would be impossible thing to hope for. Moreover for a team like Chelsea, losing another match is not an option for them.

Higher chance would be that they would be winning the next match, so as a gambler I would bet on them to win even that I do "hate" them. Regarding Leicester city, it could be that they are pretty luck to have such a great run though honestly that their luck will run out someday ( same thing happened to Southampton before though )


Either he could be one of the best defender there or a flop. One or two good season for him doesnt mean that he is a tough defender in EPL

For the first bolded part, Minimum amount and house edge have nothing to do with the multiplier. The problem could lies with their rounding, it could be rounding issue of their multiplier (usually decimals issue ) . The same kind of issue happened a while back in crypto-games

For the second bolded part, it seems not everything over that amount works perfect based on Nico's post.

Either they have no idea/knowledge about what is going on exactly or rather wanting to cover this up for more profit. The lost amount due to this rounding issue may seem small but if players keep on betting without knowing that something is going on then they could get an extra profit each time

Impossible is not the word for it, as long as there are still chances for that then it is not impossible. It is highly unlike to happen, YES but not impossible. Someone could be lucky and hit the max payout with it, luck is pretty much different to each individual . Hui has proven that it is not literally impossible to hit it as he/she had a solid record on hitting the 9900x


Wrong, over 99.99 is impossible . What you mean would be probably be over 99.98 . As per stated, all you need would be luck. Winning the lottery is pretty much "impossible" for some people but there will be always someone that is lucky enough to win it

Ahh my fault for this, didnt notice this. Kinda akward that I missed in this in the "how to play" pop up


This only is actually in accordance to the first one though I cant find the clear chip button ( didnt notice you could use the right click for that ) but the funky part would be after the error I cant put more chip in it nor can I remove the chip with right click button and the only thing to fix this would be to refresh my page which for me is pretty weird and inconvenience ( is the same thing happen to you ?   )


Isnt it suppose to be 35:1 payout if you bet on 1 number and hit it?

There is no reasoning behind it as people are either hoping to win their bet or a supporter of Chelsea. With 3 losses in a row, you can expect the bookies to increase the odds for Chelsea ML which is a good opportunity for gambler to bet on it because for a team as such as Chelsea you can expect that they will be trying to turn a point for their next game.
With that said, you can expect they to win the next one or either bet on over 2 goals though I believe that they will want to end this downside trend in their next match

Not actually that hard, you might need to change few thing but it is still better than having a non provably fair mechanism


Sad truth is that is not like few years ago where you can create a gambling site, put up a thread and hope for the best. You need to actually advertise it more and with that non provably fair game, it is going be tougher .Even a few provably fair site sometimes dont stand a chance, as you can see how many sites that has actually gone out of business


Or just someone that fall in desperation

He will be extremely happy if someone tried to pull a stun like that. There are chances that someone might not hit it in 9900 times roll which means that an easy profit for the house. Besides that unless someone has quite a bankroll to spend than that strategy to roll for max profit of 19.8 BTC isnt a feasible at all though


Hui has proved that it is not impossible to roll for that though what you need is an extra luck. Combination of a good seed might help to roll it below 9900 times but the bigger question would be no one knows that the "magical seed" is

It doesnt actually matter though because all your balance is connected to all application in Moneypot. This is a bit inconvenience but for the meantime you can go to the other and claim the faucet, withdraw the bits from the apps and deposit it to this site for tryout

---

Found few funky things :

#1  There are no clear chip button, you might want to add that

#2  You can put more chip than your balance but you cant spin it and it will show


Now the funny part is that after you click OK there, you cant put more chip on the table or discard the chip ( since there are no clear chip button ), all you can do will be to refresh the page which is pretty inconvenience

#3  The "user list" is kinda screwed, Im using firefox btw


#4  When trying to open the page using chrome, I got this error instead

Seriously , I thought you were gone ever since there were no more generous poker site in this section ( that with huge freeroll and such ). The sad fact is that you are probably one of the reason why this site is in deep red. You are a lame people that abuse a freerolls but never spend some chip to help the house by playing at the ring game.


Pretty much yes, it is hard to market a poker site and not to mention that if you dont have enough funds for that then it is pretty much double the difficulty of it. Too bad indeed


sad truth but he seldom win although he uses tons of account 

There is still an option to not use the lockdown though I dont think that this is not a good feature (unique indeed) but it will be just kinda not frequently use feature so kinda a waste there (unless someone is pretty sure about the profit might be increasing at X days )


It is, for the better good criticism is welcomed I supposed


Changing it this way will means that Moneypot hold absolute control of the funds and pretty much weird I think. If someone intended to "not use" the funds for X period of time then the person could just withdraw it and keep the funds safe by himself ( just my 2cents for this  )

---

On a site note Ryan, is this lockdown feature supposed to be use to get some for bankroll the non atomic game later in the future?

Everyone can have more than 1 account and there is no restriction to that Dank and so far it seems there isnt any competitor yet for your top spot  . Regarding the new game, it is still progressing currently but it should be released once it is finished .
Either it could be at the end of August ( best possible scenario ) or at the middle of September is things are going well. One thing for sure would be that this game would be awesome and genuine which you wont probably see in another site  (atleast I have never seen this before )

P.S : the estimation above is purely comes from me though I think it will be around that time 

First of all , no one can predict the future as anything could happen. Owning a dice site now isnt totally like few years back where everyone could just throw away a dice site in the gambling board and people will be swarming it. Take into account that there are alot "older" sites around here and it takes more alot to gather some players from all of these dice sites around here

Second is that, he is not doing it for profit but much rather for getting some knowledge about technical aspect (references below)

Winning might not be pretty much surprising only if they could score more than two goals. As for the records they didnt play well against Stoke and they merely slip away with 1 goal difference which comes from Countinho speculative shot .


Indeed they are but they dont seems to be able to pull out everything that they had. Judging from their last match, it is pretty much that it seems that their homework wasnt at their best currently


Thats not a very good seat , the sunlight is pretty much blocking your eyesight it seems though it is still neat to be able to support your favourite team

You are being funny. No dice sites can actually give you more "luck". Just for the record that no one controls your "luck" though you can have a lucky seed or whatsoever but you cant really control your "luck". Pretty much an impossible thing to wish for unless a site decided to go into negative edge ( which is never going to happen ) but that doesnt mean you are turning into a lucky guy in an instance as well


Giveaways that a site can give is totally depends on their income. With that said, according to http://dicesites.com/. Primedice own 8,000+ BTC volume so profit is around 80 + BTC for them ( they merely have more than 10k BTC weekly so it is not a big deal though to spend few percentage of provide for more exposure ). Another site would be able to hold the same one as well depending on their volume as well as profit ( think of this of more of saying thankyou back to the community )

The problem with setting it this way would be that someone could pretend to be sitting out when he has a pile of chips already. This way, someone dont need to play for 2 + hours especially when the round is pretty much very slow. The other downside of using this setting will be that some player that lucky enough to have a seat with all these inactive user will be able to pile up more chips from these user which could be just an alt account of someone

The best solution would be that to have a setting that is some kinda "time bank" which can only be use if you play for over 1-2 hours in a slow tournament like this so everyone that have some urgent matter to take care would be able to use this time bank though  ( not sure if it is applicable )

tl;dr : it is pretty hard to please everyone

Poker is pretty much different than sportsbetting. Unlike sportsbetting, poker allow you to minimize your lost depending on the situation of the ongoing game , plus that you are actually playing against another players instead of the house and your winning amount is pretty much varies depending on the situation and not depending to the odds unlike sportsbetting


You are not a psychic and you can possibly know what will happen next so it is rather a matter of luck and not skills indeed. No one knows exactly what may happen next and things could happen as something unexpected might happen which is why we have a bad beat in Poker which usually happens when someone is pretty confident with his card and ended up luck plays a vital part of the lost


Plinko and dice only need a single click for the result