That is good.
As stated earlier I don't think there is any victim anyway if there is any real victim who can provide any info then we will tag for scamming. I guess you will not get any info and there is a chance those people whom you think are the victim will not discuss anything at least would not provide any info for the scam. Anyway, guess can't be always perfect we have to wait to see their update.

I have personally not yet contacted but several people from my local contacted and as further as we came to know there is no problem with skrill and Neteller that problem is only for our country. I have tried VPN yesterday and saw login page working fine on India. On Bangladesh now we can't see anything of skrill.

I have already pointed out all the point how that can't be a scam. If you have any point against those points then mention them. On scam accusation, you have to post on the proven scam which already happened or a probable scam which may happen. On your post, you mentioned the previous scam which is not proven.
See this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086015 I have provided all the proof yet what is told by DT (yahoo62278)

Have you any proof of those scams? No? Can you proof any so-called scam? I am 99.9999% sure there was no scam and you have just pointed out a baseless post which has made about 4 months ago.
Let's make you more clear, untrusted feedbacks are mentioned below:

USA.seller told scammed 300$ where on trust gave risk BTC amount 0.01BTC can you prove that time 0.01BTC=300$, can you post blockchain link? If not then how you can call that is a scam?
nolulooow gave negative trust where risked BTC amount 0.008BTC and not posted on the thread so can you proof that scam happened?
kiko2001 gave negative trust where risk BTC amount 0.01 but not posted on the link, can you prove that scam?
And one more thing all negative trusts came from newbie accounts except your where you have mentioned 1 BTC risk amount and on reference, you posted a baseless link.

So, think yourself how suit your scam accusation thread is. If you try to check then you will find out a lot of accounts who got negative trust from newbie and negatively trusted accounts.

If there was no scam happened and the person creates a post on reputation board then all will go against you except the account trading matter, I can't say anything about those account trading as I have no idea of those accounts.

I have no knowledge about Revolut accounts. But from the thread and from the untrusted feedback I don't think there has been any scam happened. If there was any scam happened then the people who have been scammed show as many evidence as possible on scam accusation thread at least on the topic from where they have been scammed.
Those people who told scam never posted before they told scams I think they have not been scammed. When there happen scam those people who have been scammed should post on scam accusation instead of 3rdparty like you, me and any other people as you don't know the reality, I don't know the reality and so on.
But if you mean account selling may happen scam then you may post for that but not for those 2 so-called scams.

From which country you are using? Are you from Bangladesh or from somewhere else, waiting for a kind response from you to know more?

Thanks for reaching to me, I am sorry but I do not take PayPal especially from a newbie. I only take PayPal only from sr member or above if need. Also, now I do not need any PayPal fund, thanks.

How you came to know that the website is fake and stealing our info? Have you any info regarding their scam. If you have any info that could be better to take a decision. If anyone wants to redeem their coin for fork then they have to enter their private key or seed there is no exception.
Yes, they are both same ones is asking wallet id to check and another one asking private key to redeem. As both all info looking same we can say it a scam.

Iconefirm gave negative trust then I gave with a valid point and also removed that once another person told both people to remove negative trust then I did that immediately. So, how much wrong I did cant imagine and for that point you have excluded which is perfect?

---

Anyone can include/exclude anyone without any reason but as you have pointed a reason that point can't be right. Your point is baseless because you got the point when there was no negative trust by me. If you want to say it is a valid point to exclude me then I want to say if I make a mistake for giving negative trust which was removed before you saw the trust then you did a wrong for excluding base on the negative trust which was vanished before you saw the trust.
So this time 1 mistake and 1 wrong made a right.
Anyway, have a piece of good luck.

As you are a jr. member can you please escrow the fund to ensure the payment of the community? You may choose your escrow holder from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5047302

Thanks for reaching to me, I am sorry but I have no PayPal balance in stock. I will update once it is available. Right Now I have Payza, Webmoney and perfect money.

The bounty manager could check easily if s/he requires proof of authentication and also s/he could avoid if ask proof of authentication link on the form. By this way, the bounty manager could check easily and in this way fraud, people never could get payment.

Thanks for your opinion. Especially it has drawn me attention which gives me a lot of inspiration. Thanks a lot.

ICOFirm was a mispell of IconFirm and I think ICOForum is not related to IconFirm. I don't know much as probably I wasn't active here at that time.

Reserve

When someone gives you negative trust without valid reason then what does that mean you are a scammer? If you are not a scammer then how you will react, you will keep silence? If you keep silence then what will happen, You agreed with the feedback which you received?

When anyone gives false negative trust what does that mean? The person told a lie and the person who told a lie can't be a scammer? In this sense, that person doesn't deserve any feedback?
I follow many DT and all most all the DT do the same thing which I did.
You can see feedbacks from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=164822 same type of feedback has been given. If I did wrong then all the DT who gave this type of feedback all did wrong. Isn't it?

Why anyone didn't call for those?

It is not necessary you have applied on the project or the person who has applied doesn't have any access to your account. Anyone can fill the google form by anyone's info which the owner of the account can't know. And the person who applied on the project may get payment too instead of the real owner of the account and it may happen for telegram campaign (usually), it may happen for facebook, twitter, etc too, in this case, they user others twitter/facebook profile who has already applied on the project. And this type of sin happens when the project does not require proof of authentication.

Can you help me by finding out their contact number so that I can make a call to them to know the fact? I can't find out the contact number as I have no access to Skrill.