Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2024, 07:49:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 ... 590 »
5781  Other / Meta / Re: Who's in charge? on: September 02, 2016, 05:06:55 PM
That's exactly my point. There was no posted rules.
Yes there are. Rules for each section are posted in stickied threads for each board. You must also abide by the forum rules posted in the meta section.

It was an ICO announcement in the appropriate language section. There was no where else to post it.
Generally altcoins announcements are only allowed in the altcoins section in English.

The moderator decided he doesn't want ico announcements on his section of the forum and just removed the post entirely without even notifying me.
Why do they have to notify you? It is up to you to read and understand the rules before you post. Your notification is the notification of the deleted post.
5782  Other / MultiBit / Re: why its take more than 90 minutes to transfer btc? on: September 02, 2016, 03:34:07 PM
txid:

  1f0293a89a1a6f55c33047aa988b1abce585bc40a291c1c2a91e8aa26195a956

and on the block explorer it says that there is no such transaction.
I am unable to find this transaction on any block explorer. Can you post the raw transaction? There should be an option to get the raw hex of the transaction, it depends on your wallet.

i paid 0.0001 fee.
That's probably too low, although it depends on how large (as in size in bytes) the transaction is.

if it wont go through will i lose the coins?
No you will not. Either it will confirm and the Bitcoin goes to who you sent it to, or it does not. If it does not, the transaction will eventually be forgotten by the network (although you may have to tell your wallet to forget it) and the Bitcoin will "return" to your wallet. It doesn't actually return, it just reverts to a state in which that transaction was never made.
5783  Other / Meta / Re: Automate downloading a thread on: September 02, 2016, 03:26:28 PM
For some help processing threads, take a look at https://github.com/achow101/BitcointalkForum/blob/master/app/src/main/java/com/achow101/bitcointalkforum/fragments/TopicFragment.java#L368 and https://github.com/achow101/BitcointalkAccountPricer/blob/master/src/com/achow101/bctalkaccountpricer/server/AccountPricer.java#L195 where I have written code (and comments) on parsing posts.

I can also write a program for you, for a fee, that can get all of the data and parse it for whatever you need.
5784  Other / MultiBit / Re: why its take more than 90 minutes to transfer btc? on: September 02, 2016, 03:20:37 PM
i sent small amount of btc 90 minutes ago from multibit wallet and it still didnt reach to its destination.


it says: "this transaction is not yet confirm. seen by 1 peer."
how long should i wait?
What is the txid of the transaction? It is highly likely that you did not use a high enough transaction fee.
5785  Other / MultiBit / Re: EMERGENCY please help for Multibit wallet transaction on: September 02, 2016, 03:19:00 PM
You have to keep using Multibit Classic. Multibit HD will not work since you are currently using Multibit classic. Try sending again, hopefully you will not run into that error since the S values are random. Try enough times and eventually you will get a Low S. You should also upgrade to Multibit HD, see instructions here: https://multibit.org/help/hd0.3/how-to-upgrade-from-classic.html

About that error. In the signatures, there is an integer called 'S'. The S can be two different values and still be a valid signature. The Bitcoin protocol made High S values non standard. Since S is random, eventually you will get one with a Low S value.

One of my wallets is still Multibit Classic. Is the "high S error" happening specifically found only in the classic wallet? I have version 0.5.19 that was released on 9/9/2015 if that is of any significance.
AFAIK, Multibit classic never fixed that issue because it was discontinued before Low S enforcement became widely used.
5786  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: September 02, 2016, 03:22:38 AM
I am wondering how post quality is determined can you please provide the algo to check post quality. Because I want to write my post according to defined algorithm so that I don't have to fear of bad post quality
I see your reading comprehension is high. /s

If you want to know the algo, then read the first post where I explained everything. The variables are very simple and self-explanatory.

The way that post quality is calculated here is by no means definitive. In fact, it is one of the worst ways to determine post quality, but the easiest for a computer. Post quality is completely subjective, and if you do everything you can to get a rating of "excellent" on my site, your post quality could still be absolute shit. Good post quality means that your posts are constructive and add to the discussion at hand.
5787  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is there a wallet where we can have predetermined change addresses? on: September 02, 2016, 12:59:30 AM
No it is not possible. You have to generate the private keys yourself for every single address. A chain of vanity addresses cannot be derived from a single seed, that is not how randomness works.
5788  Other / Meta / Re: My bigs21024 account hacked and no reply on: September 01, 2016, 07:46:25 PM
The only acceptable way to prove ownership of an account is to post a message signed with an address that you posted from that account. Otherwise your request will be ignored.
the btc addy i have on profile is my Bittrex wallet and i sent i screenshot of it
That doesn't matter. A screenshot can be faked. The only way to prove that that address is yours is to sign a message with it.
5789  Other / Meta / Re: Legendary one day? on: September 01, 2016, 03:10:56 PM
Finally eligible for legendary!
5790  Other / Meta / Re: My bigs21024 account hacked and no reply on: September 01, 2016, 01:03:47 PM
The only acceptable way to prove ownership of an account is to post a message signed with an address that you posted from that account. Otherwise your request will be ignored.
5791  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Anyone know what password to one wallet? on: September 01, 2016, 12:16:49 PM
If anyone knew the password to it, the Bitcoin would be long gone. You can try to brute force it, but it will likely take several years to complete. Furthermore, this wallet is someone's Bitcoin. By gettting the password to it, you are stealing someone else's Bitcoin. Do you really want to do that?
5792  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Getting a Shift Debit- Can I Use it Online Before the Card Gets Here? on: September 01, 2016, 12:11:39 PM
No, you do not get the card number until after it arrives.
5793  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: September 01, 2016, 12:07:37 PM
I have two things to say :

-Why do I have -6 in queue when I request ?
-6 is used as a placeholder to indicate that the request has not been processed yet. Why -6? Because -1 through -5 are used to indicate other things, primarily errors.

-You should not remove the price estimator because it is the original idea behind the site and because the domain name is tied to it.
Yes, I know.

Now a problem in your site . i am trying to get detail of my ac but i am not able . because this site is not showing me the box to entre code . since it was working two hours ago . please check whether is problem .
I do not see this issue on my computer. Try clearing your browser caches.
5794  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Sent A Few Btc Accidentally with no Trnsaction fee Attached on: September 01, 2016, 02:18:14 AM
abandontransaction didn't exist until 0.12.0

Did you upgrade after sending your transaction, or were you actually running the very recent 0.12.0 and not the 0.8.3 that you thought you were running?
Furthermore, if he upgrades to/is using 0.13, then he can just right click the transaction in the transaction list and select Abandon transaction instead of going to the console.

Code:
dumprawtransaction 417b1e741a30571bf27138a965864c27d5bb99c617a7b5864a3d3a24c959b928
It's actually getrawtransaction not dumprawtransaction
5795  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Unconfirmed transaction + unrecognised address in blockchain on: September 01, 2016, 01:22:02 AM
Blockchain.info is not the blockchain. What you see when you visit their website is a representation of the data that their node(s) has. That may not be representative of the network. Not seeing your transaction on blockchain.info simply means that their node has decided to drop your transaction. It does not matter what their node says. In order to resend just use -zapwallettxes or abandontransaction to remove the transaction. Then you can resend.
5796  Other / MultiBit / Re: EMERGENCY please help for Multibit wallet transaction on: August 31, 2016, 09:05:49 PM
You have to keep using Multibit Classic. Multibit HD will not work since you are currently using Multibit classic. Try sending again, hopefully you will not run into that error since the S values are random. Try enough times and eventually you will get a Low S. You should also upgrade to Multibit HD, see instructions here: https://multibit.org/help/hd0.3/how-to-upgrade-from-classic.html

About that error. In the signatures, there is an integer called 'S'. The S can be two different values and still be a valid signature. The Bitcoin protocol made High S values non standard. Since S is random, eventually you will get one with a Low S value.
5797  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: The new Armory website on: August 31, 2016, 09:01:04 PM
Maybe also try getting listed on bitcoin.com?
I'll try, but I don't like them. The wallet page is a mess to use.
5798  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: August 31, 2016, 08:13:44 PM
Well you should know that in writing class in college, we were penalized for making our pieces too long or too wordy, in fact, the final exam had to write just one page on a very broad topic. The goal was obviously to learn to conjoin sentences and avoid repeating information, choppy sentence structure is associated with poor writing skill. For a basic example, instead of saying:

This is Ben. He is a man. Ben likes cake. Ben is twenty two years old.

You would say:

Ben is a twenty two year old man who likes cake.

I do not have any programming experience so I don't know if this will be possible to execute but, you could make it so it detects what percentage of a user's posts are plagiarized (by linking it to a free online detector, perhaps?). Also, you could make it so it detects the degree of repetition of certain words/phrases/sentences too.
An algorithm to detect repetitions and such patterns is in fact ridiculously hard to code. It becomes ridiculously complex very quickly when you are trying to get a computer to recognize patterns. Since determining post quality requires analysis and pattern recognition, it is fairly difficult to do this in a computer. I have neither the expertise nor the time to work on any such algorithm.

For plagiarism, I don't think it matters. IMO the people who plagiarize are in the minority. The vast majority of them are found out and quickly shut down by the mods anyways.

Also, as I said above, the length of a post is usually a big determining factor for determining whether a post is spam. Yes there are exceptions; this has been discussed ad nauseam both in this thread and throughout the meta section. It's also completely subjective. I will not be changing the post quality unless someone can suggest a much better algorithm that is also not ridiculously complicated to implement. Even better would be to submit a pull request with said implementation.

Any news about changing the price estimator to add and relaying in usd so that it is not confused newbie seller accounts about the estimated price..
As I have said before in this thread, I will not be adding anything for converting prices to any fiat.

Honestly the price of bitcoin is changed and the estimate should decrease too..
Honestly, I haven't changed the estimation algo in a very long time. I am considering removing it entirely and just letting the site be an account stats thing.
5799  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: August 31, 2016, 06:24:07 PM
Is the sole criteria for judging "post quality" an analysis of the volume of characters per post?
yes

Because in that case, it will only reward people who are fans of pasting data from websites.
No, that is not the only people it will reward. It will reward people who also legitimately post good content which tends to be longer. Not all long content is spam. Likewise not all short content is spam. However, from past experience, shorter posts tend to be spammier than longer posts.

If you have any better solution for determining post quality (a subjective quality mind you) then I am all ears. So far no one has suggested anything better than checking the character count. And I don't want/can't implement a spam checking AI.
5800  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: August 31, 2016, 04:22:52 PM
Website now has https and will force all users to use https. http will automatically be redirected to https.
Pages: « 1 ... 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 ... 590 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!