|
Can we have a section that is decentralized? That does not interfere with freedom of speech.
|
|
|
|
It appears most of the people here are not of any political spectrum or group, but of their own spectrum. Sure they agree with things of the left and of the right, but that is being a individual.  |
|
|
|
While I am searching for churches that readily accept bitcoin for donations, I realized that there are now some who seem to see the potential use of cryptocurrency in their financial operation (religious groups do need money as just like any other organizations). "Father Rosado believes that St. John’s the Evangelist is the first Catholic Church to accept bitcoins and he thinks virtual currency donations can be much more useful than those in fiat currencies. 'In theory, in the future, you could exchange bitcoins for any currency. It would be faster to move money around,' said Father Rosado." "An evangelical church in Zurich will begin accepting offerings in the cryptocurrency bitcoin. “Digital currencies and the blockchain technology will change our daily lives more and more in the next years,” Nicolas Legler, spokesperson for Zurich's ICF Church, told Swiss media." Have you encountered a denomination near your area accepting bitcoin or cryptocurrency? Would you share the same idea to the denomination or faith you are a part of? "THE CHURCH OR CALL IT WHATEVER YOU WANT OF BITCOIN" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141757.0none profit organization here, Our Creator does not need money, no need to donate brother, just pay the btc tax fees to support the network. |
|
|
|
I also love conspiracy theories but then they will remain as that until solid evidence really arrived and until maybe what you feared has already come true (which can surprise all). I am sure this is not the first nor the last one presenting the idea that it is the government that can be behind bitcoin. However, why the USA government? Are they really that intelligent enough to have concocted bitcoin? No, I doubt it. Just because someone was mentioning CIA do not make it so. I am theorizing that ever there was a government involved in the making of bitcoin it must be the Japanese government...just look at how good they are in embracing bitcoin though in a strict environment. Nothing to say on Japan yet?
I think it is Chinese, 81% hashing power in China, think about reverse social engineering. (please note everything I state is speculation) other than what was posted by Gavin/satoshi themselves. Please note: I do not think Gavin or anyone in the CIA is a bad person, I think they are being directed by bad people and they should be directed by all of the people (51% of them), I love Gavin, Hal and Satoshi with all of my heart. Infact I have never met another being that I do not love, weather I think they are bad or not or do not agree with their opinions or actions. I wish only good things to all people, no harm upon anyone, I just want a world where people can improve upon themselves and have safety while they do so. There is no excuse we do not have free food, water and shelter for all of the people with the amount of taxes that have been paid. NO EXCUSE! we should be working on that right now, not missles or going to other planets, fix earth first before you fuck up mars. |
|
|
|
How do you use 51% of people? How do you determine that someone is a different person from someone else online? Are you going to collect everyone's IDs? Who is going to store those IDs?
Determining individuals is basically impossible to do and is easily gameable by individuals such that some people get more power than others without those others necessarily knowing.
Also, Bitcoin doesn't use 51% mining power for anything except 51% attacks.
filesharing, take a picture of your eye/fingerprint, gg wp. (it is already built into the ardor/bitswift network) The filesharing can check for dupes on the blockchain, so you can only have 1 account. here is a eye captcha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4x0vOAu0lQyou can do the same with fingerprint here is the file sharing https://youtu.be/Y7TLFyK_3Pk?t=965 I explain it briefly in this check out www.bitswift.network wallet (login top right). p2p exchange, file sharing, decentralized voting, asset creation etc.  Inb4 no more dead people voting and hacked elections. (wait there is no elections?) people just vote on issues and get paid for it? They vote where the tax funds go WOW and they get paid for it? WOW  |
|
|
|
If bitcoin was made as per your suggestion, they'd never have made bitcoin an open source project. These people and institutions are cunning and they won't make thier creation easily copyable. Bitcoin not only is the pioneering cryptocurrency, it also opened up grounds for hundreds of other cryptocurrencies. You are free to choose any others if you don't like bitcoin.
Bitcoin is everything these central financial sydicates don't want. That's why they are the ones opposing it, sending legal threats and spreading FUDs.
Counter Logic/Reverse Social Engineering, remember that. It is how Trump got in over Hilary. (both suck)  Thinking: Was she not suppose to be in jail by now, Trump? |
|
|
|
Who cares who uses bitcoin? The more people that use it, the stronger it will become, which benefits everyone. It's already too big for a government to take over, so what's the harm?
I don`t think you understand this post, it points out the fact it is already under government take over. I completely understood, I was saying who cares? How can they take over bitcoin? They cannot 51% attack it, so all they are doing is using it which is making it more powerful You don`t think they can take over 51% of the hashing power? come on bro, they have unlimited money LOL. Chances are the 81% of hashing power coming out of China, 51% is owned by the same team. |
|
|
|
Hashing power is for hardwares not for humans.
It doesn't matter how many people there are or how many machines you are running. What matters is how powerful these machines are.
Please remove the GIF.
yes, my point exactly, the rich get richer in the future with bitcoin, also there is no future for the people born after 2045, they don`t get a chance to mine! What kind of distribution is that? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYJVG1fKnRo this is the future of that world, I played in it, killed the king twice (who was AI hacker) made 4 bitcoin in a few clicks. SPOILER: EVERYONE DIES, EVEN THE LAST TRIBE KILLS ITSELF, SPOILER: LIFE IS A BLOCKCHAIN, MY ACTIONS LOCKED IN TIME IN THAT BLOCKCHAIN huntercoin was a human mineable crypto like a gold/bitcoin simulation, then bots took over. Now, What if there was a way to do it by address rather than number of machines and how powerful the machines are? Insuring only 1 address can be created per person |
|
|
|
How do you use 51% of people? How do you determine that someone is a different person from someone else online? Are you going to collect everyone's IDs? Who is going to store those IDs?
Determining individuals is basically impossible to do and is easily gameable by individuals such that some people get more power than others without those others necessarily knowing.
Also, Bitcoin doesn't use 51% mining power for anything except 51% attacks.
The blockchain stores the IDs I will go more in depth in this post, keep in mind I am just a random pro gamer/farmer I am not a coder so I really need your help achow101, I am not affiliated with ardor or bitswift other than being on of them`s little brother who really likes the concepts of everyone making the money and everyone voting on where their taxes go. Person creates a unnamed coin address, in order to make one they upload a picture of themselves, gov id, eyes, fingerprint. The system checks to make sure there is no duplicates using back track. from then this happens. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5151153.0 (look at the 3rd pic down and 4th pic) I can explain better on voice, I think this is the future brother. I know you can make it better then a farm boy who dropped out of school in grade 3, achow101 do not do it for self profit, do it for the profit of all of humanity and it will come out great, think what world do you want your kids in? one where they are working for another mans money supply, voting people to vote for them or one where they can vote, they make the money supply, equally (until people enterprise and get more) |
|
|
|
How do you use 51% of people? How do you determine that someone is a different person from someone else online? Are you going to collect everyone's IDs? Who is going to store those IDs?
Determining individuals is basically impossible to do and is easily gameable by individuals such that some people get more power than others without those others necessarily knowing.
Also, Bitcoin doesn't use 51% mining power for anything except 51% attacks.
filesharing, take a picture of your eye/fingerprint, gg wp. (it is already built into the ardor/bitswift network) The filesharing can check for dupes on the blockchain, so you can only have 1 account, in theory. here is a eye captcha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4x0vOAu0lQyou can do the same with fingerprint here is the file sharing https://youtu.be/Y7TLFyK_3Pk?t=965 I explain it briefly in this check out www.bitswift.network wallet (login top right). p2p exchange, file sharing, decentralized voting, asset creation etc. |
|
|
|
Who cares who uses bitcoin? The more people that use it, the stronger it will become, which benefits everyone. It's already too big for a government to take over, so what's the harm?
I don`t think you understand this post, it points out the fact it is already under government take over. The more people who use a network that has 51% of the participants as the censuses of the network the better, bitcoin is prone to 51% attacks from people with money having 51% of the hashing power be the consensus, not the people. The more people that use bitcoin does not make it any stronger. |
|
|
|
Who cares who uses bitcoin? The more people that use it, the stronger it will become, which benefits everyone. It's already too big for a government to take over, so what's the harm?
I don`t think you understand this post, it points out the fact it is already under government take over. |
|
|
|
Some important facts are being mentioned here which i believe some are true and others wrong.
Bitcoin being an escape goat for the FED and Bankers are just a way to excuse or justify the meanings of the unknown inside bitcoin's owner or its final purpose.
Satoshi could even be several people working together and for making them hidden from the conspiracies they could add a pseudo name.
Well they fucked up when Satoshi`s email got hacked and it said they gave it to Gavin`s hands, and Gavin admits to be in cahoots with the CIA. I DO NOT TRUST THE CIA/NSA/FED/NASA/IMF/DEA OR ANY OF THESE BIG ORGS, THEY HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO NOT BE WORTHY OF TRUST. ALL OF THEIR FUNDING SHOULD BE STRIPED. A group of people now yes, before I don`t think so, I think they took out satoshi or threatened him to work with them. You can tell satoshi does not have very big balls, sure he may of been a great coder but as a person he lived with fear. He was not a very good soldier. Satoshi Nakamoto: "WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet’s nest, and the swarm is headed towards us." Satoshi Nakamoto: "Do not bring it on" It shows the person lived in fear. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin has no relation with anti banking thought process! It's a flawed and misleading statement! Bitcoiners never say that they want to replace the banking system because it's simply not possible! Bitcoin can be included within the banking system and the current economy very nicely, Japan is already leading the way! Always look at the brighter side my friend!
I am a Bitcoiner I say they do, and it is possible. |
|
|
|
Creation of Bitcoin was kind of opposal to traditional financial system and alternative to banks and other financial institutions but I don't believe in conspiracy theories about Satoshi, Bitcoin and whatever. They don't make sense at all and you only waist your energy for nothing.
How is this a conspiracy theory? Satoshi says I left bitcoin to Gavin "it is in good hands now" In the email.
In the video Gavin himself says he was in cahoots with the CIA "Giving a talk at the CIA" again who gives a presentation to the CIA without working for them? come on bro. It is not in good hands https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00806R000201150052-5.pdf (Sanitized copy) |
|
|
|
Dude, I have seen you before, you are a conspiracy theorist, you are one of those guys who start believing crazy shit with the slightest ''proof''. Don't be delusional, no one knows for sure who satoshi was. Gavin Andresen never admitted working for the CIA btw.
Exactly this makes zero sense, dude is just someone who's friend their brain and thinks they're psychic because they won sports bets. Him and actor Tom could write bad movies together. If we meet in person, and I tell you to pick a number between 1-1000 and I guess the number right, will you believe I am psychic? Also wtf does "dude is just someone who's friend their brain" mean? |
|
|
|
Dude, I have seen you before, you are a conspiracy theorist, you are one of those guys who start believing crazy shit with the slightest ''proof''. Don't be delusional, no one knows for sure who satoshi was. Gavin Andresen never admitted working for the CIA btw.
Who gives a a presentation to the CIA without working for them, come on bro. If I am a conspiracy theorist here is a list of ones that came true. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbcqU7x2nQw Conspiracy THEORIES Turned Conspiracy FACTS that Change Everything Btw the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me how any of this is distinguishable from state sponsored child abuse and mutilation? A six year old child doesn't know anything about sex or gender and would say anything their parent or parents want them to to get their approval. This kind of thing is becoming a regular occurrence and CPS are taking people's children over refusing to allow this to be done to their children. This subject needs to have more attention on it. This is an inexcusable trauma and permanent mutilation of children backed by state power. This needs to stop. https://savejames.com/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py_AcKYkifUAll beings should be legal guardians of themselves first from birth, then parents second. If James wants to become a girl, let him! or her? them? I, You, They, Them I think that is all we need. I mean you want to talk about baby mutilation, is there not a religion that chops the tip off kids penis`s, then a old rabi sucks it? is that not pedophilia? I disagree.... So, everyone should be their own guardian right from birth? So, we should ask a baby's permission first before feeding him milk? We should ask permission to change their diapers? If they wanna put their fingers in sockets to be super man, we should allow them? Lol. Everyone should be their own guardian when they turn adult or maybe when they are matured enough. How do you say babies and toddlers should be their own guardian lmao ?! Specially in cases where it can hamper and damage his/her whole life! So when he grows up and regrets and ask him mum "mommy why did you do it to me" , mom will reply "when you were a baby, you gave me your permission".... damn No, they have secondary guardians the parents who act on things they cannot until they can, and if those guardians are not fit, they are replaced. Do we stop our little on from jumping off the side of a zoo so harambe does not get killed of course because they are not aware of danger yet. ofc. If you don`t agree you should be your own being from the day you are born, I feel sorry for you. Dicks out for harambe! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23um2h4YUwU |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me how any of this is distinguishable from state sponsored child abuse and mutilation? A six year old child doesn't know anything about sex or gender and would say anything their parent or parents want them to to get their approval. This kind of thing is becoming a regular occurrence and CPS are taking people's children over refusing to allow this to be done to their children. This subject needs to have more attention on it. This is an inexcusable trauma and permanent mutilation of children backed by state power. This needs to stop. https://savejames.com/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py_AcKYkifUAll beings should be legal guardians of themselves first from birth, then parents second. If James wants to become a girl, let him! or her? them? I, You, They, Them I think that is all we need. I mean you want to talk about baby mutilation, is there not a religion that chops the tip off kids penis`s, then a old rabi sucks it? is that not pedophilia? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
