Now just need the eagles out of the playoffs and the world will be right again.  I would be fine with that but I have a bet in on Eagles to cover 3. Turns out its not as easy as I had planned as they are down by 7 at the half. I forgot that the Eagles were 1-5 in their last 6 games. Sheesh. And losing to the Cardinals? Stunningly bad form. Mayfield is looking great. He is right where he needs to be for his career trajectory to resume, in a post-Brady Buccaneers. |
|
|
|
User is banned. Now begins the fun of finding their alt accounts. Proof of authentication:
- BSC bep20 address: 0x675ab9dB368Ebc966f50066e8b161d592AEc8499E8E
- Telegram Username: @Fedrey
- Campaigns applied for: twitter, telegram, discord
Here's an easy one: Proof of authentication:
- BSC bep20 address: 0x675ab9dB368Ebc966f50066e8b161d592AEc8499E8E
- Telegram Username: @Fedrey
- Campaigns applied for: twitter, telegram, discord
Whats kind of funny is it turns out this isn't even a real BSC address... its 3 characters too long. Seems like a case of a bot gone wrong. lovesmayfamilis had connected Fedrey to several other accounts years ago, so they are all now ban evading, but they are red tagged anyway, so I'm not reporting them (anyone else can feel free). |
|
|
|
I don't usually count pictures been sent there as they're indicated on spreadsheet as denied post but to make things easier if the campaign continues all members will be requested not to engage on the thread.
Well, I don't want to tell people where they can or can't post. I just don't understand the purpose of counting their posts in places where their signature isn't shown. I realize their avatar is still shown. You don't have announce or change anything, but the whole purpose of disabling signatures in that thread is to deter spam posts there. |
|
|
|
Hopefully you have reported me to theymos in order that he can consider doing something about me being the supposed problem, as perceived by you.
Only you can fix the problem. But you obviously don't care... You will rank up the most useless multi-accounting scammers here if they kiss the center of your b-hole just right, because that is what matters to you most in your forum experience. Hopefully you are reporting campaign managers who you believe to be too loosey goosey with the posting requirements of their members.
"Reporting campaign managers?" You really don't have the first clue about how any of this works. There's no point in wasting any more time on you, so back on ignore you go. None of this is for you anyway, because as you've established, you don't care to change. Its for everyone else to see what's going on and why they shouldn't emulate your behavior.
Some members are writing more than 60 posts for their requirements for the campaign weekly such members don't get their spams counted on this threads while some members their irrelevant replies on the thread are been ignored. I'm actively watching all account and anyone that get tagged for their spamming are getting removed. Just tagged and I'll do the needful. I have warned my participants and anybody spamming the forum won't be part of my campaigns anymore. Tagged (neutral is eligible to get removed, I don't have to wait for negative).
OK. Is there any chance you could consider not paying participants for posting the WO thread? Their signature isn't being displayed there anyway, after all... I really can't understand what BitVest would get out of it. |
|
|
|
Who is the head of this tree @nutildah? What was a little person like me doing there?  OK fair point, I've been indirectly responsible for your "success" I'm in a sig campaign too so, whatevs. In recent times, however, I only post haikus here, usually. Shit on a shingle
Guess this is what its come to
FML, TY |
|
|
|
Sounds a bit vague in terms of the 4 supposed members who supposedly do not deserve merits for some or all of their posts. Maybe you can name the names of these merit recipients who supposedly did not deserve merits for their posts.... to the extent that your ongoing whining on such topic even matters?
I took you off ignore to do you the courtesy of at least replying to your question and was relieved to see you hadn't written a novel. I didn't want to mention them by name. After all, I'm not a cruel or tacky person at heart, even if shitcoining is my main game. But something I discovered today left me flabbergasted: BitVest sig campaigners are getting paid to post in the WO. They are, AFAIK, the only campaign that pays for such posts, in that they have no clause that says posts in places where the signature isn't displayed won't be counted. So they aren't just posting in the WO to collect merits from you, knowing you are by far the forum's loosest merit source. They are also getting paid for it!Also I just want to point out that this clause doesn't seem to be enforced, whatsoever: 2. Signature Spamming that is detrimental to the discussions in threads will not count as payment. If you're reported or caught for spamming you'll be removed from this campaign after 2 strike.
Several campaign members have been tagged as spammers already and their posts deleted. Just dumb AF. Stop incentivizing them with merits. If you insist on doing that, do it elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Could you provide more details on how Chartbuddy visualizes the change in market depth over time?
I'm particularly interested in understanding how the bids and asks are displayed, and how the concept of 'walls' in the chart helps in assessing market sentiment or potential market manipulation. Additionally, how does the chart handle the spread, and what role do the world times play in this context?
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected Hive: 92% likely to be AI-Generated Sapling.ai: 100% Fake  Hey, I just realized something: these BitVest dipshits are getting paid to post in this thread. That explains a lot.  |
|
|
|
Let's go forward. Most posts in sport topics are too short to be detected correctly, but those which are long enough to try are detected... And as I see they have a long history of AI usage (I looked at their first posts too and many of them are AI written) and also they've got a tag for plagiarism via translating from English into Bengali. Surprising that this account was caught only now. ... I thought there was something fishy going on in the Gambling section... Several accounts that can barely string a sentence together in English elsewhere are mass producing these concise summaries of soccer and cricket matches with flawless English. I reported one of them last month and the posts weren't deleted. For a while I thought maybe these accounts were translating news blurbs from their native language or using text spinners, but it appears they are feeding sports news stories into ChatGPT and asking them to rewrite it. Here's an example I found from this user even outside of there... what were they thinking posting in the WO thread of all places, jeez. Could you provide more details on how Chartbuddy visualizes the change in market depth over time?
I'm particularly interested in understanding how the bids and asks are displayed, and how the concept of 'walls' in the chart helps in assessing market sentiment or potential market manipulation. Additionally, how does the chart handle the spread, and what role do the world times play in this context?
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected Hive: 92% likely to be AI-Generated Sapling.ai: 100% Fake |
|
|
|
So we've been protesting to the wrong people and on the wrong board (reputation), while Theymos is only a few seconds away to edits/modifies in less than 24 hours. For a long time, this is how the DT should have been.
For a long time, that's how it was -- including the first 15 months of your account's existence. The whole point of changing it was so theymos wouldn't have to deal with it personally (not nearly as much, anyway). He doesn't want to deal with it, so he put it in the hands of the forum members. It's a (largely) self-regulating body - a unique form of democracy - and there isn't much out there to compare it to. In my experience, its working as intended. Theymos certainly isn't going to meddle with it because of your issue with JollyGood. Feel free to PM him if you want, though I wouldn't expect a reply. |
|
|
|
Hi, and excuse me.
Just to make a point here.
Money, Markle Tree, Preoccupations and Life of Peoples are not playground.
Thanks. Acigo.
I don't know how to respond to this so I asked ChatGPT, and this was the result: If you're responding to the message in the "[ANN] Shitcoin 3.0 Thread" on the Bitcointalk forum, you might consider a respectful and concise reply:
"Hello Acigo,
I appreciate your perspective on the seriousness of topics like money, Merkle trees, preoccupations, and people's lives. If you have specific concerns or questions related to Shitcoin 3.0, feel free to share them, and let's discuss in a constructive manner.
Thank you."
Remember to keep the tone respectful and open to further discussion. I am therefore respectfully open to further discussion. |
|
|
|
OK fair I made a mistake, I just checked and you're right
You should have just stopped here. Here's a question for you though; why did you not bother mentioning that CMC had included the incorrect pairs in their market listings, given this was a reference in the OP's topic? Were you unaware of this obvious error, or did you simply think it was insigificant?
It's irrelevant to the claim you were making, which was false. I tried explaining to you why it was false, and you ignored the explanation in order to accuse me of spreading "misinformation." Take some time to reflect. Meditate somewhere peaceful, attempt to discover your inner self, and then come back with a reply.
That's cute. Don't forget to include that in your diary  Clearly you didn't take my advice. That's a shame, but oh well. Putting you on ignore so I don't accidentally waste time attempting to reason with you anymore. |
|
|
|
The issue is the chart image he posted is of $PEPE on ETH, and the link he posted for it goes to nowhere. Simply incorrect, please check before making these types of accusations in the future. The pair is clearly PEPE/TRY (not ETH), whatever the f TRY is. LOL bro. It's like you've never actually traded on any type of exchange before. First of all, TRY is the Turkish lira. Second, it is the ETH version of PEPE being shown on the chart.Compare the price here: https://kripto.btcturk.com/en/pro/exchange/PEPE_TRYto the price shown here, after changing the currency setting to TRY: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pepe/"Likely not traded". Please just check next time. It clearly is, as I already referenced. No offence intended here, but we don't need a dose of misinformation posted into this thread.
Its not the fact that you've been wrong about so many things for years that bothers me about you, its the fact that you're so smug in your wrongness. You'll forever be a noob to me. Take some time to reflect. Meditate somewhere peaceful, attempt to discover your inner self, and then come back with a reply. |
|
|
|
User's coin is up 6,000% this week and he/she wants to sell. Not sure what the issue is here.
The issue is the chart image he posted is of $PEPE on ETH, and the link he posted for it goes to nowhere. I dunno if he was trying to trick people into thinking he held the ETH version or not -- perhaps not, because the invalid link he posted does end with "pepe-coin-bsc2/". This version is likely not traded on the exchange he linked, so he's giving a false impression, even if by accident. Not something I would tag somebody over, but unless you speak Turkish and are familiar with the local scene on the forum, its impossible to understand the nuances of the situation. |
|
|
|
^^^ This is 100% AI-generated, but you know what, I'm cool with it, because its completely in line with the Shitcoin Ethos. Its a full embodiment of this Shitcoin's spirit and who am I to complain about the actual content of the post. So whether anybody likes it or not, shittoken season is nearing full swing, and I'mma pitch the shit out of SHITCOIN because I did the research folks, and guess what? This is the first token named "Shitcoin", and its the 2nd crypto overall named "Shitcoin" (not 3rd as I originally thought -- can you believe the 2nd was just a joke???). I have to pay respects to the original Shitcoin on its own blockchain, by Vlad2Vlad. But unfortunately for shit enthusiasts, its blockchain has been dead since 2018. So that leaves you with SHITCOIN, the original shit token. Its on a pretty good blockchain, too. It doesn't pause when it gets overloaded, its not owned by a megalomaniac, but it is endorsed by the world's richest man. And I was into Dogecoin way before he was. What's kind of crazy is way over a million of them have been sold in the last two weeks. Almost all the bounty hunters from last year who put theirs in a dispenser have sold them. You can verify all the data for yourselves, just click on the Dispensers and Dispenses tab to check out the lowest prices & recent action: https://dogeparty.xchain.io/asset/SHITCOINHere's the latest Official Shitcoin News for anybody interested:  I have about 3.78 million left to sell in my official dispenser, which has been open for over 2 years now. After its sold out, it's warp speed to the fuckin' moon!!! Expect further details from new CEO Turd Ferguson shortly. |
|
|
|
You look at the still photo, and I'm talking about the possible evolution.
Altcoinstalks is at a severe disadvantage in every relevant metric. No way its going to take a measurable traffic share from Bitcointalk. Did all the posters you mention "defect" from here to there? If they want to post over there as well, good for them, but I'd be very surprised if they stopped posting here. Sig campaigns are the result of Bitcointalk's traffic, prestige & reputation; not the other way around. Guess I just fail to understand what the problem here is. |
|
|
|
Kind of glad I missed the first game. Was rooting for the Browns but it was a washout for them. I got the cheifs in a cold one. I think it's supposed to be upwards of negative 10 degrees with the windchill.
Ended up being -22 with the wind chill at certain points, they said. Dropped from -5 to -9 throughout the course of the game. Definitely not Dolphins weather. Plus, Tua was born and raised in Hawaii, then played college in Alabama... he's just not built or ready for the cold weather, and it showed. Both teams ended up missing catches due to what looked like a frozen ball & ice on the field, but Tua just couldn't function. Poor guy. I felt sorry for him. Mahomes gave him a big man hug at the end of the game, that was nice. Here's the mandatory Taylor Swift shot for you guys, because I know you all want to see it:  They showed her every single time Kelce got more than 3 yards  and then more in addition to that. If Al Michaels was there he woulda made a comment about it... which is why he wasn't there, lol. |
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry about it too much. Does any organic traffic actually land at that site? Not really. Does it have posts by Satoshi, Hal, Vitalik & other crypto-luminaries of our time? No. Does it have 12 years worth of content & backlinks? No.
Here's a quick comparison of the site's traffic metrics according to Similarweb:
Bitcointalk Global Rank: #39,778 Worldwide
Altcoinstalks Global Rank: #540,599 Worldwide
Bitcointalk Monthly Visits: 1.5 million
Altcoinstalks Monthly Visits: 45.4 thousand
Bitcointalk Traffic Sources: 42.54% Search
Altcoinstalks Traffic Sources: 10.45% Search
I assume the campaigns there are paying peanuts compared to here. Also, its got to be a complete spamfest, which is why its not attracting organic traffic. If people want to make a few extra bucks by posting there, good for them. I don't think it will detract from Bitcointalk's status.
|
|
|
|
This is definitely a recently-bought account, sucking up to LoyceV while trying to make good with the community, but then he resorts to AI posting... How can the owner not know about this thread by now. kuribohPost #1 (quotes removed for analysis) Would that make make Bitcoin any less hard a currency? Bitcoin's credibility as a medium of exchange is independent of market liquidity and participant wealth. A common definition of "hard currency" is finite money that cannot be printed or inflated. Due to its decentralisation and 21,000,000 coin supply, many consider Bitcoin a "hard currency". Scarcity and blockchain technology make it a secure and transparent way to store value. Bitcoin is a hard currency despite its ease of trading. Anyone can trade bitcoins, regardless of income. Market factors like demand and supply determine bitcoin prices. Potential traders should consider cryptocurrency's risks and volatility rather than Bitcoin's hard currency functionality. Even though Bitcoin is more reliable and popular as a digital currency, its price and regulation can change. Before trading Bitcoin or other assets, investors and traders should research the market and assess their risk tolerance. So what makes a currency hard, if not a capped supply? A hard currency is one that, for various reasons, does not lose purchasing power over time. A currency's perceived difficulty in use can be influenced by factors other than its supply, such as the total number of bitcoins. Some of the most important factors that determine a currency's hardness are: - A low inflation rate
- Widespread acceptance
- Trust and confidence
- A limited or controlled supply
- And stability are all necessary conditions
Keep in mind that market confidence, geopolitical tensions, and economic conditions are just a few of the factors that can influence how difficult a currency is perceived to be. Additionally, the idea of a hard currency is subjective and has different definitions depending on who you ask. Copyleaks: AI Content Detected Hivemoderation: 83.2% likely to contain AI Generated Text Sapling.ai: 99.7% Fake Post #2Trading does not necessarily need affluence or solid financial footing. Many people from different socioeconomic backgrounds can participate in trading activities, despite the fact that doing so carries with it certain risks. That only the rich and famous should be able to participate in the stock market is based on the assumption that they can more easily afford to lose money. However, keep in mind that individuals from all walks of life can trade and manage risks with the right amount of preparation, education, and risk management strategies. Everyone, regardless of their income level, can take part in trading. Online brokerage services and trading platforms have made trading accessible to a wider audience by lowering entry barriers and increasing efficiency. To help individuals make educated investment decisions, many platforms offer fractional shares, affordable options, and educational materials.
Trading also offers opportunities for people to achieve their financial goals and grow their wealth, which is something important to remember. Knowing the risks, conducting thorough research, and utilising risk management tools allow anyone, regardless of their financial situation, to make wise trading decisions. But any trader worth their salt needs a thorough understanding of the market and the dangers involved before they start trading. Starting with smaller investments, learning about trading strategies, and seeking financial advice can help reduce risks and increase the likelihood of success. A person's risk tolerance, financial goals, and willingness to learn new skills and adapt to changing market conditions should ultimately determine whether they choose to trade or not, rather than their wealth or comfort level.
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected Hivemoderation: 100% likely to contain AI Generated Text Sapling.ai: 100% Fake Post #3 (quote removed for analysis) Blockchain and AI can be used together to create new synergies and possibilities. Here are a few examples: - Security and privacy of data
- Models of decentralized AI
- Reliable, verifiable AI results
- Paying data contributors
- Optimization of the supply chain and logistics
- Tailored artificial intelligence services
Blockchain and AI work together to make new and exciting possibilities that make AI systems safer, more reliable, and more open. They also make it possible for people to work together without a central authority, give each other personalized experiences, and create incentives. It's possible that these changes will completely change a number of industries and create new chances for growth and innovation. Copyleaks: AI Content Detected Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text Sapling.ai: 100% Fake |
|
|
|
I was gonna re-open my thread on the subject but remembered this one exists & is more fitting anyway. Like, I can't believe the shamelessness of some people. Some basic stats about the WO thread to highlight the problemPosts in the last 30 days: 2,410 Posts excluding ChartBuddy: 1,682 Posts written by 4 BitVest sig campaigners: 169 (10% of all non-bot posts in the last month... 1 out of every 10 posts is from a BV campaigner trying to coax merits out of JJG) BV campaigner #1:   BV campaigner #2:   The other 2 of the 4 don't post nearly as much. They, along with everyone else, seem to have gotten the memo. But not these 2. Whatever I guess. |
|
|
|
Well, my poll only got 2 votes Thanks yahoo for being the other vote. I guess all NFL discussion takes place in the American Football thread. Everyone else here just enjoys shitposting about soccer and cricket, it seems. Oh well. Anyway. I took one bet for this weekend, and that is Eagles @ -3 over the Buccaneers. Should be easy money, but we'll see. Really looking forward to the Dolphins/Chiefs contest tomorrow (or today in some places). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
