How can I run two separate bitcoin servers that accept json-rcp commands on a single machine?

Are there any PHP scripts that allow to receive and confirm (6 confirmation) without relying on bitcoin-qt running as server?

Please refer to the following posts where I have already addressed the issue so you may better "compreend" everything:


As I have already expressed this in the most childish way possible so even an infant may understand: I am not the one that needs to prove they are NOT fair, they are the one needing to prove that they ARE fair, it hasn't been done once.




I think it is related to the dark side of anarchism whereas people begin to disregard technological advances and standards that have been established as a result of perfecting the systems and simply claim that these standards are a series of monopolized marketing schemes aiming at increasing profitability.

Basically the logic of fuck METAS, licensing, technological institutions that specialize in metrology, they are all greed seeking pigs, so we'll use a lava lamp as an RNG instead since we can do it better (and increase our own profits in the grand scheme of things).

This is the new dawn of cryptocurrency demagogism that, from their perspective, will ideally misguide fools, give themselves a piggyback ride on the economy and leave fools scratching their heads and blaming Bitcoins when they have hit rock bottom.

The sole fact that they haven't shown one bit of evidence just makes it painfully obvious to anyone who doesn't have urine in their circulation system. Stop showing us your right hand while giving us the ol' switch and grab, the true members of the community will still look at your other hand.

The problem occurs though when >90% of bets are like that for example. The house edge seems normal more or less but you were already predetermined to loose to a greater degree before even placing the bet,  this coupled with stealing from investors = success.

Way to take this argument to the level of name calling, what exactly makes you come to the conclusion it is 100% random if no statistical analysis has been done? What makes you think that it isn't weighed in one way or another? Just because it's hashes 2 times this possibility is somehow automatically eliminated?

You two kids are hopeless but let me educate you a little, yes it is possible to prove that the bet result was generated using the transaction id, the secret key and whatnot but who guarantees even distribution across all numbers as it needs to be by the industries standards?

You could theoretically even have a proper house edge, just that you would have abnormally long "cold" periods and "hot" periods, if you bet 20 times in a row and loose every time and some else evens the house edge by winning 20 times it isn't very fair is it? Potentially house edge heightening, but at least you admit that you are a gullible sheep and posses no ability to read and comprehend text, so very brave of you  .

Thing yes provable fair has not been proven even once until today. Please educate yourself before replying to "big guys" talking okay buds?

You two are a joke, living proof of how gullible the masses are on a big scale, don't play at SRoulettes casino for all I care.

Here is a situation though, Satoshidice knows their own secret word ahead of time, thus they can submit bets to themselves as if they are the player, since they can potentially "be" the player and know the secret word ahead of time (since they are really Satoshidice) they can thus submit selective bets and raise the house edge to such a degree that no one of the investors would be getting a cent.

In the "real world" there is so much surveillance and protocols that casinos have to follow that claiming a person won a million dollars without it happening would be virtually impossible. Funny that so many people are defending their precious stock yet they fail to see and to point out this simple flaw while claiming some algorithms/blockchain protects them on the low level.

We can now establish who is right in the first argument: Me


Satoshidice claims it is "provably fair" but decides they will not prove that they are fair and so far it hasn't been proven once. Now I do understand your claim that they must not prove that they are fair to really be fair but then it's the argument of religion basically, if I hold my hand behind my back and claim I have a couple of pounds of diamonds in my hand I would be the one making the statement thus I would be the one needing proof (e.g. showing you the diamonds) and not you needing proof of me not having the diamonds in my hand behind my back in order to establish that they really are not there, since I have no initial proof of my statement it is disregarded.

Makes sense? Gox has everything to do with it since both of the companies are ran by teenagers that fail to employ the proper people to do a job they are unqualified to do out of pure greed.

We can now establish who is right in the second argument: Me



Interesting that the mainstream will roll with the established website despite the utter stupidity in doing so while such alternatives exist.

As of the moment no one has done that yet thus claiming "provable fair" isn't the most noble thing to do, some would even call it lying.

S Dice would have a unique opportunity to cheat their shareholders due to the nature of the Bitcoin network, it all comes down to the greed of the individual I think, Gox could have easily hired professional security guys, rent a CDN, buy a DDOS protecting router for that 3% is it that they pull? Instead they chose to lie to their users like a bunch of teenagers and deny a DDOS ever happened (according to what I've got they have admitted to it in the end), same thing with S Dice and most successful bitcoin casinos, gluttony.

Have you read the rest of my post and comprehended my point though?


You just lost me there,

They are misrepresenting themselves to the gullible bitcointalk masses, the quality of the numbers generated is unknown, I rest my case.

It might work, it might even generate the house edge they claim, but it is unfair to the players that the numbers are not generated according to the standards of the industry, e.g. players could have "cold"/"hot" periods with S dice whereas players would loose 15 times in a row or win 15 times in a row. Same thing with other bitcoin casinos, nobody can guarantee how chaostic they are exactly. People need to start pulling their head out of their asses.

The chance of it being fixed by an established and licensed casino is much lower than ANY bitcoin casino.

S. Dice for example claim they have fair play, yet it is possible for them to submit selective bets since they know the secret word in advance and potentially steal from their investors. Okay not bad right? Wrong, nobody can vouch for the quality of the numbers that satoshidice generates and how random they are exactly, have they been certified by the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology (also known as METAS) and confirmed for quality number output that could compare to commercial RNGs such as Quantis? No? Didn't think so, it was certified by a bunch of smartasses on bitcointalk.

Using the (salted) hash of the chat as a seed is also a bad idea for various reasons, please leave it to the pros to generate quality random numbers, especially when it comes to gambling on virtual property, fund your project properly and hire a qualified person to do that work.

Seems to me that provable fairness gives the spotlight to crypto-charlatans, I would much rather trust my funds to large licensed casinos than a bunch of dorks hashing each other hashes in someones basement.

I've been playing a little seems to work great so far, pretty addicting.

I guess it is simply the nature of people to bubble something, can't prevent it.

Hey I've checked this out everything seems to work props to you. I'm surprised of the lack of attention this has received so far, must be a gold mine of some kind.

You can count on me playing again...

With the fees? I mean with bitcoins getting rare lately paying a 0.0015 fee for sending 0.01 btc seems a bit extreme, even if there are 8 inputs, paying 30 cents for a 2 dollar transfer is a bit greedy and even though I understand that this is necessary to decrease the size of the chain wouldn't it be possible to introduce different concepts in order to make the chain smaller? Possibly "timestamping" a certain point in the chain and deleting all the spent transactions before that and then using it as a new start? This could be done automatically every month for example.

Never underestimate the foolishness of the average gullible misguided fool, I bet if bitcoin wouldn't gain momentum rapidly and the economy would expand over time instead they would paint the whole practice in propoganda instead and wage a prohibition era against bitcoin fueled by the fear of the masses.

Back at the day when I was new to bitcoins you could buy them at about 6$ per coin, wish I could travel back in time and slap myself on the head and invest all I can gather into them.

I know that already, figured it out, thanks.