You're welcome. More useful information can be found here.

10k more and you can run your own masternode.

I take it that he is talking about the people who he has outright scammed, such as bitenvy: reference link.

If you are unsure how the system works, you should take a look here. You need 240 activity to become a senior member. If you remain active on this forum, you will be a senior member in less than 6 months.

Nicely placed. The quality is not pristine. Are you sure that you've downloaded the original version? There are nice banners to pick from in the banner competition.

No. I have not even remotely implied that.

Kick them from the campaign after review.

Again, what you fail to understand is that: You can make such modifications but for new participants. The existing ones should be treated according to the ruleset which they signed up with. Additionally, you could add a transition period where they would get paid for 1 round (if applicable) and would need to adhere to the changed rules for the following round. However, I do not believe that said campaign will run for too long thus I don't see this being a possibility (unless you have a weekly payout or something).

No, you do not have that right if it affects people who have already accepted the *contract* under different terms. You can change it for new participants, but not for the existing ones without essentially scamming them.

Relevance?

Where did you mention that they can't?

Relevance?

Is this the only thing that has changed? To be exact: Initially it was specified that you had to write 50 posts. Sometime since those conditions were accepted, they have increased them by another 30? Anything else?

Start by compiling a list of accounts related to the projects. With accounts I mean everyone, bounty manager, owners, developers, etc., and post that list here. I will tag everyone after verifying this story.

Not surprising. 1 PM every week or two should be sufficient (that is, if they ever recover it).

This is not the right section for discussing scams or scam accusations. You should move this thread to: Scam Accusations. There's an option to do that in the lower left corner of the screen when viewing this thread.

If you've claimed/joined the bounty with predetermined rules/conditions, and you've completed said conditions then you have earned whatever was *promised* at the time. Changing these conditions afterwards is shady at best / an outright scam.

The airdrop specification was created a long time ago, and a lot has changed since then. Who knows where we will be at in 18 months with BitSend. Therefore, I do think that there is a possibility of it being longer albeit with possibly different rules (e.g. smaller reward pool).

That makes no sense.

What is a "bold" transaction?

Sidechains are already here, just not fully decentralized 2-peg sidechains.

That would be a bit too extreme and just a dream at this point. I don't think that theymos would even implement that activity reduction let alone account destruction.

A secondary ban does not necessarily have to mean that you deserve destruction or otherwise I probably wouldn't be here now.

That's also a tough debate. I wouldn't just do that for *all* accounts, but there are different ways of approaching that. Rizzarolla has a nice thread where he lists a huge number of farmed accounts that are just mindlessly shitposting. Absolutely nothing has been done against them.

There is enough time for you to rank up to Senior and join the airdrop before it ends. As it currently stands, it will end early 2019 although that might change.

Thanks.

Surprise, surprise. The negative ratings are warranted and I regret ever removing the initial one. I hope that we never see you or any new coins produced by you in this section.

Deserves more negative ratings.

Every other day a new ATH. I think we are all getting used to these smaller movements:

That would do the complete opposite IMO. That would start a huge wave of accounts that get registered only to remain dormant and spam later.

We all know the likelihood that the current ruler of this place will implement such a measure.

Gunbot will trade in the pairs that you've selected, and should not have a problem with other balances. This is at least how I used to run it, having some side balance in a coin or two.

More frequent bans, 50% activity deduction on your second ban for spamming. The '50%' is my lenient suggestion, I'd personally go with something like 90%.

Default settings are okay, or 1-1.5%.

Depends on your settings, capital and strategy that you're using. I don't think someone can answer this question correctly.

Then it is working as intended.

It requires learning and fine-tuning for optimal gains. I've seen people do double digit % gains in single days (although that requires an advanced configuration, experience and does not happen often).

No, the ranking system is too lenient and spammers aren't punished correctly as is.

Stop supporting scams and shady developers.

Thought lately we haven't been active as much as we used to be. You can always try to find alts / cheaters yourself, it is often not difficult.