[quote author=sluppy link=topic=1669443.msg49745921#msg49745921 date=1550185536] [quote author=xtraelv link=topic=1669443.msg49745247#msg49745247 date=1550180976] [img width=200]https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/17/blobf891cb9ff692775c.png[/img] https://twitter.com/Cryptopia_NZ[/quote] Website still unchanged with a month old message on it .. nice service .. aren't there list allready of everything that was stolen .. they have to Check if they still have access to the wallets and replace all the Passwords maybe but that inventory of whats "Missing" could have been made long ago. [/quote] It's five PM in Christchurch of Friday the 15th and their website ( Archive today - right now in fact) remains unchanged from a few weeks ago... Weird that they'd post something on twitter eh? |
|
|
|
|
I notice you're not tagging these accounts?
|
|
|
|
KWH posted lots of useful trust ratings, which is why I included him. Not sure what to do now. I wish he was more specific about his departure, i.e. whether his account has been compromised, in which case he should be excluded. As long as his account isn't compromised, he can stay on DT2. If one of his ratings is proven to be wrong, that might be the moment to consider excluding him. Perhaps LoyceV could make list of his negative feedback's which has only single tag. I'm not really in favour of centralizing trust ratings instead of just leaving the original tags visible. I didn't have much in the way of interaction with KWH, but had he been on my DT list, I wouldn't be removing him. Might just add him to my list. |
|
|
|
Two Accounts Connected. (reconfirmed previous work by Johny Depp, owlcatz and Bill Gates)gial1949, Blockbet, I got a PM from gial1949 - this is my reply. Please remove your negative trust i have nothing to do with site at all .
Thanks
In my tagging, I reference this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg20798435;topicseen#msg20798435So let's look at the three links: Image Archived here: http://archive.fo/WFVUT Then there is the link and Archive - Message 111 if you can't find it... Message 114 you post this: http://archive.fo/LWAJB#selection-4299.61-4299.121[quote author=gial1949 link=topic=2018816.msg20799124#msg20799124 date=1502474062] yes I am posted this. i am assign to advertise this website. I deleted it because I don't want to involve this discussion.Leave me out of this. [/quote] Owlcatz then posts this: (message 117) http://archive.fo/LWAJB#selection-4853.0-4853.143[quote author=owlcatz link=topic=2018816.msg20802971#msg20802971 date=1502486942] [quote author=gial1949 link=topic=2018816.msg20799124#msg20799124 date=1502474062] yes I am posted this. i am assign to advertise this website. I deleted it because I don't want to involve this discussion.Leave me out of this. [/quote] Too late...  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg20798435;topicseen#msg20798435[/quote] The link just above takes us back to the first post in this message and is archived here.
I nearly missed seeing this: This is an archive of all nine pages in one go: http://archive.fo/UaOWLPost 121 you are tapped on the shoulder for promoting the website in another gambling sites thread... (all the links have been archived, so don't bother going and deleting them) [quote author=gevp link=topic=2018816.msg20847007#msg20847007 date=1502648243] from chain-bet.com topic. gial1949. [quote author=Victor Beckham link=topic=1492457.msg20800147#msg20800147 date=1502476944] [quote author=gial1949 link=topic=1492457.msg20286338#msg20286338 date=1500653682] Other website which using same concept of block hash end digit with a different way block-bet.info i played both of games ..chain-bet is bit risky as compared to block-bet . [/quote] What nonsense! Why r u sending me such disgusting PM? [/quote] [quote author=DarkStar_ link=topic=2018816.msg20844825#msg20844825 date=1502642360] Since the owners and the accuser are both too lazy to calculate the house edge, here it is (free of charge!): Low Risker: 21.875% House Edge -1*(1/16) + 0*(1/16) + -0.5*(1/16) + -1*(1/16) + 1*(1/16) + 0*(1/16) + -0.5*(1/16)+ 0.5*(1/16)+ -0.5*(1/16) +0*(1/16)+ -1*(1/16) + 1*(1/16) + -1*(1/16) + -0.5*(1/16) + -1 * (1/16) + 1*(1/16) [/quote]free and incorrect  [/quote]
The last time you post is on the 12 August 2017, 03:54:22 (post 114) [quote author=gial1949 link=topic=2018816.msg20799124#msg20799124 date=1502474062] yes I am posted this. i am assign to advertise this website. I deleted it because I don't want to involve this discussion.Leave me out of this. [/quote] The second last post is on the 02 September 2017, 12:04:05 [quote author=bruboi link=topic=2018816.msg21426918#msg21426918 date=1504317845] closed your doors now? [/quote] Seven months, twenty one days later - the very last post ... *you* bump the thread:http://archive.fo/UaOWL#selection-41901.0-41901.2[quote author=gial1949 link=topic=2018816.msg35414729#msg35414729 date=1524509396] [quote author=bruboi link=topic=2018816.msg21426918#msg21426918 date=1504317845] closed your doors now? [/quote] up [/quote]
Please remove your negative trust i have nothing to do with site at all .
Thanks
Yet you promoted it in another gambling thread over that threads site. http://archive.fo/vXPtT#selection-4375.0-4379.75[quote author=gial1949 link=topic=1492457.msg20286338#msg20286338 date=1500653682] Other website which using same concept of block hash end digit with a different way block-bet.info i played both of games ..chain-bet is bit risky as compared to block-bet . [/quote] Two posts later, you are warned off posting further links to the website in your post http://archive.fo/vXPtT#selection-4783.82-4783.152 Victor Beckham gives two examples of where you have posted the URL in that thread. Lastly: You give blockbet positive trust: http://archive.fo/rqVqz So no, your assertion in your PM is false. That makes you a liar. Feel free to take it up in the [color=#0a80b1]Known Alts of any-one[/color] - [color=#f8ae23]A User Generated List[/color] [color=#c81c8f]Mk III thread.
|
|
|
|
|
[quote author=pinoycash link=topic=1669443.msg49737719#msg49737719 date=1550148567]
[img width=400]https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/17/blob9411b5bd23a0c742.png[/img]
These mod is making customers stupid by making such statement, Why the in the world police will allow Cryptopia owners to return to their offices but cannot touch anything.
The mods are deleting speculation but they are the one posting their own speculative statement
[/quote]
I wouldn't go putting much weight into anonymous online mods...
Three separate online articles by stuff.co.nz state categorically that the Cryptopia CEO has said that he was told by Police not to say anything and has also stated he will not say anything.
|
|
|
|
My posts are being deleted by unnamed "mods" including ones that I am posting concerning Cryptopia, so I'm not sure how long it will be before this one is also deleted. As we know articles have been floating around the internet stating that the New Zealand Police have stated there is nothing to prevent Cryptopia from reopening now that they have concluded their main investigations at Cryptopia's head office. As at this date and time 14/02/2019 11:24 AM NZDST (00:24 GMT +/- 0) Cryptopia's website is *still* showing nothing except: http://archive.fo/i2BjM[img width=400]https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/17/blob102d6e7127c7aa8a.jpeg[/img] So they aren't in any hurry to re-open (if at all) and, as three online articles by stuff.co.nz have now stated Cryptopia's sole director is saying nothing we can only presume they won't be opening today, this week and probably not this month. |
|
|
|
just on two weeks ago I commented in a post that hillariousandco has at least two confirmed alts. (previously I also posted that s/he had taunted me in a PM that their main alt was quickseller) in the two weeks since I made that comment multiple random posts dating back three years have been deleted by mods without explanation every other day. That's not including the seven from qs' thread we are discussing here. Overnight, this was deleted from the thread I started Cryptopia - ONLINE ARTICLES related to hack & theft of funds 2019 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097916.0A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. [mod note: post merged with the first one]
Police skills in doubt over Cryptopia probe into missing $23m https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/110387805/cryptopia-director-says-technicians-are-helping-police-track-stolen-23m / ( Archive) Chris Hutching16:34, Feb 05 2019 An expert in corporate law is questioning whether police have the skills to resolve the $23 million theft from Christchurch-based Cryptopia.
Auckland University associate professor of commercial law, Alex Sims, said information about the investigation had not been handled well and regulatory authorities were "struggling" to deal with cyber theft.
"No one seems to have a clue what's going on. But this hasn't come out of the blue. There has been a lot of dialogue in recent years about the security of cryptocurrency and where to store the digital wallets.
"Cryptocurrency is a legitimate business. It's not a scam. But our regulators are really struggling compared with the US, Japan and European countries which have set up secure custodial services," Sims said.
Cryptopia had held investors' digital wallets, when they should have been held by the investors or with a safe custodial service, and any money kept in trust by the exchange, she said.
Sims said cryptocurrency and the underlying blockchain technology was here to stay.
"It would be like someone in 1900 saying we should outlaw cars because someone got run over. If you outlawed New Zealand cryptocurrency exchanges people will just use overseas exchanges."
She made the comment as Cryptopia's sole Christchurch-based director Pete Dawson apologised for his silence because of the risk to the police investigation.
"Our team is giving police technical assistance and their advice to is maintain radio silence in case we inadvertently say something that might interrupt their investigation," Dawson said.
Dawson said the overseas reports had misinterpreted further transfers of some of the stolen cryptocurrencies, which can be traced through different trading exchanges.
Other overseas reports said police had said Cryptopia could be operating again this month, but an official police spokesperson said there had not been any indication of when it might re-start business.
A New York-based analyst, Max Galka of Elementus, said the thieves been busy liquidating the stolen tokens by converting them into other cryptocurrencies via an international exchange called Etherdelta.
Another Christchurch exchange called BitPrime recently assured stakeholders them it did not hold or manage customer funds.
"Holding customer funds increases the risk, which can turn out disastrously," BitPrime chief executive Ross Carter-Brown said.
"Our own cryptocurrency reserves are held by an institutional custodian in cold storage, with US$100 million worth of insurance coverage.
"If you use a centralised exchange, ensure you withdraw all of your funds to your own wallets as soon as possible. If the coins are not in a wallet that you control the private keys for, in effect, then they're not really your coins."
Another Kiwi exchange called Vimba gave similar advice.
"When you keep crypto on an exchange you don't actually have ownership of those coins. We highly recommend you to move it into a personal wallet that you control."
Ross Carter-Brown said investors would be unable to claim all tax losses losses because until their digital coins were cashed up they could be classed as income.
He has also written about what may happen when cryptocurrency investors die.
"Traditionally, gaining access to a bank account is relatively straightforward after a family member passes. In the case of Bitcoin, it is much more complicated as there are wallets, passphrases and security boundaries.
"If your family isn't aware of the existence of your crypto holdings, it will be lost forever. Keep your wallet passphrase somewhere secure like a deposit box or a locked safe and provide instructions on how to get to it in your will."
As you can see there is (for the first time) a message [mod note: post merged with the first one] However if you look at the OP of the thread that *I* started the above has not been merged. This post is on topic as it concerns a person claiming to be qs in PM (posted previously) and recent unexplained upto three year old posts being necro-deleted. |
|
|
|
In answer to the questions in "the other thread" Yes, my post eight hours later was deleted: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Archived for future reference: http://archive.fo/nSkkUIt was somewhat recently (~3 weeks ago) brought to my attention that Vod made an implied death threat against me via the following post: Quote from: Vod on August 21, 2016, 06:17:11 AM I think Quickseller really should kill himself. It was later clarified by Vod that this post was not a joke Quote from: Vod on August 21, 2016, 08:36:48 PM I really wish the guy would kill himself already This statement is fairly clearly an implied threat, and is most likely illegal in Canada. While these kinds of implied threats are very clearly very wrong, especially when unprovoked, I believe the community as a whole should very strongly condemn this kind of behavior, especially when then author is not simply frustrated with someone, but rather has acknowledged that he really means it when he makes these kinds of statements. This kind of behavior is so egregious that I believe that anyone supporting, and/or trusting someone who makes these kinds of threats, is himself condoning violence, and as a result I do not think it is a good idea to trade with these people. I have previously sent a PM to the below list of people advising them of the situation. This list of people only includes those that I am certain received my PM, and those that have discussed the situation with my in one way or another that leads me to believe they do not condone these kinds of threats have not been included in this list. The below list of people are those that I believe condone threats of violence. It is my opinion that everyone should avoid doing any kind of business with the below people: Cyrus - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=78147 (staff member) dooglus - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420QuestionAuthority - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=72795Amitabh S - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=72118KWH - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=70535GIANNAT - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=73619kcud_dab - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=85550 (staff member) Gws24 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101842mentalpanda - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=160727cakir - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205338Aggressor66 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=224500whywefight - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=289686micky123 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=327665mexxer-2 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=341982Steamingoff - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=511296mr.relax - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=522205The following companies are advertised by the above users and/or are run by the above users, and as a result I believe you should avoid doing any kind of business with the below companies: JustDice.com In the event that corrective action is taken by anyone on the above list and/or anyone on the above list can defend their position to my satisfaction, I will reconsider their position on this list. Self-moderated thread. Posts that I deem to be trolling and/or off topic will be removed by myself. PS everyone reading this, this is what is known in Australia as quickseller taking their bat and ball and going home... |
|
|
|
Actually no, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1614573.msg49709412#msg49709412Quote from: Quickseller on 13 February 2019, 01:12:00
You will have to talk to timelord about bumping the two year old thread. He was the one who bumped it. I can confirm this. I didn't bump it, I reposted the part where quickseller had removed from their OP the list of people s/he doesn't trust. I had seven of my posts removed in one go then my reposting of quickseller's list. quickseller was the one who provoked the repost by necro deleting his/her posts from three years ago, I just happened to be the first to repost her/his list. |
|
|
|
I really don't have any other alts. You are probably trying to connect dots using all the posts from all the accounts. You've selectively cut out the rest of the post (the very post above yours). What I wrote was: So let me remind you how we got to this point: -(snip)- 1) Accounts Buyer/Seller. It wasn't a problem at that time but you were using them to scam and default loans. And somehow I think that you were after getting your accounts negged. Check iram66680 and magemist for instance. 2) Defaulted many loans check iram66680, cyrusb(I though am unsure about cyrusb due to this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1041009.msg11235253#msg11235253) . My best guess you were taking loans to gamble and defaulted when you were unable to pay. Obviously it didn't hurt you at all since you had already a good no. of accounts back then. So it was easy to move over to next account wasn't it? 3) Operator of scam site: GotaPauj. Check trust page of the profile. 4) Used alt accounts to abuse giveaways on a mass level: If you check the report by Lutpin you will see that he abused a giveaway by 28 times!! Now I wonder and want to ask if is it something that community should forgive because he scammed in past? It was no mistake that he chose to default loans,scam users and abuse giveaways.I'll get to the 28 other alts in a little while, but for now let's start with cyrusb. In this post by avirunes we see 7 Accounts Connected:iram66680, xinzark, cyrusb, coolcoin, kishan889, GotaPauj, magemist, to which we add Ajatmoralez, RoAnonymous, shadowmoon identified from your trust wall as being alts (and that's not counting the alts mentioned in the links on the trust wall) ... and in the PM to me madhatter, madhatter's profile number is number 11 (eleven) Including madhatter Date Registered: 09 December 2009, 15:21:10 - Last Active: 16 November 2018, 06:07:52 there are actually 11 Accounts Connected:madhatter. : Got a perma ban back in 2014 Um, I don't think so. Edit : shadowmoon, coolcoin and madhatter. were bought accounts perhaps.
If you lock this thread I'll just start another one. zazarb (who starts their loan service on the 25 August 2015, 09:50:24) first takes control of the UID xinzark on the 04 September 2015, 01:49:21 - post #48 ( Archived) - the loan is deemed to be "covered" http://archive.fo/xgJWi#selection-867.0-901.7 which I can only presume means the original owner defaulted but the loan was covered either through the account being sold or repaid through other means. If "covered" is code for "the loan defaulted and I have sold the UID to cover my losses" then Heutenamos, cryptopaths, xinzark, Panzzer, waterpile, BruceLee007, togesix , user64, hakanbalta577, Argwai96, nmuras29, rsarkar and lastly michaelwang33 have all been used as collateral and then sold to recover costs since 2015 to now. Two things then occur: - On the 14th, 15th, 17th and 28th of September 2015 zazarb starts four account sale threads (link in date) advertising UID's created in 2013 some with a corresponding bitcoin wallet address signature to "prove ownership" (ie clouds people's minds about whether or not a UID has changed hands)
- Three times 27 June 2016, 18:23:07 (0.2 btc) / 09 September 2016, 20:51:48 (0.3 btc) / 22 October 2016, 19:07:34 (0.30 btc) xinzark takes unsecured loans from zazarb
So what happened? zazarb secures the xinzark account the first time nine months earlier for a loan of BTC 0.15Maybe, just maybe xinzark bought back their account by covering the loan repayment with three of four other UID's to sweeten the deal? Care to enlighten us which ones?
I'll get to Floki soon...  |
|
|
|
|
BRB - have inadvertently deleted my post while cut and pasting - did anyone archive it?
|
|
|
|
I haven't posted with coolcoin and shadowmoon after getting banned.
You can't post from a banned account anyway. What are you talking about ? If one of your accounts get banned then ,according to forum rules, you are not allawed to use any other account. 25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed Regarding the ban see this thread: http://archive.fo/ibHov - Ban Appeal 29 April 2015, 02:56:23 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1041009.0 |
|
|
|
[quote author=xinzark link=topic=5108712.msg49705936#msg49705936 date=1549974384] Regarding this xinzark account, i have pms as proof. And master-P acted as escrow in this deal  [/quote] master-p was exposed on the 28th of December 2015.  When do you claim you bought this account from zazarb? |
|
|
|
I was going to post all the accounts here but saw some details which i didn't felt right to make public so i am going to pm you
You can make a confirmation post when all your questions are answered
Will be making another reply answering Timelord2067 questions All you did was PM me a list of known alts that were already in the public domain and you then went on to post your PM further down this thread, so no, you haven't answered my questions. Any proof of any kind (transaction details with chat screenshots if by any chance you are able to retrieve at this point) to support your statement. Have you provided proof to Timelord2067 in the PM? Without it simply looks like a hollow claim to me.
Very hollow. |
|
|
|
Just in case you didn't see this in my thread: |
|
|
|
Just a quick request: If you are planning on returning on forum please sign a message from the old address staked so that we can verify the account owner is same from the way back then. Hope you will be able to do that.
The links in my post point to signed messages by xinzark so that would be a starting point for signed messages. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
