You literally openly admitted in the past that you troll people you believe are in a weak position.
Correct, mostly friends and acquaintances who make stupid mistakes. It does not seem like you know the meaning of the word fun. You routinely troll others who question you and ignore almost all (if not all) concerns others post about you.
I think you were referencing yourself in the following part of your post, snowflake: This statement could not be farther from the truth.
You have no idea how and with whom I speak, not that it is any of your concern. Claiming that you know how I speak to them would be a defamatory lie. Then again, you are known for this kind of bullshit behavior.  You are a bad person.
Not only are you a verified scammer, you are fully delusional as well. When you say 'bad person' you need to take a good look at the mirror first. Do I need to remind you why you have: "Trust: -241"? |
|
|
|
I understand theymos agrees this behavior is acceptable.
That behavior is not acceptable (the case of the latter; the former link is bullshit) and everyone reasonable at this point knows that it was ill-devised / not thought through. This is turning into ad nauseum / harassment. ..to extort people then I would have no issue in removing him.
No more sting operations of that kind, or any kind for that matter.
For crying out loud, man up and post with your main account Quickseller. |
|
|
|
Exactly the maturity level I expected from you.
Remind me again: 1) Who was ignoring who, and who is revealing private messages. 2) Who is supporting scammers / account farming / escrowing account sales. Just the same intransparent shit as always with Laura, 'you may not know my reasons, but the exist. honest!!! More important people know them'.
There is absolutely no reason to reveal anything that is not necessary to people who are not relevant, especially not scammers such as QS. ..since a conversation with Lauda is impossible.
Which has nothing to do with reality / could not be further from the truth. Some people do not deserve a proper conversation from me, such as the case with OP. Others are always welcome and treated properly via the proper communication channels.
You are starting to turn into QS. |
|
|
|
Work faster, now!  |
|
|
|
|
There is no rule against that / I don't see why this would be a problem / He should do that were applicable / The forum has a lot of things to worry about, but whether users get offended or not is not one of them.
|
|
|
|
Trust summary for Kentedvard
This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.
Tagged.
Look at all those illiterate bounty campaign spammers. They are completely ignoring your post and just spamming. |
|
|
|
It sounds like Lauda is unable to backup his rating in *any* way. The rating is fairly clearly retaliatory in nature.
The rating is self-explanatory, perfectly valid and backed up. Just because I do not want to share the details with, known scammers such as yourself, that does not mean that it can't be backed up snowflake. I would suggest involving both Blazed and hilariousandco in the situation, as their credibility will be shot if they allow Lauda to remain on their trust lists.
Everyone has been long informed about this, with the majority being surprised by shorena's actions. |
|
|
|
Yes I ignored it.
I'm going to ignore it too then. It works both ways, as long as accounts can be escrowed all is fine I guess. Its exactly what ad hominem means, you try to refute the argument (you try to hide the discussion in private PMs) by talking negativly about the person who made it.
Nothing needs refuting in here as the thread is completely distanced from reality / no such action has been attempted. What needs to be clear to the newcomers is that QS is a confirmed scammer with near zero credibility, end-of. So can we please drop this topic and focus on my question for a few posts?
Off-topic? Maybe you like sharing details of private transactions, but I don't. |
|
|
|
In other words, you can't refute my argument, so you resort to ad hominem attacks.
Speculating about shorena's intentions is not an argument. You've made almost near-zero proper arguments in this thread, which is still almost completely flawed and includes people who are not related to the issue. Stating facts, i.e. that you're a confirmed scammer, is not ad hominem in any way.  |
|
|
|
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.
You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here? It looks like shorena is trying to prevent you from hiding how you weasel out of negative situations like this one. I have absolutely no idea why a confirmed scammer such as yourself is commenting this or any cases at all. Must be boring in that basement, no? |
|
|
|
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.
You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here? |
|
|
|
Or simply disallow signatures in general. Problem solved.
Or pass the keys of the forum to someone who actually cares about issues experienced by actual community members (this excludes probably over 90% of the members ATM who are just account farmers, sig. spammers or similar). I think that would involve a considerable amount of money changing hands, more money than most of those who care about the forum could afford. It's a good idea in theory. Ignore the money. Let theymos continue doing ADs, and staff payments. Pay the person as much as an admin would be receiving for a while and decide from there. The money isn't even important in this context, at least not from my perspective. The whole argument that the garbage threads will just keep getting created smacks of laziness. It's so much easier to do nothing than to try something new.
Banning sig campaigns would definitely solve the problem, but I highly doubt that's going to happen.
Just having a stronger stance, i.e. be less lenient on shitposting, harder bans, blacklisting services, banning account sales, farmed accounts, et. al. would kill the majority of the issue. |
|
|
|
When will that approximately take place ?
That can't be specified at this time. I'd estimate sometime in the next 6 months. |
|
|
|
Interesting hypothesis. May I see a shred of evidence mister shoreno?  |
|
|
|
is there a need to update the masternode client in the near future?
Yes, the 0.14.0 client will have a mandatory update. is there a mailinglist, when i get notification, if the masternode needs an mandatory update?
Sign up on the forum or keep watching this thread. |
|
|
|
Or simply disallow signatures in general. Problem solved.
Or pass the keys of the forum to someone who actually cares about issues experienced by actual community members (this excludes probably over 90% of the members ATM who are just account farmers, sig. spammers or similar). |
|
|
|
One more question guys, is it possible to install gunbot on two different machines (eg desktop/laptop) but run it only from one at a time?
Yes, you can install it on several machines. It's not advisable to run Gunbot on multiple machines at the same time on a single account. Read before you spam post: but run it only from one at a time?
|
|
|
|
OP, IMHO you deserve to be lit up like a Christmas Tree. Spamming us with 5,6,7,8,9 new threads only hurt you, not help. What's next, the "highly accurate" poll thread? I see that you've been tagging some people with open Scam accusations, but not all of them. Therefore, you are making the trust system very shady. - OP logic. For help, you should try some soothing salve.
 |
|
|
|
Sir yahoo and SMAS answer to none?
When it comes to SMAS, and SMAS only, we don't have to answer to anyone. The fact that we often do is just rather generosity. WTF are you on about Lauda?
What's wrong with you? I have nothing to do with users currently enrolled in his campaigns, nor do I want to get involved in disputes between you two. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
