Lauda/TMAN extortion attempt

[Lauda]

I will be honest and say that I have long thought you are a sock of lauda and your statements in this thread make it look more to be the case.

LOL

Damn, we've been exposed. I take it, that anyone who does not agree with the twisted reality of QS in cases related to me is either part of "my group of friends" or my "sock" account. Ironically, the latter is coming from a master account farmer/trader.

[1714885363]

1714885363

[1714885363]

1714885363

[minifrij]

To me it looks like there is no consensus among the community members. You can try to dismiss this with personal attacks, but I dont think it will change someones mind. Then again, maybe my understand of 'the community' differs from yours.

If people agreed with QS then Lauda and TMAN would have recieved more negatives than just yours. Don't you agree?

[Quickseller]

To me it looks like there is no consensus among the community members. You can try to dismiss this with personal attacks, but I dont think it will change someones mind. Then again, maybe my understand of 'the community' differs from yours.

If people agreed with QS then Lauda and TMAN would have recieved more negatives than just yours. Don't you agree?

Considering that both have left retaliatory negative trust against everyone who left negative trust against them and that blazed and hilariousandco have kept the extortionist on their trust lists, no I do not agreee.

[sho_road_warrior]

To me it looks like there is no consensus among the community members. You can try to dismiss this with personal attacks, but I dont think it will change someones mind. Then again, maybe my understand of 'the community' differs from yours.

If people agreed with QS then Lauda and TMAN would have recieved more negatives than just yours. Don't you agree?

Agreeing with QS has become dangerous as barely anyone is willing to see their arguments and just attacks them based on their past flaws. If everyone would agree, so I would I unless I was expelled from this community without notice.

@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.


Removed previously perfectly valid trust ratings in order to manipulate the general history/view. Is in strong support of scammers such as Quickseller. Changing trust ratings on and off based on how he feels on a particular day.
Shorena does not seem alike to the person that I've used to know and have interacted in the past. I've stopped trusting them post their actions and strong support of said scammers.

[Lauda]

@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here?

[Quickseller]

@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here?

It looks like shorena is trying to prevent you from hiding how you weasel out of negative situations like this one.

[TMAN]

Hey QS, how's it going in cuntland today? Just thought I would pop in and say HI

[Lauda]

@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here?

It looks like shorena is trying to prevent you from hiding how you weasel out of negative situations like this one.

I have absolutely no idea why a confirmed scammer such as yourself is commenting this or any cases at all. Must be boring in that basement, no?

[Quickseller]

@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here?

It looks like shorena is trying to prevent you from hiding how you weasel out of negative situations like this one.

I have absolutely no idea why a confirmed scammer such as yourself is commenting this or any cases at all. Must be boring in that basement, no?

In other words, you can't refute my argument, so you resort to ad hominem attacks.

[Lauda]

In other words, you can't refute my argument, so you resort to ad hominem attacks.

Speculating about shorena's intentions is not an argument. You've made almost near-zero proper arguments in this thread, which is still almost completely flawed and includes people who are not related to the issue. Stating facts, i.e. that you're a confirmed scammer, is not ad hominem in any way.

[shorena]

@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here?

This PM?

Wondering what happened to you. You don't seem the same person from mid-late 2016.

Yes I ignored it.

You ignored my question. Maybe you already forgot.

-snip-
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

Removed previously perfectly valid trust ratings in order to manipulate the general history/view. Is in strong support of scammers such as Quickseller. Changing trust ratings on and off based on how he feels on a particular day.
Shorena does not seem alike to the person that I've used to know and have interacted in the past. I've stopped trusting them post their actions and strong support of said scammers.

-snip-
Stating facts, i.e. that you're a confirmed scammer, is not ad hominem in any way.

Its exactly what ad hominem means, you try to refute the argument (you try to hide the discussion in private PMs) by talking negativly (is a scammer) about the person who (quickseller) made it. This does nothing to refute the argument, it makes you look petty. Not that this is new or anyone cares. So can we please drop this topic and focus on my question for a few posts?

[Lauda]

Yes I ignored it.

I'm going to ignore it too then. It works both ways, as long as accounts can be escrowed all is fine I guess.

Its exactly what ad hominem means, you try to refute the argument (you try to hide the discussion in private PMs) by talking negativly about the person who made it.

Nothing needs refuting in here as the thread is completely distanced from reality / no such action has been attempted. What needs to be clear to the newcomers is that QS is a confirmed scammer with near zero credibility, end-of.

So can we please drop this topic and focus on my question for a few posts?

Off-topic? Maybe you like sharing details of private transactions, but I don't.

[Quickseller]

Yes I ignored it.

I'm going to ignore it too then.

-snip-
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

Removed previously perfectly valid trust ratings in order to manipulate the general history/view. Is in strong support of scammers such as Quickseller. Changing trust ratings on and off based on how he feels on a particular day.
Shorena does not seem alike to the person that I've used to know and have interacted in the past. I've stopped trusting them post their actions and strong support of said scammers.

It sounds like Lauda is unable to backup his rating in *any* way. The rating is fairly clearly retaliatory in nature.

I would suggest involving both Blazed and hilariousandco in the situation, as their credibility will be shot if they allow Lauda to remain on their trust lists.

[Lauda]

It sounds like Lauda is unable to backup his rating in *any* way. The rating is fairly clearly retaliatory in nature.

The rating is self-explanatory, perfectly valid and backed up. Just because I do not want to share the details with, known scammers such as yourself, that does not mean that it can't be backed up snowflake.

I would suggest involving both Blazed and hilariousandco in the situation, as their credibility will be shot if they allow Lauda to remain on their trust lists.

Everyone has been long informed about this, with the majority being surprised by shorena's actions.

[btctalkacc]

You are so idiots. All of you. All of you scammers. I have sold accounts to at least 1/5 of DT users here.

You all scam. You are all a piece of shit.

[gorgon666]

I have posted a thread to either have hilariousandco removed from being staff or he remove Lauda from his trust list.

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list. 

[Vod]

I have posted a thread to either have hilariousandco removed from being staff or he remove Lauda from his trust list.

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list. 

Quickseller is now using his alts to pretend he has support for this ridiculous accusation.

If he is not willing to stand behind his complaint, should we take it seriously?

[Vod]

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list. 

We need to start a thread titled "Quickseller - extortion attempt".   

[shorena]

Yes I ignored it.

I'm going to ignore it too then. It works both ways, as long as accounts can be escrowed all is fine I guess.

Exactly the maturity level I expected from you. You pondered in my general direction and because I didnt reply, you use it now as an excuse to avoid my direct question regarding a trust rating.

Yes I ignored it.

I'm going to ignore it too then.

-snip-
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.

Removed previously perfectly valid trust ratings in order to manipulate the general history/view. Is in strong support of scammers such as Quickseller. Changing trust ratings on and off based on how he feels on a particular day.
Shorena does not seem alike to the person that I've used to know and have interacted in the past. I've stopped trusting them post their actions and strong support of said scammers.

It sounds like Lauda is unable to backup his rating in *any* way. The rating is fairly clearly retaliatory in nature.

I would suggest involving both Blazed and hilariousandco in the situation, as their credibility will be shot if they allow Lauda to remain on their trust lists.

Just the same intransparent shit as always with Laura, 'you may not know my reasons, but the exist. honest!!! More important people know them'.

I have posted a thread to either have hilariousandco removed from being staff or he remove Lauda from his trust list.

A thread regarding Blazed is forthcoming is Lauda is not removed from his trust list. 

Quickseller is now using his alts to pretend he has support for this ridiculous accusation.

If he is not willing to stand behind his complaint, should we take it seriously?

As someone who knows the repercussions of having your - or one users believe to be yours - identity revealed you can maybe understand why someone would try to avoid attribution to an argument that will be ignored because of the person that made it. Its only logical to discredit those giving Lauda their power since a conversation with Lauda is impossible.

[Lauda]

Exactly the maturity level I expected from you.

Remind me again: 1) Who was ignoring who, and who is revealing private messages. 2) Who is supporting scammers / account farming / escrowing account sales.

Just the same intransparent shit as always with Laura, 'you may not know my reasons, but the exist. honest!!! More important people know them'.

There is absolutely no reason to reveal anything that is not necessary to people who are not relevant, especially not scammers such as QS.

..since a conversation with Lauda is impossible.

Which has nothing to do with reality / could not be further from the truth. Some people do not deserve a proper conversation from me, such as the case with OP. Others are always welcome and treated properly via the proper communication channels.
You are starting to turn into QS.