If you mean about the part when you viewed a particular transaction in which there was a status according to it's priority (high, medium and low) then you have a point (was useful) but from the wallet itself, it's still there. You should switch from "Regular Send" to "Advanced Send" so you would be able to adjust and see the status as below (before you make the payments and perhaps this is the reason that they took away the priority status part since you could know everything before processing the payment):


Within 1 block = High priority
Within 6 blocks = Medium priority
More than 6 blocks = Low priority

For starters, 10% is way lower than a fair percentage, 40% should be the least for these kinds of sales. Payments shouldn't be in a indirect manner (mining contract earnings being divided and then paying the artist) but instead it should be directed at artists (in bitcoin) on a regular manner.
What measurements would be taken to ensure the artists of fair earnings? Would there be a transparency in terms of each sales for each artist?

NO. Most providers that offer cheap VPS, hate it when users attempt to mine on it and as result suspend those users account.

It has been unprofitable for years.

Start from here:
https://99bitcoins.com/beginners-guide-to-mining/

---

To have a general idea:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining
https://www.weusecoins.com/en/mining-guide/
http://www.coindesk.com/information/how-bitcoin-mining-works/

---

Take note: Nowadays only "ASIC Mining" is worth the shot.

According to "Received Time", you sent it 2 days ago (not 5 days ago).

Most likely you forgot to bring the slider to the most right side (even if you've checked the use dynamic fee option) and as result, ended up with "low fee" status.

It's not out of order but rather limited to maximum of 100 transactions per hour. Just keep trying it.

Actually it goes up and down throughout the day but before the recent incidents (massive unconfirmed transactions going beyond 100k), it usually was on an average from 30k to 60k range at most.

Around 72 hrs.

Contact some users to help you out by including your transactions in a block, in exchange for some fees:

1. kano: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=36044
2. macbook-air: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=16114

---

Furthermore read this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1802212.0

Gocoin (https://www.gocoin.com/) seems to gives also an smooth experience like bitpay and their support is somehow good as well (based on past experience).

---

PAYMIUM (https://paymium.com/page/services#merchants) also seems to be another option worthy of a look (although haven't tested their way of processing).

---

This thread belongs to "Service Discussion section".

Goes back to your address.

Although it would've been nice for them to not allow unconfirmed inputs to be used, it's still users (your) fault for using it since you took the risk of using a transaction that might never receive confirmations. Other nodes have most likely dropped it and as result, that transaction isn't visible on other explorers.

---

This thread gives a solution for the confirmation issues (and few others): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1802212.0

There's no definite answer but there could be an estimated amount of blocks depending on the fee you paid per byte.

Yes, if it gets dropped from the network, it will be returned to the senders address.

You can wait while doing few other steps like adding it to "ViaBTC website" so it could speed up the process (https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/). If you're going to double spend it, then that's when you want to make another transaction.

---

Read this thread for more detailed version: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1802212.0

1st issue: You used a very low fee than the recommended fee on per byte basis and it resulted to the 1st warning
2nd issue: After following your main address (https://blockchain.info/address/163FQt96KHh9Di6L9vtahq9DGpM3T1oaYb), it seems that you've double spend it since some nodes haven't dropped the initial transaction and that resulted to the 2nd warning

---

It might take a while but one of those eventually will be confirmed (although you still used a fee lower than recommended on second attempt)

---

To get an idea for needed fees per byte: https://blockchain.info/address/163FQt96KHh9Di6L9vtahq9DGpM3T1oaYb

Another option that is missing from "keyscore44's thread" is Cryptogrind: https://www.cryptogrind.com/

---

Also there's a website that compiles some job offers into a single place (like a working hub): https://coinality.com/

Nothing so far although this issue should fall down under their teams fault (since bitify escrow most likely used a fee, less than recommended and it resulted in it being dropped after few days).

As long as you've provided enough evidence, your coins should be safe with them.

Not sure where you're staying but will base my answer on my own location. I've worked with a local offline (on spot) exchange before and the actual volume of BTCitcoin trades never been to a level that gains you any significant amount in terms of taking few percentages from each trades (my guess is, it's due to all the other alternative options that can be done with a press of a button, in other words online trades are way more popular than the traditional exchanges since the whole steps are a lot easier). On the other hand, it isn't worth the hassle to go and take permits just to see yourself making few trades on a daily basis.

No.

Make it look professional at least (most tend to just post without even aligning stuff). Few simple details that can be done with provided tools above each post can have a big impact.

It would be best to have an account that is at least Jr. member and above so the images would be shown normally (instead of links if posted by Newbie users).

Here's some that I've heard of (before you start, do some research about each since some tend to ban or block your account easily):

1. coinurl - https://coinurl.com/
2. linkshrink - https://linkshrink.net/
3. binbucks - http://www.binbucks.com/
4. adfocus - http://adfoc.us/

---

Take note: If you're going to post those links here, it's against forum rules:

Here's my entry

---

Not sure if you're aware or not but you're using parts of a design that I made in the past. The middle part is based on my previous work, even though you tweaked it a bit (exact same font / Not all caps / deleted the in between parts / changed the order of the names). In a way you're presenting my past work, as yours (even if you used only parts of it).
Regardless of the fact that both of your entries are invalid (except the Hero version in your 2nd entry, although it needs tweaking in terms of size for both end parts), you shouldn't present someone else's work as yours (be original).

---

Since I've seen a lot of invalid entries, I recommend everyone to read the following link (middle part of 1st post) and change their entries accordingly).
Signature restrictions: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.0

---

Update:
I've been designing signatures for long enough to notice someone using a plagiarized content (from my previous designs).

Proof 1 (1st part): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1753651.msg17633878#msg17633878
Proof 1 (2nd part): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1785247.0

Proof 2 (1st part): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1775265.0
Proof 2 (2nd part): You can see it in my portfolio thread (link in my profile, not the escrow link in personal message area).

Check middle parts of each so you would know. For further proofs, you could also ask each respective owners.

---

Violating one of the rules:

"No" since mostly(since before), I've used the appropriate fees and the difference with recent events is minimal in my case, therefor my behavior hasn't changed. From my observation, majority of users that I see complain nowadays, are those that used to put a fee lower than recommended (and got used to it since it did the trick) and they see the current situation as a big change rather than a step climb in fees.

Usually the answer to these questions is already provided on most websites.

These on the other hand is going to be tricky since not everyone is going to reveal the answers.

Yes, here's the list (there might be some more):

1. https://coinmap.org/welcome/
2. http://spendbitcoins.com/
3. http://usebitcoins.info/
4. http://bitcoin.travel/

Regardless of the fact that there's already similar websites, it would always be nice to have a new addition to those lines. Some websites don't have everything listed yet (tend to miss few businesses out there) so there's definitely room for one more.

I believe this link will give all the answers that you need about reversibility of different methods: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Payment_methods

What's the exact message that you receive about the failure?

---

Here's another two websites for you:

1. http://bitcoin.travel/
2. http://usebitcoins.info/

You're mixing $35 to 0.030179BTC. Check the transaction link again: https://blockchain.info/tx/1eb6a5997ae3c3c98f42ac13feb0f813d0dc640825ff7196d3a3eebcb134d9c2
Hover over the 0.030179BTC amount and it will show you the exact value at the time of transaction process (which is $35.16).