You can generate a new (different!) seed, but keep in mind that this means basically a new wallet. If you have coins on the old wallet and the old (recovery) seed is lost, also those coins are lost.
If you don't have coins on current wallet, I also recommend you write (when you can) onto the old seed paper "no longer in use" or similar to not confuse you.
You may want to also read this (old) topic: https://www.reddit.com/r/TREZOR/comments/8lqvki/i_want_new_seed_words/

You are somewhat right, but not completely.
Indeed, too many are here only for the money. But on the other hand bitcointalk grew as a bigger and more diversified (international) community.
Clearly in the bigger the community is, the more the scammers, the spammers or the illiterate. Or those posting translated text.. 

Somehow I think that all this both good and bad. But I don't think that you can realistically have one without the other.
So, as said, get used to ignore the noise and you'll be able to easily make proper conversation.
I also recommend you start using the ignore feature. It can do wonders 

I'm not certain that this could work, since in the same way one can buy coins without KYC, he can also spend without KYC. Or he can donate.
Or in certain cases one can claim that he wanted to just trade and his account was hacked and coins withdrawn to a wallet he doesn't have.
Also, you cannot imagine how many people use to lose their seed or private keys in fishing accidents  

Making a credible story is up to you. The fact that they don't know the underlying tech may or may not work in your favor.
I am not convinced that they can go that easy after you - even in an authoritarian state - with or without trying their 5$ wrench. And the number of bitcoiners is rising day by day, making it harder and harder to pick those worthwhile to put effort in making them confess.

I'm not sure my logic was clear enough, I hope it was.

That option 3 caught my attention. I think that this point of view, although it would make sense, it's incorrect from IRS (or similar) point of view.
But I'm not that good in this kind of things, so I would like to see others' opinion, especially if they did bought goods with Bitcoin - how did they fill their tax papers.

Imho it's not that much a great news than a basically normal development. All I can say is "finally, end of drama".

I am not convinced that the development is that great for George Russel, but time will tell. He clearly deserves a good car and he has shown that he can do wonders in a Mercedes.. when Lewis was not there. Let's see how the things will go when Lewis is present, especially as lately he seems to be needing badly any help he can get against Max. Of course, that may be or may not be the same next year.

I am more curious who will fill the "missing spot" (left by Russel). Will it be Alex Albon or will it be somebody else? That part may be a bit complicated...

I've read that it's actually optional, hence I do expect that - especially at start - the huge majority of stores will turn down bitcoin payments (unfortunately).

Eu am prins nebunia ICO. Toata lumea parea sa cumpere tokenuri de toate felurile, nu conta cat de prost sau copiat era proiectul, important era sa intre pe vreo bursa (iar intrarea este/era pe bani).
Preturile cresteau nejustificat. Multe proiecte au fost complet teapa. Altele au devenit intre timp (de ce ar mai dezvolta ceva daca au castigat peste noapte 10M$?).

Din punctul meu de vedere exact la fel e cu NFT. Nu conteaza ce tampenie e, nu conteza de la cine e, toata lumea cumpara in speranta ca va vinde mai scump, candva, cat mai curand. Nu vad cum ar putea sa se termine bine...

No, the bot was made by TryNinja, I'm using it too. Just simply @fillippone got (re)merited by DdmrDdmr and then checked DdmrDdmr merit history.
I know since I've received a notification too for getting re-merited 

This sounds interesting indeed. I didn't know. Of course, they'll have to know how to do it, but with the amount of money involved, I'm sure that they'll find somebody help them out.


Clearly, all businesses go where it's better for them, usually where they'll earn more. My question was not really serious.
But, as said, better is, even for Americans, that the hash rate is not centralized (although one cannot actually know if it's centralized or not).

This is something useful. This may indeed mean that your friend's money may not be stolen, although it again doesn't add up, since if he would have sent smaller amount, the transaction would have been looking different.
That transaction looks like either a consolidation of funds, or seep (as nc50lc said!), either a hack. And in the previous or next few days there were no transactions from that address.

It's quite sad that you are asking here this late; back those days your friend could have been more certain about what he did, hence be more helpful for tracking the funds.


However, if it's not a hack (I'm not 100% convinced, but let's get more optimistic, at least.) then it's a consolidation or sweep.

Although I didn't follow those, I remember some stories (I don't know how real) about sweeping a paper wallet that ended into disaster, funds being sent to odd/unknown addresses.
Again, I don't know those well, but maybe it rings a bell to somebody familiar with the topic.

First I'd try to see though what other addresses are in that wallet, since there are more transactions going to 1EF3DDBaPzbpJ5cXHVW2gZkyG1Jd4FotFW and they look intended, while the change goes back to 13uzBESjqTT87ak4uAipKUoP8EuVHcQk2e.

If he didn't initiate any send action there, I don't see how it could be a glitch in Mycelium.
Unfortunately, from what I read, my conclusion is that somebody else got access to the private key of 13uzBESjqTT87ak4uAipKUoP8EuVHcQk2e and stole the coins by sending them to 1EF3DDBaPzbpJ5cXHVW2gZkyG1Jd4FotFW.

On the other hand, I see multiple send actions from 13uzBESjqTT87ak4uAipKUoP8EuVHcQk2e to 1EF3DDBaPzbpJ5cXHVW2gZkyG1Jd4FotFW, even with change back to 13uzBESjqTT87ak4uAipKUoP8EuVHcQk2e, hence I think that something is missing from the story.

Indeed, NFTs have a big chance to be Tulip 2.0, ICO 3.0, and so on.
Also to be kept an eye on Eth, since with the move to PoS it can easily move way down.

Exactly.
The only "metrics" would be the changes in the hash rate and whatever the mining farm owners are declaring. Way to small and scarce information and possibly not very reliable also.


I find it quite an odd place to move. I don't know what would be the status for the hardware (do they have to pay import tax?) and what would be the taxes to be paid in US for the operations (aren't they higher than in other places?)

And something else: will the "Bitcoin mining is centralized in China" narrative get replaced by "Bitcoin mining is centralized in United States" (narrative)?

Cred ca intrebi in locul gresit 
Adica, noi, cei de aici, stim ca crypto are randament mai bun decat actiunile.
As plusa si as zice ca nu suntem atat de bogati cat sa ne permitem sa diversificam prea mult portofoliul, iar actiunile sunt tot in grupa de risc mare, deci ar fi oricum mai jos in lista.
Deci sunt sanse mari sa primesti cam acelasi raspuns ca al meu: nu stiu, nu am investit pe bursa de actiuni.

I think that you were misled by the FUDsters; I think that you were misled that there was a bear market in 2021, while those were only corrections and we are in the same bull market as in the end of 2020.
If you look at it like this you may not have that many uncertainties.

(Also try to not follow -literally- everybody's predictions.)

A private blockchain is useful in a pretty limited number of use cases, in most a normal database is better.
Bitcoin came with public blockchain, bitcoin came with pretty well thought incentivizing for the miners to keep the blockchain safe, bitcoin came with everything public and transparent, features heavily demanded currently in many sectors.
The technology and the fact it was properly used (including the fact that's public and transparent) made it so appealing.

The fact that the ledger can be publicly read by everybody also made the governments don't oppose it with all their power.

Last month was lower and, well, just read the starting post (at least the part about dust payments) and look into the spreadsheet and should be clear. Everything is transparent.
Shortly: almost nobody got any coins transferred, maybe next month.

Thanks for the research. Then, unfortunately, it's no longer a news that good, since they do basically the same thing as PayPal (and I think Revolut too).
Not a bad one either, obviously , but no longer a "wow". They're are still a "proper" bank, although a small one, maybe closer to average Joe's "soul" and will add more credibility. (imho we still need that).

I think that Twitter alone is not a good indicator, since there's a lot of paid shilling that's going on there.
But it's not only Twitter; it's the news too, for example. And that's normal; just look at the price. I think that the best image is:

---

The news I know are:
1. El Salvador - not new, but still trending
2. Tipping at Twitter
3. Vast.Bank offers crypto

However, take a look at the Press board, there are more.

From what I see, the first image may be from a computer browser, while the second is from Google Play Android app, hence the difference.
Although it's (more or less) on the list, I'll add that it's available for my Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus with Android 8.1; but the problem may indeed be the Huawei device.