Hello, I apologize of I did this wrong, I am new and have tried to mine bitcoins solo, to see it work. Three weeks ago I used cgminer to mine bitcoins using "cgminer.exe -o http://127.0.0.1:xxxx -u xxx -p xxxx". Everything worked ok I got the messages as per the cgminer output. A week later I went back to bitcoin after a break pool mining bitcoins. Now I get an error "bit coin address is invalid 15qSxp..." seems to be the default address for a mandatory field. So now I am getting back blockchain size and diff but am not mining. I no longer see the messages" accepted ccccc from anu0". For example. So I set btc-address to the address in my bitcoin wallet from the receive menu. I do not understand the instruction to set it to bitcoind. So now I can't solo mine, can anybody help? Thanks Basically what btc-address do I use as the default no longer seems to work. Just pick any valid btc address that you own. It does not even matter if the wallet that contains that address isn't on the bitcoind you are mining to. |
|
|
|
|
Spondoolies driver is now in cgminer git master.
|
|
|
|
Currently I use version 4.1.0
Anyone got an Idea what to check next?
This. |
|
|
|
No, you have to enable icarus for support to be compiled in. At runtime don't use any icarus options though. I don't know what you mean? So you put it icarus enabled in the bat file and run it. then somehow disable it? If yes, how? No, if you are talking about bat files you are talking about windows. The other poster asked about compiling it for himself on linux and the instructions were for the compilation stage. On windows do nothing at all [sic]. |
|
|
|
|
Try with debugging enabled as I said, you may gleam something from it but expect a LOT of output.
|
|
|
|
|
Try one at a time without any overclock settings. Your USB might not be providing enough power. Also start cgminer with the extra options -D -T
Then you might get some useful debugging information.
|
|
|
|
Hi, I just compiled cgminer 4.2.3 on Linux Mint with the additional technobit drivers. After starting cgminer I cant see the status window, also i cant interact with cgminer via the console. Same problem with cgminer 3.12.3. Raspberry Pi works great...
can someone help me?
thanks in advance!
Well, you're asking for help with something you patched that isn't our code... However your problem is the classic one of not installing the libncurses development library prior to building it. |
|
|
|
Please do not use icarus options at all with these as the only thing you're likely to do is make it worse. Those options are of zero utility with the antminer U*s.
New to mining. I am setting up a couple of these for the first time on a linux distro. Based on what you have said, does that mean I can skip enabling icarus? i.e. "./configure --enable-icarus" No, you have to enable icarus for support to be compiled in. At runtime don't use any icarus options though. |
|
|
|
I don't see why you shouldn't be able to get that
It's a public address he doesn't own it.. it's assigned by his ISP.. There are no privacy laws broken by providing that information
You talking to me? I don't have any such access I said. Only the forum administrators do and you have to appeal to them. Don't take out your frustration on me. |
|
|
|
yes I tried and let cgminer works for 15 minutes but no hashrate in log file. I use 3.7.2
Oh you mean you want the hashrate in the logfile. You didn't specify where. Change it into text mode as well by adding -T |
|
|
|
Add this to the end of your cgminer commands: 2>log.txt
Because of the way windows writes to files you may not see anything in the log.txt file until you exit cgminer.
Thanks but I need to see hashrate when cgminer still works. Did you try it? It will still show on screen. |
|
|
|
So the moderators know about this now?
I've sent them PM's to get the IP addresses registered against them so I can contact the ISP
He used his real name on Skype...
Is this not possible at all?
No moderator has that ability, only theymos can do that and he would likely not. |
|
|
|
1) Is the Sierra pretty loud? Can it be left running in the guest room with the door closed without bothering anyone in the rest of a condo? If a guest is over and is to sleep in the guest room, is that thing gonna be too loud for him? How loud, a hair dryer, an airplane, in the middle, or better?
2) Do I really have to prepare myself to doing the paper clip trick for the power supply? Any great resources for that?
Thank you dear honorable Sierra owners.
It depends entirely on the ambient temperature as to how loud it is because I made the fan control adjust for optimum efficiency in terms of the lowest fanspeed required to maintain safe temperatures. If the room is warm they will get very loud but if it's cold they're pretty unobtrusive when behind a door/wall. They come with their own PSUs so there is no need to power them separately. |
|
|
|
|
Add this to the end of your cgminer commands: 2>log.txt
Because of the way windows writes to files you may not see anything in the log.txt file until you exit cgminer.
|
|
|
|
|
@spondoolies-tech: You asked about what is the convention on these forums. Since this is a self moderated thread, you are free to remove any posts you like if you think they're too offtopic or by whatever standards you like; mods usually don't moderate self moderated threads. However bear in mind most customers get upset if you start deleting any negative comments and they have ways of watching the original thread elsewhere to see what was deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not use icarus options at all with these as the only thing you're likely to do is make it worse. Those options are of zero utility with the antminer U*s.
|
|
|
|
I am having a problem with rejected duplicate shares, which is weird, because there is no way that could happen: wr_lock(&cgpu->qlock);
HASH_ITER(hh, cgpu->queued_work, work, tmp) {
if ( !work->stale && !(work->tv_work_start.tv_sec) ) {
cgtime(&work->tv_work_start);
wr_unlock(&cgpu->qlock);
return work;
}
1. Iteration is inside a wr_lock 2. Once accepted the work is marked as used/started again inside the lock 3. The whole function is called inside a thread private lock and no other thread is calling that function at all 4. Adding a job to the queue is also done under the same private lock but still there are duplicates returned from different chips (if the same chip that may be just delayed chip scanning and work reuse), which points to the same work being returned in two consecutive calls or sending a work to the wrong chip. Any pointers how to debug this? Is the (struct work) job_id unique enough to identify that or subid (any driver as example?) should be used instead? Is this in your own code because that doesn't look familiar. It doesn't look like you're actually removing the work item from the hash list before unlocking the write lock, you're only finding it so the work remains on the hash list. |
|
|
|
so was that message from QuiveringGibbage just a hoax? cause no one else had anything and now he/she's conveniently not replying.
smells like a hashspy among us feeding us more false hope hmmm
No, he bought it second hand. |
|
|
|
Was there ever a .05 firmware update?
Is there anybody out there? Nod if you can hear me...
Nod, there was. Sweet! Thanks, Con. Anybody have a link to the latest HF firmware? I apologize if it is staring me in the face. Honestly, if you're on 0.4, I'd recommend staying with it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
