|
Yes, it is a scam.
I called it 1 year ago, in their thread as well, some comments got censored, some survived.
|
|
|
|
|
You should buy BSV, or a goat, or both.
Goat makes free milk, you sell milk and buy more BSV. Win/Win
|
|
|
|
I want introduce new Bitcore BTX game! House edge 1% only! Min bet 0.05 BTX and max bet 1 BTX. Game with provably fair system. http://oddevenbets.comEasy to WIN. Chance to win is 50/50! Good luck, friends! In case you want to bet, there are plenty of provably fair websites with 0.5% house edge. Found one with 0.1% house edge, on BTC of course. So why lose odds? |
|
|
|
I'm not a professional at solving riddles, but I don't think there's a clue, per se. It sounds very familiar, perhaps somewhere read before, and the main characters you have replaced. We need to think about the answers...
It has been answered a long time ago, the answer is IXCoin. By looking at the price and development of IXCoin, we can see how successful it was/is. |
|
|
|
|
One is 70% premined and another one is 100% premined, both centralized and both are used to create unregistered securities offerings.
Genius.
|
|
|
|
Quote from the press release of the US Copyright Office: In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.
|
|
|
|
In all honesty, i don't think the real Satoshi, an inventor of a groundbreaking technology that is more concerned about anonymously will fight so hard in public to be recognized  it doesn't sound like what the real satoshi will do, if satoshi doesn't want to be known for so long, then why the sudden cry for recognition? I expect Mr Satoshi to be bigger than this child's play. Yeh he was so concerned about anonymity that he paid for Bitcoin.org domain with credit card in 2008 and got Australian Tax record for it. Ah yeh he also copyrighted it because he wanted to stay anonymous. Some peoples bags are definitive to big to carry, head is starved of oxygen.  Can you tell me the identity of the person behind the credit card used to pay for this bitcoin.org domain you talk about? am sure any credit card carries the information of the owner, and if this is the case there is no need to look any further, or for Mr Craig to cry out so loud for recognition, the bank which issue that card can rightly state who's identity is attached to the credit card, or even the Australian Tax record can also provide this information, So i think it is easy to know know if CW is satoshi or not  Craig Wright claimed the expenses for the bitcoin.org purchase on his tax in the 2008/2009 tax year. That is also a fact. |
|
|
|
Hey all got a question. To those of you who use bittrex and withdraw btc to your wallet whether its nano ledger, electrum or even another exchange, do you notice whenever you withdraw it, it shows as pending withdraw for a short while... then it shows as completed? I previously withdrew btc from bittrex to my wallet and it doesn't take long for btc to show up in my wallet. I also have withdraw another altcoin from bittrex and when it shows as completed, that altcoin shows up in my wallet or another exchange i use for example.
I recently did a withdraw from bittrex... and it showed as pending... then completed. But the altcoin is not in my wallet. Its been a short while already. Has this happened to anyone with bittrex? Example you withdraw say bitcoin or whatever altcoin like lisk etc to your wallet... it shows as completed. But it still does not show up in your wallet? If so, how long does it take? Should i email bittrex about it?
If the transaction shows as pending... well then it make sense for it to take long. But it shows as authorized and completed but its still not in my wallet? If anything, this is my first time using this wallet for my altcoin but i know i downloaded the correct wallet as its from the official site.
Check the address you sent to on blockchain explorer, if it is completed on bittrex it must be there. I never had issues with Bittrex of this kind so I believe the mistake you made is in address. EDIT: So the coins were sent to testnet address. It will be difficult to recover them, if possible. |
|
|
|
Meanwhile, in Bitcoin world: https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/05/22/new-record-block-on-stn-stress-test/So the team began incrementing the cap in successive cycles. The end result was better than hoped for, after seeing how robustly 0.2.0 handled 1GB the decision was taken to push past the initial target. The test ended with a 1.424GB block containing 359,793 transactions. At this point some degradation of services like block explorers was observed. The Bitcoin SV nodes handled things ok and probably could have been pushed further but the Stresstest team and the nChain team both needed some sleep.
The following table shows some of the more notable blocks from the test period:  |
|
|
|
-snip- That's great and all, but you are completely missing the point. The point is that anyone who wishes to can fill in a form for a copyright claim, and it will be registered, as was done so by a random dude called Ronald 3 years ago. Everyone in this forum could fill in the form and we would all have bitcoin registered as our own. It means nothing. The "Date of Creation" and "Date of Publication" that you are circling are irrelevant. There is a box (3a and 3b) on the form you submit (viewable here: https://www.copyright.gov/forms/formtx.pdf) which the claimant fills in the year of creation and publication. Those entries you have circled simply mimic whatever was entered in those boxes. They says nothing about those data being truthful or verified. The entire stunt, just like everything to do with CSW, is pathetically laughable. I thought if I will just point it out with red circles it will be enough for you to see the difference(beside the Title of the claim itself) - the example you provided was just registered, while the example with CSW has this text: Regarding copyright claimant: Change made to record on 5/20/2019
And to be even more specific than that - this line specifically means it was approved by US Government Copyright Office and if you still want to indicate that anyone can claim anything and get registered by US G.C.O. I will point to the example you provided, it has passed to the US G.C.O and that is it, it does not have the response from authority, no "Regarding copyright claimant:". I hope it is clear enough for you know. |
|
|
|
A copyright registration is NOT the same thing as a copyright.
Its really not so hard to understand.
If you read the coingeek article first on the issue, then I can see how you might be confused on the matter.
Please, stop embarrassing yourself.
Craig Wright has not applied, he did that months back. He has now been issued a fully vetted certificate of copyright by US Government Copyright office. This can not be contested unless you have standing so this is it, game over, checkmate. |
|
|
|
Where is your God now? I'll just quote myself from the other topic below. Anyone can file a copyright claim for anything and it would be registered. This means absolutely nothing in terms of proving he is Satoshi. Actually, that's incorrect. This is yet more evidence that he is decidedly not Satoshi. To think Satoshi would start filing copyright claims on bitcoin is utterly laughable. CSW continues to be a fraud, liar, and scammer. He has registered a copyright claim. Anyone can register a copyright claim for anything. Registering a claim says nothing about the claim being investigated, verified, supported by evidence, legally binding, etc. Everyone who has posted in this thread could right now register a copyright claim for bitcoin's whitepaper, and they would all be accepted.
If it wasn't hilarious enough that someone claiming to be Satoshi (who has apparently abandoned everything Satoshi stood for) was shouting his identity from every platform he can find and suing people for not believing him, let's all take a moment to appreciate just how hilarious someone claiming to be Satoshi filing a copyright claim is. Let's also appreciate the hilarity of the BSV shills pumping BSV on the back of this fraudulent announcement.
In court, there is a procedure and a set of rules, people cannot rely on falsified information. CSW I appreciate your opinion, also I can note your naivety. Signed - Just a Bitcoin SV shill, you can call me like that, no problem or hard feelings. |
|
|
|
Where is your God now?
Notably, when reviewing Wright’s copyright applications, the U.S. copyright examiner was aware that the Bitcoin white paper and code were each a “famous work” and there have been questions about who is associated with the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. After receiving confirmation from Wright that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the Copyright Office granted the following registrations:
• U.S. copyright registration no. TXu 2-136-996, effective date April 11, 2019, for the paper entitled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, with year of completion 2008. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
• U.S. copyright registration no. TX-8-708-058, effective date April 13, 2019, for computer program entitled Bitcoin, with year of completion 2009 and date of first publication January 3, 2009. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright wrote most of version 0.1 of the Bitcoin client software, and the registration covers the portions he authored.
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
No need to thank me. I just hope you have some Bitcoin.
I have some BTC = Bitcoin yes.When moon?  That one already mooned. |
|
|
|
Checkmate! Notably, when reviewing Wright’s copyright applications, the U.S. copyright examiner was aware that the Bitcoin white paper and code were each a “famous work” and there have been questions about who is associated with the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. After receiving confirmation from Wright that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the Copyright Office granted the following registrations:
• U.S. copyright registration no. TXu 2-136-996, effective date April 11, 2019, for the paper entitled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, with year of completion 2008. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
• U.S. copyright registration no. TX-8-708-058, effective date April 13, 2019, for computer program entitled Bitcoin, with year of completion 2009 and date of first publication January 3, 2009. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright wrote most of version 0.1 of the Bitcoin client software, and the registration covers the portions he authored.
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/No need to thank me. I just hope you have some Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Binance said it would cover the incident “in full” and no user funds will be affected.
Cryptopia haircut - ETH = 100%, BTC = 16%, LTC=30%. Close enough |
|
|
|
I was holding some good amount of token and ethereum in cryptopia still we couldn’t able to withdraw from exchange hope it will be sort out and we will get our fund back . If anybody having insight any genuine please let us know in this thread.
They applied a "haircut" to all clients having BTC=16%, ETH=100% and LTC=30%, i think the number are correct, you can check on their site. For a week or so they enabled withdraw to some of their coins, only during working hours. Just withdraw your coins and stay away from their scam exchange, also from https://assetylene.com/ exchange, which is their re-branded version. I dint get 100% ethereum means whichever ethereum I hold it in exchange that’s disappeared . I had around 1 ether in exchange you mean to say it’s gone . Sorry if am wrong. It's gone. Enjoy the haircut, mate. |
|
|
|
WSJ article: WSJA cryptocurrency exchange that claims real dollars back its popular digital coin Tether raided those reserves to cover up $850 million that went missing, the New York Attorney General’s office said Thursday.
State Attorney General Letitia James said Hong Kong-based iFinex Inc., which operates the Bitfinex cryptocurrency exchange and owns Tether Ltd., has been commingling client and corporate funds to cover up the missing funds, which occurred in mid-2018 and hadn’t been disclosed publicly.
CSW, check the date:  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
